There is no doubt that Biden had classified documents he stole and that he shared that information with his ghost writer.Not beyond a reasonable doubt.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is no doubt that Biden had classified documents he stole and that he shared that information with his ghost writer.Not beyond a reasonable doubt.
And Hur lied openly about that.
Hur admitted that Biden didn't willfully retain any actual classified documents. The only actual classified docs he had were accidentally packed up by his staffers, and were immediately returned when discovered.
Hur is lying big by claiming that Biden's personal diaries are classified docs. The law says they're not. That was settled with hte issue of Reagan's diaries.
You spread those lies, willingly. It's clearly deliberate dishonesty on your part.
Hur said otherwise.There is no doubt that Biden had classified documents he stole and that he shared that information with his ghost writer.
Hur said otherwise.
Dude, Carl Lewis couldn't make that leap of logic.Even if true, that makes it even worse.
That means Trump already mailed the contents of the folders to his buddies Putin and Xi.
I just quoted the report where he said so.He clearly did not.
Because I actually read the Hur report and it lists the documents they found in Appendix A.
Did you know that?
Investigators even uncovered a recording of Biden confiding in his ghostwriter Mark Zwonitzer in April 2017, three months after leaving the vice presidency, that he still had official records because “I didn’t want to turn them in”I just quoted the report where he said so.
And that's fine, despite the Trump cultists LyingForTheParty about it.
Can classified documents be taken out of a SCIF?
President Joe Biden has been grappling with the discovery of classified documents at two locations: his post-vice presidwww.politifact.com
All I'm saying is that we don't know if senators in the 1970s would only view classified documents in a SCIF. You seem to believe that, but your belief doesn't seem to be substantiated.Are you suggesting that Senators in the 70’s had the right to remove classified documents and take them home?
Dude, Carl Lewis couldn't make that leap of logic.
Those aren't "official records" you're talking about, they're Biden's own notes. There is precedent with Reagan that personal notes are considered personal documents and do not need to be turned in.Investigators even uncovered a recording of Biden confiding in his ghostwriter Mark Zwonitzer in April 2017, three months after leaving the vice presidency, that he still had official records because “I didn’t want to turn them in”
Nonsense. Your excuses are debunked in the executive summary of the Hur report, item. 2Those aren't "official records" you're talking about, they're Biden's own notes. There is precedent with Reagan that personal notes are considered personal documents and do not need to be turned in.
You're lying about the quote from Biden about "not wanting to turn them in". It's actually a reference to notecards which Biden didn't want to turn in because he thought they were personal, but were turned in anyway.Nonsense. Your excuses are debunked in the executive summary of the Hur report, item. 2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY We conclude that no criminal charges are warranted in this matter. 1 We would reach the same conclusion even if Department of Justice policy did not foreclose criminal charges against a sitting president. 2 Our investigation uncovered evidence that President Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified materials after his vice presidency when he was a private citizen
Your conspiracy theories are getting more outlandish.You're lying about the quote from Biden about "not wanting to turn them in". It's actually a reference to notecards which Biden didn't want to turn in because he thought they were personal, but were turned in anyway.
Uncovering evidence that something happened is not the same as having evidence to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.
You are being quite dishonest.
Further proof of Trump's contempt for the law and his belief that he can get away with violating the law."In a prerecorded interview that aired Wednesday, Trump effortlessly unraveled the work of his defense team, telling Newsmax’s Greg Kelly point blank that he actually did take the classified documents, describing the process of shamelessly packing them away while leaving office.
“I took ’em very legally,” Trump said. “And I wasn’t hiding them.”
“We had boxes on the front of the—and a lot of those boxes had clothing and a lot of—we were moving out, OK? Unfortunately, we were moving out of the White House. And because we’re moving out of the White House our country is going to hell.”
“But um, we weren’t hiding anything. He was,” he added, referring to President Joe Biden having kept a box with a handful of classified documents in his garage. By comparison, the FBI seized 11,000 records at Mar-a-Lago."
This is your "very stable genius" guys.
What do you think he was thinking when he said that? He knew he was being recorded. He knew he had a hearing for the dismissal of charges coming up.
He's just lost in his own little world of sad dementia.
Trump Makes Idiotic Confession Just Before Key Classified Docs Hearing
Genius Donald Trump said the stupidest thing possible, mere hours before a key hearing in his classified documents case.newrepublic.com
There's no conspiracy theory. There's just you being incredibly dishonest (or incredibly ignorant) of what the report actually says.Your conspiracy theories are getting more outlandish.
Read the Executice Summary from the Hur report. It's what I posted for you.
Your frantic conspiracy theories are concerning.
Further proof that the unhinged rants from leftist loons are concerning.Further proof of Trump's contempt for the law and his belief that he can get away with violating the law.
You selectively edited out the part your conspiracy theory hinges on. It's dishonest to selectively edited out what conflicts with your conspiracy theory.There's no conspiracy theory. There's just you being incredibly dishonest (or incredibly ignorant) of what the report actually says.
From the executive summary:
View attachment 917469
How does that change the fact that he found the evidence does not prove it beyond a reasonable doubt?You selectively edited out the part your conspiracy theory hinges on.
Item 2.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY We conclude that no criminal charges are warranted in this matter. 1 We would reach the same conclusion even if Department of Justice policy did not foreclose criminal charges against a sitting president. 2 Our investigation uncovered evidence that President Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified materials after his vice presidency when he was a private citizen