Trump decides the election is "rigged"

bill718

Diamond Member
Jun 26, 2016
1,164
2,171
Now that it's clear Donald Trump is losing, Mr. Trump has taken to attacking the election process itself. Although the election is nearly 3 months away "The Donald" has decided the entire electoral process, which has elected just as many Republicans as Democrats is "rigged against him" Donald Trump has no evidence of this whatsoever, nor has he made an effort to produce any. The general election in America is the most closely watched election in the world. The amount of verified voter fraud is less than 1/10th of 1%, Still, legions of his followers have blindly chosen to believe this nonsense rather than to find out for themselves. Maybe Republicans really are THAT dumb.
:boohoo:

Donald Trump is wrong. Rigging an election is almost impossible.
 
To them the elections are rigged because they let everyone vote instead of just white protestant males.
 
Now that it's clear Donald Trump is losing, Mr. Trump has taken to attacking the election process itself. Although the election is nearly 3 months away "The Donald" has decided the entire electoral process, which has elected just as many Republicans as Democrats is "rigged against him" Donald Trump has no evidence of this whatsoever, nor has he made an effort to produce any. The general election in America is the most closely watched election in the world. The amount of verified voter fraud is less than 1/10th of 1%, Still, legions of his followers have blindly chosen to believe this nonsense rather than to find out for themselves. Maybe Republicans really are THAT dumb.
:boohoo:

Donald Trump is wrong. Rigging an election is almost impossible.

Yeah, tell Bernie Sanders' supporters that an election can't be rigged.
 
Is Trump laying the ground work for an excuse after his defeat in November? Is he ginning up fervor among his die hard supporters? Or is The Donald simply being The Donald, an incorrigible moral Pygmy who has surrounded himself with sycophants and obsequious 'yes men' who dare not try to reign him in and responsibly advise him?
 
Is Trump laying the ground work for an excuse after his defeat in November? Is he ginning up fervor among his die hard supporters? Or is The Donald simply being The Donald, an incorrigible moral Pygmy who has surrounded himself with sycophants and obsequious 'yes men' who dare not try to reign him in and responsibly advise him?
He's laying the groundwork for a breakaway white nationalist party whether he knows it or not.
 
Now that it's clear Donald Trump is losing, Mr. Trump has taken to attacking the election process itself. Although the election is nearly 3 months away "The Donald" has decided the entire electoral process, which has elected just as many Republicans as Democrats is "rigged against him" Donald Trump has no evidence of this whatsoever, nor has he made an effort to produce any. The general election in America is the most closely watched election in the world. The amount of verified voter fraud is less than 1/10th of 1%, Still, legions of his followers have blindly chosen to believe this nonsense rather than to find out for themselves. Maybe Republicans really are THAT dumb.
:boohoo:

Donald Trump is wrong. Rigging an election is almost impossible.

Not.if you have a complicit press
 
Is Trump laying the ground work for an excuse after his defeat in November? Is he ginning up fervor among his die hard supporters? Or is The Donald simply being The Donald, an incorrigible moral Pygmy who has surrounded himself with sycophants and obsequious 'yes men' who dare not try to reign him in and responsibly advise him?
He's laying the groundwork for a breakaway white nationalist party whether he knows it or not.


th



(Really scary people are that afraid of him, to make up that kind of bs)
 
Now that it's clear Donald Trump is losing, Mr. Trump has taken to attacking the election process itself. Although the election is nearly 3 months away "The Donald" has decided the entire electoral process, which has elected just as many Republicans as Democrats is "rigged against him" Donald Trump has no evidence of this whatsoever, nor has he made an effort to produce any. The general election in America is the most closely watched election in the world. The amount of verified voter fraud is less than 1/10th of 1%, Still, legions of his followers have blindly chosen to believe this nonsense rather than to find out for themselves. Maybe Republicans really are THAT dumb.
:boohoo:

Donald Trump is wrong. Rigging an election is almost impossible.
Well, it wasn't impossible for the Democratic leadership to rig the nomination process to cheat Sanders out of a fair shot at the nomination, and one of the very important ways the leadership rigged the nomination process was to limit the debates. They did this because they know Hillary is a poor debater. In fact, after each debate during the primaries, Sanders gained on her. Since the Democratic leadership, which would include Obama, had already decided to give the nomination to Clinton, it makes sense that even months ago, regardless of who won the Republican nomination, they would want to protect Clinton from being humiliated in the debates, so it is not difficult to believe they pushed the networks to schedule the debates at times when there would be low viewership.

It is not rigged to the extent the Democratic leadership rigged the nomination process, but we have seen in other countries when the government flexes its muscles to influence the media, it can have a powerful effect on the outcome of an election.
 
Now that it's clear Donald Trump is losing, Mr. Trump has taken to attacking the election process itself. Although the election is nearly 3 months away "The Donald" has decided the entire electoral process, which has elected just as many Republicans as Democrats is "rigged against him" Donald Trump has no evidence of this whatsoever, nor has he made an effort to produce any. The general election in America is the most closely watched election in the world. The amount of verified voter fraud is less than 1/10th of 1%, Still, legions of his followers have blindly chosen to believe this nonsense rather than to find out for themselves. Maybe Republicans really are THAT dumb.
:boohoo:

Donald Trump is wrong. Rigging an election is almost impossible.

Yeah, tell Bernie Sanders' supporters that an election can't be rigged.


The problem, Mr. Pred, is that Mr. Trump should have made his case for this BEFORE he started slumping in the polls. He prides himself on being such an insider, why didn't he say from the get go that the elections were rigged? He boasts about giving all these politicians money and he didn't know the elections were rigged?
 
Now that it's clear Donald Trump is losing, Mr. Trump has taken to attacking the election process itself. Although the election is nearly 3 months away "The Donald" has decided the entire electoral process, which has elected just as many Republicans as Democrats is "rigged against him" Donald Trump has no evidence of this whatsoever, nor has he made an effort to produce any. The general election in America is the most closely watched election in the world. The amount of verified voter fraud is less than 1/10th of 1%, Still, legions of his followers have blindly chosen to believe this nonsense rather than to find out for themselves. Maybe Republicans really are THAT dumb.
:boohoo:

Donald Trump is wrong. Rigging an election is almost impossible.
Well, it wasn't impossible for the Democratic leadership to rig the nomination process to cheat Sanders out of a fair shot at the nomination, and one of the very important ways the leadership rigged the nomination process was to limit the debates. They did this because they know Hillary is a poor debater. In fact, after each debate during the primaries, Sanders gained on her. Since the Democratic leadership, which would include Obama, had already decided to give the nomination to Clinton, it makes sense that even months ago, regardless of who won the Republican nomination, they would want to protect Clinton from being humiliated in the debates, so it is not difficult to believe they pushed the networks to schedule the debates at times when there would be low viewership.

It is not rigged to the extent the Democratic leadership rigged the nomination process, but we have seen in other countries when the government flexes its muscles to influence the media, it can have a powerful effect on the outcome of an election.
We are the only country in the world where the government has no control of the media, care to explain the mechanism whereby our government may use the media to unfairly influence our election?
 
Now that it's clear Donald Trump is losing, Mr. Trump has taken to attacking the election process itself. Although the election is nearly 3 months away "The Donald" has decided the entire electoral process, which has elected just as many Republicans as Democrats is "rigged against him" Donald Trump has no evidence of this whatsoever, nor has he made an effort to produce any. The general election in America is the most closely watched election in the world. The amount of verified voter fraud is less than 1/10th of 1%, Still, legions of his followers have blindly chosen to believe this nonsense rather than to find out for themselves. Maybe Republicans really are THAT dumb.
:boohoo:

Donald Trump is wrong. Rigging an election is almost impossible.
Well, it wasn't impossible for the Democratic leadership to rig the nomination process to cheat Sanders out of a fair shot at the nomination, and one of the very important ways the leadership rigged the nomination process was to limit the debates. They did this because they know Hillary is a poor debater. In fact, after each debate during the primaries, Sanders gained on her. Since the Democratic leadership, which would include Obama, had already decided to give the nomination to Clinton, it makes sense that even months ago, regardless of who won the Republican nomination, they would want to protect Clinton from being humiliated in the debates, so it is not difficult to believe they pushed the networks to schedule the debates at times when there would be low viewership.

It is not rigged to the extent the Democratic leadership rigged the nomination process, but we have seen in other countries when the government flexes its muscles to influence the media, it can have a powerful effect on the outcome of an election.
We are the only country in the world where the government has no control of the media, care to explain the mechanism whereby our government may use the media to unfairly influence our election?

We are the only country in the world where the government has no control of the media, care to explain the mechanism whereby our government may use the media to unfairly influence our election?

I agree 100%, but please, don't write things like this. Republicans have a hard time thinking outside the little box of right wing sound bites. You'll just confuse them.
:biggrin:
 
Now that it's clear Donald Trump is losing, Mr. Trump has taken to attacking the election process itself. Although the election is nearly 3 months away "The Donald" has decided the entire electoral process, which has elected just as many Republicans as Democrats is "rigged against him" Donald Trump has no evidence of this whatsoever, nor has he made an effort to produce any. The general election in America is the most closely watched election in the world. The amount of verified voter fraud is less than 1/10th of 1%, Still, legions of his followers have blindly chosen to believe this nonsense rather than to find out for themselves. Maybe Republicans really are THAT dumb.
:boohoo:

Donald Trump is wrong. Rigging an election is almost impossible.
Well, it wasn't impossible for the Democratic leadership to rig the nomination process to cheat Sanders out of a fair shot at the nomination, and one of the very important ways the leadership rigged the nomination process was to limit the debates. They did this because they know Hillary is a poor debater. In fact, after each debate during the primaries, Sanders gained on her. Since the Democratic leadership, which would include Obama, had already decided to give the nomination to Clinton, it makes sense that even months ago, regardless of who won the Republican nomination, they would want to protect Clinton from being humiliated in the debates, so it is not difficult to believe they pushed the networks to schedule the debates at times when there would be low viewership.

It is not rigged to the extent the Democratic leadership rigged the nomination process, but we have seen in other countries when the government flexes its muscles to influence the media, it can have a powerful effect on the outcome of an election.
We are the only country in the world where the government has no control of the media, care to explain the mechanism whereby our government may use the media to unfairly influence our election?
I just did. The Democratic leadership which has the support of the WH can suggest a tit for tat arrangement by which a network can get more access - or less if they don't comply - if the debates are scheduled at times of expected low viewership to save Clinton from again being humiliated by her poor debating skills.
 

Forum List

Back
Top