Trump desire to suspend the Constitution is not a deal breaker to Republicans

[Redfish]

Means nothing like that

It means meeting military specifications for performance and survivability

mil specs do not mean what you think they do.

 

[Indeependent]

Means nothing like that

It means meeting military specifications for performance and survivability

Translation…
It means one of the lowest bidders.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Means nothing like that

It means meeting military specifications for performance and survivability

Riiight. Not one person I ever served with nor my many relatives that served ever used the term "military grade". Ruggedized is the term. Military Grade is a term coined by civilian companies to sell more shit to those who never served.

 

[rightwinger]

yep, she would know, she orchestrated it. Only problem was that the dems did not cheat ENOUGH, that is why she is still pissed off about that election.

Are you going to tell us that bullshit that 3 million illegal Mexicans voted for Hillary

 

[Redfish]

People are capable of using anything in order to kill as many people as they can. Cars, rental trucks, shotgun, hand guns, pressure cookers.

Should we ban all those things that have been used to kill as many people as they could?

Why do you people always want to punish those that have broken no laws?

A rare time when I agree with GG.

 

[Lastamender]

The Constitution Has Already Been Terminated | By John & Nisha Whitehead

For anyone to advocate terminating or suspending the Constitution is tantamount to a declaration of war against the founding principles of our representative government and the rule of law. Then again, the Constitution has been on life support for years.

www.rutherford.org

Consider for yourself.


We are in the grip of martial law. We have what the founders feared most: a “standing” or permanent army on American soil. This de facto standing army is made up of weaponized, militarized domestic police forces which look like, dress like, and act like the military; are armed with guns, ammunition and military-style equipment; are authorized to make arrests; and are trained in military tactics.


We are in the government’s crosshairs. The U.S. government continues to act as judge, jury and executioner over a populace that have been pre-judged and found guilty, stripped of their rights, and left to suffer at the hands of government agents trained to respond with the utmost degree of violence. Consequently, we are at the mercy of law enforcement officers who have almost absolute discretion to decide who is a threat, what constitutes resistance, and how harshly they can deal with the citizens they were appointed to “serve and protect.” With alarming regularity, unarmed men, women, children and even pets are being gunned down by the government’s standing army of militarized police who shoot first and ask questions later.


We are no longer safe in our homes. This present menace comes from the government’s army of bureaucratized, corporatized, militarized SWAT teams who are waging war on the last stronghold left to us as a free people: the sanctity of our homes.


We have no real freedom of speech. We are moving fast down a slippery slope to an authoritarian society in which the only opinions, ideas and speech expressed are the ones permitted by the government and its corporate cohorts. In more and more cases, the government is declaring war on what should be protected political speech whenever it challenges the government’s power, reveals the government’s corruption, exposes the government’s lies, and encourages the citizenry to push back against the government’s many injustices. The ramifications are so far-reaching as to render almost every American who criticizes the government an extremist in word, deed, thought or by association.


We have no real privacy. We’re being spied on by a domestic army of government snitches, spies and techno-warriors. This government of Peeping Toms is watching everything we do, reading everything we write, listening to everything we say, and monitoring everything we spend. Beware of what you say, what you read, what you write, where you go, and with whom you communicate, because it is all being recorded, stored, and catalogued, and will be used against you eventually, at a time and place of the government’s choosing.


We are losing our right to bodily privacy and integrity. The debate over bodily integrity covers broad territory, ranging from forced vaccinations, forced cavity searches, forced colonoscopies, forced blood draws and forced breath-alcohol tests to forced DNA extractions, forced eye scans, and forced inclusion in biometric databases: these are just a few ways in which Americans continue to be reminded that we have no real privacy, no real presumption of innocence, and no real control over what happens to our bodies during an encounter with government officials. The groundwork being laid with these mandates is a prologue to what will become the police state’s conquest of a new, relatively uncharted, frontier: inner space, specifically, the inner workings (genetic, biological, biometric, mental, emotional) of the human race.

There is more but what is going right now Trump had nothing to with.

 

[rightwinger]

Translation…
It means one of the lowest bidders.

No it means lowest Qualified bidders who can meet the standards of performance and survivability

 

[Redfish]

Are you going to tell us that bullshit that 3 million illegal Mexicans voted for Hillary

never said that, but that is clearly the dem goal of immigration. let as many illegals in as possible and then make them dem voters through bribery.

Hillary's problem is that the cheaters did not fix the machines enough to overcome Trump's lead and the fact that the bitch was a terrible candidate that no one liked.

 

[Redfish]

No

There is nothing in the Constitution about private entities setting rules of conduct and determining what is propaganda and misinformation
Nothing preventing them from asking the FBI to help them

Maybe you could show me the “rules” where you object

But that is exactly what the dems did with Twitter and facebook. your hypocrisy is amazing.

 

[Indeependent]

No it means lowest Qualified bidders who can meet the standards of performance and survivability

Why did you parrot my post?

 

[Lastamender]

We no longer have a right to private property. If government agents can invade your home, break down your doors, kill your dog, damage your furnishings and terrorize your family, your property is no longer private and secure—it belongs to the government. Hard-working Americans are having their bank accounts, homes, cars electronics and cash seized by police under the assumption that they have allegedly been associated with some criminal scheme.


We have no due process. The groundwork has been laid for a new kind of government where it won’t matter if you’re innocent or guilty, whether you’re a threat to the nation, or even if you’re a citizen. What will matter is what the government—or whoever happens to be calling the shots at the time—thinks. And if the powers-that-be think you’re a threat to the nation and should be locked up, then you’ll be locked up with no access to the protections our Constitution provides.


We are no longer presumed innocent. The burden of proof has been reversed. Now we’re presumed guilty unless we can prove our innocence beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. Rarely, are we even given the opportunity to do so. The government has embarked on a diabolical campaign to create a nation of suspects predicated on a massive national DNA database. Having already used surveillance technology to render the entire American populace potential suspects, DNA technology in the hands of government coupled with artificial intelligence will complete our transition to a suspect society in which we are all merely waiting to be matched up with a crime.


We have lost the right to be anonymous and move about freely. At every turn, we’re hemmed in by laws, fines and penalties that regulate and restrict our autonomy, and surveillance cameras that monitor our movements. Likewise, digital currency provides the government and its corporate partners with a mode of commerce that can easily be monitored, tracked, tabulated, mined for data, hacked, hijacked and confiscated when convenient.


We no longer have a government of the people, by the people and for the people. In fact, a study conducted by Princeton and Northwestern University concluded that the U.S. government does not represent the majority of American citizens. Instead, the study found that the government is ruled by the rich and powerful, or the so-called “economic elite.” Moreover, the researchers concluded that policies enacted by this governmental elite nearly always favor special interests and lobbying groups. In other words, we are being ruled by an oligarchy disguised as a democracy, and arguably on our way towards fascism—a form of government where private corporate interests rule, money calls the shots, and the people are seen as mere subjects to be controlled.


We have no guardians of justice. The courts were established to intervene and protect the people against the government and its agents when they overstep their bounds. Yet through their deference to police power, preference for security over freedom, and evisceration of our most basic rights for the sake of order and expediency, the courts have become the guardians of the American police state in which we now live. As a result, sound judgment and justice have largely taken a back seat to legalism, statism and elitism, while preserving the rights of the people has been deprioritized and made to play second fiddle to both governmental and corporate interests.


We have been saddled with a dictator for life. Secret, unchecked presidential powers—acquired through the use of executive orders, decrees, memorandums, proclamations, national security directives and legislative signing statements and which can be activated by any sitting president—now enable past, president and future presidents to operate above the law and beyond the reach of the Constitution.


Unfortunately, we have done this to ourselves.


We allowed ourselves to be seduced by the false siren song of politicians promising safety in exchange for relinquished freedom. We placed our trust in political saviors and failed to ask questions to hold our representatives accountable to abiding by the Constitution. We looked the other way and made excuses while the government amassed an amazing amount of power over us, and backed up that power-grab with a terrifying amount of military might and weaponry, and got the courts to sanction their actions every step of the way. We chose to let partisan politics divide us and turn us into easy targets for the government’s oppression.


Mind you, the powers-that-be want us to be censored, silenced, muzzled, gagged, zoned out, caged in and shut down. They want our speech and activities monitored for any sign of “extremist” activity. They want us to be estranged from each other and kept at a distance from those who are supposed to represent us. They want taxation without representation. They want a government without the consent of the governed.


They want the Constitution terminated.


“We” may have contributed to our downfall through our inaction and gullibility, but we are also the only hope for a free future.


After all, the Constitution begins with those three beautiful words, “We the people.” Those three words were intended as a reminder to future generations that there is no government without us—our sheer numbers, our muscle, our economy, our physical presence in this land.


As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, when we forget that, when we allow the “Me” of a self-absorbed, narcissistic, politically polarizing culture to override our civic duties as citizens to collectively stand up to tyranny and make the government play by the rules of the Constitution, there can be no surprise when tyranny rises and freedom falls


Remember, there is power in numbers.


There are 332 million of us in this country. Imagine what we could accomplish if we actually worked together, presented a united front, and spoke with one voice?

The Constitution Has Already Been Terminated | By John & Nisha Whitehead

For anyone to advocate terminating or suspending the Constitution is tantamount to a declaration of war against the founding principles of our representative government and the rule of law. Then again, the Constitution has been on life support for years.

www.rutherford.org

Could take the trolls and paid posters awhile to read all of that. Again what is going on is not Trump's fault and have nothing to do with any of his policies, is this the country Americans want?

 

[rightwinger]

Why did you parrot my post?

You have no idea what you are talking about
As usual

Have you ever bought military grade equipment?

 

[Sixties Fan]

Shall not be infringed . My State and local Government will tell the Feds to go fuck themselves and their bans. If you loons want to ban guns you should be the ones stacking up and kicking in doors, but you want because you are all cowards.

Second Amendment Does Not Guarantee the Right To Own a Gun (From Gun Control, P 99-102, 1992, Charles P Cozic, ed. -- See NCJ-160164)​

NCJ Number
160176

Author(s)
W E Burger
Date Published

1992
Length

4 pages
Annotation
Former Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court Warren Burger argues that the sale, purchase, and use of guns should be regulated just as automobiles and boats are regulated; such regulations would not violate the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

Abstract

The Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees a "right of the people to keep and bear arms." However, the meaning of this clause cannot be understood apart from the purpose, the setting, and the objectives of the draftsmen. At the time of the Bill of Rights, people were apprehensive about the new national government presented to them, and this helps explain the language and purpose of the Second Amendment. It guarantees, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." The need for a State militia was the predicate of the "right" guarantee, so as to protect the security of the State. Today, of course, the State militia serves a different purpose. A huge national defense establishment has assumed the role of the militia of 200 years ago. Americans have a right to defend their homes, and nothing should undermine this right; nor does anyone question that the Constitution protects the right of hunters to own and keep sporting guns for hunting anymore than anyone would challenge the right to own and keep fishing rods and other equipment for fishing. Neither does anyone question the right of citizens to keep and own an automobile. Yet there is no strong interest by the citizenry in questioning the power of the State to regulate the purchase or the transfer of such a vehicle and the right to license the vehicle and the driver with reasonable standards. It is even more desirable for the State to have reasonable regulations for the ownership and use of a firearm in an effort to stop mindless homicidal carnage.

Second Amendment Does Not Guarantee the Right To Own a Gun (From Gun Control, P 99-102, 1992, Charles P Cozic, ed. -- See NCJ-160164) | Office of Justice Programs

www.ojp.gov

 

[Indeependent]

You have no idea what you are talking about
As usual

Have you ever bought military grade equipment?

I know how Nassau County and the Town of a Hempstead work.
Now tell the guys here that were in the military they have no idea what they are talking about.

 

[rightwinger]

I know how Nassau County and the Town of a Hempstead work.
Now tell the guys here that were in the military they have no idea what they are talking about.

OMG
Nassau and Hempstead Public Works are experts in military procurement

 

[Indeependent]

OMG
Nassau and Hempstead Public Works are experts in military procurement

Procurement is corrupt no matter what is being procured, schmuck.
Even Al Gore ran on that issue.

 

[Faun]

Government agencies interfering with a national election for the party in power is unconstitutional.... and illegal....

18 U.S. Code § 595 - Interference by administrative employees of Federal, State, or Territorial Governments

www.law.cornell.edu

file:///C:/Users/Ed/Searches/Downloads/GPO-CONAN-1992-10-11.pdf
Read and learn dummy.... read the 10th amendment to the constitution dummy....

Sounds like something Trump could be charged with.

 

[Lastamender]

Sounds like something Trump could be charged with.

So do 10 million other things. Funny they can find nothing.

 

[Sixties Fan]

never said that, but that is clearly the dem goal of immigration. let as many illegals in as possible and then make them dem voters through bribery.

Hillary's problem is that the cheaters did not fix the machines enough to overcome Trump's lead and the fact that the bitch was a terrible candidate that no one liked.

There was no cheating in 2016. But follow the conspiracies all the way to the Abbys . Many continue to choose to do so, why not you?

She lost fairly and conceded as all who lose must do.

Trump has not conceded once in public, only amongst his aides, since November 2020.

 

[Lastamender]

There was no cheating in 2016. But follow the conspiracies all the way to the Abbys . Many continue to choose to do so, why not you?

She lost fairly and conceded as all who lose must do.

Trump has not conceded once in public, only amongst his aides, since November 2020.

There was not enough cheating. That is why Trump won. They sure fixed that with the ridiculous 81 million votes in 2020.