Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They get compensated more than fairly for the "taking" of their desert land. So what?
Yup and I'd bet they would be more than happy to give up the land for a wall that would keep illegals off their property.
I sure as hell would.
Sure, everyone wants to be cutoff form their only water supply for 500 miles.
Who says they will be cut off?? If it is pipes can be laid so he gets his water.
No big deal.
How else do you build a 2000 mile wall? Use the barrel of a gun to takenthe land from American citizens .
This from the party that complained about the health insurance mandate ! Guess the GOP Is just fine with big oppressive government.
Amid immigration debate, feds moving ahead with land seizures for South Texas border wall
As a national debate raged about family separations at the border, U.S. Customs and Border Protection told a group of South Texas officials earlier this week that the federal government plans to move forward with private land seizures in the Rio Grande Valley to build sections of President Donald Trump’s border wall.
How else do you build a 2000 mile wall? Use the barrel of a gun to takenthe land from American citizens .
This from the party that complained about the health insurance mandate ! Guess the GOP Is just fine with big oppressive government.
Amid immigration debate, feds moving ahead with land seizures for South Texas border wall
As a national debate raged about family separations at the border, U.S. Customs and Border Protection told a group of South Texas officials earlier this week that the federal government plans to move forward with private land seizures in the Rio Grande Valley to build sections of President Donald Trump’s border wall.
Most of it is Federal Land anyway
Since the local economy is importing humans, cocaine, and heroin, among other things, yeah, so what?They are trying to take away ready access to a river in a desert. It's why there is not a barrier there now. It would wreck the local economy but so what?They get compensated more than fairly for the "taking" of their desert land. So what?
Since the local economy is importing humans, cocaine, and heroin, among other things, yeah, so what?They are trying to take away ready access to a river in a desert. It's why there is not a barrier there now. It would wreck the local economy but so what?They get compensated more than fairly for the "taking" of their desert land. So what?
Yea sort of like this?
Special Forces soldier arrested in botched cocaine smuggling plot
More drugs come into this country from other sources than you quote.
How else do you build a 2000 mile wall? Use the barrel of a gun to takenthe land from American citizens .
This from the party that complained about the health insurance mandate ! Guess the GOP Is just fine with big oppressive government.
Amid immigration debate, feds moving ahead with land seizures for South Texas border wall
As a national debate raged about family separations at the border, U.S. Customs and Border Protection told a group of South Texas officials earlier this week that the federal government plans to move forward with private land seizures in the Rio Grande Valley to build sections of President Donald Trump’s border wall.
They are trying to take away ready access to a river in a desert. It's why there is not a barrier there now. It would wreck the local economy but so what?They get compensated more than fairly for the "taking" of their desert land. So what?
Wow. The list of pseudocon value-flipping gets longer every day!
They might as well start registering as Democrats at this point.
True.To make omelettes ya gotta break a few eggs.They get compensated more than fairly for the "taking" of their desert land. So what?
Yup and I'd bet they would be more than happy to give up the land for a wall that would keep illegals off their property.
I sure as hell would.
Sure, everyone wants to be cutoff form their only water supply for 500 miles.
that is very easy to say when they are not your eggs that are being taken
They are trying to take away ready access to a river in a desert. It's why there is not a barrier there now. It would wreck the local economy but so what?They get compensated more than fairly for the "taking" of their desert land. So what?
True.To make omelettes ya gotta break a few eggs.They get compensated more than fairly for the "taking" of their desert land. So what?
Yup and I'd bet they would be more than happy to give up the land for a wall that would keep illegals off their property.
I sure as hell would.
Sure, everyone wants to be cutoff form their only water supply for 500 miles.
that is very easy to say when they are not your eggs that are being taken
However...
1. the needs of the many vastly outweigh the needs of the one, in this case
2. the owners will be fairly compensated
That's as complicated as this needs to get.
How else do you build a 2000 mile wall? Use the barrel of a gun to takenthe land from American citizens .
This from the party that complained about the health insurance mandate ! Guess the GOP Is just fine with big oppressive government.
Amid immigration debate, feds moving ahead with land seizures for South Texas border wall
As a national debate raged about family separations at the border, U.S. Customs and Border Protection told a group of South Texas officials earlier this week that the federal government plans to move forward with private land seizures in the Rio Grande Valley to build sections of President Donald Trump’s border wall.
". . . nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." - Fifth Amendment, US Constitution
That ringing a bell in that big, empty melon you call a head?
While we're on the subject, where was your outrage on this subject when the then-left leaning Supreme Court handed down the Kelo vs. New London decision? 'Cause if you pitched a hissy about THAT, I must've missed it.
I did . In fact it’s tge left who was against that decision. While the right loved it as it benefits big biz .
Y’all talk a lot of shit about “big government “ when it suits you .
I will put it in third-grade English, It looks like Trump can talk his base into supporting anything.Most of those dummies probably voted for Trump so I feel little sympathy but I am wondering if there is a limb on the fascism tree the so-called conservatives will not follow Trump out on.Land seizures are illegal. Eminent domain CAN be abusive but is pretty well defined now. Especially in the states that CLARIFIED the law following that awful Keloh decision in the Sup. Ct. And Texas was one of the first states to act on that clarification..
A river that US Cities almost tap out before it gets to El Paso. COULD build a canal to divert some on the American side if that bothers you...
Do you know that Trump owns most of vacant desert in your head? That's why that last post made no sense whatsoever...
Just trying to correct the predictable misconceptions on the left about "FORCIBLY" taking property. Or who's river the Rio Grande is.. If you don't know how anything works --- all you got left is that mania about Trump...
I've been consistently fighting eminent domain abuse for decades.. But even I recognize that in certain instances it is necessary... DONE RIGHT -- it's not a "forced taking"... But your tiny brain is bored already aint it?
Lol. I’m just using the same language you cons use when it comes to the *GASP* health insurance madate ! Oh the drama ! Oh the government overeach to have a tax penalty. Soooo unamerican .
Meanwhile . Taking land for a boondoggle wall. Totally cool with that !!
1. Happens all the time, in the context of Left, Right and Center; it's not a particularly 'socialist' perspective... whatever works in the momentTrue.To make omelettes ya gotta break a few eggs.Yup and I'd bet they would be more than happy to give up the land for a wall that would keep illegals off their property.
I sure as hell would.
Sure, everyone wants to be cutoff form their only water supply for 500 miles.
that is very easy to say when they are not your eggs that are being taken
However...
1. the needs of the many vastly outweigh the needs of the one, in this case
2. the owners will be fairly compensated
That's as complicated as this needs to get.
1. That is a very socialist point of view, thanks for sharing it.
2. How do you know this? We have 100 threads a week on here talking about how the government is not to be trusted and then you blindly accept they will do the right thing in this case.
While we're on the subject, where was your outrage on this subject when the then-left leaning Supreme Court handed down the Kelo vs. New London decision? 'Cause if you pitched a hissy about THAT, I must've missed it.
Did this board even exist in 2005?
1. Happens all the time, in the context of Left, Right and Center; it's not a particularly 'socialist' perspective... whatever works in the momentTrue.To make omelettes ya gotta break a few eggs.Sure, everyone wants to be cutoff form their only water supply for 500 miles.
that is very easy to say when they are not your eggs that are being taken
However...
1. the needs of the many vastly outweigh the needs of the one, in this case
2. the owners will be fairly compensated
That's as complicated as this needs to get.
1. That is a very socialist point of view, thanks for sharing it.
2. How do you know this? We have 100 threads a week on here talking about how the government is not to be trusted and then you blindly accept they will do the right thing in this case.
2. Because the law requires it; if the owners do not get fair market value, then you can complain; but eminent domain will continue to be used.
I will put it in third-grade English, It looks like Trump can talk his base into supporting anything.Most of those dummies probably voted for Trump so I feel little sympathy but I am wondering if there is a limb on the fascism tree the so-called conservatives will not follow Trump out on.
Do you know that Trump owns most of vacant desert in your head? That's why that last post made no sense whatsoever...
Just trying to correct the predictable misconceptions on the left about "FORCIBLY" taking property. Or who's river the Rio Grande is.. If you don't know how anything works --- all you got left is that mania about Trump...
I've been consistently fighting eminent domain abuse for decades.. But even I recognize that in certain instances it is necessary... DONE RIGHT -- it's not a "forced taking"... But your tiny brain is bored already aint it?
Lol. I’m just using the same language you cons use when it comes to the *GASP* health insurance madate ! Oh the drama ! Oh the government overeach to have a tax penalty. Soooo unamerican .
Meanwhile . Taking land for a boondoggle wall. Totally cool with that !!
"LOL I'm just trying to compare two competely different things, because I'm too stupid to know better."
And you wonder why everyone treats you like a puddle of dog diarrhea that magically began speaking.
I will put it in third-grade English, It looks like Trump can talk his base into supporting anything.Do you know that Trump owns most of vacant desert in your head? That's why that last post made no sense whatsoever...
Just trying to correct the predictable misconceptions on the left about "FORCIBLY" taking property. Or who's river the Rio Grande is.. If you don't know how anything works --- all you got left is that mania about Trump...
I've been consistently fighting eminent domain abuse for decades.. But even I recognize that in certain instances it is necessary... DONE RIGHT -- it's not a "forced taking"... But your tiny brain is bored already aint it?
Lol. I’m just using the same language you cons use when it comes to the *GASP* health insurance madate ! Oh the drama ! Oh the government overeach to have a tax penalty. Soooo unamerican .
Meanwhile . Taking land for a boondoggle wall. Totally cool with that !!
"LOL I'm just trying to compare two competely different things, because I'm too stupid to know better."
And you wonder why everyone treats you like a puddle of dog diarrhea that magically began speaking.
Lol. More insults .
That’s all you cons ever have when you are exposed for your constant hypocrisy.
Conservatives are for eminent domain. Really. I'm sure. Probably.How else do you build a 2000 mile wall? Use the barrel of a gun to takenthe land from American citizens .
This from the party that complained about the health insurance mandate ! Guess the GOP Is just fine with big oppressive government.
Amid immigration debate, feds moving ahead with land seizures for South Texas border wall
As a national debate raged about family separations at the border, U.S. Customs and Border Protection told a group of South Texas officials earlier this week that the federal government plans to move forward with private land seizures in the Rio Grande Valley to build sections of President Donald Trump’s border wall.
You just made that up! LOLThey are trying to take away ready access to a river in a desert. It's why there is not a barrier there now. It would wreck the local economy but so what?They get compensated more than fairly for the "taking" of their desert land. So what?
The needs of the many out weight the needs of the few.
Taxing for highways is unconstitutional.I will put it in third-grade English, It looks like Trump can talk his base into supporting anything.
Just trying to correct the predictable misconceptions on the left about "FORCIBLY" taking property. Or who's river the Rio Grande is.. If you don't know how anything works --- all you got left is that mania about Trump...
I've been consistently fighting eminent domain abuse for decades.. But even I recognize that in certain instances it is necessary... DONE RIGHT -- it's not a "forced taking"... But your tiny brain is bored already aint it?
Lol. I’m just using the same language you cons use when it comes to the *GASP* health insurance madate ! Oh the drama ! Oh the government overeach to have a tax penalty. Soooo unamerican .
Meanwhile . Taking land for a boondoggle wall. Totally cool with that !!
"LOL I'm just trying to compare two competely different things, because I'm too stupid to know better."
And you wonder why everyone treats you like a puddle of dog diarrhea that magically began speaking.
Lol. More insults .
That’s all you cons ever have when you are exposed for your constant hypocrisy.
Yeah, you exposed my hypocrisy and that's why I decided to "insult" you by saying you were comparing completely different things. *eye roll*
Eminent domain is in the Constitution. Healthcare isn't. Ergo, one is government overreach, and the other is . . . government. Do you need a picture, or would you like to continue making an ass-waving fool out of yourself crowing about the "hypocrisy" of opposing government taking action outside of the Constitution while declining to oppose government taing Constitutional action? Just let me know how long you'd like to dance around being laughed at.
How else do you build a 2000 mile wall? Use the barrel of a gun to takenthe land from American citizens .
This from the party that complained about the health insurance mandate ! Guess the GOP Is just fine with big oppressive government.
Amid immigration debate, feds moving ahead with land seizures for South Texas border wall
As a national debate raged about family separations at the border, U.S. Customs and Border Protection told a group of South Texas officials earlier this week that the federal government plans to move forward with private land seizures in the Rio Grande Valley to build sections of President Donald Trump’s border wall.
A completely valid use of eminent domain.
