john doe 101
Platinum Member
- Sep 6, 2021
- 12,854
- 6,821
- 938
34 counts. Guilty.What, because a damned leftist kangaroo court said so ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
34 counts. Guilty.What, because a damned leftist kangaroo court said so ?
Yeah I wish good luck to that clown trying to convince us that dems are going to vote for trump. The wack jobs really are coming out of the woodwork.
You Democrat cultists who worshipped Barrack Obama as the 2nd coming of Jesus Christ. Your media was saying exactly this. Your education camps called elementary schools were making children learn songs about Obama. "Obama, Obama..." Good little Maoists you are...You are a MAGA liar who worships a felon.
You Democrat cultists who worshipped Barrack Obama as the 2nd coming of Jesus Christ. Your media was saying exactly this. Your education camps called elementary schools were making children learn songs about Obama. "Obama, Obama..." Good little Maoists you are...
You Democrat cultists who worshipped Barrack Obama as the 2nd coming of Jesus Christ. Your media was saying exactly this. Your education camps called elementary schools were making children learn songs about Obama. "Obama, Obama..." Good little Maoists you are...
There’s no requirement for the elevating crime to be charged or even proven. It only needs to be made apparent that it occurred.There was no law in the indictment. The "law" was thrown in during the closing arguments. Yet, what was stated isn't a law on the books. Not only that, the court is not a federal court. So, it has no jurisdiction over election laws for the Presidency.
Not only that, paying off a hooker to keep the affair from the public during an election isn't against the law either. If it were, Biden would be in jail as well since he and all the Democrats kept Hunter's laptop from being used in the election that would have given the Presidency to Trump. Can't have it both ways.
This may be the most embarrassing situation democrats have ever been in.
Proofread? For what? It certainly isn’t for accuracy.What are you people doing, sitting there with your computer mouse trigger cocked like a double barrel shotgun ready to shoot as soon as a post hits the posted position ????? Rotflmbo
I couldn't even proof read and edit before you grabbed the dambed thing or is there some kind of way that you all are able to see what's being typed before its posted ?.. hmm![]()
There is no such thing, dupe.What, because a damned leftist kangaroo court said so ?
There’s no requirement for the elevating crime to be charged or even proven. It only needs to be made apparent that it occurred.
The only problem is your lack of ability to understand.Therein lies the problem.
If you're going to charge someone with enough felonies to put them in prison for 134 years because of a LONG EXPIRED misdemeanor that's 9 years old that they say was done to further a crime, AND YOU DON'T EVEN HAVE TO PROVE THAT CRIME EVER HAPPENED, is absolutely fucking INSANE. To be able to elevate a misdemeanor which would be a fine at most, to 134 years in prison WITHOUT PROOF THE CRIME OCCURRED, our fucking justice system is fucking gone.
Haha, low IQ cultist tap out so easily... what an incapable lightweight you are...You gay guys and your hobbies!
Polishing scrotums - what will they think of next!
This pathetic lying won't help you. There is no comparison to support of Obama with you replacing your god with trump.You Democrat cultists who worshipped Barrack Obama as the 2nd coming of Jesus Christ. Your media was saying exactly this. Your education camps called elementary schools were making children learn songs about Obama. "Obama, Obama..." Good little Maoists you are...