Trump Guilty!

What, because a damned leftist kangaroo court said so ?


240530_abcnl_5p_spev_trump1_hpMain_16x9.jpg
 
Yea when the defense is blocked by the judge from allowing evidence that shows his innocence and blindly allows the prosecution to do whatever the fuck they wanted to without so much as a hint of blocking ANYTHING from being submitted to the court, it was a sham trial and everyone knows it. Even DEMOCRATS are saying it was absurd. To somehow try to twist a 9 year old accounting error which is, at best, a misdemeanor which is long run past its statute of limitations into a felony where he's now facing 134 years in prison (limited by NY to 20) is absurd.

Gagged Trump but let Cohen run his mouth all he wanted to, oh yea, THAT SHIT WAS FAIR. Yea, and I've got a bridge to sell you.
 
Last edited:
There was no law in the indictment. The "law" was thrown in during the closing arguments. Yet, what was stated isn't a law on the books. Not only that, the court is not a federal court. So, it has no jurisdiction over election laws for the Presidency.
Not only that, paying off a hooker to keep the affair from the public during an election isn't against the law either. If it were, Biden would be in jail as well since he and all the Democrats kept Hunter's laptop from being used in the election that would have given the Presidency to Trump. Can't have it both ways.
There’s no requirement for the elevating crime to be charged or even proven. It only needs to be made apparent that it occurred.
 
What are you people doing, sitting there with your computer mouse trigger cocked like a double barrel shotgun ready to shoot as soon as a post hits the posted position ????? Rotflmbo 🤣

I couldn't even proof read and edit before you grabbed the dambed thing or is there some kind of way that you all are able to see what's being typed before its posted ?.. hmm 🤔
Proofread? For what? It certainly isn’t for accuracy.
You’re all posting the same ignorant drivel. It’s not difficult to stay ahead of it.
 
There’s no requirement for the elevating crime to be charged or even proven. It only needs to be made apparent that it occurred.

Therein lies the problem.

If you're going to charge someone with enough felonies to put them in prison for 134 years because of a LONG EXPIRED misdemeanor that's 9 years old that they say was done to further a crime, AND YOU DON'T EVEN HAVE TO PROVE THAT CRIME EVER HAPPENED, is absolutely fucking INSANE. To be able to elevate a misdemeanor which would be a fine at most, to 134 years in prison WITHOUT PROOF THE CRIME OCCURRED, our fucking justice system is fucking gone.
 
Therein lies the problem.

If you're going to charge someone with enough felonies to put them in prison for 134 years because of a LONG EXPIRED misdemeanor that's 9 years old that they say was done to further a crime, AND YOU DON'T EVEN HAVE TO PROVE THAT CRIME EVER HAPPENED, is absolutely fucking INSANE. To be able to elevate a misdemeanor which would be a fine at most, to 134 years in prison WITHOUT PROOF THE CRIME OCCURRED, our fucking justice system is fucking gone.
The only problem is your lack of ability to understand.
 
You Democrat cultists who worshipped Barrack Obama as the 2nd coming of Jesus Christ. Your media was saying exactly this. Your education camps called elementary schools were making children learn songs about Obama. "Obama, Obama..." Good little Maoists you are...
This pathetic lying won't help you. There is no comparison to support of Obama with you replacing your god with trump.

None whatsoever.
 

Forum List

Back
Top