Trump has been EXONERATED of all charges.

[Nostra]

<YAWN!>

How does it matter? It means nothing. The impeachment was a sham. Everyone knows that.

The trial was the sham. That's what everybody knows.

Same rules as the Clinton trial.

Clinton's trial called witnesses to testify.

So did Trumps...................10 more than Clinton's.

That did not happen.

Yes it did, liar.

 

[JustAGuy1]

Poor stupid little yellow coward. Hey asshole, in this country one does not have to prove innocence. Burden of proof is on YOU dumbestfuck. Keep showing how dumb you are. Slapping you is so easy.

LOL

Yet another dumbfuck who doesn't understand presumption of innocence applies to criminal cases, not political procedures.

You are simply an inveterate liar. I asked you to prove and you can't. You really are quite the punk kid.

LOL

Liar.

I proved it here.

There is NOTHING there that says it is scrapped in an impeachment. Again, you'll have to do better than that. SHOW everyone where it DOESN'T apply to impeachment....c'mon, you made the claim.

LOLOL

It's a principle of our criminal justice system, ys moron. It doesn't apply to impeach

Lie

Imbecile, "nuh-uh" isn't a rebuttal.

Presumption of innocence is a bedrock principle of the American criminal justice system...

So it is, the point is son that you can't show that it's not a "bedrock principle" of an impeachment. You aren't as "bright" as you think you are.

LOLOL

The only ones saying a principle of our criminal justice system is also applicable outside of our criminal justice system are idiots like you who claim it with zero proof.
You just say it and then believe it's true because you said it.

Still, it's a construct from our Constitution that applies to the law. Impeachments are political procedures, not legal ones. Case in point, get convicted of a crime by our criminal justice system and you can face imprisonment. But get convicted in an impeachment trial, and you don't face imprisonment.

We're making progress, you admit you can't prove it. You say it and that makes it true. Allow me to help.

"Impeachment in the United States is the process by which a legislature (usually in the form of the lower house) brings charges against a civil officer of crimes allegedly committed,
. Impeachment may occur at the federal level or the state level. The federal House of Representatives can impeach federal officials, including the president, and each state's legislature can impeach state officials, including the governor, in accordance with their respective federal or state constitution.

Most impeachments have concerned alleged crimes comitted while in office, though there have been a few cases in which officials have been impeached and subsequently convictd for crimes committed prior to taking office.[1] The impeached official remains in office until a trial is held. That trial, and removal from office if convicted, is separate from the act of impeachment itself.

In impeachment proceedings, the defendant does not risk forfeiture of life, liberty, or property. According to the Constitution, the only penalties allowed to be imposed by the Senate are removal from office and disqualification from holding any federal office in the future."

Impeachment in the United States - Wikipedia
A lot of talk about crimes and shit in there

Impeachment is still not a criminal procedure nor is it tried by our criminal justice system. One can even be Impeached without committing a crime.

I post a direct contradiction to your claims and you respond with "Nuh-Uh". You're getting bitch slapped here kid.

 

[Nostra]

You are still a lying moron.


Read and get an education, Fuckwit.

Tips for Using Video Testimony at Trial - Magna Legal Services

Also, they voted against ADDING ADDITIONAL WITNESSES, Dummy. To ADD witnesses there has to already BE witnesses.

You lose again...............

WASHINGTON – A razor-thin majority of Senate Republicans on Friday voted against a Democratic proposal to admit additional witnesses and documents into President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial.


Senate votes against calling new witnesses in Trump's impeachment trial

LOL

Dumbfuck, you still can't question a video.

Doesn't matter, Moron. They are still considered witnesses. I'm surprised you are back for another beatdown on this.........wait, no I'm not.

Tips for Using Video Testimony at Trial - Magna Legal Services

LOL

Dumbfuck, they were witnesses before the trial. This is the only impeachment trial in U.S. history to not call in witnesses to testify.

Why were there several votes on calling 'ADDITIONAL WITNESSES' then, Fuckwit?

Big word. You need help with it?

Don't even try it. There were no witnesses.

13 of them, liar.

 

[Nostra]

Poor stupid little yellow coward. Hey asshole, in this country one does not have to prove innocence. Burden of proof is on YOU dumbestfuck. Keep showing how dumb you are. Slapping you is so easy.

LOL

Yet another dumbfuck who doesn't understand presumption of innocence applies to criminal cases, not political procedures.

Exonerated. Innocent of charges. Forever.

trump is guilty. You know he's guilty. So repeating that madness means nothing.

You still crying?
I thought you'd be out scrounging around to find the next "scandal".

I have no reason to cry. trump is guilty. That's a fact.

More lies.

 

[Nostra]

Same rules as the Clinton trial.

Clinton's trial called witnesses to testify.

So did Trumps...................10 more than Clinton's.

Liar.

Zero witnessed were called to testify at Impeached Trump's trial

Adolph Schiffler called 17 witnesses, dumbass. Trump got to call zero.

And still, for the first time in U.S. history, not a single witness called in to testify during an impeachment trial. What are you cons so afraid of?

That lie has been debunked.

 

[Ame®icano]

This is the state of entire Democrat party right now...

 

[IM2]

trump proved it by blocking witnesses and documents. trump is guilty.

You are running from the question keemosabe.

Didn't run from anything. trump proved his guilt by what he did.

So you CAN'T prove it and hearsay is just fine.
You have fine legal mind there Malcolm.

Trumps actions proved his guilt. His blocking witnesses and documents is not hearsay. It is what he did.

So you don't really NEED for evidence a thing IS simply because you say it is....must be a heavy burden being both judge and jury for all things.

I find it rather rich that a bunch of republicans make claims like this while declaring that joe Biden blackmailed Ukraine with no evidence. trumps behavior proved his guilt. This is not about being judge or jury, if trump was innocent he doesn't block any information that proves it.

 

[Faun]

trump proved it by blocking witnesses and documents. trump is guilty.

That's like saying I am guilty in a trial for refusing to talk to cops. Ridiculous...

Trump had nothing to prove, it was the job of the democrats to prove him guilty. They failed...

Nope it's not. If you were requested subpoenaed by the court and refused you go to jail. If you are being investigated for a crime and tell all witnesses not to testify and you defy court orders to turn over documents you go to jail. Trump did both. He did have something to prove. He refused to do so. He blocked witnesses and documents critical to the case and that's because doing so would have proven his guilt. trump is guilty. Your argument is a load o9f crap. Furthermore, you know he is guilty.

They held the trial according to the rules.

Trump was acquitted.

You lost, Trump won.

trump is guilty. You can make all the excuses you want to rationalize this joke of a trial because you're a republican, but trump is guilty. I lost nothing. But we all lost because trump still has a job.

Trump was determined...

INNOCENT.

Oops.

Uh, no, he was determined to be "not guilty," not "innocent"...

 

[IM2]

Clinton's trial called witnesses to testify.

So did Trumps...................10 more than Clinton's.

Liar.

Zero witnessed were called to testify at Impeached Trump's trial

Adolph Schiffler called 17 witnesses, dumbass. Trump got to call zero.

And still, for the first time in U.S. history, not a single witness called in to testify during an impeachment trial. What are you cons so afraid of?

That lie has been debunked.

Except it hasn't.

 

[Nostra]

Poor stupid little yellow coward. Hey asshole, in this country one does not have to prove innocence. Burden of proof is on YOU dumbestfuck. Keep showing how dumb you are. Slapping you is so easy.

LOL

Yet another dumbfuck who doesn't understand presumption of innocence applies to criminal cases, not political procedures.

Exonerated. Innocent of charges. Forever.

trump is guilty. You know he's guilty. So repeating that madness means nothing.

Correction, we know you SAY he is guilty.

trump is guilty. Period.

You are still lying.

 

[Faun]

LOL

Dumbfuck, you still can't question a video.

Doesn't matter, Moron. They are still considered witnesses. I'm surprised you are back for another beatdown on this.........wait, no I'm not.

Tips for Using Video Testimony at Trial - Magna Legal Services

LOL

Dumbfuck, they were witnesses before the trial. This is the only impeachment trial in U.S. history to not call in witnesses to testify.

Why were there several votes on calling 'ADDITIONAL WITNESSES' then, Fuckwit?

Big word. You need help with it?

Still not a single witness called in to testify in the trial. First time ever for an impeachment trial. Why are you cons so afraid?

You have been proven to be a lying asshat.

LOL

So you slobber.




Still, for the first time in U.S. history, not a single witness called in to testify during an impeachment trial. What are you cons so afraid of?

 

[Nostra]

Exonerated. Innocent of charges. Forever.

trump is guilty. You know he's guilty. So repeating that madness means nothing.

Correction, we know you SAY he is guilty.

trump is guilty. Period.

Huh, can you prove it with real evidence or do you insist that hearsay is all you need?

trump proved it by blocking witnesses and documents. trump is guilty.

The entire Dimwinger party has been in epic meltdown mode since Trump was found INNOCENT.

 

[IM2]

Poor dumbfuck ^^^ can't post without lying. In reality, I actually said Impeached Trump was not guilty until proven innocent.

Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.

Poor stupid little yellow coward. Hey asshole, in this country one does not have to prove innocence. Burden of proof is on YOU dumbestfuck. Keep showing how dumb you are. Slapping you is so easy.

LOL

Yet another dumbfuck who doesn't understand presumption of innocence applies to criminal cases, not political procedures.

Exonerated. Innocent of charges. Forever.

trump is guilty. You know he's guilty. So repeating that madness means nothing.

Exonerated.

Innocent.

You lose again, loser.

trump is guilty. Just face it. Your party is complicit in a crime against the people of the United States. I've lost nothing because I know the truth.

 

[IM2]

trump is guilty. You know he's guilty. So repeating that madness means nothing.

Correction, we know you SAY he is guilty.

trump is guilty. Period.

Huh, can you prove it with real evidence or do you insist that hearsay is all you need?

trump proved it by blocking witnesses and documents. trump is guilty.

The entire Dimwinger party has been in epic meltdown mode since Trump was found INNOCENT.

No meltdown. Because we all knew what the republicans were going to do. trump is guilty and you can't handle that everybody knows it.

 

[Nostra]

Correction, we know you SAY he is guilty.

trump is guilty. Period.

Huh, can you prove it with real evidence or do you insist that hearsay is all you need?

trump proved it by blocking witnesses and documents. trump is guilty.

You are running from the question keemosabe.

Didn't run from anything. trump proved his guilt by what he did.

More lies.

 

[Nostra]

Lie

Imbecile, "nuh-uh" isn't a rebuttal.

Presumption of innocence is a bedrock principle of the American criminal justice system...

So it is, the point is son that you can't show that it's not a "bedrock principle" of an impeachment. You aren't as "bright" as you think you are.

LOLOL

The only ones saying a principle of our criminal justice system is also applicable outside of our criminal justice system are idiots like you who claim it with zero proof.
You just say it and then believe it's true because you said it.

Still, it's a construct from our Constitution that applies to the law. Impeachments are political procedures, not legal ones. Case in point, get convicted of a crime by our criminal justice system and you can face imprisonment. But get convicted in an impeachment trial, and you don't face imprisonment.

We're making progress, you admit you can't prove it. You say it and that makes it true. Allow me to help.

"Impeachment in the United States is the process by which a legislature (usually in the form of the lower house) brings charges against a civil officer of crimes allegedly committed,
. Impeachment may occur at the federal level or the state level. The federal House of Representatives can impeach federal officials, including the president, and each state's legislature can impeach state officials, including the governor, in accordance with their respective federal or state constitution.

Most impeachments have concerned alleged crimes comitted while in office, though there have been a few cases in which officials have been impeached and subsequently convictd for crimes committed prior to taking office.[1] The impeached official remains in office until a trial is held. That trial, and removal from office if convicted, is separate from the act of impeachment itself.

In impeachment proceedings, the defendant does not risk forfeiture of life, liberty, or property. According to the Constitution, the only penalties allowed to be imposed by the Senate are removal from office and disqualification from holding any federal office in the future."

Impeachment in the United States - Wikipedia
A lot of talk about crimes and shit in there

Impeachment is still not a criminal procedure nor is it tried by our criminal justice system. One can even be Impeached without committing a crime.

Why are you asking for "witnesses" whey you claim this isn't a trial?

 

[Nostra]

So did Trumps...................10 more than Clinton's.

Liar.

Zero witnessed were called to testify at Impeached Trump's trial

Adolph Schiffler called 17 witnesses, dumbass. Trump got to call zero.

And still, for the first time in U.S. history, not a single witness called in to testify during an impeachment trial. What are you cons so afraid of?

That lie has been debunked.

Except it hasn't.

Yes it has. Many times

 

[Ame®icano]

trump is guilty. Just face it. Your party is complicit in a crime against the people of the United States. I've lost nothing because I know the truth.

 

[Nostra]

Doesn't matter, Moron. They are still considered witnesses. I'm surprised you are back for another beatdown on this.........wait, no I'm not.

Tips for Using Video Testimony at Trial - Magna Legal Services

LOL

Dumbfuck, they were witnesses before the trial. This is the only impeachment trial in U.S. history to not call in witnesses to testify.

Why were there several votes on calling 'ADDITIONAL WITNESSES' then, Fuckwit?

Big word. You need help with it?

Still not a single witness called in to testify in the trial. First time ever for an impeachment trial. Why are you cons so afraid?

You have been proven to be a lying asshat.

LOL

So you slobber.




Still, for the first time in U.S. history, not a single witness called in to testify during an impeachment trial. What are you cons so afraid of?

Why are you whining about "witnesses"?

By definition, they are used in courts. You claim this is nothing like court trials.

Oops! How man times have you lost in this thread? Hundreds would be my estimation.

A witness is a person who comes to court and swears under oath to give truthful evidence.

Trial Witnesses Law and Legal Definition | USLegal, Inc.

 

[JustAGuy1]

You are running from the question keemosabe.

Didn't run from anything. trump proved his guilt by what he did.

So you CAN'T prove it and hearsay is just fine.
You have fine legal mind there Malcolm.

Trumps actions proved his guilt. His blocking witnesses and documents is not hearsay. It is what he did.

So you don't really NEED for evidence a thing IS simply because you say it is....must be a heavy burden being both judge and jury for all things.

I find it rather rich that a bunch of republicans make claims like this while declaring that joe Biden blackmailed Ukraine with no evidence. trumps behavior proved his guilt. This is not about being judge or jury, if trump was innocent he doesn't block any information that proves it.

I'm not a Republican son, nor a Partisan. I also don't live in a banana republican where someone is guilty because people like you say he is. Did Biden do anything illegal? I don't know , what I do know is that there is more than enough evidence to investigate him/them though.