Trump has been EXONERATED of all charges.

Exonerated. Innocent of charges. Forever.

trump is guilty. You know he's guilty. So repeating that madness means nothing.

Correction, we know you SAY he is guilty.

trump is guilty. Period.

I have some bad news to you...

MW-HZ818_trump__ZH_20200206162304.jpg


The fake news you read weren't correct.

I didn't read any fake news. The facts are plain. trump blocked witnesses and documents. Innocent people don't block information that proves their innocence. trump is guilty.


You don't read? i gathered as much. Beat him at the ballot box. Why so nervous?
 
Exonerated. Innocent of charges. Forever.

trump is guilty. You know he's guilty. So repeating that madness means nothing.

Correction, we know you SAY he is guilty.

trump is guilty. Period.

Huh, can you prove it with real evidence or do you insist that hearsay is all you need?

trump proved it by blocking witnesses and documents. trump is guilty.

That's like saying I am guilty in a trial for refusing to talk to cops. Ridiculous...

Trump had nothing to prove, it was the job of the democrats to prove him guilty. They failed...
 
trump is guilty. You know he's guilty. So repeating that madness means nothing.

Correction, we know you SAY he is guilty.

trump is guilty. Period.

Huh, can you prove it with real evidence or do you insist that hearsay is all you need?

trump proved it by blocking witnesses and documents. trump is guilty.

You are running from the question keemosabe.

Didn't run from anything. trump proved his guilt by what he did.
 
trump proved it by blocking witnesses and documents. trump is guilty.

Trump had nothing top do with it you ignorant jackass, the senate ran the show after the house scammed it.
trump had everything to do with it since McConnell admitted to working directly with the white house. trump is guilty.
 
Then why are you and your cronies constantly blubbering about a "fair trial?" Presumption of innocence is one of the critical components of a fair trial.
Of a fair criminal trial, fucking moron. :cuckoo:

Lie
Imbecile, "nuh-uh" isn't a rebuttal.
icon_rolleyes.gif


Presumption of innocence is a bedrock principle of the American criminal justice system...

So it is, the point is son that you can't show that it's not a "bedrock principle" of an impeachment. You aren't as "bright" as you think you are.
LOLOL

The only ones saying a principle of our criminal justice system is also applicable outside of our criminal justice system are idiots like you who claim it with zero proof.
You just say it and then believe it's true because you said it.

Still, it's a construct from our Constitution that applies to the law. Impeachments are political procedures, not legal ones. Case in point, get convicted of a crime by our criminal justice system and you can face imprisonment. But get convicted in an impeachment trial, and you don't face imprisonment.

We're making progress, you admit you can't prove it. You say it and that makes it true. Allow me to help.

"Impeachment in the United States is the process by which a legislature (usually in the form of the lower house) brings charges against a civil officer of crimes allegedly committed,
. Impeachment may occur at the
federal level or the state level. The federal House of Representatives can impeach federal officials, including the president, and each state's legislature can impeach state officials, including the governor, in accordance with their respective federal or state constitution.

Most impeachments have concerned alleged crimes comitted while in office, though there have been a few cases in which officials have been impeached and subsequently convictd for crimes committed prior to taking office.[1] The impeached official remains in office until a trial is held. That trial, and removal from office if convicted, is separate from the act of impeachment itself.

In impeachment proceedings, the defendant does not risk forfeiture of life, liberty, or property. According to the
Constitution, the only penalties allowed to be imposed by the Senate are removal from office and disqualification from holding any federal office in the future."

Impeachment in the United States - Wikipedia
A lot of talk about crimes and shit in there ;)
 
Correction, we know you SAY he is guilty.

trump is guilty. Period.

Huh, can you prove it with real evidence or do you insist that hearsay is all you need?

trump proved it by blocking witnesses and documents. trump is guilty.

You are running from the question keemosabe.

Didn't run from anything. trump proved his guilt by what he did.

So you CAN'T prove it and hearsay is just fine.
You have fine legal mind there Malcolm.
 
trump is guilty. You know he's guilty. So repeating that madness means nothing.

Correction, we know you SAY he is guilty.

trump is guilty. Period.

Huh, can you prove it with real evidence or do you insist that hearsay is all you need?

trump proved it by blocking witnesses and documents. trump is guilty.

That's like saying I am guilty in a trial for refusing to talk to cops. Ridiculous...

Trump had nothing to prove, it was the job of the democrats to prove him guilty. They failed...

Nope it's not. If you were requested subpoenaed by the court and refused you go to jail. If you are being investigated for a crime and tell all witnesses not to testify and you defy court orders to turn over documents you go to jail. Trump did both. He did have something to prove. He refused to do so. He blocked witnesses and documents critical to the case and that's because doing so would have proven his guilt. trump is guilty. Your argument is a load o9f crap. Furthermore, you know he is guilty.
 
Correction, we know you SAY he is guilty.

trump is guilty. Period.

Huh, can you prove it with real evidence or do you insist that hearsay is all you need?

trump proved it by blocking witnesses and documents. trump is guilty.

That's like saying I am guilty in a trial for refusing to talk to cops. Ridiculous...

Trump had nothing to prove, it was the job of the democrats to prove him guilty. They failed...

Nope it's not. If you were requested subpoenaed by the court and refused you go to jail. If you are being investigated for a crime and tell all witnesses not to testify and you defy court orders to turn over documents you go to jail. Trump did both. He did have something to prove. He refused to do so. He blocked witnesses and documents critical to the case and that's because doing so would have proven his guilt. trump is guilty. Your argument is a load o9f crap. Furthermore, you know he is guilty.

They held the trial according to the rules.

Trump was acquitted.

You lost, Trump won.
 
trump is guilty. Period.

Huh, can you prove it with real evidence or do you insist that hearsay is all you need?

trump proved it by blocking witnesses and documents. trump is guilty.

You are running from the question keemosabe.

Didn't run from anything. trump proved his guilt by what he did.

So you CAN'T prove it and hearsay is just fine.
You have fine legal mind there Malcolm.

Trumps actions proved his guilt. His blocking witnesses and documents is not hearsay. It is what he did.
 
The Dims called 18 witnesses, moron.
^^^ a fucking moron who still doesn't know the difference between an inquiry/hearing and a trial. :cuckoo:
What happens in the Senate is not a trial in the legal sense. It's a political process.

Someone who claims to understand this shit should understand that.
Still the only impeachment trial in U.S. history to not call a single witness. What are you cons afraid of?
<YAWN!>

How does it matter? It means nothing. The impeachment was a sham. Everyone knows that.
The trial was the sham. That's what everybody knows.

Everybody?

That means you, and who else?
 
trump is guilty. Period.

Huh, can you prove it with real evidence or do you insist that hearsay is all you need?

trump proved it by blocking witnesses and documents. trump is guilty.

That's like saying I am guilty in a trial for refusing to talk to cops. Ridiculous...

Trump had nothing to prove, it was the job of the democrats to prove him guilty. They failed...

Nope it's not. If you were requested subpoenaed by the court and refused you go to jail. If you are being investigated for a crime and tell all witnesses not to testify and you defy court orders to turn over documents you go to jail. Trump did both. He did have something to prove. He refused to do so. He blocked witnesses and documents critical to the case and that's because doing so would have proven his guilt. trump is guilty. Your argument is a load o9f crap. Furthermore, you know he is guilty.

They held the trial according to the rules.

Trump was acquitted.

You lost, Trump won.

trump is guilty. You can make all the excuses you want to rationalize this joke of a trial because you're a republican, but trump is guilty. I lost nothing. But we all lost because trump still has a job.
 
^^^ a fucking moron who still doesn't know the difference between an inquiry/hearing and a trial. :cuckoo:
What happens in the Senate is not a trial in the legal sense. It's a political process.

Someone who claims to understand this shit should understand that.
Still the only impeachment trial in U.S. history to not call a single witness. What are you cons afraid of?
<YAWN!>

How does it matter? It means nothing. The impeachment was a sham. Everyone knows that.
The trial was the sham. That's what everybody knows.

Everybody?

That means you, and who else?

It means everybody in America. Including trump.
 
Huh, can you prove it with real evidence or do you insist that hearsay is all you need?

trump proved it by blocking witnesses and documents. trump is guilty.

That's like saying I am guilty in a trial for refusing to talk to cops. Ridiculous...

Trump had nothing to prove, it was the job of the democrats to prove him guilty. They failed...

Nope it's not. If you were requested subpoenaed by the court and refused you go to jail. If you are being investigated for a crime and tell all witnesses not to testify and you defy court orders to turn over documents you go to jail. Trump did both. He did have something to prove. He refused to do so. He blocked witnesses and documents critical to the case and that's because doing so would have proven his guilt. trump is guilty. Your argument is a load o9f crap. Furthermore, you know he is guilty.

They held the trial according to the rules.

Trump was acquitted.

You lost, Trump won.

trump is guilty. You can make all the excuses you want to rationalize this joke of a trial because you're a republican, but trump is guilty. I lost nothing. But we all lost because trump still has a job.

Trump was determined...

INNOCENT.

Oops.
 
How so? We knew he was going to be acquitted. He's still forever impeached. His name will always be mentioned along with Johnson, almost impeached Nixon and Clinton when anyone talks about how there's been 3 presidents impeached.
How much does it mean to you to say it? Is that suppose to mean something to us?

"impeached forever"

LOL

1580362532753.jpg
 
Huh, can you prove it with real evidence or do you insist that hearsay is all you need?

trump proved it by blocking witnesses and documents. trump is guilty.

You are running from the question keemosabe.

Didn't run from anything. trump proved his guilt by what he did.

So you CAN'T prove it and hearsay is just fine.
You have fine legal mind there Malcolm.

Trumps actions proved his guilt. His blocking witnesses and documents is not hearsay. It is what he did.

So you don't really NEED for evidence a thing IS simply because you say it is....must be a heavy burden being both judge and jury for all things.
 
You are still a lying moron.


Read and get an education, Fuckwit.

Tips for Using Video Testimony at Trial - Magna Legal Services

Also, they voted against ADDING ADDITIONAL WITNESSES, Dummy. To ADD witnesses there has to already BE witnesses.

You lose again...............

WASHINGTON – A razor-thin majority of Senate Republicans on Friday voted against a Democratic proposal to admit additional witnesses and documents into President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial.



Senate votes against calling new witnesses in Trump's impeachment trial
LOL

Dumbfuck, you still can't question a video. :cuckoo:
Doesn't matter, Moron. They are still considered witnesses. I'm surprised you are back for another beatdown on this.........wait, no I'm not.

Tips for Using Video Testimony at Trial - Magna Legal Services
LOL

Dumbfuck, they were witnesses before the trial. This is the only impeachment trial in U.S. history to not call in witnesses to testify.


Why were there several votes on calling 'ADDITIONAL WITNESSES' then, Fuckwit?

Big word. You need help with it?
Still not a single witness called in to testify in the trial. First time ever for an impeachment trial. Why are you cons so afraid?
You have been proven to be a lying asshat.
 
Faun thinks you are guilty until proven innocent. Innocent until proven guilty doesn't apply to impeachments.:auiqs.jpg::laughing0301::cuckoo:
Poor dumbfuck ^^^ can't post without lying. In reality, I actually said Impeached Trump was not guilty until proven innocent.

Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.

Poor stupid little yellow coward. Hey asshole, in this country one does not have to prove innocence. Burden of proof is on YOU dumbestfuck. Keep showing how dumb you are. Slapping you is so easy.
LOL

Yet another dumbfuck who doesn't understand presumption of innocence applies to criminal cases, not political procedures.

Exonerated. Innocent of charges. Forever.

trump is guilty. You know he's guilty. So repeating that madness means nothing.
Exonerated.

Innocent.

You lose again, loser.
 

So it is, the point is son that you can't show that it's not a "bedrock principle" of an impeachment. You aren't as "bright" as you think you are.
LOLOL

The only ones saying a principle of our criminal justice system is also applicable outside of our criminal justice system are idiots like you who claim it with zero proof.
You just say it and then believe it's true because you said it.

Still, it's a construct from our Constitution that applies to the law. Impeachments are political procedures, not legal ones. Case in point, get convicted of a crime by our criminal justice system and you can face imprisonment. But get convicted in an impeachment trial, and you don't face imprisonment.

We're making progress, you admit you can't prove it. You say it and that makes it true. Allow me to help.

"Impeachment in the United States is the process by which a legislature (usually in the form of the lower house) brings charges against a civil officer of crimes allegedly committed,
. Impeachment may occur at the
federal level or the state level. The federal House of Representatives can impeach federal officials, including the president, and each state's legislature can impeach state officials, including the governor, in accordance with their respective federal or state constitution.

Most impeachments have concerned alleged crimes comitted while in office, though there have been a few cases in which officials have been impeached and subsequently convictd for crimes committed prior to taking office.[1] The impeached official remains in office until a trial is held. That trial, and removal from office if convicted, is separate from the act of impeachment itself.

In impeachment proceedings, the defendant does not risk forfeiture of life, liberty, or property. According to the
Constitution, the only penalties allowed to be imposed by the Senate are removal from office and disqualification from holding any federal office in the future."

Impeachment in the United States - Wikipedia
A lot of talk about crimes and shit in there ;)
Impeachment is still not a criminal procedure nor is it tried by our criminal justice system. One can even be Impeached without committing a crime.
 

Forum List

Back
Top