Trump has now been implicated in a federal crime

Maobama was fined 370,000 by the FEC, where was your impeachment talk then? Hypocrite.

.
Obama was fined for inadvertently not reporting campaign finances. We’ll see if the FEC finds the same for trump, who secretively paid off a porn star to keep her mouth shut.


It's all comes down to intent, did Trump intend to violate laws he had never been subject to just a year before? Candidates rely on lawyers to keep them straight, Trumps lawyer seems to have failed. That doesn't prove intent on Trump, if it was a violation at all, which is debatable. BTW failing to report is failing to report, where's the equal treatment under the law?

.


Trump: get some money to Story for her silence
Cohen: But that is illegal
Trump Do it.


Who cares? It's a civil suit..


.
It's a felony. Just ask prosecutors.


Oj killed Nicole and Ron in cold blood..


Now why wasn't he convicted of those charges?

.
 
Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election. The hush money was to protect his personal spotless reputation.:cuckoo::cuckoo:

Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election.

Doesn't matter, it wasn't a campaign expense.
How do you know that? Did you talk to Trump?

And by the way, prosecutors will charge it as a campaign finance crime/felony/expense because of the obvious. He needed to hide an affair weeks before the election, the money was not reported, it exceeded $2700 dollars, and it was reported to have come from stolen money out of his charity. Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016. A $130,000 payment would far exceed that limit. Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from. So for you to say it is not a campaign expense, is the joke of the day. Since Trump was lying, how in the hell do you know if it was an expense or not? Lol!
they don't charge people if something APPEARS to be obvious--but on evidence!!
The obvious is the evidence fool.
you just made a fatal/irrevocable error:
no the obvious is NOT evidence!!!!
you fked up
they didn't/could charge OJ without all the blood evidence/etc
LOl! You understand nothing of semantics sonny. Go back to school. You are way out of your league here.
 
Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election. The hush money was to protect his personal spotless reputation.:cuckoo::cuckoo:

Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election.

Doesn't matter, it wasn't a campaign expense.
How do you know that? Did you talk to Trump?

And by the way, prosecutors will charge it as a campaign finance crime/felony/expense because of the obvious. He needed to hide an affair weeks before the election, the money was not reported, it exceeded $2700 dollars, and it was reported to have come from stolen money out of his charity. Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016. A $130,000 payment would far exceed that limit. Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from. So for you to say it is not a campaign expense, is the joke of the day. Since Trump was lying, how in the hell do you know if it was an expense or not? Lol!
they don't charge people if something APPEARS to be obvious--but on evidence!!
The obvious is the evidence fool.
you just made a fatal/irrevocable error:
no the obvious is NOT evidence!!!!
you fked up
they didn't/could charge OJ without all the blood evidence/etc


Damn you beat me to it..


.
 
It wasn't a campaign expenditure, no reason to report it.
Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election. The hush money was to protect his personal spotless reputation.:cuckoo::cuckoo:

Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election.

Doesn't matter, it wasn't a campaign expense.
How do you know that? Did you talk to Trump?

And by the way, prosecutors will charge it as a campaign finance crime/felony/expense because of the obvious. He needed to hide an affair weeks before the election, the money was not reported, it exceeded $2700 dollars, and it was reported to have come from stolen money out of his charity. Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016. A $130,000 payment would far exceed that limit. Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from. So for you to say it is not a campaign expense, is the joke of the day. Since Trump was lying, how in the hell do you know if it was an expense or not? Lol!
how is it obvious?
Can you read? He needed to hide an affair weeks before the election, the money was not reported, it exceeded $2700 dollars, and it was reported to have come from stolen money out of his charity. Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016. A $130,000 payment would far exceed that limit. Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from. So for you to say it is not a campaign expense, is the joke of the day. Since Trump was lying, how in the hell do you know if it was an expense or not? Lol! Learn to read the obvious fool.

Go buy a clue...

Adam Schiff's Statements Are Frequently False Or Missing Key Details
The Federalist

View attachment 233788
Jan 30, 2018 · Adam Schiff is portrayed by many in the media as a straight shooter. His record in reality is of fanning the flames of every single Trump-Russia collusion allegation out there. ... As soon as the committee had finished voting, ranking member Rep. Adam Schiff ran to the cameras to spin
Why do you find it so difficult to defend Trump's criminal actions?

The Michael Cohen Sentencing Memos Are Damning for Trump

"In September, 2015, Trump approved Cohen’s plan to reach out to the Russian government.

"That November, Cohen 'spoke with a Russian national who claimed to be a ‘trusted person’ in the Russian Federation who could offer the campaign ‘political synergy’ and ‘synergy on a government level.’

"Cohen’s contact 'repeatedly proposed' a meeting between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, suggesting that it would have a 'phenomenal' effect on Trump’s efforts to build a Trump Tower in Moscow, which Mueller’s filing calls the 'Moscow Project.'"

Are you truly gullible enough to believe Trump is NOT a gold-plated con man who lies as often as most people breathe?
He is in the first couple of stages of the grieving process.

new-understanding-the-stages-of-grief-1.png
Which of those Seven Stages of Grief do you imagine Trump currently occupies?

The Michael Cohen Sentencing Memos Are Damning for Trump

"The Southern District of New York’s simultaneously released sentencing memo also has serious legal ramifications for the President.

"In describing how Cohen bought the silence of two women with whom Trump had affairs in order to help Trump win the Presidency, it makes clear that Cohen 'acted in coordination with and at the direction of Individual-1.'

"Three months ago, Cohen said in his guilty plea that this was true and that the President was implicated in a criminal scheme to sway the election.

"Now, though, federal prosecutors working under Robert Khuzami, the acting U.S. Attorney, feel confident enough in this assertion that they have tied themselves to it."

I'm guessing "Anger."


President was implicated in a criminal scheme to sway the election.


By saying he didn't have sex with that woman? Or paying off another girl almost a million dollars in a civil suit while he was president?


Quit embarrassing yourselves..


.
Anyone who voted for or supports Trump really shouldn't lecture about embarrassment:
95c0b45760d5f433c94b05b683c8258d.jpg


Michael Cohen told Mueller's office about contacts between Trump aides and Russia

"After the filing from Mueller, Trump tweeted that it 'totally clears the President. Thank you!'

"But in fact there was nothing in either court filing that exonerated Trump, and one portion strongly suggested that Trump was personally involved in a campaign finance violation.

"The Manhattan prosecutors said Cohen had paid off two women to suppress their stories about affairs with Trump — a campaign expense that was improperly not reported — and said he did so "in coordination with and at the direction of" Trump."

Maobama was fined 370,000 by the FEC, where was your impeachment talk then? Hypocrite.

.
Obama was fined for inadvertently not reporting campaign finances. We’ll see if the FEC finds the same for trump, who secretively paid off a porn star to keep her mouth shut.


It's all comes down to intent, did Trump intend to violate laws he had never been subject to just a year before? Candidates rely on lawyers to keep them straight, Trumps lawyer seems to have failed. That doesn't prove intent on Trump, if it was a violation at all, which is debatable. BTW failing to report is failing to report, where's the equal treatment under the law?

.


Trump: get some money to Story for her silence
Cohen: But that is illegal
Trump Do it.


Who cares? It's a civil suit..


.
It's a felony. Just ask prosecutors.

We'll see how it plays out.


Victory is Near: SpyGate is Timed to Blow

"Remember, Trump knows everything and can prove it. This includes SpyGate, ObamaGate, The Clinton Foundation, Uranium One, Benghazi, Iran Deal. EVERYTHING.

He has all the evidence to nail Obama, Clinton and their cronies to the wall and has armed his cannons for firing, when the timing is right.

BUT he isn’t ready to fire, just yet.

Trump has had to prepare the terrain first.

Remember, since his inauguration, Trump has appointed loyalists to the key agencies that protect the Republic. The DOJ, FBI, CIA, NSA, SCOTUS, Senate (judiciary appointments) and other agencies are all led by Trump appointees.

The military establishment is also 100% behind Trump.

Trump knows that he is close to victory, but has not yet won the war. Why?

Robert Mueller’s SC and FakeNews, the last serious enemy holdouts, have yet to be defeated."

======================

"
For example, right now Mueller is trying to frame the four individuals who will be revealed as targets of illegal FISAs - Manafort, Flynn, Papadopoulos and Page - as suspicious liars. This is for FakeNews to activate later.

Mueller is also (desperately) trying to create a false narrative that the Russians hacked the DNC and then leaked it to WikiLeaks, then waited for the green light by the Trump campaign to release them. FakeNews is pushing this lie, 24/7."

"
They need fresh meat, in the form of information, to keep up their assault on Trump.

In order to create narratives, Mueller needs access to fresh intelligence. For FakeNews to do the same, they need fresh leaks.

Trump isn’t going to give them either.
"

"
Mueller was probably hoping to try and keep his witch-hunt going until the new Congress is sworn in, on Jan 3, 2019.

That will now be very difficult.

Time is against him."

"

Mueller’s new strategy will likely be to release a damning report, that he hopes the House can use to impeach Trump. One problem : Whitaker has the power to block its release.

One thing seems certain. Mueller will be closed down, in my opinion, before the end of the year. If not sooner.


Victory is Near: SpyGate is Timed to Blow


If you think Trump doesn't have all the information and knows what he's doing, you're wrong. He holds all the cards. Just waiting for the right time to lay them on the table.
 
Stormy Daniels did speak up about it years earlier. Tiny didn’t pay for her silence then, so clearly, he didn’t silence her weeks before his election out of concerns that Melanie would find out.
Unfortunately you can't prove it. Just a coincidence, and as far as his lawyer goes, we have an indicted felon on taxi and IRS problems PLEADING IN FRONT OF A JUDGE,no less for a light sentence....and after making himself look like a rat bastard, Mulehead, STILL throws the book at him....or was he going to s pend 20 years behind bars as the various MSM's stated
LOLOL

Again, it’s up to the FEC to decide. Their evidence? That trump didn’t pay Stormy to stay silent for 10 years until his election was just 11 days away. Clearly not to hide it from Melanie.

And if the FEC finds he violated campaign finance laws, then the House can impeach him based on the same evidence that he didn’t pay her off for 10 years.
The De!monRAT HOUSE can Impesch a ham sandwich.As with Clinton it is THE REPUBLICAN Senate that would have to convict to remove. And after Trump helping all those Senators to get reelected, and elected, there is NO WAY to remove him! the Senate needs ,67 votes to impeach....just another exercise in WASTING TAXPAYER MONEY!....ROTFLMFAO!
So what? He can still be impeached. Impeachment did wonders for Republicans when they did it. Imagine how well it will do for Democrats.

:dance:
Yes, a serial rapist compared to a willing partner...ROTFLMFAO...even MOST ABNORMALS know the difference, except you and the other low 2 digit, IQ communists that post in this thread!
Trump was only accused of rape by two women, I wouldn’t call him a “serial rapist.”
 
She will say the money came from Cohen......a violation

Unless Cohen paid from campaign funds, how is it a violation?
It’s a violation because it wasn’t reported.

It wasn't a campaign expenditure, no reason to report it.
Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election. The hush money was to protect his personal spotless reputation.:cuckoo::cuckoo:

Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election.

Doesn't matter, it wasn't a campaign expense.
How do you know that? Did you talk to Trump?

And by the way, prosecutors will charge it as a campaign finance crime/felony/expense because of the obvious. He needed to hide an affair weeks before the election, the money was not reported, it exceeded $2700 dollars, and it was reported to have come from stolen money out of his charity. Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016. A $130,000 payment would far exceed that limit. Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from. So for you to say it is not a campaign expense, is the joke of the day. Since Trump was lying, how in the hell do you know if it was an expense or not? Lol!

How do you know that?

Because it's not a campaign expense.
Why do you feel it is?

Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016.

I agree, a donation that size to the campaign would be an issue. This wasn't. It isn't.

Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from.

So what?

So for you to say it is not a campaign expense,

Was a check cut to the campaign? From the campaign?
 
Obama was fined for inadvertently not reporting campaign finances. We’ll see if the FEC finds the same for trump, who secretively paid off a porn star to keep her mouth shut.


It's all comes down to intent, did Trump intend to violate laws he had never been subject to just a year before? Candidates rely on lawyers to keep them straight, Trumps lawyer seems to have failed. That doesn't prove intent on Trump, if it was a violation at all, which is debatable. BTW failing to report is failing to report, where's the equal treatment under the law?

.


Trump: get some money to Story for her silence
Cohen: But that is illegal
Trump Do it.


Who cares? It's a civil suit..


.
It's a felony. Just ask prosecutors.


Oj killed Nicole and Ron in cold blood..


Now why wasn't he convicted of those charges?

.
If it first you cannot argue the topic, change it to something else, like a coward would do. If you think I am going to entertain your off topic stupidity, you are out of your mind.
 
Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election.

Doesn't matter, it wasn't a campaign expense.
How do you know that? Did you talk to Trump?

And by the way, prosecutors will charge it as a campaign finance crime/felony/expense because of the obvious. He needed to hide an affair weeks before the election, the money was not reported, it exceeded $2700 dollars, and it was reported to have come from stolen money out of his charity. Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016. A $130,000 payment would far exceed that limit. Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from. So for you to say it is not a campaign expense, is the joke of the day. Since Trump was lying, how in the hell do you know if it was an expense or not? Lol!
they don't charge people if something APPEARS to be obvious--but on evidence!!
The obvious is the evidence fool.
you just made a fatal/irrevocable error:
no the obvious is NOT evidence!!!!
you fked up
they didn't/could charge OJ without all the blood evidence/etc
LOl! You understand nothing of semantics sonny. Go back to school. You are way out of your league here.


You never been in jail have you?

No it's obvious your way out of your league here..


It's not black and white..if it was the 9th would of not said Trump's muslim ban or asylum ban was Illegal
 
It wasn't a campaign expenditure, no reason to report it.
Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election. The hush money was to protect his personal spotless reputation.:cuckoo::cuckoo:

Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election.

Doesn't matter, it wasn't a campaign expense.
How do you know that? Did you talk to Trump?

And by the way, prosecutors will charge it as a campaign finance crime/felony/expense because of the obvious. He needed to hide an affair weeks before the election, the money was not reported, it exceeded $2700 dollars, and it was reported to have come from stolen money out of his charity. Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016. A $130,000 payment would far exceed that limit. Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from. So for you to say it is not a campaign expense, is the joke of the day. Since Trump was lying, how in the hell do you know if it was an expense or not? Lol!
how is it obvious?
Can you read? He needed to hide an affair weeks before the election, the money was not reported, it exceeded $2700 dollars, and it was reported to have come from stolen money out of his charity. Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016. A $130,000 payment would far exceed that limit. Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from. So for you to say it is not a campaign expense, is the joke of the day. Since Trump was lying, how in the hell do you know if it was an expense or not? Lol! Learn to read the obvious fool.
He needed to hide an affair weeks before the election,

So what? Rich guys do that all the time.

the money was not reported

Rich guys don't need to report payoffs to keep people quiet.
 
It's all comes down to intent, did Trump intend to violate laws he had never been subject to just a year before? Candidates rely on lawyers to keep them straight, Trumps lawyer seems to have failed. That doesn't prove intent on Trump, if it was a violation at all, which is debatable. BTW failing to report is failing to report, where's the equal treatment under the law?

.


Trump: get some money to Story for her silence
Cohen: But that is illegal
Trump Do it.


Who cares? It's a civil suit..


.
It's a felony. Just ask prosecutors.


Oj killed Nicole and Ron in cold blood..


Now why wasn't he convicted of those charges?

.
If it first you cannot argue the topic, change it to something else, like a coward would do. If you think I am going to entertain your off topic stupidity, you are out of your mind.


It's obvious your a child who never been before a judge , who never spent time in jail, who doesn't know politics or fucking history..



You post like a paid moron..


.
 
Trump: get some money to Story for her silence
Cohen: But that is illegal
Trump Do it.


Who cares? It's a civil suit..


.
It's a felony. Just ask prosecutors.


Oj killed Nicole and Ron in cold blood..


Now why wasn't he convicted of those charges?

.
If it first you cannot argue the topic, change it to something else, like a coward would do. If you think I am going to entertain your off topic stupidity, you are out of your mind.


It's obvious your a child who never been before a judge , who never spent time in jail, who doesn't know politics or fucking history..



You post like a paid moron..


.


You post fucking propaganda to feel good about your self?


.
 
Unfortunately you can't prove it. Just a coincidence, and as far as his lawyer goes, we have an indicted felon on taxi and IRS problems PLEADING IN FRONT OF A JUDGE,no less for a light sentence....and after making himself look like a rat bastard, Mulehead, STILL throws the book at him....or was he going to s pend 20 years behind bars as the various MSM's stated
LOLOL

Again, it’s up to the FEC to decide. Their evidence? That trump didn’t pay Stormy to stay silent for 10 years until his election was just 11 days away. Clearly not to hide it from Melanie.

And if the FEC finds he violated campaign finance laws, then the House can impeach him based on the same evidence that he didn’t pay her off for 10 years.
The De!monRAT HOUSE can Impesch a ham sandwich.As with Clinton it is THE REPUBLICAN Senate that would have to convict to remove. And after Trump helping all those Senators to get reelected, and elected, there is NO WAY to remove him! the Senate needs ,67 votes to impeach....just another exercise in WASTING TAXPAYER MONEY!....ROTFLMFAO!
So what? He can still be impeached. Impeachment did wonders for Republicans when they did it. Imagine how well it will do for Democrats.

:dance:
Yes, a serial rapist compared to a willing partner...ROTFLMFAO...even MOST ABNORMALS know the difference, except you and the other low 2 digit, IQ communists that post in this thread!
Trump was only accused of rape by two women, I wouldn’t call him a “serial rapist.”


Bill paid off Paula jones for rape..


So you still can't figure this out can you
 
LOLOL

Again, it’s up to the FEC to decide. Their evidence? That trump didn’t pay Stormy to stay silent for 10 years until his election was just 11 days away. Clearly not to hide it from Melanie.

And if the FEC finds he violated campaign finance laws, then the House can impeach him based on the same evidence that he didn’t pay her off for 10 years.
The De!monRAT HOUSE can Impesch a ham sandwich.As with Clinton it is THE REPUBLICAN Senate that would have to convict to remove. And after Trump helping all those Senators to get reelected, and elected, there is NO WAY to remove him! the Senate needs ,67 votes to impeach....just another exercise in WASTING TAXPAYER MONEY!....ROTFLMFAO!

When the evidence shows he broke the law by paying off a porn star, stole money from the government, colluded with the NRA & Russia, sent Kushner to avoid MBS on how to lie about his killing? His name will be shit outside of Trump world.


Lets start naming which Republicans will lead the charge: Romney, Grahm,
You just make it up as you go, and use DNC bullshit talking points....ROTFLMFAO!!!

WHen it was discovered that Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign was guilty of violations involving nearly $2 million – an amount that dwarfs the $280,000 in Cohen’s case – the Obama Justice Department decided not to prosecute. Instead, the matter was quietly disposed of by a $375,000 fine by the Federal Election Commission.

A new head of the DOJ, will simply refuse to prosecute. As they did with the mulatto....watch the ABNORMALS Heads explode then....full RETARD....LOLOLOL!
Dumbfuck, the DoJ can’t touch a sitting president. You really are dumber than shit.
Asshole. All it takes is a CHANGE in DOJ regulations AS THEY DID FOR CLINTON, to indict a sitting president, it is up to the AMMENDABLE DOJ REGS......STUPID ASS!
LOLOL

What a moron you are, eh? Clinton was never indicted with any crime by the DoJ while he was president.

You idiots never learn. What a pity.
 
It’s a violation because it wasn’t reported.

It wasn't a campaign expenditure, no reason to report it.
Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election. The hush money was to protect his personal spotless reputation.:cuckoo::cuckoo:

Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election.

Doesn't matter, it wasn't a campaign expense.
How do you know that? Did you talk to Trump?

And by the way, prosecutors will charge it as a campaign finance crime/felony/expense because of the obvious. He needed to hide an affair weeks before the election, the money was not reported, it exceeded $2700 dollars, and it was reported to have come from stolen money out of his charity. Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016. A $130,000 payment would far exceed that limit. Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from. So for you to say it is not a campaign expense, is the joke of the day. Since Trump was lying, how in the hell do you know if it was an expense or not? Lol!

How do you know that?

Because it's not a campaign expense.
Why do you feel it is?
I asked you two questions. Can't you answer?

Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016.
I agree, a donation that size to the campaign would be an issue. This wasn't. It isn't.
Under what guidelines do you draw your conclusion?

Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from.
Lol! Because that tells us everything you idiot. :21: He wasn't straight with the American people exposing his lies about the source of the money. If you don't know the source, how can you claim it is or isn't a campaign expense? Answer, you can't, which is why you are so full of shit.

So for you to say it is not a campaign expense,
Was a check cut to the campaign? From the campaign?
You tell me? You are the one who said it wasn't an expense. Lol!
 
The De!monRAT HOUSE can Impesch a ham sandwich.As with Clinton it is THE REPUBLICAN Senate that would have to convict to remove. And after Trump helping all those Senators to get reelected, and elected, there is NO WAY to remove him! the Senate needs ,67 votes to impeach....just another exercise in WASTING TAXPAYER MONEY!....ROTFLMFAO!

When the evidence shows he broke the law by paying off a porn star, stole money from the government, colluded with the NRA & Russia, sent Kushner to avoid MBS on how to lie about his killing? His name will be shit outside of Trump world.


Lets start naming which Republicans will lead the charge: Romney, Grahm,
You just make it up as you go, and use DNC bullshit talking points....ROTFLMFAO!!!

WHen it was discovered that Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign was guilty of violations involving nearly $2 million – an amount that dwarfs the $280,000 in Cohen’s case – the Obama Justice Department decided not to prosecute. Instead, the matter was quietly disposed of by a $375,000 fine by the Federal Election Commission.

A new head of the DOJ, will simply refuse to prosecute. As they did with the mulatto....watch the ABNORMALS Heads explode then....full RETARD....LOLOLOL!
Dumbfuck, the DoJ can’t touch a sitting president. You really are dumber than shit.
Asshole. All it takes is a CHANGE in DOJ regulations AS THEY DID FOR CLINTON, to indict a sitting president, it is up to the AMMENDABLE DOJ REGS......STUPID ASS!
LOLOL

What a moron you are, eh? Clinton was never indicted with any crime by the DoJ while he was president.

You idiots never learn. What a pity.
Then why was he punished?
 
LOLOL

Of course there is. His actions spoke for him. He waited years to buy Stormy’s silence and never did so until weeks before his election. Clearly, it wasn’t to hide it from Melanie or he would have paid her off years earlier when Stormy first went public with their affair.
no--it's NOT so clear
in a court of law you need proof beyond reasonable doubt
you are just guessing/theorizing
LOLOL

That would be for a jury to decide if it would ever go to court, which it won’t.
Meanwhile, anyone with a functioning brain can see his motive when he didn’t pay for Storm’s silence when she first spoke up in 2006... never paid her during the next 10 years to keep it hidden from Melanie — but did pay her when his election was just 11 days away.

:lmao:

Anyway, it’s not going to court. It’s being investigated by the FEC and they will decide trump’s motive.


And if anything happens it will be a civil fine, nothing more.

.
It isn't a civil crime. It's a felony.


Bullshit you call it civil we call it a felony, it's who ever judge that day..who holds the cards like that piece of shit kneegro Eric holder who refused to indict felony crimes of Louis lerner.


.
Who cares what you call it? You’re a brain-dead con. What mattered was what the FEC called it and the FEC called it a civil offense.
 
The De!monRAT HOUSE can Impesch a ham sandwich.As with Clinton it is THE REPUBLICAN Senate that would have to convict to remove. And after Trump helping all those Senators to get reelected, and elected, there is NO WAY to remove him! the Senate needs ,67 votes to impeach....just another exercise in WASTING TAXPAYER MONEY!....ROTFLMFAO!

When the evidence shows he broke the law by paying off a porn star, stole money from the government, colluded with the NRA & Russia, sent Kushner to avoid MBS on how to lie about his killing? His name will be shit outside of Trump world.


Lets start naming which Republicans will lead the charge: Romney, Grahm,
You just make it up as you go, and use DNC bullshit talking points....ROTFLMFAO!!!

WHen it was discovered that Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign was guilty of violations involving nearly $2 million – an amount that dwarfs the $280,000 in Cohen’s case – the Obama Justice Department decided not to prosecute. Instead, the matter was quietly disposed of by a $375,000 fine by the Federal Election Commission.

A new head of the DOJ, will simply refuse to prosecute. As they did with the mulatto....watch the ABNORMALS Heads explode then....full RETARD....LOLOLOL!
Dumbfuck, the DoJ can’t touch a sitting president. You really are dumber than shit.
Asshole. All it takes is a CHANGE in DOJ regulations AS THEY DID FOR CLINTON, to indict a sitting president, it is up to the AMMENDABLE DOJ REGS......STUPID ASS!
LOLOL

What a moron you are, eh? Clinton was never indicted with any crime by the DoJ while he was president.

You idiots never learn. What a pity.
These folks are so unbelievably stupid.
 
Trump paid for it... then didn’t report it.


It was a personal expense paid with his own money, he didn't need to report it.

.
An expense used to hide an affair to help him get elected is looked upon as a campaign expenditure that was never reported according to prosecutors.
Like with Edwards, a jury would not believe that. POTUS did it to hide it from his wife, like all his other Clinton type payments

-Geaux
Oh? Then why did he wait so many years before paying off Daniels?
Save money, some of you ABNORMALS seem to think he's cheap....run with that!
LOL

Nutcase.... how did that save him money? He still paid her $130,000.00.
 
When the evidence shows he broke the law by paying off a porn star, stole money from the government, colluded with the NRA & Russia, sent Kushner to avoid MBS on how to lie about his killing? His name will be shit outside of Trump world.


Lets start naming which Republicans will lead the charge: Romney, Grahm,
You just make it up as you go, and use DNC bullshit talking points....ROTFLMFAO!!!

WHen it was discovered that Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign was guilty of violations involving nearly $2 million – an amount that dwarfs the $280,000 in Cohen’s case – the Obama Justice Department decided not to prosecute. Instead, the matter was quietly disposed of by a $375,000 fine by the Federal Election Commission.

A new head of the DOJ, will simply refuse to prosecute. As they did with the mulatto....watch the ABNORMALS Heads explode then....full RETARD....LOLOLOL!
Dumbfuck, the DoJ can’t touch a sitting president. You really are dumber than shit.
Asshole. All it takes is a CHANGE in DOJ regulations AS THEY DID FOR CLINTON, to indict a sitting president, it is up to the AMMENDABLE DOJ REGS......STUPID ASS!
LOLOL

What a moron you are, eh? Clinton was never indicted with any crime by the DoJ while he was president.

You idiots never learn. What a pity.
These folks are so unbelievably stupid.
I’m tellin’ ya, bro.
 
no--it's NOT so clear
in a court of law you need proof beyond reasonable doubt
you are just guessing/theorizing
LOLOL

That would be for a jury to decide if it would ever go to court, which it won’t.
Meanwhile, anyone with a functioning brain can see his motive when he didn’t pay for Storm’s silence when she first spoke up in 2006... never paid her during the next 10 years to keep it hidden from Melanie — but did pay her when his election was just 11 days away.

:lmao:

Anyway, it’s not going to court. It’s being investigated by the FEC and they will decide trump’s motive.


And if anything happens it will be a civil fine, nothing more.

.
It isn't a civil crime. It's a felony.


Bullshit you call it civil we call it a felony, it's who ever judge that day..who holds the cards like that piece of shit kneegro Eric holder who refused to indict felony crimes of Louis lerner.


.
Who cares what you call it? You’re a brain-dead con. What mattered was what the FEC called it and the FEC called it a civil offense.
As is this. Been there, done that.

As a woman, will you be voting for Melania?
 

Forum List

Back
Top