Trump has now been implicated in a federal crime

No trial --- no proof.
That makes zero sense. Of course there is proof, or Cohen would not have pled guilty. Of course there is proof, or federal prosecutors would not have declared it as fact in court. And spare me the goofy 'spiracy nonsense.


People plea to lesser crimes all the time that they didn't commit. That's not proof they actually did it. The charge was nothing but a way to try to connect Trump to wrong doing. It's no where close to proof that Trump did anything improper.

.
Yeah, people plea guilty to lesser crimes when offered a deal. But they’re still guilty of the original charges. How stupid do you have to be to plead guilty to any crime, and face prison, when you’re completely innocent?


????


Yoi never heard of plea bargain?

God damn anyone knows you plead guilty of a lessor crime than go to a jury trial....cops set people up.


It's basic math.. either do 6 months in jail or try to fight it and spend 6 years in prison
.

.


Faun you stupid as hell..

I remember being in jail this one guy was only there on the weekends (had to serve 3 months)


This other guy went to a jury trial and got 10 years for the same damn crime..


I fucking told him I the yard when we were playing hand ball don't go to a jury trial.

.
 
Do you have one from the campaign?
Let’s ask Stormy how she was paid
She will say the money came from Cohen......a violation

If Trump claims he paid Cohen......show us the check

She will say the money came from Cohen......a violation

Unless Cohen paid from campaign funds, how is it a violation?
It’s a violation because it wasn’t reported.

It wasn't a campaign expenditure, no reason to report it.
Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election. The hush money was to protect his personal spotless reputation.:cuckoo::cuckoo:

Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election.

Doesn't matter, it wasn't a campaign expense.
 
Quantity evidently is not relevant.

I person lying & telling his wife she does not look fat in that dress is exactly the same as lying to go to war or lying every fucking day to the American people.
I don't care if he lies
just as long as he MAGAs and keeps shitholers out of the US

Did you think he is lying to you when he claims to MASGA?
doesn't matter--just as long as Hillary is not POTUS
You are essentially a brainless human being who has zero thought process to think for yourself. It has nothing to do with Clinton, and everything to do with "YOU", you idiot. Don't you people get it?
You people ???
Trump Sheep! is that clear enough for you?
 
The law is nothing when it has ignored the obvious clown show in which snubbed the law during the Obama error, and corrupted the law during that error. Now all of a sudden the law means something again eh ??? Cherry picking the laws in order to make them apply sometimes or during some instances found in political situation's is a disgrace and deplorable usage of our laws.
The Great Obama had a scandal free administration for eight years. If Republicans had anything they would have held investigations

Oh.....wait
They had endless investigations that managed to find nothing
Investigations go no place when you have a free pass based upon the nation's fear of investigating a black president and his administration who could do no wrong in the EYESIGHT of the people, and this of course being based upon his skin color and not being based upon his character or his administration's actions for 8 years.

Then we have liberal Demon-crat whites riding the wave of protections found in the situation, otherwise hiding their bullcrap and corruption behind the black president who can't be touched no matter what (as based upon the nations mindset), and it being based upon the nation's past.

What a set up eh ??
Republicans had no problem investigating the first black president

What they had a problem with was finding actual facts to support their conspiracy theories
Where there's smoke there's fire, but don't anyone dare try and put the fire out right ??? Burn this mother down is the Demon-crats philosophy in order to push forward their anti-American agenda.
So you elected a con man fraud who broke the law & no one is supposed to care because prosecuting/impeaching might hurt this country?

Do you assfucks ever think before you post?
Didn't matter when the Demon-crats did it, so why exactly should anyone care at this point ?? It's about the economy now dummy.
 
I don't care if he lies
just as long as he MAGAs and keeps shitholers out of the US

Did you think he is lying to you when he claims to MASGA?
doesn't matter--just as long as Hillary is not POTUS
You are essentially a brainless human being who has zero thought process to think for yourself. It has nothing to do with Clinton, and everything to do with "YOU", you idiot. Don't you people get it?
You people ???
Trump Sheep! is that clear enough for you?
That's bigotry you ole hipocrite. Oh wait, Demon-crats don't engage in that do they ??? ROTFLMBO. Yes they do.
 
Let’s ask Stormy how she was paid
She will say the money came from Cohen......a violation

If Trump claims he paid Cohen......show us the check

She will say the money came from Cohen......a violation

Unless Cohen paid from campaign funds, how is it a violation?
It’s a violation because it wasn’t reported.

It wasn't a campaign expenditure, no reason to report it.
Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election. The hush money was to protect his personal spotless reputation.:cuckoo::cuckoo:

Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election.

Doesn't matter, it wasn't a campaign expense.
How do you know that? Did you talk to Trump?

And by the way, prosecutors will charge it as a campaign finance crime/felony/expense because of the obvious. He needed to hide an affair weeks before the election, the money was not reported, it exceeded $2700 dollars, and it was reported to have come from stolen money out of his charity. Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016. A $130,000 payment would far exceed that limit. Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from. So for you to say it is not a campaign expense, is the joke of the day. Since Trump was lying, how in the hell do you know if it was an expense or not? Lol!
 
She will say the money came from Cohen......a violation

Unless Cohen paid from campaign funds, how is it a violation?
It’s a violation because it wasn’t reported.

It wasn't a campaign expenditure, no reason to report it.
Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election. The hush money was to protect his personal spotless reputation.:cuckoo::cuckoo:

Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election.

Doesn't matter, it wasn't a campaign expense.
How do you know that? Did you talk to Trump?

And by the way, prosecutors will charge it as a campaign finance crime/felony/expense because of the obvious. He needed to hide an affair weeks before the election, the money was not reported, it exceeded $2700 dollars, and it was reported to have come from stolen money out of his charity. Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016. A $130,000 payment would far exceed that limit. Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from. So for you to say it is not a campaign expense, is the joke of the day. Since Trump was lying, how in the hell do you know if it was an expense or not? Lol!
how is it obvious?
 
Did you think he is lying to you when he claims to MASGA?
doesn't matter--just as long as Hillary is not POTUS
You are essentially a brainless human being who has zero thought process to think for yourself. It has nothing to do with Clinton, and everything to do with "YOU", you idiot. Don't you people get it?
You people ???
Trump Sheep! is that clear enough for you?
That's bigotry you ole hipocrite. Oh wait, Demon-crats don't engage in that do they ??? ROTFLMBO. Yes they do.
I do, and I proved it with the very argument you can't handle.
 
It’s a violation because it wasn’t reported.

It wasn't a campaign expenditure, no reason to report it.
Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election. The hush money was to protect his personal spotless reputation.:cuckoo::cuckoo:

Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election.

Doesn't matter, it wasn't a campaign expense.
How do you know that? Did you talk to Trump?

And by the way, prosecutors will charge it as a campaign finance crime/felony/expense because of the obvious. He needed to hide an affair weeks before the election, the money was not reported, it exceeded $2700 dollars, and it was reported to have come from stolen money out of his charity. Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016. A $130,000 payment would far exceed that limit. Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from. So for you to say it is not a campaign expense, is the joke of the day. Since Trump was lying, how in the hell do you know if it was an expense or not? Lol!
how is it obvious?
Can you read? He needed to hide an affair weeks before the election, the money was not reported, it exceeded $2700 dollars, and it was reported to have come from stolen money out of his charity. Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016. A $130,000 payment would far exceed that limit. Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from. So for you to say it is not a campaign expense, is the joke of the day. Since Trump was lying, how in the hell do you know if it was an expense or not? Lol! Learn to read the obvious fool.
 
She will say the money came from Cohen......a violation

Unless Cohen paid from campaign funds, how is it a violation?
It’s a violation because it wasn’t reported.

It wasn't a campaign expenditure, no reason to report it.
Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election. The hush money was to protect his personal spotless reputation.:cuckoo::cuckoo:

Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election.

Doesn't matter, it wasn't a campaign expense.
How do you know that? Did you talk to Trump?

And by the way, prosecutors will charge it as a campaign finance crime/felony/expense because of the obvious. He needed to hide an affair weeks before the election, the money was not reported, it exceeded $2700 dollars, and it was reported to have come from stolen money out of his charity. Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016. A $130,000 payment would far exceed that limit. Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from. So for you to say it is not a campaign expense, is the joke of the day. Since Trump was lying, how in the hell do you know if it was an expense or not? Lol!
they don't charge people if something APPEARS to be obvious--but on evidence!!
 
It’s a violation because it wasn’t reported.

It wasn't a campaign expenditure, no reason to report it.
Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election. The hush money was to protect his personal spotless reputation.:cuckoo::cuckoo:

Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election.

Doesn't matter, it wasn't a campaign expense.
How do you know that? Did you talk to Trump?

And by the way, prosecutors will charge it as a campaign finance crime/felony/expense because of the obvious. He needed to hide an affair weeks before the election, the money was not reported, it exceeded $2700 dollars, and it was reported to have come from stolen money out of his charity. Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016. A $130,000 payment would far exceed that limit. Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from. So for you to say it is not a campaign expense, is the joke of the day. Since Trump was lying, how in the hell do you know if it was an expense or not? Lol!
they don't charge people if something APPEARS to be obvious--but on evidence!!
The obvious is the evidence fool.
 
It would not surprise me in the least if Adam Schiff and Devin Nunes have been, and will continue to, leak classified information on this and many other matters.

That in no way affects the rampant criminality of the useless eater currently living in the White House:

Adam Schiff on "Face the Nation" says Trump faces "real prospect of jail time" after leaving office - CBS News

"Schiff said the court documents suggest that the 'president of the United States not only coordinated, but directed an illegal campaign scheme' to alter the outcome of the 2016 election.

"Asked if the revelations in the filings meet the standard for an impeachable offense, Schiff demurred and said more investigative work needs to be completed by the House Intelligence Committee and special counsel Robert Mueller, particularly on any possible collusion or coordination between Trump campaign associates and the Russian government.

"Still, he said the separate memo by the special counsel on Cohen includes other damaging information on Mr. Trump that contradicts the president's repeated statements on the campaign trail that he had no business ventures in Russia.

"'In fact they were having private conversations seeking to enlist the Kremlin's help in a project that could make him tens or hundreds of millions of dollars, a project that might need Putin's approval while they were arguing that sanctions on Russia should go away,' Schiff said." 'That's pretty breathtaking.'"

Do you believe Donald Trump lies more often than Schiff or Nunes?
Go buy a clue...

Adam Schiff's Statements Are Frequently False Or Missing Key Details
The Federalist

View attachment 233788
Jan 30, 2018 · Adam Schiff is portrayed by many in the media as a straight shooter. His record in reality is of fanning the flames of every single Trump-Russia collusion allegation out there. ... As soon as the committee had finished voting, ranking member Rep. Adam Schiff ran to the cameras to spin
Why do you find it so difficult to defend Trump's criminal actions?

The Michael Cohen Sentencing Memos Are Damning for Trump

"In September, 2015, Trump approved Cohen’s plan to reach out to the Russian government.

"That November, Cohen 'spoke with a Russian national who claimed to be a ‘trusted person’ in the Russian Federation who could offer the campaign ‘political synergy’ and ‘synergy on a government level.’

"Cohen’s contact 'repeatedly proposed' a meeting between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, suggesting that it would have a 'phenomenal' effect on Trump’s efforts to build a Trump Tower in Moscow, which Mueller’s filing calls the 'Moscow Project.'"

Are you truly gullible enough to believe Trump is NOT a gold-plated con man who lies as often as most people breathe?
He is in the first couple of stages of the grieving process.

new-understanding-the-stages-of-grief-1.png
Which of those Seven Stages of Grief do you imagine Trump currently occupies?

The Michael Cohen Sentencing Memos Are Damning for Trump

"The Southern District of New York’s simultaneously released sentencing memo also has serious legal ramifications for the President.

"In describing how Cohen bought the silence of two women with whom Trump had affairs in order to help Trump win the Presidency, it makes clear that Cohen 'acted in coordination with and at the direction of Individual-1.'

"Three months ago, Cohen said in his guilty plea that this was true and that the President was implicated in a criminal scheme to sway the election.

"Now, though, federal prosecutors working under Robert Khuzami, the acting U.S. Attorney, feel confident enough in this assertion that they have tied themselves to it."

I'm guessing "Anger."


President was implicated in a criminal scheme to sway the election.


By saying he didn't have sex with that woman? Or paying off another girl almost a million dollars in a civil suit while he was president?


Quit embarrassing yourselves..


.
Anyone who voted for or supports Trump really shouldn't lecture about embarrassment:
95c0b45760d5f433c94b05b683c8258d.jpg


Michael Cohen told Mueller's office about contacts between Trump aides and Russia

"After the filing from Mueller, Trump tweeted that it 'totally clears the President. Thank you!'

"But in fact there was nothing in either court filing that exonerated Trump, and one portion strongly suggested that Trump was personally involved in a campaign finance violation.

"The Manhattan prosecutors said Cohen had paid off two women to suppress their stories about affairs with Trump — a campaign expense that was improperly not reported — and said he did so "in coordination with and at the direction of" Trump."
 
She will say the money came from Cohen......a violation

Unless Cohen paid from campaign funds, how is it a violation?
It’s a violation because it wasn’t reported.

It wasn't a campaign expenditure, no reason to report it.
Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election. The hush money was to protect his personal spotless reputation.:cuckoo::cuckoo:

Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election.

Doesn't matter, it wasn't a campaign expense.
How do you know that? Did you talk to Trump?

And by the way, prosecutors will charge it as a campaign finance crime/felony/expense because of the obvious. He needed to hide an affair weeks before the election, the money was not reported, it exceeded $2700 dollars, and it was reported to have come from stolen money out of his charity. Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016. A $130,000 payment would far exceed that limit. Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from. So for you to say it is not a campaign expense, is the joke of the day. Since Trump was lying, how in the hell do you know if it was an expense or not? Lol!
Doesn't rise to the level. Been there, done that.

However, just to show there's no hard feelings, The Reps can run Melania for President in 20 years.
 
LOLOL

Again, it’s up to the FEC to decide. Their evidence? That trump didn’t pay Stormy to stay silent for 10 years until his election was just 11 days away. Clearly not to hide it from Melanie.

And if the FEC finds he violated campaign finance laws, then the House can impeach him based on the same evidence that he didn’t pay her off for 10 years.


Maobama was fined 370,000 by the FEC, where was your impeachment talk then? Hypocrite.

.
Obama was fined for inadvertently not reporting campaign finances. We’ll see if the FEC finds the same for trump, who secretively paid off a porn star to keep her mouth shut.


It's all comes down to intent, did Trump intend to violate laws he had never been subject to just a year before? Candidates rely on lawyers to keep them straight, Trumps lawyer seems to have failed. That doesn't prove intent on Trump, if it was a violation at all, which is debatable. BTW failing to report is failing to report, where's the equal treatment under the law?

.


Trump: get some money to Story for her silence
Cohen: But that is illegal
Trump Do it.


Who cares? It's a civil suit..


.
It's a felony. Just ask prosecutors.
 
It wasn't a campaign expenditure, no reason to report it.
Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election. The hush money was to protect his personal spotless reputation.:cuckoo::cuckoo:

Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election.

Doesn't matter, it wasn't a campaign expense.
How do you know that? Did you talk to Trump?

And by the way, prosecutors will charge it as a campaign finance crime/felony/expense because of the obvious. He needed to hide an affair weeks before the election, the money was not reported, it exceeded $2700 dollars, and it was reported to have come from stolen money out of his charity. Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016. A $130,000 payment would far exceed that limit. Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from. So for you to say it is not a campaign expense, is the joke of the day. Since Trump was lying, how in the hell do you know if it was an expense or not? Lol!
how is it obvious?
Can you read? He needed to hide an affair weeks before the election, the money was not reported, it exceeded $2700 dollars, and it was reported to have come from stolen money out of his charity. Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016. A $130,000 payment would far exceed that limit. Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from. So for you to say it is not a campaign expense, is the joke of the day. Since Trump was lying, how in the hell do you know if it was an expense or not? Lol! Learn to read the obvious fool.
:laugh::laugh::laugh:
and what is the PROOF he did it for election aspects?? !!! ???

you must be under the impression there would not be a trial where the defense does not get to make a case..............!!!!!!!!
DUMBASS
 
It’s a violation because it wasn’t reported.

It wasn't a campaign expenditure, no reason to report it.
Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election. The hush money was to protect his personal spotless reputation.:cuckoo::cuckoo:

Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election.

Doesn't matter, it wasn't a campaign expense.
How do you know that? Did you talk to Trump?

And by the way, prosecutors will charge it as a campaign finance crime/felony/expense because of the obvious. He needed to hide an affair weeks before the election, the money was not reported, it exceeded $2700 dollars, and it was reported to have come from stolen money out of his charity. Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016. A $130,000 payment would far exceed that limit. Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from. So for you to say it is not a campaign expense, is the joke of the day. Since Trump was lying, how in the hell do you know if it was an expense or not? Lol!
Doesn't rise to the level. Been there, done that.

However, just to show there's no hard feelings, The Reps can run Melania for President in 20 years.
A misdemeanor rises to the level, and this one is a federal crime. Lol! Shows what you know.
 
Maobama was fined 370,000 by the FEC, where was your impeachment talk then? Hypocrite.

.
Obama was fined for inadvertently not reporting campaign finances. We’ll see if the FEC finds the same for trump, who secretively paid off a porn star to keep her mouth shut.


It's all comes down to intent, did Trump intend to violate laws he had never been subject to just a year before? Candidates rely on lawyers to keep them straight, Trumps lawyer seems to have failed. That doesn't prove intent on Trump, if it was a violation at all, which is debatable. BTW failing to report is failing to report, where's the equal treatment under the law?

.


Trump: get some money to Story for her silence
Cohen: But that is illegal
Trump Do it.


Who cares? It's a civil suit..


.
It's a felony. Just ask prosecutors.


What Hillary did was a felony, what nixion did was a felony..


Now conviction is another thing..
 
It wasn't a campaign expenditure, no reason to report it.
Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election. The hush money was to protect his personal spotless reputation.:cuckoo::cuckoo:

Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election.

Doesn't matter, it wasn't a campaign expense.
How do you know that? Did you talk to Trump?

And by the way, prosecutors will charge it as a campaign finance crime/felony/expense because of the obvious. He needed to hide an affair weeks before the election, the money was not reported, it exceeded $2700 dollars, and it was reported to have come from stolen money out of his charity. Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016. A $130,000 payment would far exceed that limit. Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from. So for you to say it is not a campaign expense, is the joke of the day. Since Trump was lying, how in the hell do you know if it was an expense or not? Lol!
Doesn't rise to the level. Been there, done that.

However, just to show there's no hard feelings, The Reps can run Melania for President in 20 years.
A misdemeanor rises to the level, and this one is a federal crime. Lol! Shows what you know.
Lying to a grand jury is a felony. Been there, done that.

Melania can be the most qualified person to ever run for Prez.
 
It wasn't a campaign expenditure, no reason to report it.
Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election. The hush money was to protect his personal spotless reputation.:cuckoo::cuckoo:

Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election.

Doesn't matter, it wasn't a campaign expense.
How do you know that? Did you talk to Trump?

And by the way, prosecutors will charge it as a campaign finance crime/felony/expense because of the obvious. He needed to hide an affair weeks before the election, the money was not reported, it exceeded $2700 dollars, and it was reported to have come from stolen money out of his charity. Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016. A $130,000 payment would far exceed that limit. Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from. So for you to say it is not a campaign expense, is the joke of the day. Since Trump was lying, how in the hell do you know if it was an expense or not? Lol!
they don't charge people if something APPEARS to be obvious--but on evidence!!
The obvious is the evidence fool.
you just made a fatal/irrevocable error:
no the obvious is NOT evidence!!!!
you fked up
they didn't/could charge OJ without all the blood evidence/etc
 
Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election. The hush money was to protect his personal spotless reputation.:cuckoo::cuckoo:

Trump wasn't concerned about adulterous affairs swaying the religious right in the election.

Doesn't matter, it wasn't a campaign expense.
How do you know that? Did you talk to Trump?

And by the way, prosecutors will charge it as a campaign finance crime/felony/expense because of the obvious. He needed to hide an affair weeks before the election, the money was not reported, it exceeded $2700 dollars, and it was reported to have come from stolen money out of his charity. Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016. A $130,000 payment would far exceed that limit. Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from. So for you to say it is not a campaign expense, is the joke of the day. Since Trump was lying, how in the hell do you know if it was an expense or not? Lol!
how is it obvious?
Can you read? He needed to hide an affair weeks before the election, the money was not reported, it exceeded $2700 dollars, and it was reported to have come from stolen money out of his charity. Under federal law, an individual could not donate more than $2,700 directly to Trump’s primary or general election campaign in 2016. A $130,000 payment would far exceed that limit. Remember, Trump already lied about where the money came from. So for you to say it is not a campaign expense, is the joke of the day. Since Trump was lying, how in the hell do you know if it was an expense or not? Lol! Learn to read the obvious fool.
:laugh::laugh::laugh:
and what is the PROOF he did it for election aspects?? !!! ???

you must be under the impression there would not be a trial where the defense does not get to make a case..............!!!!!!!!
DUMBASS
I never said there wouldn't. I'm telling you that the feds are looking at this through a window of being a felony. If you want to plant things no one said, that's on you, not me. All that is is a lie.

Did it for " election aspects"? What the hell is that?
 

Forum List

Back
Top