Trump: If Hillary wins Pennsylvania, she cheated

[IsaacNewton]

I'm waiting for trump to come out and say "I think we need to check into Hillary's past games of checkers, I mean no one's checked that as far as I know, I think it's possible, I mean, you don't know, it's possible, if she won a single game of checkers she cheated. There's no way she could win a game of checkers, so, and you can't say one way or the other but seriously, have you ever seen Hillary Clinton win at checkers? I don't think anyone has so you just don't know, but I think, I've heard, that her checker games could have been rigged, much like the election."

Bat --- shite --- cray --- cray

I don't think we need any more evidence that Hillary is the cheating type.

We're just waiting for others in authority to acknowledge that, much less do anything about it.

I surely would not put steering an election past her (although I don't think that will be necessary). Many have done it.

Yes please, explain how that is 'done'.

In 2008 Minnesota Senate race incumbent republican Norm Coleman narrowly defeated democrat Al Franken. Close enough that a recount was mandated. In the recount, Al Franken was declared the winner by a 312 vote edge. Rampant voter fraud charges followed. And yet, nothing came of it for reasons I cannot recall? But it was Franken’s election that gave Obama the vote he needed to pass Obamacare.

One case of voter fraud alone found in many links shows how Franken could have tipped the election. The whole system is absolutely bogus and corrupt. Is everyone blackmailed to shut up?

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Widespread Voter Fraud Documented in New Minnesota Supreme Court Case - American Experiment

But for voter fraud in Minnesota, we would not have Obamacare. That is the scenario of a case being heard by the Supreme Court of Minnesota, over likely voter fraud that made the difference in the 2008 election of Senator Al Franken, whose vote was absolutely necessary for the passage of Obamacare.

After a grueling recount, the Minnesota Voters Alliance (MVA) found 941 ineligible felons who were allowed to vote in 2008 alone, exceeding the 312 vote margin separating DFL candidate Al Franken and GOP Sen. Norm Coleman after a grueling recount.

This is stunning. It was Franken’s razor-thin “victory” over incumbent Senator Norm Coleman that allowed the Democrats to ram Obamacare down the throats of the American people. If we assume that 80% of the 941 ineligible felons voted for Al Franken–a conservative assumption, as nearly all convicted felons are Democrats–then Franken’s victory is attributable to voter fraud.

The lawyers representing plaintiffs in the case have done a great deal of digging, and have come up with names, dates and places–illegal votes that likely swung Minnesota elections toward Democratic candidates. The illegal votes that plaintiffs have been able to document are only a small fraction of the actual total:

Court papers demonstrate how the incomplete list of ineligible voters provided to local election officials routinely allows felons, wards of the state, immigrants [who are not citizens] and other ineligible persons to register and vote.

“The 1,366 identified felons who have been permitted to vote is believed to be only a fraction of the true total,” the 110 page court petition filed by MVA and former Rep. Kirk Stensrud states. “Cooperation from the Secretary of State would have allowed for a more complete accounting of the number of ineligible persons who have been permitted to vote.”

The Minnesota Voters Alliance group behind the challenge alleges the actual number of illegal ballots submitted by ineligible voters far surpasses the 1,670 votes documented through a painstaking search of voting records hampered by a lack of cooperation by Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon.images

Altogether, more than 100,000 Minnesota felons had their right to vote restricted and reported to the Minnesota Secretary of State between 2003 and 2015. But the Minnesota Secretary of State only notifies local election officials of the ineligible status of felons and others if they’re already registered to vote in the Statewide Voter Registration System.

Court papers demonstrate how the incomplete list of ineligible voters provided to local election officials routinely allows felons, wards of the state, immigrants and other ineligible persons to register and vote.

“The 1,366 identified felons who have been permitted to vote is believed to be only a fraction of the true total,” the 110 page court petition filed by MVA and former Rep. Kirk Stensrud states. “Cooperation from the Secretary of State would have allowed for a more complete accounting of the number of ineligible persons who have been permitted to vote.”

Secretary of State Simon has refused to release the data that would enable MVA to verify the actual number of ineligible people that have illegally cast a vote. In holding back the critical government data, Simon has ignored a Minnesota Department of Administration opinion stating that the voting records in question should be made public. “The Secretary of State plays a significant role with other election officials in permitting known ineligible felons to register or to vote,” court documents state.

Riiight. Norm Coleman's lawyers couldn't get anywhere in court? Hmm, wonder why.

Because there are a lot of competing forces at work int he political world, and sometimes they influence judgments. This one is hardly a precedence.

If you have direct evidence then go to the FBI or Attorney General. The documented cases of actual voter fraud have been less than 10 if I remember correctly. It is an issue that does not exist.

I DO think they need to keep voting a paper only endeavor as using electronic machines with computers IS to easy to hack and cheat with. But until there is some proven incident of large scale fraud or tampering it is a non-issue. Trump saying it only shows that he knows what is coming now.

 

[OldLady]

What an irresponsible idiot. You cannot steal an election by any means unless it is very, very, very close.

Keep in mind, Trump believes every conspiracy theory he hears

To him, it is very real

Well this could also be a ploy to get supporters to stalk polling places and attempt to intimidate minority voters. It sounds too Machiavellian for him to come up with but he has a bunch of like-minded yes men who could have put the idea in his ear.

It's not that thought out, imo. It's the narcissism shining through. The ONLY way to beat him is to cheat because he CANNOT be responsible for losing. That would involve accepting a certain amount of criticism, if you look at it that he didn't have the best personality, the best ideas, the best everything. He cannot accept that. It will be the media or the Clinton campaign cheating at the voting booth, if he loses. It will never ever be Trump's fault.

 

[owebo]

I don't think we need any more evidence that Hillary is the cheating type.

We're just waiting for others in authority to acknowledge that, much less do anything about it.

I surely would not put steering an election past her (although I don't think that will be necessary). Many have done it.

Yes please, explain how that is 'done'.

In 2008 Minnesota Senate race incumbent republican Norm Coleman narrowly defeated democrat Al Franken. Close enough that a recount was mandated. In the recount, Al Franken was declared the winner by a 312 vote edge. Rampant voter fraud charges followed. And yet, nothing came of it for reasons I cannot recall? But it was Franken’s election that gave Obama the vote he needed to pass Obamacare.

One case of voter fraud alone found in many links shows how Franken could have tipped the election. The whole system is absolutely bogus and corrupt. Is everyone blackmailed to shut up?

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Widespread Voter Fraud Documented in New Minnesota Supreme Court Case - American Experiment

But for voter fraud in Minnesota, we would not have Obamacare. That is the scenario of a case being heard by the Supreme Court of Minnesota, over likely voter fraud that made the difference in the 2008 election of Senator Al Franken, whose vote was absolutely necessary for the passage of Obamacare.

After a grueling recount, the Minnesota Voters Alliance (MVA) found 941 ineligible felons who were allowed to vote in 2008 alone, exceeding the 312 vote margin separating DFL candidate Al Franken and GOP Sen. Norm Coleman after a grueling recount.

This is stunning. It was Franken’s razor-thin “victory” over incumbent Senator Norm Coleman that allowed the Democrats to ram Obamacare down the throats of the American people. If we assume that 80% of the 941 ineligible felons voted for Al Franken–a conservative assumption, as nearly all convicted felons are Democrats–then Franken’s victory is attributable to voter fraud.

The lawyers representing plaintiffs in the case have done a great deal of digging, and have come up with names, dates and places–illegal votes that likely swung Minnesota elections toward Democratic candidates. The illegal votes that plaintiffs have been able to document are only a small fraction of the actual total:

Court papers demonstrate how the incomplete list of ineligible voters provided to local election officials routinely allows felons, wards of the state, immigrants [who are not citizens] and other ineligible persons to register and vote.

“The 1,366 identified felons who have been permitted to vote is believed to be only a fraction of the true total,” the 110 page court petition filed by MVA and former Rep. Kirk Stensrud states. “Cooperation from the Secretary of State would have allowed for a more complete accounting of the number of ineligible persons who have been permitted to vote.”

The Minnesota Voters Alliance group behind the challenge alleges the actual number of illegal ballots submitted by ineligible voters far surpasses the 1,670 votes documented through a painstaking search of voting records hampered by a lack of cooperation by Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon.images

Altogether, more than 100,000 Minnesota felons had their right to vote restricted and reported to the Minnesota Secretary of State between 2003 and 2015. But the Minnesota Secretary of State only notifies local election officials of the ineligible status of felons and others if they’re already registered to vote in the Statewide Voter Registration System.

Court papers demonstrate how the incomplete list of ineligible voters provided to local election officials routinely allows felons, wards of the state, immigrants and other ineligible persons to register and vote.

“The 1,366 identified felons who have been permitted to vote is believed to be only a fraction of the true total,” the 110 page court petition filed by MVA and former Rep. Kirk Stensrud states. “Cooperation from the Secretary of State would have allowed for a more complete accounting of the number of ineligible persons who have been permitted to vote.”

Secretary of State Simon has refused to release the data that would enable MVA to verify the actual number of ineligible people that have illegally cast a vote. In holding back the critical government data, Simon has ignored a Minnesota Department of Administration opinion stating that the voting records in question should be made public. “The Secretary of State plays a significant role with other election officials in permitting known ineligible felons to register or to vote,” court documents state.

Riiight. Norm Coleman's lawyers couldn't get anywhere in court? Hmm, wonder why.

Because there are a lot of competing forces at work int he political world, and sometimes they influence judgments. This one is hardly a precedence.

If you have direct evidence then go to the FBI or Attorney General. The documented cases of actual voter fraud have been less than 10 if I remember correctly. It is an issue that does not exist.

I DO think they need to keep voting a paper only endeavor as using electronic machines with computers IS to easy to hack and cheat with. But until there is some proven incident of large scale fraud or tampering it is a non-issue. Trump saying it only shows that he knows what is coming now.

You fucking uneducated liberals are a danger to America....

SEQUOIA VOTING MACHINE SYSTEMS ELECTION RESULTS MEMORY CARTRIDGE CARD SIZE 32MB

 

[SwimExpert]

You fucking uneducated liberals are a danger to America....

As opposed to uneducated anarchists like yourself?

 

[owebo]

You fucking uneducated liberals are a danger to America....

As opposed to uneducated anarchists like yourself?

See.....

 

[Toro]

Cheating can be the only reason.

Also, trailing by 10 points in the polls.

 

[OldLady]

You guys have the weirdest damned voting apparatus in your states. Where I vote, and everyplace I've ever voted in three states, I go to my ASSIGNED polling place, my name is on the list, it is CHECKED OFF when I enter to vote.
How am I supposed to vote again when I am only allowed to vote in one place and it is on record that I have already voted?

 

[owebo]

You guys have the weirdest damned voting apparatus in your states. Where I vote, and everyplace I've ever voted in three states, I go to my ASSIGNED polling place, my name is on the list, it is CHECKED OFF when I enter to vote.
How am I supposed to vote again when I am only allowed to vote in one place and it is on record that I have already voted?

The dead all agree with you....

 

[BULLDOG]

I'm waiting for trump to come out and say "I think we need to check into Hillary's past games of checkers, I mean no one's checked that as far as I know, I think it's possible, I mean, you don't know, it's possible, if she won a single game of checkers she cheated. There's no way she could win a game of checkers, so, and you can't say one way or the other but seriously, have you ever seen Hillary Clinton win at checkers? I don't think anyone has so you just don't know, but I think, I've heard, that her checker games could have been rigged, much like the election."

Bat --- shite --- cray --- cray

I don't think we need any more evidence that Hillary is the cheating type.

We're just waiting for others in authority to acknowledge that, much less do anything about it.

I surely would not put steering an election past her (although I don't think that will be necessary). Many have done it.

Yes please, explain how that is 'done'.

In 2008 Minnesota Senate race incumbent republican Norm Coleman narrowly defeated democrat Al Franken. Close enough that a recount was mandated. In the recount, Al Franken was declared the winner by a 312 vote edge. Rampant voter fraud charges followed. And yet, nothing came of it for reasons I cannot recall? But it was Franken’s election that gave Obama the vote he needed to pass Obamacare.

One case of voter fraud alone found in many links shows how Franken could have tipped the election. The whole system is absolutely bogus and corrupt. Is everyone blackmailed to shut up?

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Widespread Voter Fraud Documented in New Minnesota Supreme Court Case - American Experiment

But for voter fraud in Minnesota, we would not have Obamacare. That is the scenario of a case being heard by the Supreme Court of Minnesota, over likely voter fraud that made the difference in the 2008 election of Senator Al Franken, whose vote was absolutely necessary for the passage of Obamacare.

After a grueling recount, the Minnesota Voters Alliance (MVA) found 941 ineligible felons who were allowed to vote in 2008 alone, exceeding the 312 vote margin separating DFL candidate Al Franken and GOP Sen. Norm Coleman after a grueling recount.

This is stunning. It was Franken’s razor-thin “victory” over incumbent Senator Norm Coleman that allowed the Democrats to ram Obamacare down the throats of the American people. If we assume that 80% of the 941 ineligible felons voted for Al Franken–a conservative assumption, as nearly all convicted felons are Democrats–then Franken’s victory is attributable to voter fraud.

The lawyers representing plaintiffs in the case have done a great deal of digging, and have come up with names, dates and places–illegal votes that likely swung Minnesota elections toward Democratic candidates. The illegal votes that plaintiffs have been able to document are only a small fraction of the actual total:

Court papers demonstrate how the incomplete list of ineligible voters provided to local election officials routinely allows felons, wards of the state, immigrants [who are not citizens] and other ineligible persons to register and vote.

“The 1,366 identified felons who have been permitted to vote is believed to be only a fraction of the true total,” the 110 page court petition filed by MVA and former Rep. Kirk Stensrud states. “Cooperation from the Secretary of State would have allowed for a more complete accounting of the number of ineligible persons who have been permitted to vote.”

The Minnesota Voters Alliance group behind the challenge alleges the actual number of illegal ballots submitted by ineligible voters far surpasses the 1,670 votes documented through a painstaking search of voting records hampered by a lack of cooperation by Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon.images

Altogether, more than 100,000 Minnesota felons had their right to vote restricted and reported to the Minnesota Secretary of State between 2003 and 2015. But the Minnesota Secretary of State only notifies local election officials of the ineligible status of felons and others if they’re already registered to vote in the Statewide Voter Registration System.

Court papers demonstrate how the incomplete list of ineligible voters provided to local election officials routinely allows felons, wards of the state, immigrants and other ineligible persons to register and vote.

“The 1,366 identified felons who have been permitted to vote is believed to be only a fraction of the true total,” the 110 page court petition filed by MVA and former Rep. Kirk Stensrud states. “Cooperation from the Secretary of State would have allowed for a more complete accounting of the number of ineligible persons who have been permitted to vote.”

Secretary of State Simon has refused to release the data that would enable MVA to verify the actual number of ineligible people that have illegally cast a vote. In holding back the critical government data, Simon has ignored a Minnesota Department of Administration opinion stating that the voting records in question should be made public. “The Secretary of State plays a significant role with other election officials in permitting known ineligible felons to register or to vote,” court documents state.

Riiight. Norm Coleman's lawyers couldn't get anywhere in court? Hmm, wonder why.

Liberal judge......

That's the excuse you use for everything. A ruling doesn't go your way-----"liberal judge". A right wing led investigation doesn't go your way--------"liberal investigators" . The FBI chooses not to indict Hillary-------" Comey was afraid he would be fired by liberals" Can't you just admit that you were fed a line of bullshit that just doesn't hold up under scrutiny? False accusations will always be determined to be false eventually, no matter how much you hope otherwise.

 

[turzovka]

If you have direct evidence then go to the FBI or Attorney General. The documented cases of actual voter fraud have been less than 10 if I remember correctly. It is an issue that does not exist.

I DO think they need to keep voting a paper only endeavor as using electronic machines with computers IS to easy to hack and cheat with. But until there is some proven incident of large scale fraud or tampering it is a non-issue. Trump saying it only shows that he knows what is coming now.

Oh, sure. The Attorney General has proven to be totally in the bag for the president. How naive can anyone be to think these people are not under direct orders? How many scandals and bogus judgement and timid backoffs by the opposition do we have to be made aware of? Only the internet media has the courage to reveal the truth to all the subterfuge there is in Washington. I suppose you saw no questionable judgments by the head of the FBI lately either?

The minnesota senate case was a huge national matter. Not in the least do I doubt this was manipulated, maybe by both sides. I am sure if there was a judgement it was biased, maybe by coercion, or maybe the rulers had a strong preference.

I am not talking about Trump at all and surely not defending his desperate comments.

 

[jillian]

Note: Hillary is leading in Pennsylvania by TEN points

Donald Trump claims he'll only lose Pennsylvania if there's cheating - CNNPolitics.com

"We're going to watch Pennsylvania. Go down to certain areas and watch and study and make sure other people don't come in and vote five times," he said at a rally in Altoona, Pennsylvania. "If you do that, we're not going to lose. The only way we can lose, in my opinion -- I really mean this, Pennsylvania -- is if cheating goes on."




.

yeah, that ought to help donald.

what a nutter.

 

[turzovka]

I don't think we need any more evidence that Hillary is the cheating type.

We're just waiting for others in authority to acknowledge that, much less do anything about it.

I surely would not put steering an election past her (although I don't think that will be necessary). Many have done it.

Yes please, explain how that is 'done'.

In 2008 Minnesota Senate race incumbent republican Norm Coleman narrowly defeated democrat Al Franken. Close enough that a recount was mandated. In the recount, Al Franken was declared the winner by a 312 vote edge. Rampant voter fraud charges followed. And yet, nothing came of it for reasons I cannot recall? But it was Franken’s election that gave Obama the vote he needed to pass Obamacare.

One case of voter fraud alone found in many links shows how Franken could have tipped the election. The whole system is absolutely bogus and corrupt. Is everyone blackmailed to shut up?

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Widespread Voter Fraud Documented in New Minnesota Supreme Court Case - American Experiment

But for voter fraud in Minnesota, we would not have Obamacare. That is the scenario of a case being heard by the Supreme Court of Minnesota, over likely voter fraud that made the difference in the 2008 election of Senator Al Franken, whose vote was absolutely necessary for the passage of Obamacare.

After a grueling recount, the Minnesota Voters Alliance (MVA) found 941 ineligible felons who were allowed to vote in 2008 alone, exceeding the 312 vote margin separating DFL candidate Al Franken and GOP Sen. Norm Coleman after a grueling recount.

This is stunning. It was Franken’s razor-thin “victory” over incumbent Senator Norm Coleman that allowed the Democrats to ram Obamacare down the throats of the American people. If we assume that 80% of the 941 ineligible felons voted for Al Franken–a conservative assumption, as nearly all convicted felons are Democrats–then Franken’s victory is attributable to voter fraud.

The lawyers representing plaintiffs in the case have done a great deal of digging, and have come up with names, dates and places–illegal votes that likely swung Minnesota elections toward Democratic candidates. The illegal votes that plaintiffs have been able to document are only a small fraction of the actual total:

Court papers demonstrate how the incomplete list of ineligible voters provided to local election officials routinely allows felons, wards of the state, immigrants [who are not citizens] and other ineligible persons to register and vote.

“The 1,366 identified felons who have been permitted to vote is believed to be only a fraction of the true total,” the 110 page court petition filed by MVA and former Rep. Kirk Stensrud states. “Cooperation from the Secretary of State would have allowed for a more complete accounting of the number of ineligible persons who have been permitted to vote.”

The Minnesota Voters Alliance group behind the challenge alleges the actual number of illegal ballots submitted by ineligible voters far surpasses the 1,670 votes documented through a painstaking search of voting records hampered by a lack of cooperation by Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon.images

Altogether, more than 100,000 Minnesota felons had their right to vote restricted and reported to the Minnesota Secretary of State between 2003 and 2015. But the Minnesota Secretary of State only notifies local election officials of the ineligible status of felons and others if they’re already registered to vote in the Statewide Voter Registration System.

Court papers demonstrate how the incomplete list of ineligible voters provided to local election officials routinely allows felons, wards of the state, immigrants and other ineligible persons to register and vote.

“The 1,366 identified felons who have been permitted to vote is believed to be only a fraction of the true total,” the 110 page court petition filed by MVA and former Rep. Kirk Stensrud states. “Cooperation from the Secretary of State would have allowed for a more complete accounting of the number of ineligible persons who have been permitted to vote.”

Secretary of State Simon has refused to release the data that would enable MVA to verify the actual number of ineligible people that have illegally cast a vote. In holding back the critical government data, Simon has ignored a Minnesota Department of Administration opinion stating that the voting records in question should be made public. “The Secretary of State plays a significant role with other election officials in permitting known ineligible felons to register or to vote,” court documents state.

Riiight. Norm Coleman's lawyers couldn't get anywhere in court? Hmm, wonder why.

Liberal judge......

That's the excuse you use for everything. A ruling doesn't go your way-----"liberal judge". A right wing led investigation doesn't go your way--------"liberal investigators" . The FBI chooses not to indict Hillary-------" Comey was afraid he would be fired by liberals" Can't you just admit that you were fed a line of bullshit that just doesn't hold up under scrutiny? False accusations will always be determined to be false eventually, no matter how much you hope otherwise.

What a pollyana world you occupy.

You cannot possibly be that gullible?

 

[BULLDOG]

Yes please, explain how that is 'done'.

In 2008 Minnesota Senate race incumbent republican Norm Coleman narrowly defeated democrat Al Franken. Close enough that a recount was mandated. In the recount, Al Franken was declared the winner by a 312 vote edge. Rampant voter fraud charges followed. And yet, nothing came of it for reasons I cannot recall? But it was Franken’s election that gave Obama the vote he needed to pass Obamacare.

One case of voter fraud alone found in many links shows how Franken could have tipped the election. The whole system is absolutely bogus and corrupt. Is everyone blackmailed to shut up?

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Widespread Voter Fraud Documented in New Minnesota Supreme Court Case - American Experiment

But for voter fraud in Minnesota, we would not have Obamacare. That is the scenario of a case being heard by the Supreme Court of Minnesota, over likely voter fraud that made the difference in the 2008 election of Senator Al Franken, whose vote was absolutely necessary for the passage of Obamacare.

After a grueling recount, the Minnesota Voters Alliance (MVA) found 941 ineligible felons who were allowed to vote in 2008 alone, exceeding the 312 vote margin separating DFL candidate Al Franken and GOP Sen. Norm Coleman after a grueling recount.

This is stunning. It was Franken’s razor-thin “victory” over incumbent Senator Norm Coleman that allowed the Democrats to ram Obamacare down the throats of the American people. If we assume that 80% of the 941 ineligible felons voted for Al Franken–a conservative assumption, as nearly all convicted felons are Democrats–then Franken’s victory is attributable to voter fraud.

The lawyers representing plaintiffs in the case have done a great deal of digging, and have come up with names, dates and places–illegal votes that likely swung Minnesota elections toward Democratic candidates. The illegal votes that plaintiffs have been able to document are only a small fraction of the actual total:

Court papers demonstrate how the incomplete list of ineligible voters provided to local election officials routinely allows felons, wards of the state, immigrants [who are not citizens] and other ineligible persons to register and vote.

“The 1,366 identified felons who have been permitted to vote is believed to be only a fraction of the true total,” the 110 page court petition filed by MVA and former Rep. Kirk Stensrud states. “Cooperation from the Secretary of State would have allowed for a more complete accounting of the number of ineligible persons who have been permitted to vote.”

The Minnesota Voters Alliance group behind the challenge alleges the actual number of illegal ballots submitted by ineligible voters far surpasses the 1,670 votes documented through a painstaking search of voting records hampered by a lack of cooperation by Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon.images

Altogether, more than 100,000 Minnesota felons had their right to vote restricted and reported to the Minnesota Secretary of State between 2003 and 2015. But the Minnesota Secretary of State only notifies local election officials of the ineligible status of felons and others if they’re already registered to vote in the Statewide Voter Registration System.

Court papers demonstrate how the incomplete list of ineligible voters provided to local election officials routinely allows felons, wards of the state, immigrants and other ineligible persons to register and vote.

“The 1,366 identified felons who have been permitted to vote is believed to be only a fraction of the true total,” the 110 page court petition filed by MVA and former Rep. Kirk Stensrud states. “Cooperation from the Secretary of State would have allowed for a more complete accounting of the number of ineligible persons who have been permitted to vote.”

Secretary of State Simon has refused to release the data that would enable MVA to verify the actual number of ineligible people that have illegally cast a vote. In holding back the critical government data, Simon has ignored a Minnesota Department of Administration opinion stating that the voting records in question should be made public. “The Secretary of State plays a significant role with other election officials in permitting known ineligible felons to register or to vote,” court documents state.

Riiight. Norm Coleman's lawyers couldn't get anywhere in court? Hmm, wonder why.

Liberal judge......

That's the excuse you use for everything. A ruling doesn't go your way-----"liberal judge". A right wing led investigation doesn't go your way--------"liberal investigators" . The FBI chooses not to indict Hillary-------" Comey was afraid he would be fired by liberals" Can't you just admit that you were fed a line of bullshit that just doesn't hold up under scrutiny? False accusations will always be determined to be false eventually, no matter how much you hope otherwise.

What a pollyana world you occupy.

You cannot possibly be that gullible?

 

[rightwinger]

You guys have the weirdest damned voting apparatus in your states. Where I vote, and everyplace I've ever voted in three states, I go to my ASSIGNED polling place, my name is on the list, it is CHECKED OFF when I enter to vote.
How am I supposed to vote again when I am only allowed to vote in one place and it is on record that I have already voted?

How many times have you gone to vote and found someone had voted under your name?

 

[Ozone]

this is what i like about trump, he says these things, he gets the reaction from the libtards; they accuse him of being a conspiracy theorist and then immediately start conjuring up conspiracy theories about him... when will they ever learn? pushing some notion that election fraud is impossible is about the same thing as confessing to it, you see? nothing trump said is unreasonable, and if hillary was smart she would be advising her people similarly as it's the responsible thing to do. public trust is fragile, and we don't want to have to get the supreme court involved in the mess. but never you mind rationality, for trump has spoken, and therefore the libtards must spin and spin until they puke and we all get a laugh.

 

[owebo]

You guys have the weirdest damned voting apparatus in your states. Where I vote, and everyplace I've ever voted in three states, I go to my ASSIGNED polling place, my name is on the list, it is CHECKED OFF when I enter to vote.
How am I supposed to vote again when I am only allowed to vote in one place and it is on record that I have already voted?

How many times have you gone to vote and found someone had voted under your name?

Even Mickey Mouse voted Obama....

 

[BULLDOG]

You guys have the weirdest damned voting apparatus in your states. Where I vote, and everyplace I've ever voted in three states, I go to my ASSIGNED polling place, my name is on the list, it is CHECKED OFF when I enter to vote.
How am I supposed to vote again when I am only allowed to vote in one place and it is on record that I have already voted?

How many times have you gone to vote and found someone had voted under your name?

Even Mickey Mouse voted Obama....

I've heard that before, and the right winger who said it actually believed it was true.

 

[owebo]

You guys have the weirdest damned voting apparatus in your states. Where I vote, and everyplace I've ever voted in three states, I go to my ASSIGNED polling place, my name is on the list, it is CHECKED OFF when I enter to vote.
How am I supposed to vote again when I am only allowed to vote in one place and it is on record that I have already voted?

How many times have you gone to vote and found someone had voted under your name?

Even Mickey Mouse voted Obama....

I've heard that before, and the right winger who said it actually believed it was true.

I know....everyone knows he voted thousands of times across America because ACORN was just that good....

 

[OldLady]

You guys have the weirdest damned voting apparatus in your states. Where I vote, and everyplace I've ever voted in three states, I go to my ASSIGNED polling place, my name is on the list, it is CHECKED OFF when I enter to vote.
How am I supposed to vote again when I am only allowed to vote in one place and it is on record that I have already voted?

How many times have you gone to vote and found someone had voted under your name?

Never. Have you? Is the dead thing Owebo referenced the reason some states pushed for photo ID? In our state, it's cheap to get one. In North Carolina, though, a poster said it can cost over $100 if you need to get a copy of your birth certificate first. Outrageous. I've worked with students so broke that even getting one here which isn't expensive took a couple months of pinching pennies (you need one to take your GED). It may be hard to imagine being that broke, that $35 might as well be $3,500, but it happens.

 

[dblack]

this is what i like about trump, he says these things, he gets the reaction from the libtards; they accuse him of being a conspiracy theorist and then immediately start conjuring up conspiracy theories about him... when will they ever learn? pushing some notion that election fraud is impossible is about the same thing as confessing to it, you see? nothing trump said is unreasonable, and if hillary was smart she would be advising her people similarly as it's the responsible thing to do. public trust is fragile, and we don't want to have to get the supreme court involved in the mess. but never you mind rationality, for trump has spoken, and therefore the libtards must spin and spin until they puke and we all get a laugh.

Trump said that the only way he can lose in Pennsylvania is if there is voter fraud. That's unreasonable as hell, and amounts to a threat of insurrection if he does lose. Not only has he encouraged his voters to intimidate people at the polls, he's set them up with the notion that they've been cheated as the immediate fallback if he loses. This is a dangerous game he's playing, and the people supporting him are making a terrible mistake.