Trump in big trouble again? Hoh-lee Moh-lee! Georgia indictment possible the 3rd week of May or so

f71.gif


According to this New York Times article, a grand jury will be set up the second week of May. And if the prosecutor will work on an indictment. Hold onto your hands guys. This is about to get even better!

Caution with these dates though. Trump already screwed up by believing he would be indicted on a certain Tuesday. When the indictment didn't come, he began to think he was off the hook and boom! The Manhattan indictment dropped and he was shocked and cranky.

So it looks like he will be indicted in Georgia way before a significant court event occurs in the Bragg trial, regardless of the date.
"There's nothing wrong in saying you recalculated. I just want to find 11,780 votes which is one more then we have because we won the state".

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
 
If it's not about the 2020 election, it's not about Trump. Stop being consumed by your TDS.
/——/ It’s about the fake charges the Georgia DA is cooking up. Try and follow a thread will ya?
 
f71.gif


According to this New York Times article, a grand jury will be set up the second week of May. And if the prosecutor will work on an indictment. Hold onto your hands guys. This is about to get even better!

Caution with these dates though. Trump already screwed up by believing he would be indicted on a certain Tuesday. When the indictment didn't come, he began to think he was off the hook and boom! The Manhattan indictment dropped and he was shocked and cranky.

So it looks like he will be indicted in Georgia way before a significant court event occurs in the Bragg trial, regardless of the date.
Another pile of left wing garbage.
 
Trump didn't do anything illegal. You guys would claim a Republican campaigning for president was a crime if the public let you get aways with it.
Election interference is a crime. Anyone with at least half a brain knows that, which leaves you out.

Next you'll be claiming that it was an imposter, not Trump who called Raffensperger.

Or are you waiting until he gets indicted & outfitted in an orange jumpsuit?

Orange will be the fashion statement of the former president thanks to Fani Willis. :abgg2q.jpg:
 
Telling someone to “find the votes necessary” is different than count the votes
Also quite different from telling someone to create the votes necessary....

Find and create have two different definitions......look the up.
 
/——/ It’s about the fake charges the Georgia DA is cooking up. Try and follow a thread will ya?

LOL

Fake charges? Listening to the phone call, it appears Trump asks Raffensperger to "find" one vote more than the margin he lost by in order order to flip the state to him. Even worse, he threatens Raffensperger with committing a crime for not reporting the fraud he claims occurred, which didn't actually occur.
 
Georgia Law:

(a) (1) A person commits the offense of criminal solicitation to commit election fraud in the first degree when, with intent that another person engage in conduct constituting a felony under this article, he or she solicits, requests, commands, importunes, or otherwise attempts to cause the other person to engage in such conduct.

(2) A person commits the offense of criminal solicitation to commit election fraud in the second degree when, with intent that another person engage in conduct constituting a misdemeanor under this article, he or she solicits, requests, commands, importunes, or otherwise attempts to cause the other person to engage in such conduct.

(b) (1) A person convicted of the offense of criminal solicitation to commit election fraud in the first degree shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than three years.

(2) A person convicted of the offense of criminal solicitation to commit election fraud in the second degree shall be punished as for a misdemeanor.

(c) It is no defense to a prosecution for criminal solicitation to commit election fraud that the person solicited could not be guilty of the crime solicited.

(d) The provisions of subsections (a) through (c) of this Code section are cumulative and shall not supersede any other penal law of this state.




Nice cut and paste.

Other than that, worthless.
 
Also quite different from telling someone to create the votes necessary....

Find and create have two different definitions......look the up.

It is when he's being told the fraud he was complaining about was investigated and not true. The only way Raffensperger could "find" more votes to flip the election would be to create them.
 
So fucking what?

Hillary Clinton PAID A FOREIGN SPY to influence an election.

Show me her colostomy bag in an orange jump suit, or shut the fuck up.

Nope. Hillary Clinton paid a U.S. firm to conduct opposition research.
 
Also quite different from telling someone to create the votes necessary....

Find and create have two different definitions......look the up.

Still a crime to pressure election officials to alter votes for one side
Trump did not just say….find additional votes
He said….find them for me

He also threatened election officials and the Sec State
 
The closer we get to the 2024 election the more panicked and more desperate Democrats get to prevent Trump from winning the GOP nomination and running for President .

The closer the election gets the faster and more furious the desperate Democrats' schemes come...
 
Election interference is a crime. Anyone with at least half a brain knows that, which leaves you out.

Next you'll be claiming that it was an imposter, not Trump who called Raffensperger.

Or are you waiting until he gets indicted & outfitted in an orange jumpsuit?

Orange will be the fashion statement of the former president thanks to Fani Willis. :abgg2q.jpg:
If it's so cut and dried, then why didn't some Dim DA charge him with it?
 
It is when he's being told the fraud he was complaining about was investigated and not true. The only way Raffensperger could "find" more votes to flip the election would be to create them.
Yet Trump never asked for that.....LOL
 
Still a crime to pressure election officials to alter votes for one side
Trump did not just say….find additional votes
He said….find them for me

He also threatened election officials and the Sec State
Never said anything about altering votes. find in two similar contexts has the same meaning......toss in 'create', and it's a whole new ballgame.
 
So Trump didn't tell him that. He's just guessing about what Trump planned to do.

LOL

How on Earth would Bannon know that was what Trump was going to do unless he was involved in such discussions?

I didn't think it was possible but you're actually getting dumber. :ack-1:
 

Forum List

Back
Top