Trump is the Real DEI Candidate

[Marener]

“Democracies around the world now are struggling with the absence of a sort of truth arbiter, and there’s no one who defines what facts really are.”

That is a direct quote. It is pretty clear that if Democracies are “struggling” without some sort of “truth arbiter”, he is suggesting that one is needed. Surely, even you can understand this. The attendees at the WEF certainly did.



So now all of a sudden context is important. Funny. What context would make what Kerry said more palatable to those of us that cringe at the mention of a “truth arbiter” potentially assisting with Democracies that are “struggling”?

When Kerry says what he thinks we should do, then you can criticize. It’s pretty clear that we do suffer because of the perpetuation of disinformation. Nothing he said was inaccurate.

Now, who has Kerry said should be investigated? Did he say that broadcast licenses should be revoked?

 

[DBA]

If that’s all Trump was saying, why does he call for an investigation and call it potentially “illegal”?

You are very good at morphing Trump’s statement into something different and more palatable to yourself. It’s proof of your extreme bias.

CBS favorably editing Kamala’s interview was an attempt to hide her incompetency from the American people, thereby, harming Trump in the upcoming election. How is that any different than Fox saying unproven things about Dominion? Maybe you haven’t figure out that lying by omission is real thing.

If you were really intellectually curious, you would look for Harris’ un-edited interview. It may give you pause in electing her as the leader of the free world.

 

[DBA]

When Kerry says what he thinks we should do, then you can criticize. It’s pretty clear that we do suffer because of the perpetuation of disinformation. Nothing he said was inaccurate.

Now, who has Kerry said should be investigated? Did he say that broadcast licenses should be revoked?

He is suggesting that a “truth arbiter” would resolve these problems. You can spin it all you would like, but that is scary.

 

[Marener]

CBS favorably editing Kamala’s interview was an attempt to hide her incompetency from the American people, thereby, harming Trump in the upcoming election. How is that any different than Fox saying unproven things about Dominion? Maybe you haven’t figure out that lying by omission is real thing.

If you were really intellectually curious, you would look for Harris’ un-edited interview. It may give you pause in electing her as the leader of the free world.

Because Fox was defaming dominion promoting a civil lawsuit.

I’m still dying to know what could possibly be illegal and require an investigation of CBS?

 

[Marener]

He is suggesting that a “truth arbiter” would resolve these problems. You can spin it all you would like, but that is scary.

And that’s true! If we had a truth arbiter, it would help prevent disinformation. He also said we can’t have one because of the first amendment. He’s clearly speaking hypothetically.

Context! Don’t be dangerous. He never said anything about repealing the first amendment to criminalizing speech.

 

[DBA]

And that’s true! If we had a truth arbiter, it would help prevent disinformation. He also said we can’t have one because of the first amendment. He’s clearly speaking hypothetically.

Context! Don’t be dangerous. He never said anything about repealing the first amendment to criminalizing speech.

Your gullibility is damning.

 

[Marener]

Your gullibility is damning.

Well, let’s think about the differences here.

Kerry isn’t running for office. Trump is. I’m not voting for Kerry. You’re voting for Trump.

Trump has clearly stated on several occasions he wants government imposed repercussions for news organizations. Kerry has, at worse, implied something about combating disinformation.

And I’m the problem?