Trump is the Reason the Deficit is so Bad

[The Banker]

You’re right, the Trump Administration and his merry band of Republicans spent like drunken sailors, no doubt about it, the numbers don’t lie.

The question is, now the Democrats are in charge and have the wherewithal to do something about it, should they start cutting spending and earnestly attempt to balance the budget? Or do they, as appears to be the case so far, just follow Donny’s lead and increase the deficit EVEN MORE?

Why should Democrats always have to clean up Republican messes?

They don’t “clean up them” they just come along and make them worse, it’s like its a race to see which party can get us to the point of economic Armageddon the quickest.

I agree with that, but when you look at the 21st century, The huge push Bush and the GOP made to go to war in Iraq, the great financial crisis, in which Bush is most responsible because he was president for 7 years when it happened, then Trump's poor economic policies and his failure at covid. The GOP has done serious damage to America, far worse than anything the Dems have done.
One parties extreme failure does not excuse the others simple failure, but it definitely means that the party of extreme failure, the GOP, should not have influence on policy until they can show they have some form of competence.
Obama was not good, and he should have emphasized the economic recovery a lot more, but he certainly was not as bad as Bush or Trump. If you look at the numbers and the results from an impartial view, it is pretty obvious.

Hillary insisted we invade Iraq leaving Bush few options.

LOLOL

You think Bush WASN'T the Commander-in-Chief??

Shameful how Hillary used political pressure to force Bush into war with Iraq.

So you do think Bush wasn't the Command-in-Chief. Your ignorance is your problem, no one else's.

A good commander listens to his subordinates.
Hillarys rah rah speeches to invade Iraq swayed him.

This epitomizes the GOP.
The party of blame everybody else for your failures.
A republican has never ever taken personal responsibility for their actions or faults ever, all they do is blame everybody else. That is why the GOP is the party of total failure.

Thank you for clearing that up for all of us...

 

[Weatherman2020]

You’re right, the Trump Administration and his merry band of Republicans spent like drunken sailors, no doubt about it, the numbers don’t lie.

The question is, now the Democrats are in charge and have the wherewithal to do something about it, should they start cutting spending and earnestly attempt to balance the budget? Or do they, as appears to be the case so far, just follow Donny’s lead and increase the deficit EVEN MORE?

Why should Democrats always have to clean up Republican messes?

They don’t “clean up them” they just come along and make them worse, it’s like its a race to see which party can get us to the point of economic Armageddon the quickest.

I agree with that, but when you look at the 21st century, The huge push Bush and the GOP made to go to war in Iraq, the great financial crisis, in which Bush is most responsible because he was president for 7 years when it happened, then Trump's poor economic policies and his failure at covid. The GOP has done serious damage to America, far worse than anything the Dems have done.
One parties extreme failure does not excuse the others simple failure, but it definitely means that the party of extreme failure, the GOP, should not have influence on policy until they can show they have some form of competence.
Obama was not good, and he should have emphasized the economic recovery a lot more, but he certainly was not as bad as Bush or Trump. If you look at the numbers and the results from an impartial view, it is pretty obvious.

Hillary insisted we invade Iraq leaving Bush few options.

LOLOL

You think Bush WASN'T the Commander-in-Chief??

Shameful how Hillary used political pressure to force Bush into war with Iraq.

So you do think Bush wasn't the Command-in-Chief. Your ignorance is your problem, no one else's.

A good commander listens to his subordinates.
Hillarys rah rah speeches to invade Iraq swayed him.

This epitomizes the GOP.
The party of blame everybody else for your failures.
A republican has never ever taken personal responsibility for their actions or faults ever, all they do is blame everybody else. That is why the GOP is the party of total failure.

Thank you for clearing that up for all of us...

You’re a moron who doesn’t even know Congress is responsible for creating budgets.

 

[Weatherman2020]

You’re right, the Trump Administration and his merry band of Republicans spent like drunken sailors, no doubt about it, the numbers don’t lie.

The question is, now the Democrats are in charge and have the wherewithal to do something about it, should they start cutting spending and earnestly attempt to balance the budget? Or do they, as appears to be the case so far, just follow Donny’s lead and increase the deficit EVEN MORE?

Why should Democrats always have to clean up Republican messes?

They don’t “clean up them” they just come along and make them worse, it’s like its a race to see which party can get us to the point of economic Armageddon the quickest.

I agree with that, but when you look at the 21st century, The huge push Bush and the GOP made to go to war in Iraq, the great financial crisis, in which Bush is most responsible because he was president for 7 years when it happened, then Trump's poor economic policies and his failure at covid. The GOP has done serious damage to America, far worse than anything the Dems have done.
One parties extreme failure does not excuse the others simple failure, but it definitely means that the party of extreme failure, the GOP, should not have influence on policy until they can show they have some form of competence.
Obama was not good, and he should have emphasized the economic recovery a lot more, but he certainly was not as bad as Bush or Trump. If you look at the numbers and the results from an impartial view, it is pretty obvious.

Hillary insisted we invade Iraq leaving Bush few options.

LOLOL

You think Bush WASN'T the Commander-in-Chief??

Shameful how Hillary used political pressure to force Bush into war with Iraq.

So you do think Bush wasn't the Command-in-Chief. Your ignorance is your problem, no one else's.

A good commander listens to his subordinates.
Hillarys rah rah speeches to invade Iraq swayed him.

LOLOL

Do you ever stop posting nonsense??

Hillary was not Bush's subordinate.

Nothing compelled Bush to listen to her. And of course, even Bush manned up and took responsibility for invading Iraq even if you remain a cuck who denies it...

"As president I am responsible for the decision to go into Iraq." ~ George Bush, 12.14.2005​

So a President should ignore Congress on critical issues?

Was that your belief 2016-2020 as well?

That you're changing your position reveals even you know what an idiot you are.

Your position WAS Hillary pressured Bush into invading Iraq.

Your position NOW is Bush shouldn't have ignored Congress.

Hillary did pressure to invade Iraq. Well documented fact.

 

[Faun]

You’re right, the Trump Administration and his merry band of Republicans spent like drunken sailors, no doubt about it, the numbers don’t lie.

The question is, now the Democrats are in charge and have the wherewithal to do something about it, should they start cutting spending and earnestly attempt to balance the budget? Or do they, as appears to be the case so far, just follow Donny’s lead and increase the deficit EVEN MORE?

Why should Democrats always have to clean up Republican messes?

They don’t “clean up them” they just come along and make them worse, it’s like its a race to see which party can get us to the point of economic Armageddon the quickest.

I agree with that, but when you look at the 21st century, The huge push Bush and the GOP made to go to war in Iraq, the great financial crisis, in which Bush is most responsible because he was president for 7 years when it happened, then Trump's poor economic policies and his failure at covid. The GOP has done serious damage to America, far worse than anything the Dems have done.
One parties extreme failure does not excuse the others simple failure, but it definitely means that the party of extreme failure, the GOP, should not have influence on policy until they can show they have some form of competence.
Obama was not good, and he should have emphasized the economic recovery a lot more, but he certainly was not as bad as Bush or Trump. If you look at the numbers and the results from an impartial view, it is pretty obvious.

Hillary insisted we invade Iraq leaving Bush few options.

LOLOL

You think Bush WASN'T the Commander-in-Chief??

Shameful how Hillary used political pressure to force Bush into war with Iraq.

So you do think Bush wasn't the Command-in-Chief. Your ignorance is your problem, no one else's.

A good commander listens to his subordinates.
Hillarys rah rah speeches to invade Iraq swayed him.

LOLOL

Do you ever stop posting nonsense??

Hillary was not Bush's subordinate.

Nothing compelled Bush to listen to her. And of course, even Bush manned up and took responsibility for invading Iraq even if you remain a cuck who denies it...

"As president I am responsible for the decision to go into Iraq." ~ George Bush, 12.14.2005​

So a President should ignore Congress on critical issues?

Was that your belief 2016-2020 as well?

That you're changing your position reveals even you know what an idiot you are.

Your position WAS Hillary pressured Bush into invading Iraq.

Your position NOW is Bush shouldn't have ignored Congress.

Hillary did pressure to invade Iraq. Well documented fact.

And Bush wasn't Commander-in-Chief, right, rightard?

 

[LA RAM FAN]

You’re right, the Trump Administration and his merry band of Republicans spent like drunken sailors, no doubt about it, the numbers don’t lie.

The question is, now the Democrats are in charge and have the wherewithal to do something about it, should they start cutting spending and earnestly attempt to balance the budget? Or do they, as appears to be the case so far, just follow Donny’s lead and increase the deficit EVEN MORE?

Why should Democrats always have to clean up Republican messes?

They don’t “clean up them” they just come along and make them worse, it’s like its a race to see which party can get us to the point of economic Armageddon the quickest.

I agree with that, but when you look at the 21st century, The huge push Bush and the GOP made to go to war in Iraq, the great financial crisis, in which Bush is most responsible because he was president for 7 years when it happened, then Trump's poor economic policies and his failure at covid. The GOP has done serious damage to America, far worse than anything the Dems have done.
One parties extreme failure does not excuse the others simple failure, but it definitely means that the party of extreme failure, the GOP, should not have influence on policy until they can show they have some form of competence.
Obama was not good, and he should have emphasized the economic recovery a lot more, but he certainly was not as bad as Bush or Trump. If you look at the numbers and the results from an impartial view, it is pretty obvious.

Hillary insisted we invade Iraq leaving Bush few options.

LOLOL

You think Bush WASN'T the Commander-in-Chief??

Shameful how Hillary used political pressure to force Bush into war with Iraq.

So you do think Bush wasn't the Command-in-Chief. Your ignorance is your problem, no one else's.

A good commander listens to his subordinates.
Hillarys rah rah speeches to invade Iraq swayed him.

This epitomizes the GOP.
The party of blame everybody else for your failures.
A republican has never ever taken personal responsibility for their actions or faults ever, all they do is blame everybody else. That is why the GOP is the party of total failure.

Thank you for clearing that up for all of us...

You’re a moron who doesn’t even know Congress is responsible for creating budgets.

well he is just a child on drugs with no partental guidence so thats understandable.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

You’re right, the Trump Administration and his merry band of Republicans spent like drunken sailors, no doubt about it, the numbers don’t lie.

The question is, now the Democrats are in charge and have the wherewithal to do something about it, should they start cutting spending and earnestly attempt to balance the budget? Or do they, as appears to be the case so far, just follow Donny’s lead and increase the deficit EVEN MORE?

Why should Democrats always have to clean up Republican messes?

They don’t “clean up them” they just come along and make them worse, it’s like its a race to see which party can get us to the point of economic Armageddon the quickest.

I agree with that, but when you look at the 21st century, The huge push Bush and the GOP made to go to war in Iraq, the great financial crisis, in which Bush is most responsible because he was president for 7 years when it happened, then Trump's poor economic policies and his failure at covid. The GOP has done serious damage to America, far worse than anything the Dems have done.
One parties extreme failure does not excuse the others simple failure, but it definitely means that the party of extreme failure, the GOP, should not have influence on policy until they can show they have some form of competence.
Obama was not good, and he should have emphasized the economic recovery a lot more, but he certainly was not as bad as Bush or Trump. If you look at the numbers and the results from an impartial view, it is pretty obvious.

Hillary insisted we invade Iraq leaving Bush few options.

LOLOL

You think Bush WASN'T the Commander-in-Chief??

Shameful how Hillary used political pressure to force Bush into war with Iraq.

So you do think Bush wasn't the Command-in-Chief. Your ignorance is your problem, no one else's.

A good commander listens to his subordinates.
Hillarys rah rah speeches to invade Iraq swayed him.

LOLOL

Do you ever stop posting nonsense??

Hillary was not Bush's subordinate.

Nothing compelled Bush to listen to her. And of course, even Bush manned up and took responsibility for invading Iraq even if you remain a cuck who denies it...

"As president I am responsible for the decision to go into Iraq." ~ George Bush, 12.14.2005​

So a President should ignore Congress on critical issues?

Was that your belief 2016-2020 as well?

That you're changing your position reveals even you know what an idiot you are.

Your position WAS Hillary pressured Bush into invading Iraq.

Your position NOW is Bush shouldn't have ignored Congress.

Hillary did pressure to invade Iraq. Well documented fact.

you nailed it.

 

[Shelzin]

So... It was bad that Trump did it... So... Do it more because you don't want to do what Trump should have done.

Nice avatar... Fits.

No. Don't let the Republicans do it in the first place, idiot.

Oh... And I guess it's the Republicans fault that the Democrats are doing it now? Right?

Nice avatar... Fits.

 

[airplanemechanic]

George W Bush inherited a balanced budget with a projected surplus and turned that into total doom with mega deficits.

Care to back up that lie? Please show the balanced budget and surplus. A "projected" surplus means nothing. Show me the REAL numbers.

 

[Weatherman2020]

George W Bush inherited a balanced budget with a projected surplus and turned that into total doom with mega deficits.

Care to back up that lie?

Republican Congress had a good budget during Clinton’s era, Democrats took over after that as well as 9-11.

 

[Weatherman2020]

You’re right, the Trump Administration and his merry band of Republicans spent like drunken sailors, no doubt about it, the numbers don’t lie.

The question is, now the Democrats are in charge and have the wherewithal to do something about it, should they start cutting spending and earnestly attempt to balance the budget? Or do they, as appears to be the case so far, just follow Donny’s lead and increase the deficit EVEN MORE?

Why should Democrats always have to clean up Republican messes?

They don’t “clean up them” they just come along and make them worse, it’s like its a race to see which party can get us to the point of economic Armageddon the quickest.

I agree with that, but when you look at the 21st century, The huge push Bush and the GOP made to go to war in Iraq, the great financial crisis, in which Bush is most responsible because he was president for 7 years when it happened, then Trump's poor economic policies and his failure at covid. The GOP has done serious damage to America, far worse than anything the Dems have done.
One parties extreme failure does not excuse the others simple failure, but it definitely means that the party of extreme failure, the GOP, should not have influence on policy until they can show they have some form of competence.
Obama was not good, and he should have emphasized the economic recovery a lot more, but he certainly was not as bad as Bush or Trump. If you look at the numbers and the results from an impartial view, it is pretty obvious.

Hillary insisted we invade Iraq leaving Bush few options.

LOLOL

You think Bush WASN'T the Commander-in-Chief??

Shameful how Hillary used political pressure to force Bush into war with Iraq.

So you do think Bush wasn't the Command-in-Chief. Your ignorance is your problem, no one else's.

A good commander listens to his subordinates.
Hillarys rah rah speeches to invade Iraq swayed him.

LOLOL

Do you ever stop posting nonsense??

Hillary was not Bush's subordinate.

Nothing compelled Bush to listen to her. And of course, even Bush manned up and took responsibility for invading Iraq even if you remain a cuck who denies it...

"As president I am responsible for the decision to go into Iraq." ~ George Bush, 12.14.2005​

So a President should ignore Congress on critical issues?

Was that your belief 2016-2020 as well?

That you're changing your position reveals even you know what an idiot you are.

Your position WAS Hillary pressured Bush into invading Iraq.

Your position NOW is Bush shouldn't have ignored Congress.

Hillary did pressure to invade Iraq. Well documented fact.

And Bush wasn't Commander-in-Chief, right, rightard?

Why do you think Presidents should ignore Congress, especially when the President asks for their opinions?

 

[Faun]

George W Bush inherited a balanced budget with a projected surplus and turned that into total doom with mega deficits.

Care to back up that lie?

Republican Congress had a good budget during Clinton’s era, Democrats took over after that as well as 9-11.

LOLOL

Democrats took over Congress 6 years after Bush became president.

 

[Faun]

You’re right, the Trump Administration and his merry band of Republicans spent like drunken sailors, no doubt about it, the numbers don’t lie.

The question is, now the Democrats are in charge and have the wherewithal to do something about it, should they start cutting spending and earnestly attempt to balance the budget? Or do they, as appears to be the case so far, just follow Donny’s lead and increase the deficit EVEN MORE?

Why should Democrats always have to clean up Republican messes?

They don’t “clean up them” they just come along and make them worse, it’s like its a race to see which party can get us to the point of economic Armageddon the quickest.

I agree with that, but when you look at the 21st century, The huge push Bush and the GOP made to go to war in Iraq, the great financial crisis, in which Bush is most responsible because he was president for 7 years when it happened, then Trump's poor economic policies and his failure at covid. The GOP has done serious damage to America, far worse than anything the Dems have done.
One parties extreme failure does not excuse the others simple failure, but it definitely means that the party of extreme failure, the GOP, should not have influence on policy until they can show they have some form of competence.
Obama was not good, and he should have emphasized the economic recovery a lot more, but he certainly was not as bad as Bush or Trump. If you look at the numbers and the results from an impartial view, it is pretty obvious.

Hillary insisted we invade Iraq leaving Bush few options.

LOLOL

You think Bush WASN'T the Commander-in-Chief??

Shameful how Hillary used political pressure to force Bush into war with Iraq.

So you do think Bush wasn't the Command-in-Chief. Your ignorance is your problem, no one else's.

A good commander listens to his subordinates.
Hillarys rah rah speeches to invade Iraq swayed him.

LOLOL

Do you ever stop posting nonsense??

Hillary was not Bush's subordinate.

Nothing compelled Bush to listen to her. And of course, even Bush manned up and took responsibility for invading Iraq even if you remain a cuck who denies it...

"As president I am responsible for the decision to go into Iraq." ~ George Bush, 12.14.2005​

So a President should ignore Congress on critical issues?

Was that your belief 2016-2020 as well?

That you're changing your position reveals even you know what an idiot you are.

Your position WAS Hillary pressured Bush into invading Iraq.

Your position NOW is Bush shouldn't have ignored Congress.

Hillary did pressure to invade Iraq. Well documented fact.

And Bush wasn't Commander-in-Chief, right, rightard?

Why do you think Presidents should ignore Congress, especially when the President asks for their opinions?

I when did I say tbd president should ignore Congress, rightard? In fact, I said thd president shouldn't.

Have you always been this stupid?

 

[The Purge]

You mean like lowering the unemployment to the lowest in modern times

What makes you believe the Qult45 party had anything to do with it? Because you were told as much, and lack any critical thinking skills to question it. And why are you touting pre-pandemic stats when it all went to shit post-pandemic? The Qult45 party's contribution to improving societal problems has had all the impact of a wet fart. Any other partisan hackery you'd like me to crush?

If you can6 READ and comprehend, I am sorry but you are a Jackass, and a dyed in the wool communist.....OR you have such aow IQ. it is a wonder you can talk and type at the same time!

 

[Uncensored2008]

Dub ya-6 trillion in 8 years
Zero- 9 trillion in 8 years
Orange man-7 trillion in 4 years
Installed invalid- 3 trillion in 4 months

You might want to check your math.

Quid Pro did a $4 trillion pork spend, then another $3 trillion. That's $7 trillion in is first hundred days. Add the $6 trillion he now wants and that an insane $13 trillion in less than 6 months.

 

[Uncensored2008]

A. To cover for his mistakes.

B. Ease it to where? Interest rates were already at historic lows.

What "mistakes?" Trump had 4.5% GDP growth in Q3 2018. Obammy never cracked 3% in 8 years (and I love how the Nazi banker flat out lied with that graph.)

The Trump economy was so good that your country had to launch a biological attack on America to derail it.

The graph is 100% fact.
That is the problem, you don't like what it says, so you ignore it.
Those numbers are directly from the US Bureau of economic analysis.
They are 100% and there is no debating that. You just don't like what they say... typical Trumper stupidity, that is why you are a total sheep.

You are embarrassing yourself right now.



View attachment 494963

That graph is a flat out fucking lie. Obama never broke 3%. The clam that he was running nearly 6% is a complete fabrication.

Even radical left Politifraud had to admit as much.

Did Obama never have a whole year of 3% economic growth?

Speaking at an event in Chicago earlier this month, U.S. Rep. Peter Roskam, R-Ill., was talking tax policy and the econo

www.politifact.com

 

[Faun]

A. To cover for his mistakes.

B. Ease it to where? Interest rates were already at historic lows.

What "mistakes?" Trump had 4.5% GDP growth in Q3 2018. Obammy never cracked 3% in 8 years (and I love how the Nazi banker flat out lied with that graph.)

The Trump economy was so good that your country had to launch a biological attack on America to derail it.

The graph is 100% fact.
That is the problem, you don't like what it says, so you ignore it.
Those numbers are directly from the US Bureau of economic analysis.
They are 100% and there is no debating that. You just don't like what they say... typical Trumper stupidity, that is why you are a total sheep.

You are embarrassing yourself right now.



View attachment 494963

That graph is a flat out fucking lie. Obama never broke 3%. The clam that he was running nearly 6% is a complete fabrication.

Even radical left Politifraud had to admit as much.

Did Obama never have a whole year of 3% economic growth?

Speaking at an event in Chicago earlier this month, U.S. Rep. Peter Roskam, R-Ill., was talking tax policy and the econo

www.politifact.com

LOLOLOLOL

Fruitcake, why the fuck are you posting 4 year old data and ignoring the current data?

​

By the way, Fruitcake, that's a rhetorical question. Everyone here already knows why you're lying.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

You mean like lowering the unemployment to the lowest in modern times

What makes you believe the Qult45 party had anything to do with it? Because you were told as much, and lack any critical thinking skills to question it. And why are you touting pre-pandemic stats when it all went to shit post-pandemic? The Qult45 party's contribution to improving societal problems has had all the impact of a wet fart. Any other partisan hackery you'd like me to crush?

If you can6 READ and comprehend, I am sorry but you are a Jackass, and a dyed in the wool communist.....OR you have such aow IQ. it is a wonder you can talk and type at the same time!

Nice temper tantrum, illiterate.

 

[The Banker]

.

Dub ya-6 trillion in 8 years
Zero- 9 trillion in 8 years
Orange man-7 trillion in 4 years
Installed invalid- 3 trillion in 4 months

You might want to check your math.

Quid Pro did a $4 trillion pork spend, then another $3 trillion. That's $7 trillion in is first hundred days. Add the $6 trillion he now wants and that an insane $13 trillion in less than 6 months.

What are you even babbling about with these fake numbers.

Bush was a failed president that inherited a balanced budget with a projected surplus, then he turned that into 2 losing wars and a total economic collapse, with a Hurricane Katrina fuck up debacle sprinkled in...
Trump inherited a $550 B/year deficit and he doubled that in 3 years, yet never achieved 3% growth annually, then Trump- totally fucked up everything covid and incited an insurrection at the Capitol based on fabricated lies of election fraud that never happened, in which cops died...

No democrat has ever been remotely that bad ever in the entire history of America.

The GOP is the party of complete and total failure.

 

[Wyatt earp]

You’re right, the Trump Administration and his merry band of Republicans spent like drunken sailors, no doubt about it, the numbers don’t lie.

The question is, now the Democrats are in charge and have the wherewithal to do something about it, should they start cutting spending and earnestly attempt to balance the budget? Or do they, as appears to be the case so far, just follow Donny’s lead and increase the deficit EVEN MORE?

Why should Democrats always have to clean up Republican messes?

Because the republicans won't clean it up, they make it worse.

Most of the rest of us don't want to live in the shit hole nation that their economic and social policies turn the United States into.

I believe the proper question here is why do people keep voting those conservative republicans into office to keep doing this to our nation over and over again.

Uhm we don't know, low taxes, low cost of living, strong defense...

 

[JoeMoma]

Trump completely bankrupted America beyond anything we have ever seen before (even worse than Bush)."

Then Biden says "Hold my Beer."