Trump just sold arms worth of $350bn to terrorists

Except for the vote thingy you are right. All votes go to a candidate in a state, that can benefit both candidates.

The Republicans have, by far, an advantage in the electoral college. Why? Because there are far more smaller states that are hardcore Republicans than Democrat.
Doesn´t have a smaller state lesser votes? And given your are right, isn´t that accidentally?

Er... I don't understand what you've written.
I mean the electoral votes:
350px-ElectoralCollege2016.svg.png


We see, the most densely populated states are blue, they have more votes. Would the absolute number of votes count, these few states would have decided for the many other ones. And again, how close the election in a state ends is a matter of accident after all.

Do you know how electoral college votes are handed out?

They're based on the number of seats a state gets for the House, which is based proportionally, and added to this is the number of Senate seats.

So, Wyoming has 1 House seat. Why? Because it has half a million people. California has 53 House seats because it has 40 million people. Even then it's not fair, simply because Wyoming can't have half seats.

Then you add on the senate seats and a person from Wyoming has a vote that is worth THREE TIMES what the vote of a person in California has. Fair? No way.
Wyoming could have been blue.
 
The Republicans have, by far, an advantage in the electoral college. Why? Because there are far more smaller states that are hardcore Republicans than Democrat.
Doesn´t have a smaller state lesser votes? And given your are right, isn´t that accidentally?

Er... I don't understand what you've written.
I mean the electoral votes:
350px-ElectoralCollege2016.svg.png


We see, the most densely populated states are blue, they have more votes. Would the absolute number of votes count, these few states would have decided for the many other ones. And again, how close the election in a state ends is a matter of accident after all.

Do you know how electoral college votes are handed out?

They're based on the number of seats a state gets for the House, which is based proportionally, and added to this is the number of Senate seats.

So, Wyoming has 1 House seat. Why? Because it has half a million people. California has 53 House seats because it has 40 million people. Even then it's not fair, simply because Wyoming can't have half seats.

Then you add on the senate seats and a person from Wyoming has a vote that is worth THREE TIMES what the vote of a person in California has. Fair? No way.
Wyoming could have been blue.

Yeah, it could have been blue if the 174,000 Republican voters had voted Democrat, right? More than 3/4 of voters voted Republican.

In fact 1996 was the last time a Republican got less than 60% in the state, Bob Dole got 49.8% mainly because of Ross Perot. In fact they've voted Republican like every single time as far back as I can tell.
 
Just more proof that the cheeto doesn't work for the US.
Imagine if President Obama or Secty Clinton had pulled this.

18620021_1320345271414655_2181553676800057233_n.jpg
They did ya jackass. Obama sold the drug cartels south of the border thousands of guns and he GAVE FREE OF CHARGE to ISIS TONS Of military equipment & weapons. All they had to do was drive to iraq & pick it up while he looked the other way.
So...chalk up another trumpette ok with selling weapons to the islamic Saudis.
Obama administration arms sales offers to Saudi top $115 billion: report
 
Doesn´t have a smaller state lesser votes? And given your are right, isn´t that accidentally?

Er... I don't understand what you've written.
I mean the electoral votes:
350px-ElectoralCollege2016.svg.png


We see, the most densely populated states are blue, they have more votes. Would the absolute number of votes count, these few states would have decided for the many other ones. And again, how close the election in a state ends is a matter of accident after all.

Do you know how electoral college votes are handed out?

They're based on the number of seats a state gets for the House, which is based proportionally, and added to this is the number of Senate seats.

So, Wyoming has 1 House seat. Why? Because it has half a million people. California has 53 House seats because it has 40 million people. Even then it's not fair, simply because Wyoming can't have half seats.

Then you add on the senate seats and a person from Wyoming has a vote that is worth THREE TIMES what the vote of a person in California has. Fair? No way.
Wyoming could have been blue.

Yeah, it could have been blue if the 174,000 Republican voters had voted Democrat, right? More than 3/4 of voters voted Republican.

In fact 1996 was the last time a Republican got less than 60% in the state, Bob Dole got 49.8% mainly because of Ross Perot. In fact they've voted Republican like every single time as far back as I can tell.
Then, maybe, not the electoral collage but the Democrats deserve the blame. It´s not God given.
 
Er... I don't understand what you've written.
I mean the electoral votes:
350px-ElectoralCollege2016.svg.png


We see, the most densely populated states are blue, they have more votes. Would the absolute number of votes count, these few states would have decided for the many other ones. And again, how close the election in a state ends is a matter of accident after all.

Do you know how electoral college votes are handed out?

They're based on the number of seats a state gets for the House, which is based proportionally, and added to this is the number of Senate seats.

So, Wyoming has 1 House seat. Why? Because it has half a million people. California has 53 House seats because it has 40 million people. Even then it's not fair, simply because Wyoming can't have half seats.

Then you add on the senate seats and a person from Wyoming has a vote that is worth THREE TIMES what the vote of a person in California has. Fair? No way.
Wyoming could have been blue.

Yeah, it could have been blue if the 174,000 Republican voters had voted Democrat, right? More than 3/4 of voters voted Republican.

In fact 1996 was the last time a Republican got less than 60% in the state, Bob Dole got 49.8% mainly because of Ross Perot. In fact they've voted Republican like every single time as far back as I can tell.
Then, maybe, not the electoral collage but the Democrats deserve the blame. It´s not God given.

What? Did you not get the point of this?

The Republicans could get the same amount of votes as the Democrats and the Republicans will win EVERY TIME. How is this the fault of the Democrats? For not having smaller states? What?
 
'maduro' disarms the starving taxpaying 'venzies;' and provides guns and authority to HIS 'maduro' loyalist militia Bleipreister . --- Venezuela's Maduro to provide guns to 400,000 loyalists amid peaking tension ---
Good. The starving regime ended in 1999 and shouldn´t come back. Go Maduro!

Venezuela Maintains High Human Development: UN
Maduro: Enough killings, you murderers!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- sure , lots of killings , murdering but hey , it is south america and those type people are pretty emotional and irrational . See other parts of south america to see all kinds of violence , see mexico for example . Violence is in their blood as a way of governing or acquiring wealth both at a personal level and at a government level . Course , maduro is practicing starvation and murder as he rules the 'venzie' population BPreister .
 
I mean the electoral votes:
350px-ElectoralCollege2016.svg.png


We see, the most densely populated states are blue, they have more votes. Would the absolute number of votes count, these few states would have decided for the many other ones. And again, how close the election in a state ends is a matter of accident after all.

Do you know how electoral college votes are handed out?

They're based on the number of seats a state gets for the House, which is based proportionally, and added to this is the number of Senate seats.

So, Wyoming has 1 House seat. Why? Because it has half a million people. California has 53 House seats because it has 40 million people. Even then it's not fair, simply because Wyoming can't have half seats.

Then you add on the senate seats and a person from Wyoming has a vote that is worth THREE TIMES what the vote of a person in California has. Fair? No way.
Wyoming could have been blue.

Yeah, it could have been blue if the 174,000 Republican voters had voted Democrat, right? More than 3/4 of voters voted Republican.

In fact 1996 was the last time a Republican got less than 60% in the state, Bob Dole got 49.8% mainly because of Ross Perot. In fact they've voted Republican like every single time as far back as I can tell.
Then, maybe, not the electoral collage but the Democrats deserve the blame. It´s not God given.

What? Did you not get the point of this?

The Republicans could get the same amount of votes as the Democrats and the Republicans will win EVERY TIME. How is this the fault of the Democrats? For not having smaller states? What?
It is still accidental and could have been the other way round. Also, why has that not been changed already. Isn´t new, right?
 
'maduro' disarms the starving taxpaying 'venzies;' and provides guns and authority to HIS 'maduro' loyalist militia Bleipreister . --- Venezuela's Maduro to provide guns to 400,000 loyalists amid peaking tension ---
Good. The starving regime ended in 1999 and shouldn´t come back. Go Maduro!

Venezuela Maintains High Human Development: UN
Maduro: Enough killings, you murderers!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- sure , lots of killings , murdering but hey , it is south america and those type people are pretty emotional and irrational . See other parts of south america to see all kinds of violence , see mexico for example . Violence is in their blood as a way of governing or acquiring wealth both at a personal level and at a government level . Course , maduro is practicing starvation and murder as he rules the 'venzie' population BPreister .
He´s the elected President. If it is true what you say he wouldn´t be that.
 
Yeah, where are these in America?

Democracy? Trump got less votes than Hillary. Bush helped a coup d'etat against Hugo Chavez in 2002. There are plenty of people in the US who would take your rights away based on religious "belief".
Except for the vote thingy you are right. All votes go to a candidate in a state, that can benefit both candidates.

The Republicans have, by far, an advantage in the electoral college. Why? Because there are far more smaller states that are hardcore Republicans than Democrat.
Doesn´t have a smaller state lesser votes? And given your are right, isn´t that accidentally?

Er... I don't understand what you've written.
I mean the electoral votes:
350px-ElectoralCollege2016.svg.png


We see, the most densely populated states are blue, they have more votes. Would the absolute number of votes count, these few states would have decided for the many other ones. And again, how close the election in a state ends is a matter of accident after all.
---------------------------------------------------------- the small electoral vote states are generally called flyover country and are where the AMERICANS live .
'maduro' disarms the starving taxpaying 'venzies;' and provides guns and authority to HIS 'maduro' loyalist militia Bleipreister . --- Venezuela's Maduro to provide guns to 400,000 loyalists amid peaking tension ---
Good. The starving regime ended in 1999 and shouldn´t come back. Go Maduro!

Venezuela Maintains High Human Development: UN
Maduro: Enough killings, you murderers!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- sure , lots of killings , murdering but hey , it is south america and those type people are pretty emotional and irrational . See other parts of south america to see all kinds of violence , see mexico for example . Violence is in their blood as a way of governing or acquiring wealth both at a personal level and at a government level . Course , maduro is practicing starvation and murder as he rules the 'venzie' population BPreister .
He´s the elected President. If it is true what you say he wouldn´t be that.
---------------------------------------------------- nice thing about 'venezuela' is that the civil war that is starting will be televised B.P. .
 
Yeah, where are these in America?

Democracy? Trump got less votes than Hillary. Bush helped a coup d'etat against Hugo Chavez in 2002. There are plenty of people in the US who would take your rights away based on religious "belief".
Except for the vote thingy you are right. All votes go to a candidate in a state, that can benefit both candidates.

The Republicans have, by far, an advantage in the electoral college. Why? Because there are far more smaller states that are hardcore Republicans than Democrat.
Doesn´t have a smaller state lesser votes? And given your are right, isn´t that accidentally?

Er... I don't understand what you've written.
I mean the electoral votes:
350px-ElectoralCollege2016.svg.png


We see, the most densely populated states are blue, they have more votes. Would the absolute number of votes count, these few states would have decided for the many other ones. And again, how close the election in a state ends is a matter of accident after all.
 
This is the greatest beginnings of cooperation against international islamic terror you take trillions to stay alive from with all your excellent posting and 'popular' sub-culture.

GBless Donald Trump.
God blesses all who mock the handicapped and brag about sexual assault. You think?
 
This is the greatest beginnings of cooperation against international islamic terror you take trillions to stay alive from with all your excellent posting and 'popular' sub-culture.

GBless Donald Trump.
God blesses all who mock the handicapped and brag about sexual assault. You think?

Yeah all the bastard children and family that wont leave him, certainly. Do you screw with kids in your house ? You're not allowed to have a dog in the places he visits. xD
 
This is outrageous. Were the doomsday nuts right?

Trump_in_Saudi.jpg

No potato bag? Warm, slimy welcome for Phrump

Saudi Arabia, U.S. sign 350 billion dollar deal to bolster military capabilities

Sorry but the Saudis are not terrorists. They are not on any kind of 'watch list' prepared by the Obama Administration and they have cooperated fully in working with the USA to combat terrorism. They are currently hosting President Trump and close to 50 heads of state of other Muslim countries in a summit specifically to collectively deal with terrorist activities in Muslim countries or exported by Muslim countries.

This is a good thing and should be widely applauded, not condemned.
 

Forum List

Back
Top