Steve_McGarrett
Gold Member
- Jul 11, 2013
- 19,272
- 4,371
- 280
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #41
Ankeny v Daniels was not a presidential natural born citizen case at the federal level. You fail again. Now will you let me enjoy my beer at the local Amvets? I'm busy.The courts disagree with your batshit crazy theoryEverything is self explanatory:Oh, and speaking of the Naturalization Act of 1790.....they felt it was necessary to create a law that said that children born to two US citizens abroad 'shall be considered natural born'.
Now, if natural born meant the child of two citizens, as you claim.....why the need to explicitly include those children born outside the US to two parents? And why were they only ''considered' natural born citizens?
Easy: Natural born status follows place of birth.
![]()
In 2009, the Indiana Court of Appeals (“Indiana Court”) addressed facts and issues similar to those before this court. [Ankeny] v. Governor, 916 N.E.2d (Ind. Ct. App. 2009). … The Indiana Court rejected the argument that Mr. Obama was ineligible, stating that children born within the United States are natural born citizens, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. … This Court finds the decision and analysis of [Ankeny] persuasive.