Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,962
- 86,329
- 2,635
You really have some personal issues with reading comprehension. I never denied Biden threatened to pull a billion dollar guaranteed loan if Ukraine didn't clean up their prosecutor general's office. So there was no lie then and I see no lie now.You mean except he wasn't investigating Biden's son. Not only was Hunter Biden not under investigation, Zlochevskyi and Burisma Holdings were, Biden was but one member on their board of directors; but even they weren't being investigated because the corrupt prosecutor general wasn't letting the investigation proceed....Except for the fact that he was investigating Biden's son for corruption, why was that a matter for us to compel Ukraine through blackmail, rather than Ukraine to work out on their own as they saw fit?To fire a prosecutor who was corrupt and not allowing the investigation to go anywhere.He bragged about leveraging Ukraine with a $B taxpayer money to fire the prosecutor. If Ukraine wants to look into it, they will. If a US attorney wants to look into it, they will.LOL
Great... now prove he did so to halt the investigation into Burisma Holdings, which news is reporting was a dormant investigation.
Running for President doesn't give him immunity from prosecution, you know.
Bloomberg - Are you a robot?
But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.
“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky,” Kasko said in an interview last week. “It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.”
So Biden lied when said he threatened the Ukraine to fire the prosecutor?
Was he lying then or is he lying now? One has to be true!