Trump Picks Up Another Endorsement That Will Piss Off Hillary

[SuperDemocrat]

I really think that the unemployment rate has been incredibly high for black and hispanic voters. It usually is higher for them than any other group. They have been told by the 'liberal' media that we are at full employment yet unemployment for those groups neat 10%. Maybe they are not just buying the load of bull that we have all been fed about the unemployment situation in this country.

 

[S.J.]

I'm pretty sure you are.

How fucking stupid do you have to be to not be able to count up the NAFTA votes and determine whether most Democrats opposed it.

Someone tell me how stupid that is? I'm begging you.

lol

I don't know if you were wrong or right, but I'm pretty sure you are stupid.

Cite 10 stupid positions I've held, and we'll debate them one on one, one at a time.

Well, you've posted 76,923 times, take your pick.

Lol, so you can't name one.

You lose, retard.

You're a fucking idiot. You claimed that "democrats voted against it".

whats it gonna be, dickhead

They did. If you can prove most Democrats voted for it, post the numbers. Or, go kill yourself.

I would like to double and triple down on this. The wingnuts are very mistaken

Since I posted the numbers, you're not going far out on a limb.

Not to mention that the idiots who claimed otherwise fled like cockroaches when the light went on.

You keep saying that yet here we are.
The top dem signed it into law. Period the end.....

Sorry, you claimed I was wrong when I said that most Democrats in Congress voted against NAFTA.

Most Democrats did. That makes you a fucking idiot. Not that we needed more proof.

This one, plus the other 76,923. Happy now, semen sucker?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

I'm pretty sure you are.

How fucking stupid do you have to be to not be able to count up the NAFTA votes and determine whether most Democrats opposed it.

Someone tell me how stupid that is? I'm begging you.

lol

I don't know if you were wrong or right, but I'm pretty sure you are stupid.

Cite 10 stupid positions I've held, and we'll debate them one on one, one at a time.

Well, you've posted 76,923 times, take your pick.

Lol, so you can't name one.

You lose, retard.

You're a fucking idiot. You claimed that "democrats voted against it".

whats it gonna be, dickhead

They did. If you can prove most Democrats voted for it, post the numbers. Or, go kill yourself.

I would like to double and triple down on this. The wingnuts are very mistaken

Since I posted the numbers, you're not going far out on a limb.

Not to mention that the idiots who claimed otherwise fled like cockroaches when the light went on.

You keep saying that yet here we are.
The top dem signed it into law. Period the end.....

Sorry, you claimed I was wrong when I said that most Democrats in Congress voted against NAFTA.

Most Democrats did. That makes you a fucking idiot. Not that we needed more proof.

I claimed no such thing.

 

[NYcarbineer]

How fucking stupid do you have to be to not be able to count up the NAFTA votes and determine whether most Democrats opposed it.

Someone tell me how stupid that is? I'm begging you.

lol

I don't know if you were wrong or right, but I'm pretty sure you are stupid.

Cite 10 stupid positions I've held, and we'll debate them one on one, one at a time.

Well, you've posted 76,923 times, take your pick.

Lol, so you can't name one.

You lose, retard.

They did. If you can prove most Democrats voted for it, post the numbers. Or, go kill yourself.

I would like to double and triple down on this. The wingnuts are very mistaken

Since I posted the numbers, you're not going far out on a limb.

Not to mention that the idiots who claimed otherwise fled like cockroaches when the light went on.

You keep saying that yet here we are.
The top dem signed it into law. Period the end.....

Sorry, you claimed I was wrong when I said that most Democrats in Congress voted against NAFTA.

Most Democrats did. That makes you a fucking idiot. Not that we needed more proof.

I claimed no such thing.

So when you called me dishonest for saying that Democrats in Congress voted against NAFTA,

you meant what?

 

[NYcarbineer]

How fucking stupid do you have to be to not be able to count up the NAFTA votes and determine whether most Democrats opposed it.

Someone tell me how stupid that is? I'm begging you.

lol

I don't know if you were wrong or right, but I'm pretty sure you are stupid.

Cite 10 stupid positions I've held, and we'll debate them one on one, one at a time.

Well, you've posted 76,923 times, take your pick.

Lol, so you can't name one.

You lose, retard.

They did. If you can prove most Democrats voted for it, post the numbers. Or, go kill yourself.

I would like to double and triple down on this. The wingnuts are very mistaken

Since I posted the numbers, you're not going far out on a limb.

Not to mention that the idiots who claimed otherwise fled like cockroaches when the light went on.

You keep saying that yet here we are.
The top dem signed it into law. Period the end.....

Sorry, you claimed I was wrong when I said that most Democrats in Congress voted against NAFTA.

Most Democrats did. That makes you a fucking idiot. Not that we needed more proof.

This one, plus the other 76,923. Happy now, semen sucker?

Most Democrats in Congress voted against NAFTA. I posted the results.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

I don't know if you were wrong or right, but I'm pretty sure you are stupid.

Cite 10 stupid positions I've held, and we'll debate them one on one, one at a time.

Well, you've posted 76,923 times, take your pick.

Lol, so you can't name one.

You lose, retard.

I would like to double and triple down on this. The wingnuts are very mistaken

Since I posted the numbers, you're not going far out on a limb.

Not to mention that the idiots who claimed otherwise fled like cockroaches when the light went on.

You keep saying that yet here we are.
The top dem signed it into law. Period the end.....

Sorry, you claimed I was wrong when I said that most Democrats in Congress voted against NAFTA.

Most Democrats did. That makes you a fucking idiot. Not that we needed more proof.

I claimed no such thing.

So when you called me dishonest for saying that Democrats in Congress voted against NAFTA,

you meant what?

You'll have to show me that post.
All I've said is bill signed it into law,which of course means it was supported by dems.

 

[Never3ndr]

Cite 10 stupid positions I've held, and we'll debate them one on one, one at a time.

Well, you've posted 76,923 times, take your pick.

Lol, so you can't name one.

You lose, retard.

Since I posted the numbers, you're not going far out on a limb.

Not to mention that the idiots who claimed otherwise fled like cockroaches when the light went on.

You keep saying that yet here we are.
The top dem signed it into law. Period the end.....

Sorry, you claimed I was wrong when I said that most Democrats in Congress voted against NAFTA.

Most Democrats did. That makes you a fucking idiot. Not that we needed more proof.

I claimed no such thing.

So when you called me dishonest for saying that Democrats in Congress voted against NAFTA,

you meant what?

You'll have to show me that post.
All I've said is bill signed it into law,which of course means it was supported by dems.

I'll post the links:

House voting record:

H.R. 3450 (103rd): North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act -- House Vote #575 -- Nov 17, 1993

Senate voting record:

U.S. Senate: Roll Call Vote

Quick stats for the House (Dems) are that ~39.5% voted yay, ~60.5% voted nay
Quick stats for the Senate (Dems) are that ~78.2% voted yay, ~21.8% voted nay

If you were to add the votes together, then a numerical majority did vote against NAFTA...but only by 23 votes.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Well, you've posted 76,923 times, take your pick.

Lol, so you can't name one.

You lose, retard.

You keep saying that yet here we are.
The top dem signed it into law. Period the end.....

Sorry, you claimed I was wrong when I said that most Democrats in Congress voted against NAFTA.

Most Democrats did. That makes you a fucking idiot. Not that we needed more proof.

I claimed no such thing.

So when you called me dishonest for saying that Democrats in Congress voted against NAFTA,

you meant what?

You'll have to show me that post.
All I've said is bill signed it into law,which of course means it was supported by dems.

I'll post the links:

House voting record:

H.R. 3450 (103rd): North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act -- House Vote #575 -- Nov 17, 1993

Senate voting record:

U.S. Senate: Roll Call Vote

Quick stats for the House (Dems) are that ~39.5% voted yay, ~60.5% voted nay
Quick stats for the Senate (Dems) are that ~78.2% voted yay, ~21.8% voted nay

If you were to add the votes together, then a numerical majority did vote against NAFTA...but only by 23 votes.

And what exactly does that have to do with my post?

 

[Never3ndr]

And what exactly does that have to do with my post?

I thought you were asking for evidence that Democrats voted against NAFTA. If that was not what you were asking then feel free to disregard my post.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

And what exactly does that have to do with my post?

I thought you were asking for evidence that Democrats voted against NAFTA. If that was not what you were asking then feel free to disregard my post.

My position is since a dem was the one who signed it into to law that obviously means it had support of dems.

 

[daws101]

And what exactly does that have to do with my post?

I thought you were asking for evidence that Democrats voted against NAFTA. If that was not what you were asking then feel free to disregard my post.

My position is since a dem was the one who signed it into to law that obviously means it had support of dems.

Some not all, get it now?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Cite 10 stupid positions I've held, and we'll debate them one on one, one at a time.

Well, you've posted 76,923 times, take your pick.

Lol, so you can't name one.

You lose, retard.

Since I posted the numbers, you're not going far out on a limb.

Not to mention that the idiots who claimed otherwise fled like cockroaches when the light went on.

You keep saying that yet here we are.
The top dem signed it into law. Period the end.....

Sorry, you claimed I was wrong when I said that most Democrats in Congress voted against NAFTA.

Most Democrats did. That makes you a fucking idiot. Not that we needed more proof.

I claimed no such thing.

So when you called me dishonest for saying that Democrats in Congress voted against NAFTA,

you meant what?

You'll have to show me that post.
All I've said is bill signed it into law,which of course means it was supported by dems.

You lie.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

And what exactly does that have to do with my post?

I thought you were asking for evidence that Democrats voted against NAFTA. If that was not what you were asking then feel free to disregard my post.

My position is since a dem was the one who signed it into to law that obviously means it had support of dems.

Some not all, get it now?

Who said all? Get it now?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Well, you've posted 76,923 times, take your pick.

Lol, so you can't name one.

You lose, retard.

You keep saying that yet here we are.
The top dem signed it into law. Period the end.....

Sorry, you claimed I was wrong when I said that most Democrats in Congress voted against NAFTA.

Most Democrats did. That makes you a fucking idiot. Not that we needed more proof.

I claimed no such thing.

So when you called me dishonest for saying that Democrats in Congress voted against NAFTA,

you meant what?

You'll have to show me that post.
All I've said is bill signed it into law,which of course means it was supported by dems.

You lie.

Well that settles it..what a fucken tard.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Lol, so you can't name one.

You lose, retard.
Sorry, you claimed I was wrong when I said that most Democrats in Congress voted against NAFTA.

Most Democrats did. That makes you a fucking idiot. Not that we needed more proof.

I claimed no such thing.

So when you called me dishonest for saying that Democrats in Congress voted against NAFTA,

you meant what?

You'll have to show me that post.
All I've said is bill signed it into law,which of course means it was supported by dems.

You lie.

Well that settles it..what a fucken tard.

Trump Picks Up Another Endorsement That Will Piss Off Hillary

Read the whole post and you will see where you call me dishonest or stupid for saying that most Democrats voted against NAFTA.

 

[bendog]

Charles Evers has been supporting republicans for 30 years.

 

[Conservative65]

Never heard of the Guy.

But I'm sure he's heard of you.

I'll be sure to invite him to my press conference when I reveal my endorcement !

You should learn how to spell endorsement before giving one.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

I claimed no such thing.

So when you called me dishonest for saying that Democrats in Congress voted against NAFTA,

you meant what?

You'll have to show me that post.
All I've said is bill signed it into law,which of course means it was supported by dems.

You lie.

Well that settles it..what a fucken tard.

Trump Picks Up Another Endorsement That Will Piss Off Hillary

Read the whole post and you will see where you call me dishonest or stupid for saying that most Democrats voted against NAFTA.

Where's the post?

 

[Never3ndr]

And what exactly does that have to do with my post?

I thought you were asking for evidence that Democrats voted against NAFTA. If that was not what you were asking then feel free to disregard my post.

My position is since a dem was the one who signed it into to law that obviously means it had support of dems.

We, as the people, usually think that who has the presidential seat, has the leadership of the party. We expect them to lead both their party and Congress into following the "gameplan" of how they want the country to be ran. This is just plain false, however, and shows a lack of basic understanding of how our government operates.

Generally speaking, the party leaders are all in places of power throughout Congress. You usually don't see party leaders running for a presidential office...why? Well, being president puts you at odds with Congress members more often than not. Both on the basis of trying to maintain the influence you have coupled with a basic belief in how our government was constructed (we have 3 branches of government built to counter each other, not 1 branch built to lead). These guys are usually the ones who influence the party and can great effect how they vote (do they need people to vote based off their constituent bases or based off of the party agenda) and what initiatives they push for. Now, in practice, some presidents have been able to relatively unify both their office along with Congress, but, more often than not, it just isn't the case.

With all that said, saying that a democrat signed something into office doesn't necessarily mean that the party supported it. Now, I wasn't following politics at the time, but, if you look strictly at the voting records, it looked like an issue that the party was relatively neutral on (at least in the House) and, so, allowed their members to vote based off their constituent bases rather than off party lines. Then again, this may have been before the time where the strength of Party Whips came into effect and the parties started to pretty much always vote based off of party stances rather than how their constituents may would like. Regardless, you can say that Clinton supported it, but saying that the Dems supported it is not an entirely true statement at all.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

And what exactly does that have to do with my post?

I thought you were asking for evidence that Democrats voted against NAFTA. If that was not what you were asking then feel free to disregard my post.

My position is since a dem was the one who signed it into to law that obviously means it had support of dems.

We, as the people, usually think that who has the presidential seat, has the leadership of the party. We expect them to lead both their party and Congress into following the "gameplan" of how they want the country to be ran. This is just plain false, however, and shows a lack of basic understanding of how our government operates.

Generally speaking, the party leaders are all in places of power throughout Congress. You usually don't see party leaders running for a presidential office...why? Well, being president puts you at odds with Congress members more often than not. Both on the basis of trying to maintain the influence you have coupled with a basic belief in how our government was constructed (we have 3 branches of government built to counter each other, not 1 branch built to lead). These guys are usually the ones who influence the party and can great effect how they vote (do they need people to vote based off their constituent bases or based off of the party agenda) and what initiatives they push for. Now, in practice, some presidents have been able to relatively unify both their office along with Congress, but, more often than not, it just isn't the case.

With all that said, saying that a democrat signed something into office doesn't necessarily mean that the party supported it. Now, I wasn't following politics at the time, but, if you look strictly at the voting records, it looked like an issue that the party was relatively neutral on (at least in the House) and, so, allowed their members to vote based off their constituent bases rather than off party lines. Then again, this may have been before the time where the strength of Party Whips came into effect and the parties started to pretty much always vote based off of party stances rather than how their constituents may would like. Regardless, you can say that Clinton supported it, but saying that the Dems supported it is not an entirely true statement at all.

A dem signed the thing into law.
And you can bet a lot of those dems who did vote against it were doing so to save their own asses in the next election.