owebo
Gold Member
Mexico.......From where is Trump getting these federal funds? The Oval Office couch cushions?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mexico.......From where is Trump getting these federal funds? The Oval Office couch cushions?
We need the wall actually built....Union jobs...no non union inferiors.
I hold up as evidence these two accolades in rebuttal to your flawed tirade:your assumption that President Reagan wasn't smart enough to handle it is basically just that an assumption.What????? Oh no you didn't GO THERE! Are you a clown or a fool? Reagan didn't 'have an obstructionist Congress to contend with and he spent like crazy. Reagan didn 'thave to bail out the big banks with almost a trillion dollar welfare package, Regan didn't have to save two major auto giants from crashing... all while two BUSH wars were going on. Oh, nad lets not forget Bushes legacy of tax cuts for the rich while starting those two wars and his Part D Medicare drug initiatives. I don't Reagan was smart enough to handle all of that!"On a scale as broad?" What the fuck is that supposed to mean? The recession at the beginning of the Reagan administration was worse, the recovery was far faster and far stronger.Heh heh heh...what other recoveries have there been after the Great Depression on a scale as broad as the one Obama inherited from Bush? Stop lying!Obama didn't save anything. Recovery after a recession is the normal state of affairs. Obama's recovery has been the slowest since the Great Depression.
However, we do have proof that the magic negro was not smart enough, to that there is no question.
besides, he campaigned with the promise to end those two wars within a certain time period, after that period, I would say that those two wars were his. and, as far as obstruction, not true, bills were presented, its just that the democrats would not accept them if any of their spending, like funding obamacare was missing. with them it was all or nothing, its why they shut down the government. bunch of damn babies not getting their way. All they had to do to not have their own obstruction would have been to pass the bills without the funding for what turned out a loss and a failure anyway (like the republicans said it would) and then after the rest of the budget was signed and approved, go back and fight for the funding for obamas an idiot care. Seems so simple when you think about it, but its really hard to reason with small children when they dont get their way.
the now booming economy at the end of Obama's presidency and the high approval ratings that went with him.
It's a smaller project than building I-10 for the same number of miles. All those who oppose the wall are open borders douche bags. They pay lip service to controlling the border. What they really want are "solutions" that can easily be ignored when the next Democrat administration comes in. Once the wall is built, it's permanent. They can't unbuild it. That's why they hate it.I'm one of the trump voters that never believed the wall was practical to end illegal immigration or stop drugs. The magnitude of a project this size is unbelievable and would take years. A couple things like e verify, fine employers heavily if they hire the undocumented, and stop instant birth citizenship for any one that makes it to this country illegally, and also ending birth tourism would end a lot of people coming here for citizenships. As far as stopping drugs coming here, lots of luck. There's thousands of miles of coastlines and northern borders, and those that guard those coasts and borders are not above being bribed, either.
Union workers are fat lazy slobs.Union jobs...no non union inferiors.
Obama didn't have twelve trillion to spend. The House holds the purses strings and they made sure Obama spent the least since eisenhower.I hold up as evidence these two accolades in rebuttal to your flawed tirade:your assumption that President Reagan wasn't smart enough to handle it is basically just that an assumption.What????? Oh no you didn't GO THERE! Are you a clown or a fool? Reagan didn't 'have an obstructionist Congress to contend with and he spent like crazy. Reagan didn 'thave to bail out the big banks with almost a trillion dollar welfare package, Regan didn't have to save two major auto giants from crashing... all while two BUSH wars were going on. Oh, nad lets not forget Bushes legacy of tax cuts for the rich while starting those two wars and his Part D Medicare drug initiatives. I don't Reagan was smart enough to handle all of that!"On a scale as broad?" What the fuck is that supposed to mean? The recession at the beginning of the Reagan administration was worse, the recovery was far faster and far stronger.Heh heh heh...what other recoveries have there been after the Great Depression on a scale as broad as the one Obama inherited from Bush? Stop lying!
However, we do have proof that the magic negro was not smart enough, to that there is no question.
besides, he campaigned with the promise to end those two wars within a certain time period, after that period, I would say that those two wars were his. and, as far as obstruction, not true, bills were presented, its just that the democrats would not accept them if any of their spending, like funding obamacare was missing. with them it was all or nothing, its why they shut down the government. bunch of damn babies not getting their way. All they had to do to not have their own obstruction would have been to pass the bills without the funding for what turned out a loss and a failure anyway (like the republicans said it would) and then after the rest of the budget was signed and approved, go back and fight for the funding for obamas an idiot care. Seems so simple when you think about it, but its really hard to reason with small children when they dont get their way.
the now booming economy at the end of Obama's presidency and the high approval ratings that went with him.
You forgot to mention the high debt to counter the high ratings. Even a high school dropout or a mediocre talent like obama could have a good economy on paper with ten to twelve trillion dollars to spend.
Obama is responsible for the 09 spending. Lying about who spent what is a common Dim propaganda meme.Obama didn't have twelve trillion to spend. The House holds the purses strings and they made sure Obama spent the least since eisenhower.I hold up as evidence these two accolades in rebuttal to your flawed tirade:your assumption that President Reagan wasn't smart enough to handle it is basically just that an assumption.What????? Oh no you didn't GO THERE! Are you a clown or a fool? Reagan didn't 'have an obstructionist Congress to contend with and he spent like crazy. Reagan didn 'thave to bail out the big banks with almost a trillion dollar welfare package, Regan didn't have to save two major auto giants from crashing... all while two BUSH wars were going on. Oh, nad lets not forget Bushes legacy of tax cuts for the rich while starting those two wars and his Part D Medicare drug initiatives. I don't Reagan was smart enough to handle all of that!"On a scale as broad?" What the fuck is that supposed to mean? The recession at the beginning of the Reagan administration was worse, the recovery was far faster and far stronger.
However, we do have proof that the magic negro was not smart enough, to that there is no question.
besides, he campaigned with the promise to end those two wars within a certain time period, after that period, I would say that those two wars were his. and, as far as obstruction, not true, bills were presented, its just that the democrats would not accept them if any of their spending, like funding obamacare was missing. with them it was all or nothing, its why they shut down the government. bunch of damn babies not getting their way. All they had to do to not have their own obstruction would have been to pass the bills without the funding for what turned out a loss and a failure anyway (like the republicans said it would) and then after the rest of the budget was signed and approved, go back and fight for the funding for obamas an idiot care. Seems so simple when you think about it, but its really hard to reason with small children when they dont get their way.
the now booming economy at the end of Obama's presidency and the high approval ratings that went with him.
You forgot to mention the high debt to counter the high ratings. Even a high school dropout or a mediocre talent like obama could have a good economy on paper with ten to twelve trillion dollars to spend.
![]()
He might have been responsible for the 09 spending but he didn't incur the debt that required that spending, Bush did!Obama is responsible for the 09 spending. Lying about who spent what is a common Dim propaganda meme.Obama didn't have twelve trillion to spend. The House holds the purses strings and they made sure Obama spent the least since eisenhower.I hold up as evidence these two accolades in rebuttal to your flawed tirade:your assumption that President Reagan wasn't smart enough to handle it is basically just that an assumption.What????? Oh no you didn't GO THERE! Are you a clown or a fool? Reagan didn't 'have an obstructionist Congress to contend with and he spent like crazy. Reagan didn 'thave to bail out the big banks with almost a trillion dollar welfare package, Regan didn't have to save two major auto giants from crashing... all while two BUSH wars were going on. Oh, nad lets not forget Bushes legacy of tax cuts for the rich while starting those two wars and his Part D Medicare drug initiatives. I don't Reagan was smart enough to handle all of that!
However, we do have proof that the magic negro was not smart enough, to that there is no question.
besides, he campaigned with the promise to end those two wars within a certain time period, after that period, I would say that those two wars were his. and, as far as obstruction, not true, bills were presented, its just that the democrats would not accept them if any of their spending, like funding obamacare was missing. with them it was all or nothing, its why they shut down the government. bunch of damn babies not getting their way. All they had to do to not have their own obstruction would have been to pass the bills without the funding for what turned out a loss and a failure anyway (like the republicans said it would) and then after the rest of the budget was signed and approved, go back and fight for the funding for obamas an idiot care. Seems so simple when you think about it, but its really hard to reason with small children when they dont get their way.
the now booming economy at the end of Obama's presidency and the high approval ratings that went with him.
You forgot to mention the high debt to counter the high ratings. Even a high school dropout or a mediocre talent like obama could have a good economy on paper with ten to twelve trillion dollars to spend.
![]()
We haven't seen anyone like this in some time. I don't even remember Reagan going so hard from day one as Trump has. This is refreshing and invigorating to watch, no question.
http://nypost.com/2017/01/24/trump-to-begin-plans-for-border-wall-with-mexico/
It’s finally time to build the wall.
President Trump will be ordering the construction of his signature Mexican border wall on Wednesday, according to a report.
White House officials told the New York Times that the billionaire is expected to sign the executive order — directing federal funds to be focused on creating the structure — during an appearance at the Department of Homeland Security.
Building a wall on the border of Mexico was one of Trump’s biggest promises during his campaign. He ultimately believes that doing so would put a stop to the influx of illegal immigrants coming into the United States today.
“Big day planned on NATIONAL SECURITY tomorrow. Among many other things, we will build the wall!” Trump tweeted on Tuesday night.
While the wall won’t be completed for quite some time, officials told the Times that the President is also considering a policy that would temporarily stop refugees from coming from Syria, as well as other majority-Muslim nations that are deemed “terror prone.”
booming economy? what country do you speak of?I hold up as evidence these two accolades in rebuttal to your flawed tirade:your assumption that President Reagan wasn't smart enough to handle it is basically just that an assumption.What????? Oh no you didn't GO THERE! Are you a clown or a fool? Reagan didn't 'have an obstructionist Congress to contend with and he spent like crazy. Reagan didn 'thave to bail out the big banks with almost a trillion dollar welfare package, Regan didn't have to save two major auto giants from crashing... all while two BUSH wars were going on. Oh, nad lets not forget Bushes legacy of tax cuts for the rich while starting those two wars and his Part D Medicare drug initiatives. I don't Reagan was smart enough to handle all of that!"On a scale as broad?" What the fuck is that supposed to mean? The recession at the beginning of the Reagan administration was worse, the recovery was far faster and far stronger.Heh heh heh...what other recoveries have there been after the Great Depression on a scale as broad as the one Obama inherited from Bush? Stop lying!Obama didn't save anything. Recovery after a recession is the normal state of affairs. Obama's recovery has been the slowest since the Great Depression.
However, we do have proof that the magic negro was not smart enough, to that there is no question.
besides, he campaigned with the promise to end those two wars within a certain time period, after that period, I would say that those two wars were his. and, as far as obstruction, not true, bills were presented, its just that the democrats would not accept them if any of their spending, like funding obamacare was missing. with them it was all or nothing, its why they shut down the government. bunch of damn babies not getting their way. All they had to do to not have their own obstruction would have been to pass the bills without the funding for what turned out a loss and a failure anyway (like the republicans said it would) and then after the rest of the budget was signed and approved, go back and fight for the funding for obamas an idiot care. Seems so simple when you think about it, but its really hard to reason with small children when they dont get their way.
the now booming economy at the end of Obama's presidency and the high approval ratings that went with him.
Tell me again about all the people on assistance now that were not on assitancee just 8 years ago
He might have been responsible for the 09 spending but he didn't incur the debt that required that spending, Bush did!Obama is responsible for the 09 spending. Lying about who spent what is a common Dim propaganda meme.Obama didn't have twelve trillion to spend. The House holds the purses strings and they made sure Obama spent the least since eisenhower.I hold up as evidence these two accolades in rebuttal to your flawed tirade:your assumption that President Reagan wasn't smart enough to handle it is basically just that an assumption.
However, we do have proof that the magic negro was not smart enough, to that there is no question.
besides, he campaigned with the promise to end those two wars within a certain time period, after that period, I would say that those two wars were his. and, as far as obstruction, not true, bills were presented, its just that the democrats would not accept them if any of their spending, like funding obamacare was missing. with them it was all or nothing, its why they shut down the government. bunch of damn babies not getting their way. All they had to do to not have their own obstruction would have been to pass the bills without the funding for what turned out a loss and a failure anyway (like the republicans said it would) and then after the rest of the budget was signed and approved, go back and fight for the funding for obamas an idiot care. Seems so simple when you think about it, but its really hard to reason with small children when they dont get their way.
the now booming economy at the end of Obama's presidency and the high approval ratings that went with him.
You forgot to mention the high debt to counter the high ratings. Even a high school dropout or a mediocre talent like obama could have a good economy on paper with ten to twelve trillion dollars to spend.
![]()
Tissue ? victim of snowflakesHow can a liberal call anyone comrade when liberals ARE socialist communist scum Murderers.
Vicente Fox Quesada ✔ @VicenteFoxQue
![]()
Sean Spicer, I've said this to @realDonaldTrump and now I'll tell you: Mexico is not going to pay for that fucking wall. #FuckingWall
3:55 PM - 25 Jan 2017
Vicente Fox Quesada ✔ @VicenteFoxQue
go ahead, #trump. This will prove that the system made you win, not the people. Losing by 3+ million votes is not a mistake. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/824227824903090176 …
1:33 PM - 25 Jan 2017
.
Just get used to saying "President Trump"
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
God, I love saying that!
Clinton left Bush a surplus. Bush didn't return the favor. He left Obama a nation in shambles.He might have been responsible for the 09 spending but he didn't incur the debt that required that spending, Bush did!Obama is responsible for the 09 spending. Lying about who spent what is a common Dim propaganda meme.Obama didn't have twelve trillion to spend. The House holds the purses strings and they made sure Obama spent the least since eisenhower.I hold up as evidence these two accolades in rebuttal to your flawed tirade:
the now booming economy at the end of Obama's presidency and the high approval ratings that went with him.
You forgot to mention the high debt to counter the high ratings. Even a high school dropout or a mediocre talent like obama could have a good economy on paper with ten to twelve trillion dollars to spend.
![]()
If Bush is responsible for paying interest on previous debt, then so is Obama. You douche bags believe you can have one set of rules for Republicans and another set of rules for Democrats.