OhPleaseJustQuit
Diamond Member
- Jul 27, 2021
- 52,073
- 61,962
- 3,488
Right. I need recognition from every little blood tick I encounter.Aww, no one else gave your post the recognition you grave so desperately, so I gave it to you since you need it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Right. I need recognition from every little blood tick I encounter.Aww, no one else gave your post the recognition you grave so desperately, so I gave it to you since you need it.
Sorry. Not your anything. But keep trying.Thanks for being my secretary. Fixed it for ya.
Clever, gatorbreath.
Trump supporters: If Trump broke the law, should he be held legally accountable?
Yes.
Two more questions. Should the US Attorney General be held accountable for using the power of his position to attack political opponants of the administration he serves?
Should his boss be held accountable?
I love the equivocation. Precisely the opposite of my clear and unambiguous rule.Seems like a simple question from a simpleton. What "law" are you referring to? Do you think that government agencies should have unlimited powers of search and seizure in order to find out IF a crime was committed?
If it is a law that is evenly enforced.Seems like a simple question.
My view: If you suspect something, investigate it. If you find something, prosecute. If they're found guilty, nail them. If someone helped them, like family or associates, nail them too. If it's done in a political context, nail them a bit harder, since their conduct can affect millions. Political affiliation is irrelevant. Country over party, always.
So, again: If Trump broke the law, should he be held legally accountable?
FBI searches Trump's Florida home as part of presidential records probe
Former President Donald Trump said FBI agents raided his Mar-a-Lago estate on Monday and broke into his safe in what his son acknowledged was part of an investigation into Trump's removal of official presidential records from the White House to his Florida resort.www.reuters.com
We have a problem with the FBI and the DOJ which only arrests and indicts Republicans and not Democrats.Of course she should. Just prove it in a court of law. You guys have a real problem with that.
Prove her guilty under the law, then nail her.
My interpretation of the rule of law is not conditional. I'm not like you. Thank goodness.
What's clear is that Prog douchebags like you are perfectly happy with the two-tier system of justice where the FBI and DOJ only prosecutes RepublicansIt's clear that they just assume everyone's take on the rule of law is as conditional as theirs.
The fact that we don't care who broke the law appears to be very complicated for them.
Progs are the blatant hypocrites. They even brag about being hypocrites.Yes, of course. If I break the law, tough shit for me.
Not everyone is a blatant hypocrite like Trumpsters. True story!
We have a problem with the FBI and the DOJ which only arrests and indicts Republicans and not Democrats.
Who do you think you're fooling, douchebag?
What's conditional is the way you turn a blind eye to the biased treatment dished out by these government agencies.
What about HIllary, McCabe, Strzok, Comey and Hunter Biden?If Obama committed indictable offences, or whatever the term is, for which he is culpable, of course he should. Don't you believe in the rule of law?
Why should Mark Meadows be indicted?why hasn't mark meadows been indicted yet?
why hasn't mark meadows been indicted yet?
I love the equivocation. Precisely the opposite of my clear and unambiguous rule.
Good stuff!
Why should Mark Meadows be indicted?
First explain why Eric Holder wasn't arrested for contempt of Congress. None of you scumbag progs gave a damn about that.contempt of congress for refusing to honor a subpoena
& voter fraud for being registered in more than one state.
You sound like me 25 years ago...naive. If you are new to politics, you might believe that everyone is an angel who isn't looking out for their own interests.
He didn't set the standard, he is just one of many. The difference is that the political crooks before him enacted policies that have harmed America for decades, so, Trump was their choice out of desperation. Imperfect, but willing to fight for them when before they didn't have a voice.
The same low performers won't go easily, they want their Romneys, McCains and Cheneys back (more oddly, the left who HATED them now want them back to), the problem is that the electorate have chose a far different course and they will stop at nothing to force a bad option on them.
Why should Mark Meadows be indicted?
Sorry. Not your anything. But keep trying.