Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So which did you agree to? That he was immoral or that his behavior was immoral?
Because then it appears that you flipped your position.
Well, it's simple, I'm afraid: Trump says so. He says it was a landslide win, so that's that.I've wondered how they can actually harbor a notion of a stolen "Landslide!" when, 20 months after the election, after their recounts, after their audits, after their investigations, after their death threats directed at Republican officeholders, poll workers, and their families, after dozens of court challenges, after a goon attack on Congress, after their failure to hang the vice President, after their fake elector scheme, after their plot to seize the states' voting machines, not only have they not contrived any credible evidence needed to litigate, they don't have a single suspect in their monumental caper that would have demanded legions of conspirators.
Me: “Do you see anything immoral about a guy who was enjoying the violence that was happening and chose not to intervene in stopping it?”Which one are you saying, that Trump is immoral or that his behavior was immoral? You can't very well flip flop the question and then accuse me of flip flopping the answer.
I never flipped my position that he should have done something to stop it. Why this isn't enough for you I'll never understand.
His fake, baseless, claims are the pretext for his playing the victim card. His constant whining and obsessing over imaginary wrongs resonates with his devotees. The constant gnashing of tooth.Well, it's simple, I'm afraid: Trump says so. He says it was a landslide win, so that's that.
This person is not a mystery. His history is clear and it is consistent. The fact that he communicates almost exclusively in hyperbole is not material for serious debate.
It's all right there for them. I know this has to do with an intense longing that has been building over the years, but try as I might, I'm still not able to put my finger on it.
I'm just curious what you expected him to do?Cognitive dissonance.
E.g., "What is your opinion regarding Trump watching, for three hours, his goons savaging greatly-outnumbered police and trashing the Capitol in an attempt to sabotage the democratic process, while his minions, family, media shills, and others pleaded with him to call them off?"
View attachment 677218
"HILLARY!"
"HUNTER!"
"BAMBOO BALLOTS!"
"ITALIAN SATELLITES!"
"WHISPERING RAY"
where was Peloser in stopping the trespassing?Me: “Do you see anything immoral about a guy who was enjoying the violence that was happening and chose not to intervene in stopping it?”
You: “I suppose so.”
So you were saying that he is immoral before you decided to flip on that one. Do you still stand by what you said here?
Did he ninja attack the driver of his limo or not?His fake, baseless, claims are the pretext for his playing the victim card. His constant whining and obsessing over imaginary wrongs resonates with his devotees. The constant gnashing of tooth.
You can scrutinize it to the best of your ability. Other people can scrutinize it. I don’t mind that at all. Scrutinize away.
Let me know when more than one such incident is found.
My point stands.
Do you have memory issues?So you still can’t answer whether you think Ray Epps works for the FBI.
What’s the matter? Scared?
still stuck on the TDS huh?Well, it's simple, I'm afraid: Trump says so. He says it was a landslide win, so that's that.
This person is not a mystery. His history is clear and it is consistent. The fact that he communicates almost exclusively in hyperbole is not material for serious debate.
It's all right there for them. I know this has to do with an intense longing that has been building over the years, but try as I might, I'm still not able to put my finger on it.
I would defer to Trump's lawyers, Trump's staff, Trump's political allies, Trump's media allies, and Trump's family, ALL of whom know him and the situation FAR better than YOU, Trumpster. And THEY were PLEADING with him, because THEY KNEW.still stuck on the TDS huh?
Still wondering what you expected Trump to do about Jan 6? If you answered that, I missed it.
no, you said he sat back, I want to know what you expected him to do? Especially after the hearsay evidence suggested he wanted to go there. Can't have it both ways MAC.I would defer to Trump's lawyers, Trump's staff, Trump's political allies, Trump's media allies, and Trump's family, ALL of whom know him and the situation FAR better than YOU, Trumpster. And THEY were PLEADING with him, because THEY KNEW.
Maybe you should be asking THEM that ignorant question. Own your TDS, rube.
I don't NEED it both ways, rube.no, you said he sat back, I want to know what you expected him to do? Especially after the hearsay evidence suggested he wanted to go there. Can't have it both ways MAC.
no, the hearsay evidence said he wanted to be at the capitol. You're asking why he didn't go. Which is it? two way camI don't NEED it both ways, rube.
Ask Trump's lawyers, Trump's staff, Trump's political allies, Trump's media allies, and Trump's family, ALL of whom know him and the situation FAR better than YOU, Trumpster. And THEY were PLEADING with him, because THEY KNEW.
I'm not asking why he didn't go. I know they wouldn't LET HIM. I'm asking why HE CHOSE NOT TO STOP IT.no, the hearsay evidence said he wanted to be at the capitol. You're asking why he didn't go. Which is it? two way cam
how was he going to do that exactly? name the solution you believe he omitted.I'm not asking why he didn't go. I know they wouldn't LET HIM. I'm asking why HE CHOSE NOT TO STOP IT.
So YOU could ask those who were PLEADING WITH HIM:
Trump's lawyers, Trump's staff, Trump's political allies, Trump's media allies, and Trump's family, ALL of whom know him and the situation FAR better than YOU, Trumpster. And THEY were PLEADING with him, because THEY KNEW.
You're just playing games now. You lose. Tough shit.how was he going to do that exactly? name the solution you believe he omitted.
naw, that's you, complaining someone didn't do something but can't say what that something could have been. That's insanity, and it's okay, you are in fact that.You're just playing games now. You lose. Tough shit.
The following people KNEW HE COULD STOP IT:
Trump's lawyers, Trump's staff, Trump's political allies, Trump's media allies, and Trump's family, ALL of whom know him and the situation FAR better than YOU, Trumpster. And THEY were PLEADING with him, because THEY KNEW.
The first time I saw him say, "the only way I lose is if the election is rigged", I had a weird sense of foreboding.His fake, baseless, claims are the pretext for his playing the victim card. His constant whining and obsessing over imaginary wrongs resonates with his devotees. The constant gnashing of tooth.
Their standards are a little low for the guy.Me: “Do you see anything immoral about a guy who was enjoying the violence that was happening and chose not to intervene in stopping it?”
You: “I suppose so.”
So you were saying that he is immoral before you decided to flip on that one. Do you still stand by what you said here?
