- Sep 16, 2012
- 59,560
- 53,375
- 3,605
You're not paying attention. The going craze is that Russians bribed Hillary with $145 million plus an additional half million dollars to Bill to give a speech.Dumbfuck, the vast majority of money was donated by a Canadian not connected to the Rosatom deal and while Hillary was a Senator with zero influence on the Rosatom deal.Lil faun sez? "Now you listen to me! That Hitlery did not get no money from those ROOSKIES that interfered in our de-MOCK-RACY! I just know that those dastardly ROOSKIES conspired with that Trump
to reveal the cheating and corruption of my beloved leftard clown posse party...and that's CHEATING!!"
(snicker)
You’re just fucking crazy, delusional dale.
![]()
Actually, you are going to have to concede.
You are right, it was Canadians, but they were intricately connected to the Russians.
Cash flowed to Clinton Foundation amid Russian uranium deal
Uranium One deal examined.
Cash flowed to Clinton Foundation amid Russian uranium deal
". . . . The ultimate authority to approve or reject the Russian acquisition rested with the Cabinet officials on the foreign investment committee, including Hillary Clinton — whose husband was collecting millions in donations from people associated with Uranium One. . . . . "
<snip>
". . . To judge from those disclosures, the only Uranium One official to give to the Clinton Foundation was Telfer, the chairman, and the amount was relatively small: no more than $250,000, and that was in 2007, before talk of a Rosatom deal began percolating.
But a review of tax records in Canada, where Telfer has a family charity called the Fernwood Foundation, shows that he donated millions of dollars more, during and after the critical time when the foreign investment committee was reviewing his deal with the Russians.
His donations through the Fernwood Foundation included $1 million reported in 2009, the year his company appealed to the U.S. Embassy to help it keep its mines in Kazakhstan; $250,000 in 2010, the year the Russians sought majority control; as well as $600,000 in 2011; and $500,000 in 2012. Telfer said that his donations had nothing to do with his business dealings and that he had never discussed Uranium One with Bill or Hillary Clinton. He said he had given the money because he wanted to support Giustra’s charitable endeavors with Bill Clinton.
Telfer’s undisclosed donations came in addition to between $1.3 million and $5.6 million in contributions, which were reported, from a constellation of people with ties to Uranium One or UrAsia, the company that originally acquired Uranium One’s most valuable asset: the Kazakh mines.
Amid this influx of Uranium One-connected money, Bill Clinton was invited to speak in Moscow in June 2010, the same month Rosatom struck its deal for a majority stake in Uranium One.
The $500,000 fee was paid by Renaissance Capital, a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin. . . . "
You at least concede the money was donated by Canadians and not Russians; but you ignore the vast majority of the $145 million which was donated between 2005-2008, while Hillary was a Senator with no influence over the Rosatom in 2010. Even worse for you, Frank Giustra, who donated most of that $145 million, sold his share of Uranium One in 2007. He was long removed from the Rosatom deal 3 years later.
So all you have is a couple of million dollars donated to the Clinton Foundation, again, not by Russians ... but by the chairman of Uranium One. And according to the conspiracy, that was to buy Hillary's (by then, she was Secretary of State) approval of the deal. But then we come to the next part you left out. Hillary's approval alone was not enough for the deal to go through. It actually required a unanimous vote by a committee of nine individuals plus the president's approval; of whom, you have zero evidence any of them were bribed; and indeed, they would all have needed to be bribed to insure such an investment. Secondly, you can't even prove Hillary signed off on the deal. Her assistant claims he actually did and that she wasn't involved. He said he was the signatory on CFIUS deals, not Hillary.
And lastly is Bill's $500K speech. In reality, that was often the going rate to hire Bill Clinton to speak. I believe it was that year when Bill Received as much as $700K for a single speech. All you're actually doing is dreaming up a conspiracy because Clinton happened to give a speech in Russia at a time when he was traveling the globe giving speeches.
Here, if you possess the gumption to watch all 6½ minutes, you might just learn something. Delusional dale proved he lacked the testicular fortitude to last more than 3 seconds....
You really are a moron....the clinton's siezed control of the democrat party apparatus and everyone in that party knew she was running for President......and as we saw with the sand bagging of Bernie Sanders, their control was complete....so foreign governments were signing up early to get in with the next President of the U.S....if anyone was a manchurian candidate it was hilary.......who was bought and paid for long before entering office......
You are a moron....you are delusional...
LOL
You morons never quit being morons, do ya?
She first announced forming a presidential exploratory committee in 2007 -- years after the money from Frank Giustra started pouring into the Clinton Foundation ... and again, the president alone does not approve such deals. The nine members of CFIUS first analyze them and have to approve them. And again, Frank Giustra divested himself of Uranium one in 2007. He had nothing to do with the Rosatom deal in 2010.
You morons are actually stupid enough to claim a guy who was not a Russian and who had no part of Uranium One in 2010, paid Hillary $145 million while she was a Senator with no influence over the Uranium One deal which the Canadian investor had no interest in, do sign off on approval on a deal which she didn't personally approve.
Do ya see now why normal folks laugh at conservatives like the clown y'all are?
![1e80fg.jpg](https://i.imgflip.com/1e80fg.jpg)