Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That, we agree on. But yes, we are limited to those that actually want the job and most people don't. Hillary has a problem besides her history, she is essentially running on a third obama term and doesn't have the populous likability factor. Most don't think we are going in the right direction any candidate that can hammer that point home will do well. And Trump does seem like the type.You're joking right? Everything about Hillary is negative, in fact she's one of the few human beings (and I use the term loosely when referring to her) that has absolutely NO redeeming qualities. Trump is a class A jackass demagogue but at least he has some successful business experience (all of it heavily weighted with influence buying and inherited money but at least he's done *some* things right as a business person).How so? You haven't found any negatives on Hillary?Yet, the Queen of Corruption will probably win, not because she is worth a shit but because the Republicans are choosing to nominate such an outlandish demagogue. It should have been a fairly easy victory for the GOP in 2016, however as usual the party of stupid chose the one candidate out of a field of many that Hillary the Harpy has an advantage over.Face it kids.. there is zero excitement over Hillary. NONE. Trump is yuge.
That being said I wouldn't cast my vote for any of these miscreants, doing so would make me culpable in the evil which is sure to follow any one of them getting elected and if I can't stop the crime I damn sure ain't going to join in on it.
There are probably at least 100 million U.S. Citizens that would be "better", unfortunately none of them are running for the Presidency. This whole circus is a race to the bottom wherein the candidate with the best bullshit & deception machine will likely win and as far as I can tell that looks to be Hillary, after all when it comes to bullshit and deception she and her unholy henchmen have the most experience.Who would be better? Kasich? More establishment bs? The left hasn't even started on Cruz, if he won his negatives would probably drop to more than Trump's.
You people twist everything. It was Monica Lewinsky who went to Washington carrying her 'knee pads' according to her own description. She went there with the intention of seducing the President. When she did, you say he took advantage of her. Yet she was the one to "celebrate a woman's independence and her right to be proud and open about her sexuality." She was not taken advantage of, and I doubt any of others were either. You are the hypocrites.OMG How stupid are you? That's not what I said. But, in truth, these were two adult people doing something in private by mutual consent. What is there to object to?Yes, but we didn't see pictures of it did we? We don't have photos of it all over the internet. What two people did in private is one thing; exposing your all and all for everyone to see is something else.
Oh brother.... So, you're OK with a 50 year-old man sticking cigars in a 20 year-old's twat as long as there aren't pictures? That makes no sense at all. It's pretty vile.
Women exposing their bodies for money, for all the world to see, and in salacious terms? No I don't approve of that. It demeans all women.
So, Melania Trump was forced to take those photos? You make no sense whatsoever.
Libs like to celebrate a woman's independence and her right to be proud and open about her sexuality.
Until it benefits them to NOT like that, then they turn back into prudes without a hint of concern for the fact they are being completely hypocrites.
Liberals: All the intellectual honestly of a crack whore.
A CEO of a large corporation would have been let go and liberals would have marched the streets or boycotted until he was. Trying to spin it as just a private matter is stupid, no one buys it.Having private sexual experiences is one thing. Exposing your nudity, in a sexual way, to the world for money is the next thing to prostitution.Yep, thanks for proving yourself a hypocrite. You say lewinsky did with her body as she pleased and in your eyes that's okay. But when a republican woman does with her body as she pleases she demeans women. Got it.YepYou may have a point if it was just one or two women, but there are multiple women making those comments. All the way back to his college days when there was nothing to be gained. All those women are liars?Allegations are not proven fact. Most, if not all, of those accusations were women looking for a cash payout and some notoriety and fame. You only believe it because you want to. All of those allegations and nothing ever taken to court, nothing ever proven. Ever hear of the American tradition 'innocent until proven guilty'? You are a complete fascist as long as it is someone you don't like, or any liberal, democrat or progressive.All the times Bill sexual assaulted women and Hillary destroyed their lives. That didn't demean women?
He didn't take advantage of his position. She threw herself at him because of his position. You folks are trying to rewrite history and it's very pathetic.You people twist everything. It was Monica Lewinsky who went to Washington carrying her 'knee pads' according to her own description. She went there with the intention of seducing the President. When she did, you say he took advantage of her. Yet she was the one to "celebrate a woman's independence and her right to be proud and open about her sexuality." She was not taken advantage of, and I doubt any of others were either. You are the hypocrites.OMG How stupid are you? That's not what I said. But, in truth, these were two adult people doing something in private by mutual consent. What is there to object to?Oh brother.... So, you're OK with a 50 year-old man sticking cigars in a 20 year-old's twat as long as there aren't pictures? That makes no sense at all. It's pretty vile.
Women exposing their bodies for money, for all the world to see, and in salacious terms? No I don't approve of that. It demeans all women.
So, Melania Trump was forced to take those photos? You make no sense whatsoever.
Libs like to celebrate a woman's independence and her right to be proud and open about her sexuality.
Until it benefits them to NOT like that, then they turn back into prudes without a hint of concern for the fact they are being completely hypocrites.
Liberals: All the intellectual honestly of a crack whore.
Holy shit its the intern's fault not the POTUS taking advantage of his power and position? The POTUS had no responsibility to his office, his wife, workplace laws? That's some koolaid drinking denial right there. Good luck selling that in this day and age.
Having private sexual experiences is one thing. Exposing your nudity, in a sexual way, to the world for money is the next thing to prostitution.Yep, thanks for proving yourself a hypocrite. You say lewinsky did with her body as she pleased and in your eyes that's okay. But when a republican woman does with her body as she pleases she demeans women. Got it.YepYou may have a point if it was just one or two women, but there are multiple women making those comments. All the way back to his college days when there was nothing to be gained. All those women are liars?Allegations are not proven fact. Most, if not all, of those accusations were women looking for a cash payout and some notoriety and fame. You only believe it because you want to. All of those allegations and nothing ever taken to court, nothing ever proven. Ever hear of the American tradition 'innocent until proven guilty'? You are a complete fascist as long as it is someone you don't like, or any liberal, democrat or progressive.All the times Bill sexual assaulted women and Hillary destroyed their lives. That didn't demean women?
He didn't take advantage of his position. She threw herself at him because of his position. You folks are trying to rewrite history and it's very pathetic.You people twist everything. It was Monica Lewinsky who went to Washington carrying her 'knee pads' according to her own description. She went there with the intention of seducing the President. When she did, you say he took advantage of her. Yet she was the one to "celebrate a woman's independence and her right to be proud and open about her sexuality." She was not taken advantage of, and I doubt any of others were either. You are the hypocrites.OMG How stupid are you? That's not what I said. But, in truth, these were two adult people doing something in private by mutual consent. What is there to object to?
Women exposing their bodies for money, for all the world to see, and in salacious terms? No I don't approve of that. It demeans all women.
So, Melania Trump was forced to take those photos? You make no sense whatsoever.
Libs like to celebrate a woman's independence and her right to be proud and open about her sexuality.
Until it benefits them to NOT like that, then they turn back into prudes without a hint of concern for the fact they are being completely hypocrites.
Liberals: All the intellectual honestly of a crack whore.
Holy shit its the intern's fault not the POTUS taking advantage of his power and position? The POTUS had no responsibility to his office, his wife, workplace laws? That's some koolaid drinking denial right there. Good luck selling that in this day and age.
It's still their body right? So you have no business talking about it, by your own words. You never answered about the college girls saying Bill sexually assaulted them. They had nothing to gain, were they lying also?Having private sexual experiences is one thing. Exposing your nudity, in a sexual way, to the world for money is the next thing to prostitution.Yep, thanks for proving yourself a hypocrite. You say lewinsky did with her body as she pleased and in your eyes that's okay. But when a republican woman does with her body as she pleases she demeans women. Got it.YepYou may have a point if it was just one or two women, but there are multiple women making those comments. All the way back to his college days when there was nothing to be gained. All those women are liars?Allegations are not proven fact. Most, if not all, of those accusations were women looking for a cash payout and some notoriety and fame. You only believe it because you want to. All of those allegations and nothing ever taken to court, nothing ever proven. Ever hear of the American tradition 'innocent until proven guilty'? You are a complete fascist as long as it is someone you don't like, or any liberal, democrat or progressive.All the times Bill sexual assaulted women and Hillary destroyed their lives. That didn't demean women?
Well we know Juanita broaddrick was lying On different occasions she said either Bill Clinton raped her or that rumors that Bill Clinton raped her were unfounded. Obviously both cannot be true. And of course when she said that Bill Clinton never raped her, she swore that under oath facing the penalty of perjury.You may have a point if it was just one or two women, but there are multiple women making those comments. All the way back to his college days when there was nothing to be gained. All those women are liars?Allegations are not proven fact. Most, if not all, of those accusations were women looking for a cash payout and some notoriety and fame. You only believe it because you want to. All of those allegations and nothing ever taken to court, nothing ever proven. Ever hear of the American tradition 'innocent until proven guilty'? You are a complete fascist as long as it is someone you don't like, or any liberal, democrat or progressive.All the times Bill sexual assaulted women and Hillary destroyed their lives. That didn't demean women?OMG How stupid are you? That's not what I said. But, in truth, these were two adult people doing something in private by mutual consent. What is there to object to?Yes, but we didn't see pictures of it did we? We don't have photos of it all over the internet. What two people did in private is one thing; exposing your all and all for everyone to see is something else.
Oh brother.... So, you're OK with a 50 year-old man sticking cigars in a 20 year-old's twat as long as there aren't pictures? That makes no sense at all. It's pretty vile.
Women exposing their bodies for money, for all the world to see, and in sexual and salacious terms? No I don't approve of that. It demeans all women.
He didn't take advantage of his position. She threw herself at him because of his position. You folks are trying to rewrite history and it's very pathetic.You people twist everything. It was Monica Lewinsky who went to Washington carrying her 'knee pads' according to her own description. She went there with the intention of seducing the President. When she did, you say he took advantage of her. Yet she was the one to "celebrate a woman's independence and her right to be proud and open about her sexuality." She was not taken advantage of, and I doubt any of others were either. You are the hypocrites.OMG How stupid are you? That's not what I said. But, in truth, these were two adult people doing something in private by mutual consent. What is there to object to?
Women exposing their bodies for money, for all the world to see, and in salacious terms? No I don't approve of that. It demeans all women.
So, Melania Trump was forced to take those photos? You make no sense whatsoever.
Workplace laws? Is there a law about having a sexual encounter with a intern? Please provide it for me here. I'd love to see it.
Libs like to celebrate a woman's independence and her right to be proud and open about her sexuality.
Until it benefits them to NOT like that, then they turn back into prudes without a hint of concern for the fact they are being completely hypocrites.
Liberals: All the intellectual honestly of a crack whore.
Holy shit its the intern's fault not the POTUS taking advantage of his power and position? The POTUS had no responsibility to his office, his wife, workplace laws? That's some koolaid drinking denial right there. Good luck selling that in this day and age.
Nothing to gain? How many years later did they bring up these assaults?It's still their body right? So you have no business talking about it, by your own words. You never answered about the college girls saying Bill sexually assaulted them. They had nothing to gain, were they lying also?Having private sexual experiences is one thing. Exposing your nudity, in a sexual way, to the world for money is the next thing to prostitution.Yep, thanks for proving yourself a hypocrite. You say lewinsky did with her body as she pleased and in your eyes that's okay. But when a republican woman does with her body as she pleases she demeans women. Got it.YepYou may have a point if it was just one or two women, but there are multiple women making those comments. All the way back to his college days when there was nothing to be gained. All those women are liars?Allegations are not proven fact. Most, if not all, of those accusations were women looking for a cash payout and some notoriety and fame. You only believe it because you want to. All of those allegations and nothing ever taken to court, nothing ever proven. Ever hear of the American tradition 'innocent until proven guilty'? You are a complete fascist as long as it is someone you don't like, or any liberal, democrat or progressive.
That, we agree on. But yes, we are limited to those that actually want the job and most people don't. Hillary has a problem besides her history, she is essentially running on a third obama term and doesn't have the populous likability factor. Most don't think we are going in the right direction any candidate that can hammer that point home will do well. And Trump does seem like the type.You're joking right? Everything about Hillary is negative, in fact she's one of the few human beings (and I use the term loosely when referring to her) that has absolutely NO redeeming qualities. Trump is a class A jackass demagogue but at least he has some successful business experience (all of it heavily weighted with influence buying and inherited money but at least he's done *some* things right as a business person).How so? You haven't found any negatives on Hillary?Yet, the Queen of Corruption will probably win, not because she is worth a shit but because the Republicans are choosing to nominate such an outlandish demagogue. It should have been a fairly easy victory for the GOP in 2016, however as usual the party of stupid chose the one candidate out of a field of many that Hillary the Harpy has an advantage over.Face it kids.. there is zero excitement over Hillary. NONE. Trump is yuge.
That being said I wouldn't cast my vote for any of these miscreants, doing so would make me culpable in the evil which is sure to follow any one of them getting elected and if I can't stop the crime I damn sure ain't going to join in on it.
There are probably at least 100 million U.S. Citizens that would be "better", unfortunately none of them are running for the Presidency. This whole circus is a race to the bottom wherein the candidate with the best bullshit & deception machine will likely win and as far as I can tell that looks to be Hillary, after all when it comes to bullshit and deception she and her unholy henchmen have the most experience.Who would be better? Kasich? More establishment bs? The left hasn't even started on Cruz, if he won his negatives would probably drop to more than Trump's.
He didn't take advantage of his position. She threw herself at him because of his position. You folks are trying to rewrite history and it's very pathetic.You people twist everything. It was Monica Lewinsky who went to Washington carrying her 'knee pads' according to her own description. She went there with the intention of seducing the President. When she did, you say he took advantage of her. Yet she was the one to "celebrate a woman's independence and her right to be proud and open about her sexuality." She was not taken advantage of, and I doubt any of others were either. You are the hypocrites.So, Melania Trump was forced to take those photos? You make no sense whatsoever.
Workplace laws? Is there a law about having a sexual encounter with a intern? Please provide it for me here. I'd love to see it.
Libs like to celebrate a woman's independence and her right to be proud and open about her sexuality.
Until it benefits them to NOT like that, then they turn back into prudes without a hint of concern for the fact they are being completely hypocrites.
Liberals: All the intellectual honestly of a crack whore.
Holy shit its the intern's fault not the POTUS taking advantage of his power and position? The POTUS had no responsibility to his office, his wife, workplace laws? That's some koolaid drinking denial right there. Good luck selling that in this day and age.Nothing to gain? How many years later did they bring up these assaults?It's still their body right? So you have no business talking about it, by your own words. You never answered about the college girls saying Bill sexually assaulted them. They had nothing to gain, were they lying also?Having private sexual experiences is one thing. Exposing your nudity, in a sexual way, to the world for money is the next thing to prostitution.Yep, thanks for proving yourself a hypocrite. You say lewinsky did with her body as she pleased and in your eyes that's okay. But when a republican woman does with her body as she pleases she demeans women. Got it.YepYou may have a point if it was just one or two women, but there are multiple women making those comments. All the way back to his college days when there was nothing to be gained. All those women are liars?
I'm sure he knew it was wrong. All married men who cheat on their wives know it is wrong, and guess what? Something like 60% plus of all married men cheat. He is not out there alone doing wrong. But she is wrong too. Any woman who knowingly engages in sexual activity with a married man is wrong; and Lewinsky left for Washington with the intention of doing just that. She was not some innocent who was wronged. She participated in it fully, and she was an adult.He didn't take advantage of his position. She threw herself at him because of his position. You folks are trying to rewrite history and it's very pathetic.You people twist everything. It was Monica Lewinsky who went to Washington carrying her 'knee pads' according to her own description. She went there with the intention of seducing the President. When she did, you say he took advantage of her. Yet she was the one to "celebrate a woman's independence and her right to be proud and open about her sexuality." She was not taken advantage of, and I doubt any of others were either. You are the hypocrites.So, Melania Trump was forced to take those photos? You make no sense whatsoever.
Libs like to celebrate a woman's independence and her right to be proud and open about her sexuality.
Until it benefits them to NOT like that, then they turn back into prudes without a hint of concern for the fact they are being completely hypocrites.
Liberals: All the intellectual honestly of a crack whore.
Holy shit its the intern's fault not the POTUS taking advantage of his power and position? The POTUS had no responsibility to his office, his wife, workplace laws? That's some koolaid drinking denial right there. Good luck selling that in this day and age.
What about him maybe having the maturity to know that what he did was, well, just wrong?
For most people that may have that happen to them, it is not in the media.. so we don't hear about it. But, in fact, I have a family member who was accused of just that, by other family members among others. And he tried to do it with me too. Never got anywhere, but tried.He didn't take advantage of his position. She threw herself at him because of his position. You folks are trying to rewrite history and it's very pathetic.You people twist everything. It was Monica Lewinsky who went to Washington carrying her 'knee pads' according to her own description. She went there with the intention of seducing the President. When she did, you say he took advantage of her. Yet she was the one to "celebrate a woman's independence and her right to be proud and open about her sexuality." She was not taken advantage of, and I doubt any of others were either. You are the hypocrites.Workplace laws? Is there a law about having a sexual encounter with a intern? Please provide it for me here. I'd love to see it.
Libs like to celebrate a woman's independence and her right to be proud and open about her sexuality.
Until it benefits them to NOT like that, then they turn back into prudes without a hint of concern for the fact they are being completely hypocrites.
Liberals: All the intellectual honestly of a crack whore.
Holy shit its the intern's fault not the POTUS taking advantage of his power and position? The POTUS had no responsibility to his office, his wife, workplace laws? That's some koolaid drinking denial right there. Good luck selling that in this day and age.Nothing to gain? How many years later did they bring up these assaults?It's still their body right? So you have no business talking about it, by your own words. You never answered about the college girls saying Bill sexually assaulted them. They had nothing to gain, were they lying also?Having private sexual experiences is one thing. Exposing your nudity, in a sexual way, to the world for money is the next thing to prostitution.Yep, thanks for proving yourself a hypocrite. You say lewinsky did with her body as she pleased and in your eyes that's okay. But when a republican woman does with her body as she pleases she demeans women. Got it.
How many people do you know that have been serially, over the course of decades, been accused of repeated sexual misconduct?
I love the way liberals say when Clinton cheats it's none of our business, it's a private matter. But Trump does it and he shouldn't be president. Liberalism is a mental disease.He didn't take advantage of his position. She threw herself at him because of his position. You folks are trying to rewrite history and it's very pathetic.You people twist everything. It was Monica Lewinsky who went to Washington carrying her 'knee pads' according to her own description. She went there with the intention of seducing the President. When she did, you say he took advantage of her. Yet she was the one to "celebrate a woman's independence and her right to be proud and open about her sexuality." She was not taken advantage of, and I doubt any of others were either. You are the hypocrites.Workplace laws? Is there a law about having a sexual encounter with a intern? Please provide it for me here. I'd love to see it.
Libs like to celebrate a woman's independence and her right to be proud and open about her sexuality.
Until it benefits them to NOT like that, then they turn back into prudes without a hint of concern for the fact they are being completely hypocrites.
Liberals: All the intellectual honestly of a crack whore.
Holy shit its the intern's fault not the POTUS taking advantage of his power and position? The POTUS had no responsibility to his office, his wife, workplace laws? That's some koolaid drinking denial right there. Good luck selling that in this day and age.Nothing to gain? How many years later did they bring up these assaults?It's still their body right? So you have no business talking about it, by your own words. You never answered about the college girls saying Bill sexually assaulted them. They had nothing to gain, were they lying also?Having private sexual experiences is one thing. Exposing your nudity, in a sexual way, to the world for money is the next thing to prostitution.Yep, thanks for proving yourself a hypocrite. You say lewinsky did with her body as she pleased and in your eyes that's okay. But when a republican woman does with her body as she pleases she demeans women. Got it.
How many people do you know that have been serially, over the course of decades, been accused of repeated sexual misconduct?
Then after going through the cesspool to get the job you find yourself in the garbage dump of congress bad smell and allThat, we agree on. But yes, we are limited to those that actually want the job and most people don't. Hillary has a problem besides her history, she is essentially running on a third obama term and doesn't have the populous likability factor. Most don't think we are going in the right direction any candidate that can hammer that point home will do well. And Trump does seem like the type.You're joking right? Everything about Hillary is negative, in fact she's one of the few human beings (and I use the term loosely when referring to her) that has absolutely NO redeeming qualities. Trump is a class A jackass demagogue but at least he has some successful business experience (all of it heavily weighted with influence buying and inherited money but at least he's done *some* things right as a business person).How so? You haven't found any negatives on Hillary?Yet, the Queen of Corruption will probably win, not because she is worth a shit but because the Republicans are choosing to nominate such an outlandish demagogue. It should have been a fairly easy victory for the GOP in 2016, however as usual the party of stupid chose the one candidate out of a field of many that Hillary the Harpy has an advantage over.Face it kids.. there is zero excitement over Hillary. NONE. Trump is yuge.
That being said I wouldn't cast my vote for any of these miscreants, doing so would make me culpable in the evil which is sure to follow any one of them getting elected and if I can't stop the crime I damn sure ain't going to join in on it.
There are probably at least 100 million U.S. Citizens that would be "better", unfortunately none of them are running for the Presidency. This whole circus is a race to the bottom wherein the candidate with the best bullshit & deception machine will likely win and as far as I can tell that looks to be Hillary, after all when it comes to bullshit and deception she and her unholy henchmen have the most experience.Who would be better? Kasich? More establishment bs? The left hasn't even started on Cruz, if he won his negatives would probably drop to more than Trump's.
Personally I don't think it's a matter of people with integrity, competence and principles wanting the job, I believe it's a matter of those people not being willing to go through the cesspool (that the citizenry has allowed to be created) that is required to actually get the job. The mindless electorate has allowed the political process to become so poisonous and demonic that nobody that actually deserves the job will run for it , thus we are left with a contest of "EVIL versus EVIL may the most unqualified asshole win".
I'm sure he knew it was wrong. All married men who cheat on their wives know it is wrong, and guess what? Something like 60% plus of all married men cheat. He is not out there alone doing wrong. But she is wrong too. Any woman who knowingly engages in sexual activity with a married man is wrong; and Lewinsky left for Washington with the intention of doing just that. She was not some innocent who was wronged. She participated in it fully, and she was an adult.He didn't take advantage of his position. She threw herself at him because of his position. You folks are trying to rewrite history and it's very pathetic.You people twist everything. It was Monica Lewinsky who went to Washington carrying her 'knee pads' according to her own description. She went there with the intention of seducing the President. When she did, you say he took advantage of her. Yet she was the one to "celebrate a woman's independence and her right to be proud and open about her sexuality." She was not taken advantage of, and I doubt any of others were either. You are the hypocrites.Libs like to celebrate a woman's independence and her right to be proud and open about her sexuality.
Until it benefits them to NOT like that, then they turn back into prudes without a hint of concern for the fact they are being completely hypocrites.
Liberals: All the intellectual honestly of a crack whore.
Holy shit its the intern's fault not the POTUS taking advantage of his power and position? The POTUS had no responsibility to his office, his wife, workplace laws? That's some koolaid drinking denial right there. Good luck selling that in this day and age.
What about him maybe having the maturity to know that what he did was, well, just wrong?
No, that's not what we are saying. You people are incapable of understanding simple logic. What we say is that if you are going to vilify Clinton for cheating, then you cannot just overlook Trump's cheating. That's what we are saying. No one is saying he shouldn't be president because he cheated, but at least look the issue straight in the face and admit he is a cheater. If it is bad for a liberal to cheat, then it is just as bad for a conservative to cheat.I love the way liberals say when Clinton cheats it's none of our business, it's a private matter. But Trump does it and he shouldn't be president. Liberalism is a mental disease.He didn't take advantage of his position. She threw herself at him because of his position. You folks are trying to rewrite history and it's very pathetic.You people twist everything. It was Monica Lewinsky who went to Washington carrying her 'knee pads' according to her own description. She went there with the intention of seducing the President. When she did, you say he took advantage of her. Yet she was the one to "celebrate a woman's independence and her right to be proud and open about her sexuality." She was not taken advantage of, and I doubt any of others were either. You are the hypocrites.
Holy shit its the intern's fault not the POTUS taking advantage of his power and position? The POTUS had no responsibility to his office, his wife, workplace laws? That's some koolaid drinking denial right there. Good luck selling that in this day and age.Nothing to gain? How many years later did they bring up these assaults?It's still their body right? So you have no business talking about it, by your own words. You never answered about the college girls saying Bill sexually assaulted them. They had nothing to gain, were they lying also?Having private sexual experiences is one thing. Exposing your nudity, in a sexual way, to the world for money is the next thing to prostitution.Yep, thanks for proving yourself a hypocrite. You say lewinsky did with her body as she pleased and in your eyes that's okay. But when a republican woman does with her body as she pleases she demeans women. Got it.
How many people do you know that have been serially, over the course of decades, been accused of repeated sexual misconduct?
An impressionable girl? Give me a break. LOLI'm sure he knew it was wrong. All married men who cheat on their wives know it is wrong, and guess what? Something like 60% plus of all married men cheat. He is not out there alone doing wrong. But she is wrong too. Any woman who knowingly engages in sexual activity with a married man is wrong; and Lewinsky left for Washington with the intention of doing just that. She was not some innocent who was wronged. She participated in it fully, and she was an adult.He didn't take advantage of his position. She threw herself at him because of his position. You folks are trying to rewrite history and it's very pathetic.You people twist everything. It was Monica Lewinsky who went to Washington carrying her 'knee pads' according to her own description. She went there with the intention of seducing the President. When she did, you say he took advantage of her. Yet she was the one to "celebrate a woman's independence and her right to be proud and open about her sexuality." She was not taken advantage of, and I doubt any of others were either. You are the hypocrites.
Holy shit its the intern's fault not the POTUS taking advantage of his power and position? The POTUS had no responsibility to his office, his wife, workplace laws? That's some koolaid drinking denial right there. Good luck selling that in this day and age.
What about him maybe having the maturity to know that what he did was, well, just wrong?
Sure cheating is wrong. But, what is worse is a 50 yo man taking advantage of a young, impressionable girl. Was she an adult, sure.. agreed. But she was incredibly immature, and he took advantage of her.
OMG Get over it. Her voice was hoarse because of all the campaign speeches. Grow up. You are like a second grader, for God's sake.And obviously you have no defense for Clinton's utter insanity. Seriously, barking like a dog?
Hillary Clinton barks like a dog at a campaign rally in Nevada – video
Why would I defend something I never objected to? You're the one who was looking for maturity. So I guess you're done with asking for others to do what your canidate wont huh?
So, let me be clear, you think barking like a dog is normal? That is your choice for president, a barking woman?
Your bullshit wont work on me. YOU ASKED FOR MATURITY DUMBASS....and then you DIDNT CARE ABOUT IT NO MORE WHEN YOU WERE SHOWED TRUMP BEING A FUCKING CHILD.
Now you want to flip it into something about barking. You lose
So, you think barking like a dog is a good example of maturity? We are talking about maturity, right?
