You keep ignorantly referencing a clause that states have no juridiction over.Absent passing laws, which hasn't been done, and voting to reverse a ban, what exactly are the duties of Congress in the Section 3 of the 14th?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You keep ignorantly referencing a clause that states have no juridiction over.Absent passing laws, which hasn't been done, and voting to reverse a ban, what exactly are the duties of Congress in the Section 3 of the 14th?
Thanks for that.The fucking law was linked in post 249, tell the class you really aren't that fucking stupid and are just trolling your own thread at this point.
.
10thYou keep ignorantly referencing a clause that states have no juridiction over.
Apparently, you're asserting that the author of A. 14 thought that according to Sec. 5 Congress has to pass specific legislation banning a person from holding office, by a majority vote, but that according to Sec. 3 Congress would remove that by a 2/3 majority vote in both houses.Just because you ignorant commies wish it to be so, doesn't make it so. Go back and have an adult read and explain post 219, perhaps you get it the next time.
.
Congress passed a law when they passed the 14th amendment. Therefore using your position Texas can control its border.Since Congress has passed no laws section 5 is irrelevant.
Youre right Congress delegates insurrections on federal property. Congress passed a law at the signing of the 14th amendment.10th
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
Since Congress has passed no laws regarding enforcement of the 14th the power falls to the states.
Those who copped beg to differ.
As does anyone with two eyes.
They don't realize that their version was one of the major factors that started the American Revolution.Literally nobody has been charged with insurrection
Oh I know I know “but they don’t need to be charged, we can just assume it and that makes it so”
Your version of justice is scary…
Only to insurrectionists and their henchmen.Literally nobody has been charged with insurrection
Oh I know I know “but they don’t need to be charged, we can just assume it and that makes it so”
Your version of justice is scary…
LOL Only one judge.
Try not posting like a dick, As you say, the Amendment is silent. So, it could require a conviction. It could require an act of Congress. You don't know. And you won't know until the Supreme Court tells us what it requires.
Because there were acts of congress and Presidential proclamations identifying these folks as as insurrectionists.
Nope. Only the trial judge decided it was an insurrection. Appeals court made no independent determination.
Nope
And it was all done unconstitutionally. Only congress was given the power to enforce the 14th, all of it. And it was specified in the 14th that it would be done through legislation at the federal level. I have yet to find where congress delegated that power to anyone. Feel free to point where my reasoning is flawed.
See post 215 before you make yourself look more ignorant. BTW, all criminal laws require conviction for there to be consequences.
Cool opinion bro, Section 5 of the 14th clearly states that nothing in the amendment is self executing, all portions require acts from congress. And I think that's exactly what the supreme court will determine.
Section 5 Enforcement
The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Careful what you wish for. The only way Biden wins re-election is if Trump is his opponent.