American_Jihad
Flaming Libs/Koranimals
TRUMP: BANNED IN BRITAIN?
UK debates denying Trump entry -- but Islamists are welcome.
January 28, 2016
Deborah Weiss
...
The debate was sparked by apetition to ban Trump, signed by approximately 575,000 Brits, likely comprised primarily of Muslims and liberals.
...
Still, it is only “hate speech” against Muslims that appears to concern the British MP’s, who are pandering to their increasing Muslim constituency. Muslims in the UK who preach “Death to the West,” hatred of infidels, and abhorrence of all things British, are not shouldering equal accusations of “hate speech.”
To the contrary, Britain has hada somewhat “hands off” attitude towards Muslims, whetherjihadistsentering from abroad orIslamistspreaching hatred of infidels at home. It has welcomed war criminals, rapists and “refugees,” sometimes withfake passports, so long as they claim Asylum, legitimately or not.
In 2013, KuwaitiSheikYasserAl-Habibcame to Britain specifically for the purpose of riling upShiaMuslims against Sunnis. He spent 2 million pounds buying a former church and converting it to a mosque and satellite TV channel, from which he broadcasts his fiery sermons. Though he was formerly jailed in Kuwait for similar practices, complaints to the British Home Secretary fell on deaf ears.
Another case in point isBeharKasemi, a Muslim refugee in Britain, who has been arrested for threatening to cut his wife’s heart out because she became “too British.” During his interview with police, he insisted that wives are supposed to obey their husbands.
Additionally, subsequent to the public launch of ISIS sex slave trade, approximately1400 British girls were rapedby Pakistani “British” Muslims. Still, the government has failed to even initiate an inquiry or investigation.
...
To make matters worse, aBarnabusreport indicates thatPrime Minister David Cameron was warnedpriorto accepting the first wave of the 20,000 refugees scheduled to enter the U.K. that ISISjihadistswere among them. But that didn’t stop him from welcoming them with open arms.
The UK government’s previous standard to ban a person from entry was that such a ban would be “conducive to the public good.” It standard later expanded to “unacceptable behavior.” Ostensibly,jihadioutrages, tirades and violence against infidels constitute acceptable behavior, while speech criticizing such hatred is simply unacceptable.
The British government is in full denial mode, suffering from Jihad Denial Syndrome. British policedenied that the 7/7 terrorist attackswere religiously motivated. Imams caught on tape preaching venomous anti-infidel sermons have goneunprosecutedas have those who have desecrated Britain’s war memorials.
...
Demonstrating the height of Britishdhimmitudeand hypocrisy regarding what is or is not “acceptable behavior,” is the UK’s past bans of Dutch MPGeertWilders, talk radio show hostMichael Savage, and Islamic scholar and author Robert Spencer. None of them have ever encouraged violence or illegality. To the contrary, each are on the front-lines in the fight for freedom, including freedom of speech. If indeed, Donald Trump is banned from the UK, at least he will be in good company.
Trump: Banned in Britain?
UK debates denying Trump entry -- but Islamists are welcome.
January 28, 2016
Deborah Weiss
...
The debate was sparked by apetition to ban Trump, signed by approximately 575,000 Brits, likely comprised primarily of Muslims and liberals.
...
Still, it is only “hate speech” against Muslims that appears to concern the British MP’s, who are pandering to their increasing Muslim constituency. Muslims in the UK who preach “Death to the West,” hatred of infidels, and abhorrence of all things British, are not shouldering equal accusations of “hate speech.”
To the contrary, Britain has hada somewhat “hands off” attitude towards Muslims, whetherjihadistsentering from abroad orIslamistspreaching hatred of infidels at home. It has welcomed war criminals, rapists and “refugees,” sometimes withfake passports, so long as they claim Asylum, legitimately or not.
In 2013, KuwaitiSheikYasserAl-Habibcame to Britain specifically for the purpose of riling upShiaMuslims against Sunnis. He spent 2 million pounds buying a former church and converting it to a mosque and satellite TV channel, from which he broadcasts his fiery sermons. Though he was formerly jailed in Kuwait for similar practices, complaints to the British Home Secretary fell on deaf ears.
Another case in point isBeharKasemi, a Muslim refugee in Britain, who has been arrested for threatening to cut his wife’s heart out because she became “too British.” During his interview with police, he insisted that wives are supposed to obey their husbands.
Additionally, subsequent to the public launch of ISIS sex slave trade, approximately1400 British girls were rapedby Pakistani “British” Muslims. Still, the government has failed to even initiate an inquiry or investigation.
...
To make matters worse, aBarnabusreport indicates thatPrime Minister David Cameron was warnedpriorto accepting the first wave of the 20,000 refugees scheduled to enter the U.K. that ISISjihadistswere among them. But that didn’t stop him from welcoming them with open arms.
The UK government’s previous standard to ban a person from entry was that such a ban would be “conducive to the public good.” It standard later expanded to “unacceptable behavior.” Ostensibly,jihadioutrages, tirades and violence against infidels constitute acceptable behavior, while speech criticizing such hatred is simply unacceptable.
The British government is in full denial mode, suffering from Jihad Denial Syndrome. British policedenied that the 7/7 terrorist attackswere religiously motivated. Imams caught on tape preaching venomous anti-infidel sermons have goneunprosecutedas have those who have desecrated Britain’s war memorials.
...
Demonstrating the height of Britishdhimmitudeand hypocrisy regarding what is or is not “acceptable behavior,” is the UK’s past bans of Dutch MPGeertWilders, talk radio show hostMichael Savage, and Islamic scholar and author Robert Spencer. None of them have ever encouraged violence or illegality. To the contrary, each are on the front-lines in the fight for freedom, including freedom of speech. If indeed, Donald Trump is banned from the UK, at least he will be in good company.
Trump: Banned in Britain?
