Trump to sue Facebook, Twitter, Google over alleged censorship

[Moonglow]

Seems like a waste of time and money to me.
Is there anyone in this country who is unaware of trumps agenda?

His cult is deaf, dumb and blind to his agenda.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

who will be his lawyer? lin wood? orly taitz? sidney krackhead?

Nope, he has screwed them over pay so now he must find another sucker, that can spell his or her own name correctly.

It would be good to see the courts establish that companies cant set their own terms of service. Will trump have to prove that the election was stolen ?
That would be amazing.

Companies are able to set their own rules of service as long as they are not enforce arbitrarily and capriciously. In this case these media outlets have been selective about who they censor. That is discrimination and it is illegal.

Making false claims that lead to an insurrection seems to be enough for facebook and the rest. Who else has done that ?

 

[Concerned American]

who will be his lawyer? lin wood? orly taitz? sidney krackhead?

Nope, he has screwed them over pay so now he must find another sucker, that can spell his or her own name correctly.

It would be good to see the courts establish that companies cant set their own terms of service. Will trump have to prove that the election was stolen ?
That would be amazing.

Companies are able to set their own rules of service as long as they are not enforce arbitrarily and capriciously. In this case these media outlets have been selective about who they censor. That is discrimination and it is illegal.

how were they selective? tell us.

Fauci was allowed to post on FB numerous times over the past year only to return and totally contradict the earlier posts e.g. face mask directives--mask, don't mask, use two masks. Which one is true--tell us. None were censored.

 

[BlindBoo]

who will be his lawyer? lin wood? orly taitz? sidney krackhead?

Nope, he has screwed them over pay so now he must find another sucker, that can spell his or her own name correctly.

It would be good to see the courts establish that companies cant set their own terms of service. Will trump have to prove that the election was stolen ?
That would be amazing.

Companies are able to set their own rules of service as long as they are not enforce arbitrarily and capriciously. In this case these media outlets have been selective about who they censor. That is discrimination and it is illegal.

I think they will be able to prove they gave great deference to the POTUS's many lies and complete falsehoods until those lies sparked the Mob violence at the seat of our government 6 months ago.....

 

[Concerned American]

who will be his lawyer? lin wood? orly taitz? sidney krackhead?

Nope, he has screwed them over pay so now he must find another sucker, that can spell his or her own name correctly.

It would be good to see the courts establish that companies cant set their own terms of service. Will trump have to prove that the election was stolen ?
That would be amazing.

Companies are able to set their own rules of service as long as they are not enforce arbitrarily and capriciously. In this case these media outlets have been selective about who they censor. That is discrimination and it is illegal.

Making false claims that lead to an insurrection seems to be enough for facebook and the rest. Who else has done that ?

Fuck off with your insurrection bullshit. You know, I know and the world knows there was no fucking insurrection.

 

[Hellbilly]

His cult is deaf, dumb and blind to his agenda.

If he ever made it back to Facebook I would get enjoyment from saying “shut the fuck up Donnie” right before I block him.

 

[L.K.Eder]

who will be his lawyer? lin wood? orly taitz? sidney krackhead?

Nope, he has screwed them over pay so now he must find another sucker, that can spell his or her own name correctly.

It would be good to see the courts establish that companies cant set their own terms of service. Will trump have to prove that the election was stolen ?
That would be amazing.

Companies are able to set their own rules of service as long as they are not enforce arbitrarily and capriciously. In this case these media outlets have been selective about who they censor. That is discrimination and it is illegal.

Making false claims that lead to an insurrection seems to be enough for facebook and the rest. Who else has done that ?

we can all look forward to the suit, where they will have to define their "class".

 

[L.K.Eder]

who will be his lawyer? lin wood? orly taitz? sidney krackhead?

Nope, he has screwed them over pay so now he must find another sucker, that can spell his or her own name correctly.

It would be good to see the courts establish that companies cant set their own terms of service. Will trump have to prove that the election was stolen ?
That would be amazing.

Companies are able to set their own rules of service as long as they are not enforce arbitrarily and capriciously. In this case these media outlets have been selective about who they censor. That is discrimination and it is illegal.

how were they selective? tell us.

Fauci was allowed to post on FB numerous times over the past year only to return and totally contradict the earlier posts e.g. face mask directives--mask, don't mask, use two masks. Which one is true--tell us. None were censored.

pathetic attempt, kiddo.

 

[Faun]

Thank God that Donald Trump is standing up for all of our first amendment rights. These companies are confiscating peoples right to free speech and if we let that happen, it's goodbye America.

^^^ still hasn't learned the First Amendment right to free speech applies to government, not private businesses.

 

[Concerned American]

who will be his lawyer? lin wood? orly taitz? sidney krackhead?

Nope, he has screwed them over pay so now he must find another sucker, that can spell his or her own name correctly.

It would be good to see the courts establish that companies cant set their own terms of service. Will trump have to prove that the election was stolen ?
That would be amazing.

Companies are able to set their own rules of service as long as they are not enforce arbitrarily and capriciously. In this case these media outlets have been selective about who they censor. That is discrimination and it is illegal.

Making false claims that lead to an insurrection seems to be enough for facebook and the rest. Who else has done that ?

we can all look forward to the suit, where they will have to define their "class".

There won't be a problem with that--they are not the only people that have been censored for their political beliefs.

 

[Moonglow]

who will be his lawyer? lin wood? orly taitz? sidney krackhead?

Nope, he has screwed them over pay so now he must find another sucker, that can spell his or her own name correctly.

It would be good to see the courts establish that companies cant set their own terms of service. Will trump have to prove that the election was stolen ?
That would be amazing.

Companies are able to set their own rules of service as long as they are not enforce arbitrarily and capriciously. In this case these media outlets have been selective about who they censor. That is discrimination and it is illegal.

how were they selective? tell us.

Fauci was allowed to post on FB numerous times over the past year only to return and totally contradict the earlier posts e.g. face mask directives--mask, don't mask, use two masks. Which one is true--tell us. None were censored.

pathetic attempt, kiddo.

It's just like the disputed third grade game of four squares all over again..

 

[Concerned American]

who will be his lawyer? lin wood? orly taitz? sidney krackhead?

Nope, he has screwed them over pay so now he must find another sucker, that can spell his or her own name correctly.

It would be good to see the courts establish that companies cant set their own terms of service. Will trump have to prove that the election was stolen ?
That would be amazing.

Companies are able to set their own rules of service as long as they are not enforce arbitrarily and capriciously. In this case these media outlets have been selective about who they censor. That is discrimination and it is illegal.

how were they selective? tell us.

Fauci was allowed to post on FB numerous times over the past year only to return and totally contradict the earlier posts e.g. face mask directives--mask, don't mask, use two masks. Which one is trueT--tell us. None were censored.

pathetic attempt, kiddo.

Typical democrat response. You don't have a clue so you discount a response. Get informed.

 

[L.K.Eder]

who will be his lawyer? lin wood? orly taitz? sidney krackhead?

Nope, he has screwed them over pay so now he must find another sucker, that can spell his or her own name correctly.

It would be good to see the courts establish that companies cant set their own terms of service. Will trump have to prove that the election was stolen ?
That would be amazing.

Companies are able to set their own rules of service as long as they are not enforce arbitrarily and capriciously. In this case these media outlets have been selective about who they censor. That is discrimination and it is illegal.

Making false claims that lead to an insurrection seems to be enough for facebook and the rest. Who else has done that ?

we can all look forward to the suit, where they will have to define their "class".

There won't be a problem with that--they are not the only people that have been censored for their political beliefs.

yeah. they got kicked out of the bar for shitting on the tables, repeatedly. not for their political beliefs.

 

[L.K.Eder]

who will be his lawyer? lin wood? orly taitz? sidney krackhead?

Nope, he has screwed them over pay so now he must find another sucker, that can spell his or her own name correctly.

It would be good to see the courts establish that companies cant set their own terms of service. Will trump have to prove that the election was stolen ?
That would be amazing.

Companies are able to set their own rules of service as long as they are not enforce arbitrarily and capriciously. In this case these media outlets have been selective about who they censor. That is discrimination and it is illegal.

how were they selective? tell us.

Fauci was allowed to post on FB numerous times over the past year only to return and totally contradict the earlier posts e.g. face mask directives--mask, don't mask, use two masks. Which one is trueT--tell us. None were censored.

pathetic attempt, kiddo.

Typical democrat response. You don't have a clue so you discount a response. Get informed.

i discount your pathetic response, kiddo, because it was pathetic, kiddo.

 

[Concerned American]

who will be his lawyer? lin wood? orly taitz? sidney krackhead?

Nope, he has screwed them over pay so now he must find another sucker, that can spell his or her own name correctly.

It would be good to see the courts establish that companies cant set their own terms of service. Will trump have to prove that the election was stolen ?
That would be amazing.

Companies are able to set their own rules of service as long as they are not enforce arbitrarily and capriciously. In this case these media outlets have been selective about who they censor. That is discrimination and it is illegal.

Making false claims that lead to an insurrection seems to be enough for facebook and the rest. Who else has done that ?

we can all look forward to the suit, where they will have to define their "class".

There won't be a problem with that--they are not the only people that have been censored for their political beliefs.

yeah. they got kicked out of the bar for shitting on the tables, repeatedly. not for their political beliefs.

Blow it out your ass moron. You're not worth anymore time.

 

[Faun]

who will be his lawyer? lin wood? orly taitz? sidney krackhead?

Nope, he has screwed them over pay so now he must find another sucker, that can spell his or her own name correctly.

It would be good to see the courts establish that companies cant set their own terms of service. Will trump have to prove that the election was stolen ?
That would be amazing.

Companies are able to set their own rules of service as long as they are not enforce arbitrarily and capriciously. In this case these media outlets have been selective about who they censor. That is discrimination and it is illegal.

Making false claims that lead to an insurrection seems to be enough for facebook and the rest. Who else has done that ?

Fuck off with your insurrection bullshit. You know, I know and the world knows there was no fucking insurrection.

 

[colfax_m]

Companies are able to set their own rules of service as long as they are not enforce arbitrarily and capriciously. In this case these media outlets have been selective about who they censor. That is discrimination and it is illegal.

It's not.

There is no legal requirement to enforce rules fairly.

 

[L.K.Eder]

who will be his lawyer? lin wood? orly taitz? sidney krackhead?

Nope, he has screwed them over pay so now he must find another sucker, that can spell his or her own name correctly.

It would be good to see the courts establish that companies cant set their own terms of service. Will trump have to prove that the election was stolen ?
That would be amazing.

Companies are able to set their own rules of service as long as they are not enforce arbitrarily and capriciously. In this case these media outlets have been selective about who they censor. That is discrimination and it is illegal.

Making false claims that lead to an insurrection seems to be enough for facebook and the rest. Who else has done that ?

we can all look forward to the suit, where they will have to define their "class".

There won't be a problem with that--they are not the only people that have been censored for their political beliefs.

yeah. they got kicked out of the bar for shitting on the tables, repeatedly. not for their political beliefs.

Blow it out your ass moron. You're not worth anymore time.

bye bye, lamer.

i guess we will have to wait for the suit and see how they try to get their class defined, and certified, and somehow get the 1st amendment shoehorned into this.

you were no help, despite your bombastic statements suggesting that you were somehow "in the know".

 

[Faun]

who will be his lawyer? lin wood? orly taitz? sidney krackhead?

Nope, he has screwed them over pay so now he must find another sucker, that can spell his or her own name correctly.

It would be good to see the courts establish that companies cant set their own terms of service. Will trump have to prove that the election was stolen ?
That would be amazing.

Companies are able to set their own rules of service as long as they are not enforce arbitrarily and capriciously. In this case these media outlets have been selective about who they censor. That is discrimination and it is illegal.

Making false claims that lead to an insurrection seems to be enough for facebook and the rest. Who else has done that ?

we can all look forward to the suit, where they will have to define their "class".

There won't be a problem with that--they are not the only people that have been censored for their political beliefs.

yeah. they got kicked out of the bar for shitting on the tables, repeatedly. not for their political beliefs.

Blow it out your ass moron. You're not worth anymore time.

bye bye, lamer.

i guess we will have to wait for the suit and see how they try to get their class defined, and certified, and somehow get the 1st amendment shoehorned into this.

you were no help, despite your bombastic statements suggesting that you were somehow "in the know".

LOL

Apparently, these snowflakes think lying conservatives needs to be a protected class.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Free speechers will want a law passed that protects right wing nuts and punishes the kneelers. That should cover it.