Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here is Cornell Law School's reprint of 18 U.S. Code s/s 1512 - Tampering with a witness, victim, or informant:
18 U.S. Code § 1512 - Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant
www.law.cornell.edu
Quote the part of it that you believe Trump violated.
Again. A crime is a crime.If it occurred, it would be a process crime, regardless of how serious it may or may not be.
How many times are they going to use some lame excuse to throughly investigate Trump only to end up with crimes that would not have ever occurred if he would not have been falsely investigated to start with? Those of us with more than 2 brain cells have figured out their schtick. .
So is stalking a Supreme Court JusticeStop with the "process crime" nonsense.
A crime is a crime and witness tampering is a SERIOUS crime
Calling a number in his phone isnt tampering. It never has been and it never will be.Attempted witness tampering....if it didn't get acted on.
But you are right, the perpetual man of lawlessness, will never get charged....he's Teflon Don, has been his whole life.
An unanswered call will NEVER be considered tampering. You are a fool.Fucksake, do you even bother to know the law...
I was figuring this out the last day...
The regular Trumper invents a law and then says what there burden of proof is... That is not how the law works..
No Bribery needed... Any thing that could be deemed in any way connected to the legal proceedings could be inferred as tampering...
I say when his lawyer contacted the FBI they would have loved to set up a sting.. Simply record the call, probably wouldn't need a warrant with the consent of the witness...
It would have been game over... Cops outside Mar-a-lago ten minutes later and him in handcuffs... Because they would have such strong case for witness tampering Judge would not grant bail...
An unanswered call will NEVER be considered tampering. You are a fool.
Selected by the Speaker, dope. Per the House rules.Yeah this 'Select Committee,' selected by Pelosi, is a joke.
Again. A crime is a crime.
Witness tampering is a serious crime and the kind of thing many Mob bosses have gone to jail for
Actually not.So is stalking a Supreme Court Justice
If he did something illegal, your democrats in DC will not hesitate to charge him. Let me know if it ever happens. Until then this is just more golden shower/russia collusion horseshit.I agree that nothing will happen to him. Nothing will happen to him over any of this, not even asking for a specific number of votes. that is the way it is in America.
By Stalinists, yeah.It could be.
Apparently the target of this informed his lawyer after refusing the call.I agree, a crime is a crime. I am not arguing that witness tampering is not a crime, but I don’t know if Trump actually did that. They can investigate if they would like.
Actually not.
There is a law that says you can't protest outside a Justices home that has not been tested in Court yet. That is likely a violation of the First Amendment
It is also irrelevant to this discussion
Because you can't type the truth.....I hear ya......because you know I was correct......I admit nothing. I never agreed nor disagreed. I simply said 'oh well'.
The whole thing is a joke when The so called Defendent in a hearing that has no legal bearing on anything cannot call a witness.but is stopped by the committee. No witnesses for Trump are allowed and if he tries to call his own witnesses, they will accuse him of witness tampering. Similar thing happened with Steve Bannon. He said he would only testify live during prime time so the committee shot him down. They must have total control over what Bannon says so they can edit as needed. Guess that's not called witness tampering. Coming up soon: closing arguments for the prosecution but no closing arguments to defend Trump since no Trump witnesses were allowed to testify.
Rep. Liz Cheney ends hearing with bombshell: Donald Trump called a witness in the House January 6 investigation
Rep. Liz Cheney said the House January 6 committee informed the Justice Department of Trump's call to a witness.www.yahoo.com
Wrong. The law ONLY states that you can not protest outside a Justice's home. That is a violation of the First Amendment and SHOULD be overturned by a Court if challengedActually yes.
THIS Court? HAHAHAHAHAAnd you think SCOTUS will agree to that?
One supposed crime does not excuse another. That is a childish claim (also known as the PeeWee Herman Defense)Says you. I say it's very damn relevant.
No it isnt. If you got a recording of him bribing the guy, thats witness tampering. Just calling someone who doesnt pick up the call, isnt tampering. This isnt even a court of law.
It could be.
And this IS an official Federal proceeding.Witness tampering is not limited to bribery.
Witness tampering is not limited to bribery.
