Trump under investigation for Obstruction of Justice.

[Lakhota]

Now, the Wall Street Journal is jumping in. Oh happy day!

Anonymous source there too... Provide your sources fuck tard!

Ask the WSJ.

 

[healthmyths]

This is SO FUNNY!!!!
8,630,000 Google results for "Trump under a criminal investigation" and almost ALL quote the following:

Report: Trump Is Under Investigation for Obstruction of Justice
The Washington Post reports the probe led by special counsel Robert Mueller into Russian interference in the 2016 election has widened to include a closer look at the president’s actions. Donald Trump Is Under Investigation for Obstruction of Justice


….The obstruction-of-justice investigation of the president began days after Comey was fired on May 9, according to people familiar with the matter. Mueller’s office has now taken up that work, and the preliminary interviews scheduled with intelligence officials indicate his team is actively pursuing potential witnesses inside and outside the government.

That’s from the Washington Post. Trump’s fans, of course, continue to believe that the big scandal isn’t Trump’s likely obstruction of justice, but the fact that this stuff has been leaked. It’s the Deep State at work. After all, nothing ever leaked in Washington DC until Trump took office. Right?
Donald Trump Finally Gets His Wish, Is Now Under Criminal Investigation – Mother Jones

The investigation into ties between President Trump's campaign and the Russian government has now turned to investigating Trump himself for obstruction of justice, the Washington Post reported Wednesday.
Report: Special counsel Mueller investigating Trump for obstruction of justice

AND that's just the first three!
Where is THESE MSM leaks? Why are they all quoting the Washington Post, which is saying:
"The Post, citing unnamed sources, said the investigation into the president's own conduct began shortly after Trump fired Comey on May 9.

Unfortunately for Trump, that seems to have changed shortly after he treated Comey to his signature catchphrase: Anonymous officials are tellingthe Washington Post that special counsel Robert Mueller is examining whether the president’s conduct toward Comey constituted obstruction of justice. Trump Is Under Investigation for Obstruction of Justice: Report

 

[Dale Smith]

He's also good buddies with Comey.

Yeah, Republicans stick together.

Comey is a Clinton shill, dumb ass.......SMH........

Faun, your cyber scalp has a prominent place on my cyber wall.......you are one of my "bitches".

(snicker)

And how fortunate am I that you're batshit crazy?

Really? We don't interact in real time....we have never met and hopefully I will never have to share the same airspace with you....so how are you "lucky"? I make you look like the uninformed moron that you are. Your pathetic avatar is lamer than your responses. You are a cyber pussy just like all the rest of your leftard pals and equally uninformed...can you handle some truths, Faun-fag????? I kinda doubt it.........

 

[eddiew]

Now how are they going to find anything when there is nothing. If they cobble up something out of him saying "I hope you can let this go" There will be NO corner of the earth that will be safe for a liberal dimshit.

Bring it on puketard One way to reduce your pig sty full of pigs

 

[toobfreak]

...another fake news thread on the same subject. The Russian thing didn't stick, this can't so they will go back to voter fraud.

Oh no, the COLLUSION shtick didn't find any foothold, so now the LibTards have moved onto Gambit #2: Obstruction.

Mueller is a lifelong republican first appointed by Reagan and later by H.W. Bush and George W. Bush. I doubt he takes any pleasure in opening an investigation that may end the current republican president's term in office.

Trump might well survive charges that his campaign colluded with the Russians, but not Obstruction of Justice. Unless Mueller finds no evidence of obstruction, Trump will be hurt political just as Clinton was. Republican congressmen must be questioning whether Trump is becoming more of a liability than an asset.

Let me explain this to you one more time. There has to have been a crime for an obstruction of justice charge.

Please tell me what the crime is!

You cannot have the latter without the former.

I just hope all of you liIbs remembered to get your fishing licenses renewed!

Multiple potential and suspected crimes were being investigated by the FBI in regards to withholding information about meetings with Russian officials where classified data or inappropriate and illegal business dealing may have been discussed. Also being investigated were allegations of collusion to interfere with elections.
A point of fact is that a crime need not have been committed. The obstruction of investigators to ascertain whether a crime was committed or not is sufficient to bring about an obstruction charge.

A point of fact is that a crime need not have been committed.

Sorry, Loser, but that is EXACTLY WHAT MUST HAVE OCCURRED! What a jackass! If no evidence of a CRIME is found, the investigate is DROPPED. The only thing the FBI or special counsel is interested in or can prosecute on is a FUCKING CRIME. NO CRIME, NO MATTER. Get it?

Moron.

 

[Lakhota]

Will Trump now stop trying to prevent the Trump-Russia/Obstruction investigations - or will he get even more radical and treasonous?

 

[Billy_Bob]

This is SO FUNNY!!!!
8,630,000 Google results for "Trump under a criminal investigation" and almost ALL quote the following:

Report: Trump Is Under Investigation for Obstruction of Justice
The Washington Post reports the probe led by special counsel Robert Mueller into Russian interference in the 2016 election has widened to include a closer look at the president’s actions. Donald Trump Is Under Investigation for Obstruction of Justice


….The obstruction-of-justice investigation of the president began days after Comey was fired on May 9, according to people familiar with the matter. Mueller’s office has now taken up that work, and the preliminary interviews scheduled with intelligence officials indicate his team is actively pursuing potential witnesses inside and outside the government.

That’s from the Washington Post. Trump’s fans, of course, continue to believe that the big scandal isn’t Trump’s likely obstruction of justice, but the fact that this stuff has been leaked. It’s the Deep State at work. After all, nothing ever leaked in Washington DC until Trump took office. Right?
Donald Trump Finally Gets His Wish, Is Now Under Criminal Investigation – Mother Jones

The investigation into ties between President Trump's campaign and the Russian government has now turned to investigating Trump himself for obstruction of justice, the Washington Post reported Wednesday.
Report: Special counsel Mueller investigating Trump for obstruction of justice

AND that's just the first three!
Where is THESE MSM leaks? Why are they all quoting the Washington Post, which is saying:
"The Post, citing unnamed sources, said the investigation into the president's own conduct began shortly after Trump fired Comey on May 9.

Unfortunately for Trump, that seems to have changed shortly after he treated Comey to his signature catchphrase: Anonymous officials are tellingthe Washington Post that special counsel Robert Mueller is examining whether the president’s conduct toward Comey constituted obstruction of justice. Trump Is Under Investigation for Obstruction of Justice: Report

The left wing fake news sites are all following their leaders directions, like lap dogs with their snouts firmly up the one in front of them's ass.. Just regurgitating the shit the dog in front of them feeds them..

 

[JimH52]

See ya Comrade!

 

[toobfreak]

...another fake news thread on the same subject. The Russian thing didn't stick, this can't so they will go back to voter fraud.

Oh no, the COLLUSION shtick didn't find any foothold, so now the LibTards have moved onto Gambit #2: Obstruction.

Mueller is a lifelong republican first appointed by Reagan and later by H.W. Bush and George W. Bush. I doubt he takes any pleasure in opening an investigation that may end the current republican president's term in office.

Trump might well survive charges that his campaign colluded with the Russians, but not Obstruction of Justice. Unless Mueller finds no evidence of obstruction, Trump will be hurt political just as Clinton was. Republican congressmen must be questioning whether Trump is becoming more of a liability than an asset.

Let me explain this to you one more time. There has to have been a crime for an obstruction of justice charge.

Please tell me what the crime is!

You cannot have the latter without the former.

I just hope all of you liIbs remembered to get your fishing licenses renewed!

Multiple potential and suspected crimes were being investigated by the FBI in regards to withholding information about meetings with Russian officials where classified data or inappropriate and illegal business dealing may have been discussed. Also being investigated were allegations of collusion to interfere with elections.
A point of fact is that a crime need not have been committed. The obstruction of investigators to ascertain whether a crime was committed or not is sufficient to bring about an obstruction charge.

If they can find no evidence of his misdeeds he will be sent to the Gulag for so cleverly covering it up.

If they can find no evidence of his misdeeds he will be sent to the Gulag for so cleverly covering it up.

Yes! Exactly! In the modern world of Democratic Party Justice, the finding of no evidence is itself EVIDENCE of crime just well concealed! They know it is there because they can't find it. So why bother investigate at all.

1). SUSPECT.
2). ACCUSE.
3). FIND GUILTY.
4). STRING 'EM UP.

After all, it worked well in the Old West and for the KKK.

 

[Lakhota]

 

[JimH52]

The clearest case of obstruction of justice I have ever seen.

Yes, Richard Milhouse Trump will soon be going down...

 

[Lakhota]

Mueller is also looking at money laundering according to NYTimes.

 

[Care4all]

the president, while president, can not be charged with any crimes, he would have to be impeached, and removed, before he could be charged.

 

[Lakhota]

the president, while president, can not be charged with any crimes, he would have to be impeached, and removed, before he could be charged.

I agree - but his aides could go to prison. Watergate proved that.

The seven advisors and aides later indicted in 1974 were:[5]

• John N. Mitchell – former United States Attorney General and director of Nixon's 1968 and 1972 election campaigns; faced a maximum of 30 years in prison and $42,000 in fines; on February 21, 1975, Mitchell was found guilty of conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and perjury and sentenced to two and a half to eight years in prison, which was later reduced to one to four years; Mitchell actually served 19 months.
• H. R. Haldeman – White House chief of staff, considered the second most powerful man in the government during Nixon's first term; faced a maximum of 25 years in prison and $16,000 in fines; in 1975, he was convicted of conspiracy and obstruction of justice and received an 18-month prison sentence.
• John Ehrlichman – former assistant to Nixon in charge of domestic affairs; faced a maximum of 25 years in prison and $40,000 in fines. Ehrlichman was convicted of conspiracy, obstruction of justice, perjury and other charges; he served 18 months in prison.
• Charles Colson – former White House counsel specializing in political affairs; plead nolo contendere on June 3, 1974 to one charge of obstruction of justice, having persuaded prosecution to change the charge from one of which he believed himself innocent to another of which he believed himself guilty, in order to testify freely.;[6] he was sentenced to 1 to 3 years of prison and fined $5,000; Colson served seven months.
• Gordon C. Strachan – White House aide to Haldeman; faced a maximum of 15 years in prison and $20,000 in fines. Charges against him were dropped before trial.
• Robert Mardian – aide to Mitchell and counsel to the Committee to Re-elect the President in 1972; faced 5 years in prison and $5,000 in fines. His conviction was overturned on appeal.[7]
• Kenneth Parkinson – counsel for the Committee to Re-elect the President; faced 10 years in prison and $10,000 in fines. He was acquitted at trial. Although Parkinson was a lawyer, G. Gordon Liddy was in fact counsel for the Committee to Re-elect the President.

Watergate Seven - Wikipedia

In the aftermath of Richard Nixon’s resignation, Watergate continued to claim victims.

The final toll included:

• one presidential resignation
  
• one vice-presidential resignation – although Agnew’s crimes were unrelated to Watergate
  
• 40 government officials indicted or jailed
  
• H.R. Haldeman and John Erlichman (White House staff), resigned 30 April 1973, subsequently jailed
  
• John Dean (White House legal counsel), sacked 30 April 1973, subsequently jailed
  
• John Mitchell, Attorney-General and Chairman of the Committee to Re-elect the President (CREEP), jailed
  
• Howard Hunt and G. Gordon Liddy (ex-White House staff), planned the Watergate break-in, both jailed
  
• Charles Colson, special counsel to the President, jailed
  
• James McCord (Security Director of CREEP), jailed

Watergate Casualties and Convictions

 

[Political Junky]

Trump predicted disaster from Hillary investigation.

 

[JimH52]

the president, while president, can not be charged with any crimes, he would have to be impeached, and removed, before he could be charged.

This is going to hand Congress to the Dems in 2018. CHECKMATE!

 

[toobfreak]

Oh no, the COLLUSION shtick didn't find any foothold, so now the LibTards have moved onto Gambit #2: Obstruction.

Mueller is a lifelong republican first appointed by Reagan and later by H.W. Bush and George W. Bush. I doubt he takes any pleasure in opening an investigation that may end the current republican president's term in office.

Trump might well survive charges that his campaign colluded with the Russians, but not Obstruction of Justice. Unless Mueller finds no evidence of obstruction, Trump will be hurt political just as Clinton was. Republican congressmen must be questioning whether Trump is becoming more of a liability than an asset.

Let me explain this to you one more time. There has to have been a crime for an obstruction of justice charge.

Please tell me what the crime is!

You cannot have the latter without the former.

I just hope all of you liIbs remembered to get your fishing licenses renewed!

Multiple potential and suspected crimes were being investigated by the FBI in regards to withholding information about meetings with Russian officials where classified data or inappropriate and illegal business dealing may have been discussed. Also being investigated were allegations of collusion to interfere with elections.
A point of fact is that a crime need not have been committed. The obstruction of investigators to ascertain whether a crime was committed or not is sufficient to bring about an obstruction charge.

If they can find no evidence of his misdeeds he will be sent to the Gulag for so cleverly covering it up.

The evidence was revealed by trump when he bragged on national TV that he fired Comey over the Russian investigation. His firing of Comey can be interpreted as an effort to alter or end the investigation, hence, obstruction.

The evidence was revealed by trump when he bragged on national TV that he fired Comey over the Russian investigation. His firing of Comey can be interpreted as an effort to alter or end the investigation, hence, obstruction.

Dear Master of Non Sequiturs, bragging does not constitute "evidence.' If it did, then we would have "evidence" that Hillary was really named after the mountain climber and Al Gore invented the Internet!

Or if I wish you to go out and "break a leg" and later on you fall down and actually do so that my wish was evidence that I was the cause of it!

BTW, I invented the Saturn 5 that took astronauts to the Moon! Now you have "evidence!"

 

[JimH52]

the president, while president, can not be charged with any crimes, he would have to be impeached, and removed, before he could be charged.

I agree - but his aides could go to prison. Watergate proved that.

Soon, the slugs will start flipping on the Orange Clown. Better to give up the goods on the boss, than to spend years in a Federal Penetentary. Obviously, many of his aides are going to be interviewed...oh, and the FBI does not shy away from the lie detector test.

 

[JimH52]

Mueller is a lifelong republican first appointed by Reagan and later by H.W. Bush and George W. Bush. I doubt he takes any pleasure in opening an investigation that may end the current republican president's term in office.

Trump might well survive charges that his campaign colluded with the Russians, but not Obstruction of Justice. Unless Mueller finds no evidence of obstruction, Trump will be hurt political just as Clinton was. Republican congressmen must be questioning whether Trump is becoming more of a liability than an asset.

Let me explain this to you one more time. There has to have been a crime for an obstruction of justice charge.

Please tell me what the crime is!

You cannot have the latter without the former.

I just hope all of you liIbs remembered to get your fishing licenses renewed!

Multiple potential and suspected crimes were being investigated by the FBI in regards to withholding information about meetings with Russian officials where classified data or inappropriate and illegal business dealing may have been discussed. Also being investigated were allegations of collusion to interfere with elections.
A point of fact is that a crime need not have been committed. The obstruction of investigators to ascertain whether a crime was committed or not is sufficient to bring about an obstruction charge.

If they can find no evidence of his misdeeds he will be sent to the Gulag for so cleverly covering it up.

The evidence was revealed by trump when he bragged on national TV that he fired Comey over the Russian investigation. His firing of Comey can be interpreted as an effort to alter or end the investigation, hence, obstruction.

The evidence was revealed by trump when he bragged on national TV that he fired Comey over the Russian investigation. His firing of Comey can be interpreted as an effort to alter or end the investigation, hence, obstruction.

Dear Master of Non Sequiturs, bragging does not constitute "evidence.' If it did, then we would have "evidence" that Hillary was really named after the mountain climber and Al Gore invented the Internet!

Or if I wish you to go out and "break a leg" and later on you fall down and actually do so that my wish was evidence that I was the cause of it!

BTW, I invented the Saturn 5 that took astronauts to the Moon! Now you have "evidence!"

You sound like the perfect defense attorney for Comrade Trump.

 

[Faun]

Yeah, Republicans stick together.

Comey is a Clinton shill, dumb ass.......SMH........

Faun, your cyber scalp has a prominent place on my cyber wall.......you are one of my "bitches".

(snicker)

And how fortunate am I that you're batshit crazy?

Really? We don't interact in real time....we have never met and hopefully I will never have to share the same airspace with you....so how are you "lucky"? I make you look like the uninformed moron that you are. Your pathetic avatar is lamer than your responses. You are a cyber pussy just like all the rest of your leftard pals and equally uninformed...can you handle some truths, Faun-fag????? I kinda doubt it.........

I'm fortunate because you're crazy enough to believe the nonsense you post. If you were even close to sane, then I might have something to worry about.