- Mar 3, 2013
- 82,924
- 44,603
- 2,605
Well no. The electoral college doesn't reflect the popular vote. I acknowledge that is how our system works. but it still doesn't reflect the will of the voters. If it did, more votes, which Hillary received, would select the president.If the country had chosen Hillary, she would have the Electoral votes to show for it.It reflects the will of the voters on the state level. You need to remember that the federal government did not create the states, rather the states created the federal government.
Big deal. The voters are the people. Hillary got more than 2 million more votes from the people. Yes, Trump won on a technicality, but it was only a technicality. The majority of the voters don't support him.
Yes, Trump won on a technicality, but it was only a technicality.
That 'technicality' has decided elections for a couple of centuries
The majority of the voters don't support him.
The majority of the country does
Nope. More than 2 million more voters said the county chose Hillary. Trump weaseled a win, but it doesn't reflect the will of the country.
Why do you want two or three states to decide the presidency?
1 California 39,497,345
3 Florida 20,636,975
4 New York 19,842,724
5 Illinois 12,837,801
Win those 4 states, you have the popular vote locked up, the other 46 get fucked
To the contrary, it does, per stateThe electoral college doesn't reflect the popular vote.
You really do need a refresher course in civics.I acknowledge that is how our system works. but it still doesn't reflect the will of the voters.