Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
twist it, spin it, doesn't matter.
Electoral votes win the presidency, not the popular votes
No shit. That's the flaw in our system we've been pointing out.
It's not a flaw
It overrides the will of the majority of the voters. If you don't see that as a flaw, you're nuts.
Just because a couple of states have a bigger population, doesn't mean they get to dictate policy.
California, NY, Illinois, Florida have 4 of the top 5 populations.
Should Rhode Island, Maine, Vermont, Delaware just suck it up, because they can't compete?
We all know how the electoral college works. That doesn't make it all right to put the 2nd place contender in charge. More than 2 million votes. You don't think that means something?
He wasn't the 2nd place contender, he won the majority of the EVThat doesn't make it all right to put the 2nd place contender in charge.
More than 2 million votes.
You don't think that means something?
means that the videos showing the dems planning to ship the illegals in to vote, and the voter registration that allows the illegals to vote in california seems to have worked. Too bad about two little things that the democrats forgot about, 1, the electoral collage covered the illegal votes in California and two, this isnt Mexico. you want to count a mexican vote? move to TijuanaNo shit. That's the flaw in our system we've been pointing out.
It's not a flaw
It overrides the will of the majority of the voters. If you don't see that as a flaw, you're nuts.
Just because a couple of states have a bigger population, doesn't mean they get to dictate policy.
California, NY, Illinois, Florida have 4 of the top 5 populations.
Should Rhode Island, Maine, Vermont, Delaware just suck it up, because they can't compete?
We all know how the electoral college works. That doesn't make it all right to put the 2nd place contender in charge. More than 2 million votes. You don't think that means something?
No shit. That's the flaw in our system we've been pointing out.
It's not a flaw
It overrides the will of the majority of the voters. If you don't see that as a flaw, you're nuts.
Just because a couple of states have a bigger population, doesn't mean they get to dictate policy.
California, NY, Illinois, Florida have 4 of the top 5 populations.
Should Rhode Island, Maine, Vermont, Delaware just suck it up, because they can't compete?
We all know how the electoral college works. That doesn't make it all right to put the 2nd place contender in charge. More than 2 million votes. You don't think that means something?He wasn't the 2nd place contender, he won the majority of the EVThat doesn't make it all right to put the 2nd place contender in charge.
More than 2 million votes.
2 million...200 million?
doesn't matter.
Those votes werent' where she needed them
You don't think that means something?
It means HIllary played a lousy ground game, and didn't win enough states to win the presidency.
It's not a flaw
It overrides the will of the majority of the voters. If you don't see that as a flaw, you're nuts.
Just because a couple of states have a bigger population, doesn't mean they get to dictate policy.
California, NY, Illinois, Florida have 4 of the top 5 populations.
Should Rhode Island, Maine, Vermont, Delaware just suck it up, because they can't compete?
We all know how the electoral college works. That doesn't make it all right to put the 2nd place contender in charge. More than 2 million votes. You don't think that means something?He wasn't the 2nd place contender, he won the majority of the EVThat doesn't make it all right to put the 2nd place contender in charge.
More than 2 million votes.
2 million...200 million?
doesn't matter.
Those votes werent' where she needed them
You don't think that means something?
It means HIllary played a lousy ground game, and didn't win enough states to win the presidency.
Yep. You won on a technicality. The only way you could win.
No shit. That's the flaw in our system we've been pointing out.
It's not a flaw
It overrides the will of the majority of the voters. If you don't see that as a flaw, you're nuts.
Just because a couple of states have a bigger population, doesn't mean they get to dictate policy.
California, NY, Illinois, Florida have 4 of the top 5 populations.
Should Rhode Island, Maine, Vermont, Delaware just suck it up, because they can't compete?
We all know how the electoral college works. That doesn't make it all right to put the 2nd place contender in charge. More than 2 million votes. You don't think that means something?He wasn't the 2nd place contender, he won the majority of the EVThat doesn't make it all right to put the 2nd place contender in charge.
More than 2 million votes.
2 million...200 million?
doesn't matter.
Those votes werent' where she needed them
You don't think that means something?
It means HIllary played a lousy ground game, and didn't win enough states to win the presidency.
It overrides the will of the majority of the voters. If you don't see that as a flaw, you're nuts.
Just because a couple of states have a bigger population, doesn't mean they get to dictate policy.
California, NY, Illinois, Florida have 4 of the top 5 populations.
Should Rhode Island, Maine, Vermont, Delaware just suck it up, because they can't compete?
We all know how the electoral college works. That doesn't make it all right to put the 2nd place contender in charge. More than 2 million votes. You don't think that means something?He wasn't the 2nd place contender, he won the majority of the EVThat doesn't make it all right to put the 2nd place contender in charge.
More than 2 million votes.
2 million...200 million?
doesn't matter.
Those votes werent' where she needed them
You don't think that means something?
It means HIllary played a lousy ground game, and didn't win enough states to win the presidency.
Yep. You won on a technicality. The only way you could win.
no technicality,
the same way elections have been decided in this country for centuries
It's not a flaw
It overrides the will of the majority of the voters. If you don't see that as a flaw, you're nuts.
Just because a couple of states have a bigger population, doesn't mean they get to dictate policy.
California, NY, Illinois, Florida have 4 of the top 5 populations.
Should Rhode Island, Maine, Vermont, Delaware just suck it up, because they can't compete?
We all know how the electoral college works. That doesn't make it all right to put the 2nd place contender in charge. More than 2 million votes. You don't think that means something?He wasn't the 2nd place contender, he won the majority of the EVThat doesn't make it all right to put the 2nd place contender in charge.
More than 2 million votes.
2 million...200 million?
doesn't matter.
Those votes werent' where she needed them
You don't think that means something?
It means HIllary played a lousy ground game, and didn't win enough states to win the presidency.
If the electoral college didn't exist, had never been instituted, and someone today proposed it,
they would be laughed out of the room.
That's how bad the electoral college is.
And about 10 million Hillary votes were from the non-living and illegal aliens. Kaine was cancelling rallies for lack.of attendanceYou are absolutely right. Even if that doesn't reflect the will of the voters.twist it, spin it, doesn't matter.
Electoral votes win the presidency, not the popular votes
It reflects the will of the country, not a couple of states
Still doesn't reflect the will of the people. Hillary got more than 2 million votes more votes than that orange clown.
and longer for blacks.Just because a couple of states have a bigger population, doesn't mean they get to dictate policy.
California, NY, Illinois, Florida have 4 of the top 5 populations.
Should Rhode Island, Maine, Vermont, Delaware just suck it up, because they can't compete?
We all know how the electoral college works. That doesn't make it all right to put the 2nd place contender in charge. More than 2 million votes. You don't think that means something?He wasn't the 2nd place contender, he won the majority of the EVThat doesn't make it all right to put the 2nd place contender in charge.
More than 2 million votes.
2 million...200 million?
doesn't matter.
Those votes werent' where she needed them
You don't think that means something?
It means HIllary played a lousy ground game, and didn't win enough states to win the presidency.
Yep. You won on a technicality. The only way you could win.
no technicality,
the same way elections have been decided in this country for centuries
Things can be wrong for a very long time. Not allowing women to vote lasted for over a century.
It overrides the will of the majority of the voters. If you don't see that as a flaw, you're nuts.
Just because a couple of states have a bigger population, doesn't mean they get to dictate policy.
California, NY, Illinois, Florida have 4 of the top 5 populations.
Should Rhode Island, Maine, Vermont, Delaware just suck it up, because they can't compete?
We all know how the electoral college works. That doesn't make it all right to put the 2nd place contender in charge. More than 2 million votes. You don't think that means something?He wasn't the 2nd place contender, he won the majority of the EVThat doesn't make it all right to put the 2nd place contender in charge.
More than 2 million votes.
2 million...200 million?
doesn't matter.
Those votes werent' where she needed them
You don't think that means something?
It means HIllary played a lousy ground game, and didn't win enough states to win the presidency.
If the electoral college didn't exist, had never been instituted, and someone today proposed it,
they would be laughed out of the room.
That's how bad the electoral college is.
Proves how much wiser the Founding Fathers were than.....
you
and longer for blacks.We all know how the electoral college works. That doesn't make it all right to put the 2nd place contender in charge. More than 2 million votes. You don't think that means something?He wasn't the 2nd place contender, he won the majority of the EVThat doesn't make it all right to put the 2nd place contender in charge.
More than 2 million votes.
2 million...200 million?
doesn't matter.
Those votes werent' where she needed them
You don't think that means something?
It means HIllary played a lousy ground game, and didn't win enough states to win the presidency.
Yep. You won on a technicality. The only way you could win.
no technicality,
the same way elections have been decided in this country for centuries
Things can be wrong for a very long time. Not allowing women to vote lasted for over a century.
you're not making a point here
Just because a couple of states have a bigger population, doesn't mean they get to dictate policy.
California, NY, Illinois, Florida have 4 of the top 5 populations.
Should Rhode Island, Maine, Vermont, Delaware just suck it up, because they can't compete?
We all know how the electoral college works. That doesn't make it all right to put the 2nd place contender in charge. More than 2 million votes. You don't think that means something?He wasn't the 2nd place contender, he won the majority of the EVThat doesn't make it all right to put the 2nd place contender in charge.
More than 2 million votes.
2 million...200 million?
doesn't matter.
Those votes werent' where she needed them
You don't think that means something?
It means HIllary played a lousy ground game, and didn't win enough states to win the presidency.
If the electoral college didn't exist, had never been instituted, and someone today proposed it,
they would be laughed out of the room.
That's how bad the electoral college is.
Proves how much wiser the Founding Fathers were than.....
you
There's no wisdom in the electoral college. In fact, it wasn't wisdom that caused the Founders to cobble together the electoral college. They only did it because they needed gimmicks to unite the states who in those days thought of themselves as sovereign nations. That's how you got crazy stuff like the 3/5ths compromise, or the delay on banning slave importation,
or the electoral college.
There was nothing 'wise' about it.
and longer for blacks.He wasn't the 2nd place contender, he won the majority of the EV
2 million...200 million?
doesn't matter.
Those votes werent' where she needed them
It means HIllary played a lousy ground game, and didn't win enough states to win the presidency.
Yep. You won on a technicality. The only way you could win.
no technicality,
the same way elections have been decided in this country for centuries
Things can be wrong for a very long time. Not allowing women to vote lasted for over a century.
you're not making a point here
To argue that we should keep doing something because we've been doing it a long time is a classic fallacious argument.
Our country was founded as a republic. The electoral college represents that fact. What more wisdom do you need?Just because a couple of states have a bigger population, doesn't mean they get to dictate policy.
California, NY, Illinois, Florida have 4 of the top 5 populations.
Should Rhode Island, Maine, Vermont, Delaware just suck it up, because they can't compete?
We all know how the electoral college works. That doesn't make it all right to put the 2nd place contender in charge. More than 2 million votes. You don't think that means something?He wasn't the 2nd place contender, he won the majority of the EVThat doesn't make it all right to put the 2nd place contender in charge.
More than 2 million votes.
2 million...200 million?
doesn't matter.
Those votes werent' where she needed them
You don't think that means something?
It means HIllary played a lousy ground game, and didn't win enough states to win the presidency.
If the electoral college didn't exist, had never been instituted, and someone today proposed it,
they would be laughed out of the room.
That's how bad the electoral college is.
Proves how much wiser the Founding Fathers were than.....
you
There's no wisdom in the electoral college. In fact, it wasn't wisdom that caused the Founders to cobble together the electoral college. They only did it because they needed gimmicks to unite the states who in those days thought of themselves as sovereign nations. That's how you got crazy stuff like the 3/5ths compromise, or the delay on banning slave importation,
or the electoral college.
There was nothing 'wise' about it.
Why are you so easily fooled?Holy shit that's pretty impressive.
Hillary Counties Produce 64% of Economic Output
Damn empty land has gained a whole lot of power. The suddenly bleak future belongs to the unskilled and uneducated apparently. Go Trump!
Our country was founded as a republic. The electoral college represents that fact. What more wisdom do you need?We all know how the electoral college works. That doesn't make it all right to put the 2nd place contender in charge. More than 2 million votes. You don't think that means something?He wasn't the 2nd place contender, he won the majority of the EVThat doesn't make it all right to put the 2nd place contender in charge.
More than 2 million votes.
2 million...200 million?
doesn't matter.
Those votes werent' where she needed them
You don't think that means something?
It means HIllary played a lousy ground game, and didn't win enough states to win the presidency.
If the electoral college didn't exist, had never been instituted, and someone today proposed it,
they would be laughed out of the room.
That's how bad the electoral college is.
Proves how much wiser the Founding Fathers were than.....
you
There's no wisdom in the electoral college. In fact, it wasn't wisdom that caused the Founders to cobble together the electoral college. They only did it because they needed gimmicks to unite the states who in those days thought of themselves as sovereign nations. That's how you got crazy stuff like the 3/5ths compromise, or the delay on banning slave importation,
or the electoral college.
There was nothing 'wise' about it.
and longer for blacks.Yep. You won on a technicality. The only way you could win.
no technicality,
the same way elections have been decided in this country for centuries
Things can be wrong for a very long time. Not allowing women to vote lasted for over a century.
you're not making a point here
To argue that we should keep doing something because we've been doing it a long time is a classic fallacious argument.
We do it because it works.
as we've seen this year.
getting a high number of votes in select states, as opposed to winning the popular vote in numerous, smaller, states, is NOT winning the will of the people.
