Trump's ego can't handle the hacking truth

So if Russia is behind the hacking by putting out all those fake news stories to discredit Hillary......who was behind the fake news stories discrediting Trump?



Hmmmmmmm????
 
And it was professionally addressed. he didn't say the hack changed nothing in that piece. Is that your spin?

he stated:

"“While Russia, China, other countries, outside groups and people are consistently trying to break through the cyber infrastructure of our governmental institutions, businesses and organizations including the Democrat [sic] National Committee, there was absolutely no effect on the outcome of the election including the fact that there was no tampering whatsoever with voting machines,” Trump said."
 
And it was professionally addressed. he didn't say the hack changed nothing in that piece. Is that your spin?

he stated:

"“While Russia, China, other countries, outside groups and people are consistently trying to break through the cyber infrastructure of our governmental institutions, businesses and organizations including the Democrat [sic] National Committee, there was absolutely no effect on the outcome of the election including the fact that there was no tampering whatsoever with voting machines,” Trump said."

Trump said? Wow, that is really hilarious! Who will you be quoting next - Hannity?
 
The sloppiness of the alleged DNC hack by itself proves it was not organized by a nation state, and the “utter nonsense” presented as proof of Moscow’s involvement is rather evidence of intelligence agencies being “ignorant and naïve,” John McAfee told RT.

The so-called evidence of the Russian involvement in the hacks not only looks like “the most deceptive propaganda was perpetrated on the American public” but actually proves quite the opposite, McAfee believes.
‘Propaganda intended to incite Americans’: John McAfee to RT on ‘Russian hacking’ claims

There is much more proof that illegals effected the election, then did the Russians
Donald Trump's incoming White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer dodged questions about Russia's influence on the election this weekend by claiming that Hillary Clinton is the person who should really be punished.

"Why aren’t we talking about the influence, other influences on the election? Why aren’t we talking about Hillary Clinton getting debate questions ahead of time? That’s a pretty valid attempt to influence an election. Somebody giving her the debate questions and the answers of an election. When are we going to start talking about the other side of this. Which is what did Hillary Clinton do to influence the election? Is she being punished in any way?"
Trump Spokesman: Enough About Russia! Let's Talk About "Punishing" Hillary Instead
http://thedailybanter.com/2017/01/sean-spicer-hillary-influenced-election/

Worse than stealing debate questions was feeding articles to the media to be approved first by The DNC, and then also approving of interview questions to be asked of her by the media beforehand.........but the worst thing really was THE DNC paying Criminals to incite violence and assault Trump Supporters at rallys. Or how about The DNC giving Super Delegates to Clinton in states Sanders won?

or how about them plotting to Undermine and Steal The Primary from Bernie Sanders.

How about both Heads of The DNC being caught Cheating?
The list goes on and on.
The Russian Claims are not only BS, they had less impact than all of the things Clinton said and did. Benghazi, deleting 33,000 emails, taking millions from despotic regimes, stealing money from the Haitian Earthquake relief fund, 6 Billion dollars disappearing from The State Department, and her insulting over Half of America by calling Latinos Taco Bowls, Blacks Super Predators, Sanders supporters Basement Dwellers, and Trump supporters a Basket of Irredeemable Deplorables?

Seriously Liberals should do the world a favor and just start jumping off bridges if they think Hillary Clinton and the DNC wasn't their own worst enemy.
 
What "proof" do you have that Russia had anything to do with it? Assange has already said they were NOT his source!

Funny. The American intelligence community has PROOF - including the identities of the Russians who gave the hacked information to Wikileaks. Get real...
how? they never looked even looked at the server. You know this now right?

This was clearly explained last night on MSNBC. The FBI had no need to physically examine the server because they already had all the forensic details.


MSNBC is fake news.

Really? Please provide some "credible" proof that can be verified as factual.


Easy peasy.

"Hard-Core Clinton Fanatic" Manufactured "Viral Fake News" That MSNBC Used To Discredit Wikileaks | Zero Hedge

That the emails in the Wikileaks archive were doctored or faked – and thus should be disregarded – was classic Fake News, spread not by Macedonian teenagers or Kremlin operatives but by established news outlets such as MSNBC, the Atlantic and Newsweek. And, by design, this Fake News spread like wildfire all over the internet, hungrily clicked and shared by tens of thousands of people eager to believe it was true. As a result of this deliberate disinformation campaign, anyone reporting on the contents of the emails was instantly met with claims that the documents in the archive had been proven fake.
 
There was no proof of russia effecting the election. Just gullible loons like you who believe in such propaganda.

Then why did Russia and Wikileaks hack and release private DNC emails? Their goal was obviously to plant seeds of doubt against Hillary. Nothing that Russia and Wikileaks released was negative about Trump. What other conclusions could a sane person extrapolate?

/--- Nor did Hildabeast or Podesta claim any of the emails were forgeries. Got your PASSWORD password?

How would you like someone to hack and publish your personal and work-related emails?

/----I wouldn't like it at all. That's why I have a better password than PASSWORD.
 
There was no proof of russia effecting the election. Just gullible loons like you who believe in such propaganda.

Then why did Russia and Wikileaks hack and release private DNC emails? Their goal was obviously to plant seeds of doubt against Hillary. Nothing that Russia and Wikileaks released was negative about Trump. What other conclusions could a sane person extrapolate?

That the RNC was smart enough to not use PASSWORD as a password?
no, it's they were smart enough to know not to share it.
 
th
 
There was no proof of russia effecting the election. Just gullible loons like you who believe in such propaganda.

Then why did Russia and Wikileaks hack and release private DNC emails? Their goal was obviously to plant seeds of doubt against Hillary. Nothing that Russia and Wikileaks released was negative about Trump. What other conclusions could a sane person extrapolate?


Clapper said there was no evidence that they did. Just pure conjecture and propaganda.

Yup from an idiot who's still hurt her hero isn't POTUS. Notice all the anti Trump threads Shittingbull has posted.

Its like she's trying to convince herself how right she is. What a moron,
 
What "corruption" was revealed? Please provide "credible" proof that can be verified as factual.
Be specific, Marty. Let's see objective factual evidence, hmmm.

how about you learn to quote the right person, dippy?
How about you meeting up to the requirements of providing a factual premise, some solid evidence, and then conclusions that are worth are reading.

You don't want to make Lakhota go on the warpath, do you?

Chief Shitting bull?

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.

The emails show the DNC was in the tank for Hillary, shafting Bernie supporters. That was probably enough to tone down Bernie supporters.

So the DNC wasn't rooting for Hillary?
Mods, notice marty's deflection. Marty, we are talking about Trump and his refusal to accept the truth of the Russian attempts to interfere in our election. Answer to the OP. Be specific.

I freaking dare you to report this post, you cheap, dime-store hack.
 

Forum List

Back
Top