Trump's ego can't handle the hacking truth

[jc456]

There was no proof of russia effecting the election. Just gullible loons like you who believe in such propaganda.

Then why did Russia and Wikileaks hack and release private DNC emails? Their goal was obviously to plant seeds of doubt against Hillary. Nothing that Russia and Wikileaks released was negative about Trump. What other conclusions could a sane person extrapolate?

The seeds of doubt about Hillary were already myriad. Most voters made their decision two years ago.

That's a lie that can't be supported with "credible" proof.

Ironic eh?

 

[martybegan]

How would you like someone to hack and publish your personal and work-related emails?

If it revealed my corruption, I'd be as sad as Hillary.

What "corruption" was revealed? Please provide "credible" proof that can be verified as factual.

Be specific, Marty. Let's see objective factual evidence, hmmm.

how about you learn to quote the right person, dippy?

How about you meeting up to the requirements of providing a factual premise, some solid evidence, and then conclusions that are worth are reading.

You don't want to make Lakhota go on the warpath, do you?

Chief Shitting bull?

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.

The emails show the DNC was in the tank for Hillary, shafting Bernie supporters. That was probably enough to tone down Bernie supporters.

So the DNC wasn't rooting for Hillary?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

There was no proof of russia effecting the election. Just gullible loons like you who believe in such propaganda.

Then why did Russia and Wikileaks hack and release private DNC emails? Their goal was obviously to plant seeds of doubt against Hillary. Nothing that Russia and Wikileaks released was negative about Trump. What other conclusions could a sane person extrapolate?

/--- Nor did Hildabeast or Podesta claim any of the emails were forgeries. Got your PASSWORD password?

How would you like someone to hack and publish your personal and work-related emails?

If it revealed my corruption, I'd be as sad as Hillary.

What "corruption" was revealed? Please provide "credible" proof that can be verified as factual.

In her email, Abedin told Podesta and current Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook that the lavish May 2015 meeting of the Clinton Global Initiative was based on a $12 million pledge from Moroccan King Mohammed VI to host the event.

“The King has personally committed approx. $12 million both for the endowment and to support the meeting,” Abedin wrote.

Hacked emails show Clinton pushed for charity meeting in Morocco

$12 million? Nice!

 

[Lakhota]

The goal of Putin and Assange was to bombard American voters with seeds of doubt about Hillary. No sane person can say this didn't have some affect on the outcome.

What "proof" do you have that Russia had anything to do with it? Assange has already said they were NOT his source!

Funny. The American intelligence community has PROOF - including the identities of the Russians who gave the hacked information to Wikileaks. Get real...

 

[JakeStarkey]

If it revealed my corruption, I'd be as sad as Hillary.

What "corruption" was revealed? Please provide "credible" proof that can be verified as factual.

Be specific, Marty. Let's see objective factual evidence, hmmm.

how about you learn to quote the right person, dippy?

How about you meeting up to the requirements of providing a factual premise, some solid evidence, and then conclusions that are worth are reading.

You don't want to make Lakhota go on the warpath, do you?

Chief Shitting bull?

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.

The emails show the DNC was in the tank for Hillary, shafting Bernie supporters. That was probably enough to tone down Bernie supporters.

So the DNC wasn't rooting for Hillary?

Mods, notice marty's deflection. Marty, we are talking about Trump and his refusal to accept the truth of the Russian attempts to interfere in our election. Answer to the OP. Be specific.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The goal of Putin and Assange was to bombard American voters with seeds of doubt about Hillary. No sane person can say this didn't have some affect on the outcome.

The goal of Putin and Assange was to bombard American voters with seeds of doubt about Hillary.

It helps that she's an untrustworthy and corrupt old drunk.

 

[jc456]

The goal of Putin and Assange was to bombard American voters with seeds of doubt about Hillary. No sane person can say this didn't have some affect on the outcome.

What "proof" do you have that Russia had anything to do with it? Assange has already said they were NOT his source!

Funny. The American intelligence community has PROOF - including the identities of the Russians who gave the hacked information to Wikileaks. Get real...

how? they never looked even looked at the server. You know this now right?

 

[Lakhota]

Even if Putin and Assange had hacked and published proof that Clintons killed VInce Foster - it would still be foreign intervention in our election process. That's the point.

 

[oldsoul]

The goal of Putin and Assange was to bombard American voters with seeds of doubt about Hillary. No sane person can say this didn't have some affect on the outcome.

What "proof" do you have that Russia had anything to do with it? Assange has already said they were NOT his source!

Funny. The American intelligence community has PROOF - including the identities of the Russians who gave the hacked information to Wikileaks. Get real...

Really? And Assange still denies that the Russians had anything to do with it? Who do you believe? I know where my trust lies on this one, and I don't generally trust Assange with used toilet paper.

 

[BluesLegend]

Trump has far more important things to do than waste time on Hillary's stupidity. Goddamn what moron emails their passwords around and replies to phishing emails are these Democrat leaders that dumb?

 

[Lakhota]

The goal of Putin and Assange was to bombard American voters with seeds of doubt about Hillary. No sane person can say this didn't have some affect on the outcome.

What "proof" do you have that Russia had anything to do with it? Assange has already said they were NOT his source!

Funny. The American intelligence community has PROOF - including the identities of the Russians who gave the hacked information to Wikileaks. Get real...

how? they never looked even looked at the server. You know this now right?

This was clearly explained last night on MSNBC. The FBI had no need to physically examine the server because they already had all the forensic details.

 

[oldsoul]

Even if Putin and Assange had hacked and published proof that Clintons killed VInce Foster - it would still be foreign intervention in our election process. That's the point.

Get real, what motive would Putin have? He already knows that Clinton would be just as soft on foreign relations as Obama is. Why wouldn't he want her in? He could have run rough shod over her!!! Trump, well, we'll see. He talks tough, but is he? what would you bet on, a sure thing, or a maybe? Putin is a cold calculating and effective leader, say what you want about his policies, he knows how to do an end round on the world stage. Something Clinton and Obama don't seem to be even aware of.

 

[Lakhota]

Gee, what a surprise...

Trump still questions intelligence on Russia hacking after briefing

 

[Stratford57]

The sloppiness of the alleged DNC hack by itself proves it was not organized by a nation state, and the “utter nonsense” presented as proof of Moscow’s involvement is rather evidence of intelligence agencies being “ignorant and naïve,” John McAfee told RT.

The so-called evidence of the Russian involvement in the hacks not only looks like “the most deceptive propaganda was perpetrated on the American public” but actually proves quite the opposite, McAfee believes.
‘Propaganda intended to incite Americans’: John McAfee to RT on ‘Russian hacking’ claims

There is much more proof that illegals effected the election, then did the Russians

Donald Trump's incoming White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer dodged questions about Russia's influence on the election this weekend by claiming that Hillary Clinton is the person who should really be punished.

"Why aren’t we talking about the influence, other influences on the election? Why aren’t we talking about Hillary Clinton getting debate questions ahead of time? That’s a pretty valid attempt to influence an election. Somebody giving her the debate questions and the answers of an election. When are we going to start talking about the other side of this. Which is what did Hillary Clinton do to influence the election? Is she being punished in any way?"
http://thedailybanter.com/2017/01/sean-spicer-hillary-influenced-election/

Hilarious! You're quoting a Russian news website as proof?

About as reliable as that Huffing Paint you use

Thank you.

Even a banana republic Media actually delivers more truth than liberal Media (and liberals rely on unconditionally). All the planet knows it, except for those dummies liberals.

 

[oldsoul]

The goal of Putin and Assange was to bombard American voters with seeds of doubt about Hillary. No sane person can say this didn't have some affect on the outcome.

What "proof" do you have that Russia had anything to do with it? Assange has already said they were NOT his source!

Funny. The American intelligence community has PROOF - including the identities of the Russians who gave the hacked information to Wikileaks. Get real...

how? they never looked even looked at the server. You know this now right?

This was clearly explained last night on MSNBC. The FBI had no need to physically examine the server because they already had all the forensic details.

All you had to say was MSNBC. Nothing else mattered. Do you still not get that they are puppets?

 

[jknowgood]

There was no proof of russia effecting the election. Just gullible loons like you who believe in such propaganda.

Then why did Russia and Wikileaks hack and release private DNC emails? Their goal was obviously to plant seeds of doubt against Hillary. Nothing that Russia and Wikileaks released was negative about Trump. What other conclusions could a sane person extrapolate?

Well the guys password was password. If I was a liberal I would shut up about this thing. This is one of your best representing the intelligence of y'all.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

There was no proof of russia effecting the election. Just gullible loons like you who believe in such propaganda.

Then why did Russia and Wikileaks hack and release private DNC emails? Their goal was obviously to plant seeds of doubt against Hillary. Nothing that Russia and Wikileaks released was negative about Trump. What other conclusions could a sane person extrapolate?

The seeds of doubt about Hillary were already myriad. Most voters made their decision two years ago.

That's a lie that can't be supported with "credible" proof.

Pffft. I made my choice in 2008, and I wasn't alone in doing so. The Democratic Party is pariah.

 

[Lakhota]

The goal of Putin and Assange was to bombard American voters with seeds of doubt about Hillary. No sane person can say this didn't have some affect on the outcome.

What "proof" do you have that Russia had anything to do with it? Assange has already said they were NOT his source!

Funny. The American intelligence community has PROOF - including the identities of the Russians who gave the hacked information to Wikileaks. Get real...

how? they never looked even looked at the server. You know this now right?

This was clearly explained last night on MSNBC. The FBI had no need to physically examine the server because they already had all the forensic details.

All you had to say was MSNBC. Nothing else mattered. Do you still not get that they are puppets?

Who are your puppets?

 

[oldsoul]

Gee, what a surprise...

Trump still questions intelligence on Russia hacking after briefing

It's surprising to you that a leader questions incomplete information? Are you completely unfamiliar with effective leadership?

 

[jc456]

Even if Putin and Assange had hacked and published proof that Clintons killed VInce Foster - it would still be foreign intervention in our election process. That's the point.

what exactly is the intervention into the election?