Trump's lie of the day

[g5000]

no i'd say you are the one lying

Out of 559 key position requiring Senate confirmation, Trump has only nominated 117.

Please explain how Democratic obstructionism has prevented Trump from nominating 442 people.

Why do you ask for an explanation that you will just deny?

Argument from ignorance. Straw man.

Tard.

 

[debbiedowner]

I didn't see Trump lying about anything. He's asking for approval and it's not getting done. How do you figure that's misleading anyone? Perhaps if you post it a third or fourth time it'll be more believable.

How the fuck can they approve anyone when the senate has been on a 10 day recess?

 

[Siete]

Trump refuses to appoint anyone. Everyone he knows will get his sorry ass investigated,

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Then post a link to support your claim. What Ambassador nominations are "Dems holding up"?

Why do you ask for proof you will deny?

I'm not a Trumpster. I actually support and believe in facts. Provide some that show Democrats holding up Trump's nominees.

Trump Calls Democrats 'Obstructionists,' But He's Only Nominated 11 Ambassadors

Again, why do you ask for proof you will deny? No matter what anyone posts that proves you wrong you will only lie and spin and deflect more. It's what you clowns do everyday. So why do you ask for proof you will deny?

So show your facts, to support the info being a lie.

He can not show any facts. He is attempting to hijack and kill the thread by making it monotonous and annoying. He knows that at some point many interested in the topic will stop reading it and move on to other threads to avoid his annoying posts.

It is a zombie troll bot!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[miketx]

Then post a link to support your claim. What Ambassador nominations are "Dems holding up"?

Why do you ask for proof you will deny?

I'm not a Trumpster. I actually support and believe in facts. Provide some that show Democrats holding up Trump's nominees.

Trump Calls Democrats 'Obstructionists,' But He's Only Nominated 11 Ambassadors

Again, why do you ask for proof you will deny? No matter what anyone posts that proves you wrong you will only lie and spin and deflect more. It's what you clowns do everyday. So why do you ask for proof you will deny?

So show your facts, to support the info being a lie.

He can not show any facts. He is attempting to hijack and kill the thread by making it monotonous and annoying. He knows that at some point many interested in the topic will stop reading it and move on to other threads to avoid his annoying posts.

I've told three times now for you lying idiots that I don't have any proof of anything that I simply did not see a lie in the link, and then I ask why you ask for that which you will not believe anyway. All you are doing is playing little games trying to make your claim of lies look better and make me into a liar. You continually claim I have no proof and i already told your stupid ass that i don't have any. Why do you keep asking me the same thing when I already told you I don't have it and that all I said was I didn't see Trump lying about anything? LMAO. You see this is what you shills try to do when anyone disagrees with you. lol

 

[miketx]

Trump refuses to appoint anyone. Everyone he knows will get his sorry ass investigated,

Perhaps the dims should stop obstructing him.

 

[miketx]

Why do you ask for proof you will deny?

I'm not a Trumpster. I actually support and believe in facts. Provide some that show Democrats holding up Trump's nominees.

Trump Calls Democrats 'Obstructionists,' But He's Only Nominated 11 Ambassadors

Again, why do you ask for proof you will deny? No matter what anyone posts that proves you wrong you will only lie and spin and deflect more. It's what you clowns do everyday. So why do you ask for proof you will deny?

So show your facts, to support the info being a lie.

He can not show any facts. He is attempting to hijack and kill the thread by making it monotonous and annoying. He knows that at some point many interested in the topic will stop reading it and move on to other threads to avoid his annoying posts.

It is a zombie troll bot!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You lie. again.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Trump refuses to appoint anyone. Everyone he knows will get his sorry ass investigated,

Perhaps the dims should stop obstructing him.

Zombie troll bot


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Camp]

June 6. Trump blames democrats for not approving his diplomat appointments, even though they have absolutely nothing to do with the approval process.

" President Trump on Monday wrongly accused Democrats of stalling his ambassadorial nominees in the Republican-controlled Senate, where diplomatic picks cannot be filibustered."

Trump misleads public on ambassador nominees

"“Dems are taking forever to approve my people, including Ambassadors. They are nothing but OBSTRUCTIONISTS! Want approvals,” Trump said on Twitter.

Perhaps the lying POS should make some nominations. They can not be approved until the deceiver in chief actually makes the nominations.

 

[Siete]

President Trump agrees the government glass is half empty. He just doesn’t necessarily mind it.

Trump, in an exclusive interview Tuesday with “Fox & Friends,” suggested his lack of political appointees is less about a difficulty in finding eager candidates and more about a desire for a leaner government operation.

“When I see a story about ‘Donald Trump didn’t fill hundreds and hundreds of jobs,’ it’s because, in many cases, we don’t want to fill those jobs,” Trump said.


Trump: No plans to fill 'unnecessary' appointed positions

its the fucking dems fault .... rrrrrriiiiiiiigggggghhhhhhttttt.

lying bitch.

suck that ^^^^^ mikieboi

 

[miketx]

June 6. Trump blames democrats for not approving his diplomat appointments, even though they have absolutely nothing to do with the approval process.

" President Trump on Monday wrongly accused Democrats of stalling his ambassadorial nominees in the Republican-controlled Senate, where diplomatic picks cannot be filibustered."

Trump misleads public on ambassador nominees

"“Dems are taking forever to approve my people, including Ambassadors. They are nothing but OBSTRUCTIONISTS! Want approvals,” Trump said on Twitter.

Perhaps the lying POS should make some nominations. They can not be approved until the deceiver in chief actually makes the nominations.

What has he lied about? Can you prove it?

 

[RodISHI]

Trump refuses to appoint anyone. Everyone he knows will get his sorry ass investigated,

Perhaps the dims should stop obstructing him.

Perhaps these people do not have access to the WH nominations & appointment pages. Either that or they are not capable of doing their own research.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

no i'd say you are the one lying

Then post a link to support your claim. What Ambassador nominations are "Dems holding up"?

Why do you ask for proof you will deny?

Oh, hahahahaha.....cluck, cluck.....SQUAWK!

 

[miketx]

President Trump agrees the government glass is half empty. He just doesn’t necessarily mind it.

Trump, in an exclusive interview Tuesday with “Fox & Friends,” suggested his lack of political appointees is less about a difficulty in finding eager candidates and more about a desire for a leaner government operation.

“When I see a story about ‘Donald Trump didn’t fill hundreds and hundreds of jobs,’ it’s because, in many cases, we don’t want to fill those jobs,” Trump said.


Trump: No plans to fill 'unnecessary' appointed positions

its the fucking dems fault .... rrrrrriiiiiiiigggggghhhhhhttttt.

lying bitch.

If he's not going to appoint them, then why are you bleeding from all your orifices about it?

 

[WaitingFor2020]

June 6. Trump blames democrats for not approving his diplomat appointments, even though they have absolutely nothing to do with the approval process.

" President Trump on Monday wrongly accused Democrats of stalling his ambassadorial nominees in the Republican-controlled Senate, where diplomatic picks cannot be filibustered."

Trump misleads public on ambassador nominees

"“Dems are taking forever to approve my people, including Ambassadors. They are nothing but OBSTRUCTIONISTS! Want approvals,” Trump said on Twitter.

Perhaps the lying POS should make some nominations. They can not be approved until the deceiver in chief actually makes the nominations.

What has he lied about? Can you prove it?

You truly are one of the most intellectually incurious and lazy people on this board.

 

[g5000]

Trump's an old man. The geezer is turning 71 next week. He needs a lot of down time.

He is also an inexperienced amateur. He's never held office in his life. Remember how much whining we heard from the pseudocons over Obama's inexperience?

Obama was an elder statesman compared to Trump's experience.

This is what happens when you hire a tired, morbidly obese, apprentice.

 

[miketx]

June 6. Trump blames democrats for not approving his diplomat appointments, even though they have absolutely nothing to do with the approval process.

" President Trump on Monday wrongly accused Democrats of stalling his ambassadorial nominees in the Republican-controlled Senate, where diplomatic picks cannot be filibustered."

Trump misleads public on ambassador nominees

"“Dems are taking forever to approve my people, including Ambassadors. They are nothing but OBSTRUCTIONISTS! Want approvals,” Trump said on Twitter.

Perhaps the lying POS should make some nominations. They can not be approved until the deceiver in chief actually makes the nominations.

What has he lied about? Can you prove it?

You truly are one of the most intellectually incurious and lazy people on this board.

You are one of the biggest liars. What exactly has you bleeding all over?

 

[Marion Morrison]

Why do you ask for proof you will deny?

I'm not a Trumpster. I actually support and believe in facts. Provide some that show Democrats holding up Trump's nominees.

Trump Calls Democrats 'Obstructionists,' But He's Only Nominated 11 Ambassadors

Again, why do you ask for proof you will deny? No matter what anyone posts that proves you wrong you will only lie and spin and deflect more. It's what you clowns do everyday. So why do you ask for proof you will deny?

Try us troll bot, or just continue to hide behind that horseshit

I was just reading your siggy. You are a homo that hates white heterosexual males. So much for not being biased eh he bitch?

Thank you again for your commitment to facts and logic and to staying on topic. You're a real asset to this board-one who helps to ensure the maintenance of a collegial environment where we can all share ideas and learn from each other about the important issues of the day.

The salient point is that the Democrats are not showing up and doing their jobs.

As a taxpayer, you probably should be outraged because I'd bet they're living better than you and laughing

about

your useful idiot peon self....all the way to the bank.

 

[Camp]

Why do you ask for proof you will deny?

I'm not a Trumpster. I actually support and believe in facts. Provide some that show Democrats holding up Trump's nominees.

Trump Calls Democrats 'Obstructionists,' But He's Only Nominated 11 Ambassadors

Again, why do you ask for proof you will deny? No matter what anyone posts that proves you wrong you will only lie and spin and deflect more. It's what you clowns do everyday. So why do you ask for proof you will deny?

So show your facts, to support the info being a lie.

He can not show any facts. He is attempting to hijack and kill the thread by making it monotonous and annoying. He knows that at some point many interested in the topic will stop reading it and move on to other threads to avoid his annoying posts.

I've told three times now for you lying idiots that I don't have any proof of anything that I simply did not see a lie in the link, and then I ask why you ask for that which you will not believe anyway. All you are doing is playing little games trying to make your claim of lies look better and make me into a liar. You continually claim I have no proof and i already told your stupid ass that i don't have any. Why do you keep asking me the same thing when I already told you I don't have it and that all I said was I didn't see Trump lying about anything? LMAO. You see this is what you shills try to do when anyone disagrees with you. lol

You probably think you have responded with an intelligent response of gibberish and deflection.

 

[miketx]

Trump's an old man. The geezer is turning 71 in a few days. He needs a lot of down time.

He is also an inexperienced amateur. He's never held office in his life. Remember how much whining we heard from the pseudocons over Obama's inexperience?

Obama was an elder statesman compared to Trump's experience.

This is what happens when you hire a tired, morbidly obese, apprentice.

What happens? Did he drop something? Is that why you are so upset? Are you having your period?