Trump's Next Move Towards a Fascist State: Take Away Licensing of T.V. Networks

Not related to this thread, but JFK was killed by Oswald who was working with a group of Cubans. The Cubans were part of a program that was created by JFK to train them for the Bay of Pigs invasion to overthrow Castro. Problem was JFK pulled military support for them in the midst of the fighting, that caused many of them to die and the coup to fail. These Cubans were then pissed and vowed to take revenge on JFK. Castro was able to get a mole in the group to help push the assassination agenda for his own revenge as well.

Now, what has Trump lied about? Well how about a recent lie where he says that the U.S. is the most taxed country in the world. That's not true at all.


What is tax freedom day now? May 5th? That means once all the taxes and all other fees are figured in that the Average American works until May 5th for this corporate entity that you worship at the feet of. If us serfs are not the most taxed population? I would hate to have to live some place else that steals even more of what our labor produces.

And as far as the JFK murder goes? You are 100 percent WRONG. Oswald was a patsy and worked in military intelligence. The cover-up of the murder of JFK goes to incredibly great lengths to hide the truth. The Warren commission findings were a total joke. JFK took on the bankers that finance the military industrial complex and the CIA and lost......bottom line.


View attachment 153892

Trump's statement about the U.S. being the highest taxed country in the world is wrong. It's been proven. Not only are we NOT the highest taxed country in the world, we are below the average of the 35 countries included in the study.

"This statement is completely false. According to 2015 data from the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), taxation accounted for 26.4 percent of the United States’ gross domestic product (GDP). This was lower than the average for the 35 nations in the OECD (34.3 percent) and in some cases far lower than comparable countries (45.5 percent in France, for instance)."

Trump returns to false tax claim as he pushes for reform

Oswald worked with a group of Cuban revolutionaries named Alpha 66. ;)

But again, that is off topic.

And so who was the Las Vegas shooter working for?


No one knows and may never will. It's 44 years after Kennedy's assassination and there is still no definitive proof of whether Oswald had help or not, or what his motive was.

I have doubts with the History Channel's theories. It seems to be a lot of spin. That said, I have heard so many theories on the JFK shooting and who was involved that I think I will stick to the version that the mob was involved, specifically the Chicago mob.
New Age Culture

That History Channel is disgraceful, trying to make us believe that the Ancient Aliens theory is respectable.
 
As usual, your ignorance of history shows in a brilliant glow.


You actually have no idea what you are into.
Take a little read and do some research. Or are you to like "the gropenfuher" and you are to lazy. You need others to do the work and then take credit.
Nazi Propaganda and Censorship

Actually... read what you posted below.

Once they succeeded in ending democracy and turning Germany into a one-party dictatorship, the Nazis orchestrated a massive propaganda campaign to win the loyalty and cooperation of Germans. The Nazi Propaganda Ministry, directed by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, took control of all forms of communication in Germany: newspapers, magazines, books, public meetings, and rallies, art, music, movies, and radio. Viewpoints in any way threatening to Nazi beliefs or to the regime were censored or eliminated from all media.

If I didn't see Germans and Nazi in this quote, I would think you're talking about American leftist progressives, academia, Hollywood and Antifa.


what does the point of lefties doing it now have to do with history. you guys want censorship not us

I don't want censorship. I didn't want it when Barry's admin proposed it, I don't want it now.

The difference is that you lefties were all for the censorship of the conservative media when you had power, and now you're objecting when the same is suggested by the opponent that has power.

What I want from media is to stop lying.
I thought maybe Obama leaving office would somewhat ease the symptoms of Obama Tourettes Syndrome. Nope, you guys have gotten even worse.
we have a long time before we equal you bush bashing.
 
That was indeed the conclusion drawn by no less than eight separate investigations.
How to spot a sociopath - 10 red flags that could save you from being swept under the influence of a charismatic nut job
#3) Sociopaths are incapable of feeling shame, guilt or remorse. Their brains simply lack the circuitry to process such emotions. This allows them to betray people, threaten people or harm people without giving it a second thought. They pursue any action that serves their own self interest even if it seriously harms others.
There was plenty of evidence to convict that crooked vagina, but as we all know the worthless FBI chief wouldn't do anything. So even today, we have a 2 tier system of justice, where people like you dumbass liberals would go to jail for any small violation, yet people like the Clintons can have an intern shot in the back or US Ambassador left to die, and get off scot free. You might as well kneel down and suck both Bill's and Hillary's dicks..

More fake news.
"Crooked Hillary"
Lock her up.


It's funny that the purveyor of fake news is suggesting a network should lose it's liscense.

That isn't news, dumbass. Those are slogans shouted by Trump supporters.

Once again, a libe douche bag is trying to compare things that aren't comparable. That's what they always do when they are wriggling on the hook.
Nevertheless, those idiotic slogans were butressed with a mountain of fake news, no doubt much of it from Putin's legion. It's genius, when you think about it....Putin recruited and put to work a few million Russian agents in this country and didn't have to pay them one red Ruble...
Nope didn't pay them one red Ruble...

wheres-that-reset-button-hillary-russia-recently-hacked-pent-politics-1438912296.jpg
Idiotic meme....it's clear many people used private servers... Also a complete deflection of what I said..
 
Scariest part of this thread is how many mind numbingly STUPID conservative muppets gave the OP a "funny" rating. This forum is chock full of literal retards.
 
As usual, your ignorance of history shows in a brilliant glow.


Actually... read what you posted below.

If I didn't see Germans and Nazi in this quote, I would think you're talking about American leftist progressives, academia, Hollywood and Antifa.


what does the point of lefties doing it now have to do with history. you guys want censorship not us

I don't want censorship. I didn't want it when Barry's admin proposed it, I don't want it now.

The difference is that you lefties were all for the censorship of the conservative media when you had power, and now you're objecting when the same is suggested by the opponent that has power.

What I want from media is to stop lying.
I thought maybe Obama leaving office would somewhat ease the symptoms of Obama Tourettes Syndrome. Nope, you guys have gotten even worse.
we have a long time before we equal you bush bashing.

Haha, really? Keeping a ledger, are ya?
 
NBC stood by Dan Rather and his fake memos until the they were shamed into admitted the truth.

Time will tell. I'm confident. It's you fools who get taken every time.


Hmmm, no it's not. The fake media has been nailed broadcasting lies so many times I've lost count. They've spewed a long series of nothing burgers, and every time morons like you claimed it was the end of Trump.

Sure. Tell us some more about Beghazi, emails, Clinton murders, Obama's birth cert, being a secret Muslim, Michelle is a tranny, ...etc. It goes on and on and on. None of that shit is or ever was real but you, personally, as well as others have gone on about this shit for years. It's always you dopes who are fooled and you always go back for more.

Did FOX news broadcast any stories about "Clinton murders, Obama's birth cert, being a secret Muslim, Michelle is a tranny?" No. The Benghazi scandal and Clinton emails were majors stories covered by all the media outlets.

We're talking about the media, not what individual Americans have said. Only a douche bag with no facts on his side would try to compare the two things.

Seth Rich?
All of that has been presented as such on this forum.

Media? Like Breitbart, infowars, WND, zero hedge ....et al?

We're talking about the media, not what ignorant turds on this forum post.

None of the sites you listed are mainstream media outlets. Shall we examine what sites like HuffingtonPost, MediaMaters, and other paranoid leftwing sites publish?
 
How can people continue to support this guy? Can you think of any other historical figures that wanted to silence anyone that talked ill of them...?

""With all of the Fake News coming out of NBC and the Networks, at what point is it appropriate to challenge their License? Bad for country!" Mr Trump wrote in a tweet."
Trump raises a thoughtful and legitimate question. The airwaves belong to the public and there are FCC rules regarding their use. And some licensees such as CNN and MSNBC consistently broadcast hoaxes or "fake news" as Trump has labeled them.

Here is the relevant law regarding broadcast hoaxes.


§ 73.1217 Broadcast hoaxes.
No licensee or permittee of any broadcast station shall broadcast false information concerning a crime or a catastrophe if:

(a) The licensee knows this information is false;

(b) It is forseeable that broadcast of the information will cause substantial public harm, and

(c) Broadcast of the information does in fact directly cause substantial public harm.

Any programming accompanied by a disclaimer will be presumed not to pose foreseeable harm if the disclaimer clearly characterizes the program as a fiction and is presented in a way that is reasonable under the circumstances.


So what it basically comes down to is whether or not any of their multitude of broadcast hoaxes have ever directly caused substantial public harm. I agree with Trump that this needs to be looked into. For instance, they could investigate the possibility that any of these Milwaukee riots or the unprecedented terrorist attacks at the inauguration were incited by their fake news stories.

Fake news as TRUMP labels them. Therein lies the problem.

The main thing is intent, knowingly broadcasting false info about a crime or disaster. There is a lot of sloppy fact checking going on but that is not a crime.

The only example I can think of that fulfills some of the criteria in an MSN story is Fox's Seth Rich one, it was on a crime, knowingly false and caused harm to the family but even that probably wouldn't fly.

Those types of laws usually have very high bars like free speech laws and for good reason. They could easily be used to silence them.

The other thing is network broadcasting is now only a small part of the media...much of the false news comes on the largely unregulated internet.

The best protection in this info age is to teach people critical thinking.
I saw that report on Seth Rich. I didn't see anything in it that was demonstrably false.

If you did I'd certainly like you to show us the part that was demonstrably false.
This article offers a good analysis on the many false claims including attributing things to people they did not say. They are facing multiple lawsuits over this mess.

No Apology, No Explanation: Fox News And The Seth Rich Story
Actually it was 1 allegedly false claim and the story was retracted very soon thereafter. And the claim is not demonstrably false.
 
Trump suggests challenging NBC's broadcast license

Well, it looks like trump has had enough of liberal propoganda.

Hopefully this will be the end of MSNBC. NBC, CNN et al.

Once we shut down the propoganda networks, i bet our country will be stronger than ever before!

Laughing at you dumabass Trumpsters and your dear leader.

THIS IS NOT HOW ANY OF THIS WORKS. President cannot simply shut down a media outlet like some oligarch in near-third world shithole (see Putin's tactics)

We still have something called First Amendment in this country and you deplorables are not going to change that.
 
You do know that schools and work are two different places right? The government can stop people from praying in schools because there is a rule that is about separation of church and state.

"There is a rule"...

Post the rule.


"The Constitution uses 16 words—known as the “religion clauses”—to create rules about how faith and government interact. One clause gives citizens the right to freely exercise religious convictions; the other prohibits government (including taxpayer-funded public schools) from establishing religion, meaning granting favorable treatment."

"Among the issues that have reached the High Court:

  • Can a school district allow students to conduct prayers over the loudspeaker and before kickoff at a varsity football game? (No)
  • Does a religious student club get the same rights and privileges as other student clubs? (Yes)
  • Is a school district required to give equal access to an outside organizations that provide after-school religious instruction to young children? (Yes)
  • Is a moment of silence really a cloaking device for prayer? (Sometimes)
  • Are the words “under God” in the pledge of allegiance unconstitutional in schools? (Undecided)"
Religion and Public Schools

How that "over the loudspeakers" sneaked in there?


Child, now you pivoted from your implied argument about "rules" to now cherry picking "loud speakers."

At some point you need to just admit defeat and give up.

giphy.gif


nah the consttitution says free exercise of religion...
we get it you lefties hate it because people look to god and not government.

you guys would hate muslims too if they didnt hate America as much as you guys
 
Scariest part of this thread is how many mind numbingly STUPID conservative muppets gave the OP a "funny" rating. This forum is chock full of literal retards.
You calling other forum members retards?

Now that's funny!
 
You do know that schools and work are two different places right? The government can stop people from praying in schools because there is a rule that is about separation of church and state.

"There is a rule"...

Post the rule.


"The Constitution uses 16 words—known as the “religion clauses”—to create rules about how faith and government interact. One clause gives citizens the right to freely exercise religious convictions; the other prohibits government (including taxpayer-funded public schools) from establishing religion, meaning granting favorable treatment."

"Among the issues that have reached the High Court:

  • Can a school district allow students to conduct prayers over the loudspeaker and before kickoff at a varsity football game? (No)
  • Does a religious student club get the same rights and privileges as other student clubs? (Yes)
  • Is a school district required to give equal access to an outside organizations that provide after-school religious instruction to young children? (Yes)
  • Is a moment of silence really a cloaking device for prayer? (Sometimes)
  • Are the words “under God” in the pledge of allegiance unconstitutional in schools? (Undecided)"
Religion and Public Schools

How that "over the loudspeakers" sneaked in there?


Child, now you pivoted from your implied argument about "rules" to now cherry picking "loud speakers."

At some point you need to just admit defeat and give up.

giphy.gif


nah the consttitution says free exercise of religion...
we get it you lefties hate it because people look to god and not government.

you guys would hate muslims too if they didnt hate America as much as you guys


Oh so now you are at the point you like to cherry pick the Constitution? It says people should be free to practice it, yes, but it also says that people have the right not to have it forced onto them, like through prayer in state run places.

I'm not a lefty either...
 
Trump suggests challenging NBC's broadcast license

Well, it looks like trump has had enough of liberal propoganda.

Hopefully this will be the end of MSNBC. NBC, CNN et al.

Once we shut down the propoganda networks, i bet our country will be stronger than ever before!

Laughing at you dumabass Trumpsters and your dear leader.

THIS IS NOT HOW ANY OF THIS WORKS. President cannot simply shut down a media outlet like some oligarch in near-third world shithole (see Putin's tactics)

We still have something called First Amendment in this country and you deplorables are not going to change that.
No, but he could have the FCC revoke the licenses of the lamestream media outlets, and if they continue to put out FAKE news, be shut down and have the liars arrested as enemies of the state. See pretty easy when Commies come out of the wordwork and declare how they hate the US.

Every time a liberal opens their piehole and "CLAIM" that we are the stupid ones, I just roll on the floor and laugh my ass off about how stupid they are... Stupid is as stupid votes, and they vote Democrat....

 
Before we get too hysterical, it would behoove is to look at the requirements to obtain and keep a broadcast license. Are there requirements that NBC has violated? If there are, the fact that Trump is asking about pulling their license is legit, and all this hysteria is unwarranted. If not, then his interest is just that, interest, and of no more concern than was Obama's desire to shut down FOX. Either way, all this running around in a panic seems a bit, how do you say, stupid?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Well here is the issue. Reporters are allowed to use "Anonymous sources" and can protect that oath as long as they aren't compelled to reveal them because of certain circumstances like a threat to national security or a handful of others. So that means Trump would have to show that what NBC reported was indeed a lie.

That said, networks like NBC would be quick to point out the hypocrisy of Trump not mentioning other networks that he likes that have also reported "fake news" like Fox and Info Wars, which would prove a bias.

And no, discussing this issue is not stupid, because the most powerful man in the world, the U.S. President just openly threatened to violate part of the First Amendment to the Constitution, the Freedom of the Press.

Republican Senator Sasse of Nebraska, from a fly-over state, has come out asking Trump if he is recanting his oath as President to uphold and defend the First Amendment of the Constitution. Trump can't help himself from making enemies right and left.

Republican senator asks Trump if he's 'recanting oath' over war with press

He was asking a question. Let me know when he actually intends to take action. And no, mind reading is not a valid indication.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


He was asking a question? :laugh: Was he doing air quotes with his hands while he typed his tweet?

How about you prove he hasn't already started to take action?

That would be proving a negative, and not going to happen. Like I said, let me know when he actually starts doing stuff. Until then, it's politician talk. IOW, hot air.

I've been hearing ad nauseam that Trump's a liar. Why the hysteria now? Y'all seem absolutely certain he's telling the absolute truth this time and are terrified as the result.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
"There is a rule"...

Post the rule.


"The Constitution uses 16 words—known as the “religion clauses”—to create rules about how faith and government interact. One clause gives citizens the right to freely exercise religious convictions; the other prohibits government (including taxpayer-funded public schools) from establishing religion, meaning granting favorable treatment."

"Among the issues that have reached the High Court:

  • Can a school district allow students to conduct prayers over the loudspeaker and before kickoff at a varsity football game? (No)
  • Does a religious student club get the same rights and privileges as other student clubs? (Yes)
  • Is a school district required to give equal access to an outside organizations that provide after-school religious instruction to young children? (Yes)
  • Is a moment of silence really a cloaking device for prayer? (Sometimes)
  • Are the words “under God” in the pledge of allegiance unconstitutional in schools? (Undecided)"
Religion and Public Schools

How that "over the loudspeakers" sneaked in there?


Child, now you pivoted from your implied argument about "rules" to now cherry picking "loud speakers."

At some point you need to just admit defeat and give up.

giphy.gif


nah the consttitution says free exercise of religion...
we get it you lefties hate it because people look to god and not government.

you guys would hate muslims too if they didnt hate America as much as you guys


Oh so now you are at the point you like to cherry pick the Constitution? It says people should be free to practice it, yes, but it also says that people have the right not to have it forced onto them, like through prayer in state run places.

I'm not a lefty either...
I'm not a lefty either...
Republicans, you want to know why some of you get called Racist so much?
No you aren't a lefty, I can see you are a.......#10) Sociopaths are delusional and literally believe that what they say becomes truth merely because they say it!
How to spot a sociopath - 10 red flags that could save you from being swept under the influence of a charismatic nut job
 
Trump suggests challenging NBC's broadcast license

Well, it looks like trump has had enough of liberal propoganda.

Hopefully this will be the end of MSNBC. NBC, CNN et al.

Once we shut down the propoganda networks, i bet our country will be stronger than ever before!

Are you a Russian agent provocateur? Did you support TASS? If not, and you are native born citizen your understanding of the First Amendment has been warped by someone or something.

This attack on the press and the MSM media in general is toxic, and its infection has spread from Limbaugh 25 years ago to the idiot fringe and now to the POTUS.

It even infected Obama.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
So no US Ambassador was left to die by Al Qaeda which Obama said before his re election, he had on the run? No wonder liberals can fool you libtards all the time, with liberal thinking.




View attachment 153913


So no US Ambassador was left to die by Al Qaeda

That was indeed the conclusion drawn by no less than eight separate investigations.

How to spot a sociopath - 10 red flags that could save you from being swept under the influence of a charismatic nut job
#3) Sociopaths are incapable of feeling shame, guilt or remorse. Their brains simply lack the circuitry to process such emotions. This allows them to betray people, threaten people or harm people without giving it a second thought. They pursue any action that serves their own self interest even if it seriously harms others.
There was plenty of evidence to convict that crooked vagina, but as we all know the worthless FBI chief wouldn't do anything. So even today, we have a 2 tier system of justice, where people like you dumbass liberals would go to jail for any small violation, yet people like the Clintons can have an intern shot in the back or US Ambassador left to die, and get off scot free. You might as well kneel down and suck both Bill's and Hillary's dicks..


More fake news.
"Crooked Hillary"
Lock her up.


It's funny that the purveyor of fake news is suggesting a network should lose it's liscense.


That isn't news, dumbass. Those are slogans shouted by Trump supporters.

Once again, a libe douche bag is trying to compare things that aren't comparable. That's what they always do when they are wriggling on the hook.

Nevertheless, those idiotic slogans were butressed with a mountain of fake news, no doubt much of it from Putin's legion. It's genius, when you think about it....Putin recruited and put to work a few million Russian agents in this country and didn't have to pay them one red Ruble...

Now you're off in la-la land trying to justify your fake claims. Keep all your Putin prattle to yourself. I don't pay attention to it.
 
Before we get too hysterical, it would behoove is to look at the requirements to obtain and keep a broadcast license. Are there requirements that NBC has violated? If there are, the fact that Trump is asking about pulling their license is legit, and all this hysteria is unwarranted. If not, then his interest is just that, interest, and of no more concern than was Obama's desire to shut down FOX. Either way, all this running around in a panic seems a bit, how do you say, stupid?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Well here is the issue. Reporters are allowed to use "Anonymous sources" and can protect that oath as long as they aren't compelled to reveal them because of certain circumstances like a threat to national security or a handful of others. So that means Trump would have to show that what NBC reported was indeed a lie.

That said, networks like NBC would be quick to point out the hypocrisy of Trump not mentioning other networks that he likes that have also reported "fake news" like Fox and Info Wars, which would prove a bias.

And no, discussing this issue is not stupid, because the most powerful man in the world, the U.S. President just openly threatened to violate part of the First Amendment to the Constitution, the Freedom of the Press.

Republican Senator Sasse of Nebraska, from a fly-over state, has come out asking Trump if he is recanting his oath as President to uphold and defend the First Amendment of the Constitution. Trump can't help himself from making enemies right and left.

Republican senator asks Trump if he's 'recanting oath' over war with press

He was asking a question. Let me know when he actually intends to take action. And no, mind reading is not a valid indication.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


He was asking a question? :laugh: Was he doing air quotes with his hands while he typed his tweet?

How about you prove he hasn't already started to take action?
why don't you prove you're not gay?

go ahead prove a negative...I want to see this


Prove I'm not gay? Though it is flattering anytime someone is attracted to you, I'm going to have to tell you I'm not interested, I prefer women. Keep up hope, you'll find a nice husband some day.

Asking for proof that Trump hasn't already started taking action against networks is not proving a negative.

Yes it is.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
So no US Ambassador was left to die by Al Qaeda which Obama said before his re election, he had on the run? No wonder liberals can fool you libtards all the time, with liberal thinking.




View attachment 153913


So no US Ambassador was left to die by Al Qaeda

That was indeed the conclusion drawn by no less than eight separate investigations.

How to spot a sociopath - 10 red flags that could save you from being swept under the influence of a charismatic nut job
#3) Sociopaths are incapable of feeling shame, guilt or remorse. Their brains simply lack the circuitry to process such emotions. This allows them to betray people, threaten people or harm people without giving it a second thought. They pursue any action that serves their own self interest even if it seriously harms others.
There was plenty of evidence to convict that crooked vagina, but as we all know the worthless FBI chief wouldn't do anything. So even today, we have a 2 tier system of justice, where people like you dumbass liberals would go to jail for any small violation, yet people like the Clintons can have an intern shot in the back or US Ambassador left to die, and get off scot free. You might as well kneel down and suck both Bill's and Hillary's dicks..


More fake news.
"Crooked Hillary"
Lock her up.


It's funny that the purveyor of fake news is suggesting a network should lose it's liscense.


That isn't news, dumbass. Those are slogans shouted by Trump supporters.

Once again, a libe douche bag is trying to compare things that aren't comparable. That's what they always do when they are wriggling on the hook.


It is comparable and it is you on the hook, dope. You see that slogan came from the erroneous reports regarding Clinton's criminality. The very same erroneous reports you all used time and again right here. Trump used that fake news to rally you idiots. It was very effective.

It isn't comparable, dumbass. Only someone dumber than a brain damaged cockroach would claim it was. Reports about Clinton's criminality are not erroneous. She clearly broke a long list of laws. She sold her office to the highest bidder.
 
Well here is the issue. Reporters are allowed to use "Anonymous sources" and can protect that oath as long as they aren't compelled to reveal them because of certain circumstances like a threat to national security or a handful of others. So that means Trump would have to show that what NBC reported was indeed a lie.

That said, networks like NBC would be quick to point out the hypocrisy of Trump not mentioning other networks that he likes that have also reported "fake news" like Fox and Info Wars, which would prove a bias.

And no, discussing this issue is not stupid, because the most powerful man in the world, the U.S. President just openly threatened to violate part of the First Amendment to the Constitution, the Freedom of the Press.

Republican Senator Sasse of Nebraska, from a fly-over state, has come out asking Trump if he is recanting his oath as President to uphold and defend the First Amendment of the Constitution. Trump can't help himself from making enemies right and left.

Republican senator asks Trump if he's 'recanting oath' over war with press

He was asking a question. Let me know when he actually intends to take action. And no, mind reading is not a valid indication.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


He was asking a question? :laugh: Was he doing air quotes with his hands while he typed his tweet?

How about you prove he hasn't already started to take action?
why don't you prove you're not gay?

go ahead prove a negative...I want to see this


Prove I'm not gay? Though it is flattering anytime someone is attracted to you, I'm going to have to tell you I'm not interested, I prefer women. Keep up hope, you'll find a nice husband some day.

Asking for proof that Trump hasn't already started taking action against networks is not proving a negative.

Yes it is.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
does he know hasnt is a negative?

what kind of intelligence are we dealing with in him?
 
How can people continue to support this guy? Can you think of any other historical figures that wanted to silence anyone that talked ill of them...?

""With all of the Fake News coming out of NBC and the Networks, at what point is it appropriate to challenge their License? Bad for country!" Mr Trump wrote in a tweet."

Donald Trump threatens to shut down NBC and other TV news networks that criticise him

James Madison and Thomas Jefferson said that the free press was a key element in having a true democracy.

"I am... for freedom of the press, and against all violations of the Constitution to silence by force and not by reason the complaints or criticisms, just or unjust, of our citizens against the conduct of their agents." --Thomas Jefferson to Elbridge Gerry, 1799. ME 10:78

Jefferson on Politics & Government: Freedom of the Press
Another question might be, how can you keep posting lie after lie after lie?

He's leftist. It comes natural to him.
 

Forum List

Back
Top