Tucker Carlson’s Latest Bombshell About January 6 Might Make You Rethink Everything

[bigrebnc1775]

Retard, did you even bother to read that logorrhea? YOU posted the crime that some of Trump's thugs were convicted of...

​

§2384. Seditious conspiracy​

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.​

Guilty as charged.

"conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them"

 

[Faun]

"conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them"

LOL

Holy fuck, are you ever retarded.

Don't you know the meaning of the word, OR??

§2384. Seditious conspiracy​

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, OR by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.​

Guilty as charged.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

LOL

Holy fuck, are you ever retarded.

Don't you know the meaning of the word, OR??

​

§2384. Seditious conspiracy​

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, OR by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.​

Guilty as charged.

One more time 2384 also has this . When was J6 called a war?
"conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them"

 

[Faun]

One more time 2384 also has this . When was J6 called a war?
"conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them"

Sadly, you really don't know the meaning of the word, "or." Or the implications its usage imposes on that statute.

That level of ignorance falls solely upon you.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Sadly, you really don't know the meaning of the word, "or." Or the implications its usage imposes on that statute.

That level of ignorance falls solely upon you.

Numbnuts you keep saying sedition is insurrection. It's not

 

[Faun]

Numbnuts you keep saying sedition is insurrection. It's not

It's not just me saying it. The dictionary says it.

Insurrection

A rising against civil or political authority; the open and active opposition of a number of persons to the execution of a law in a city or state. It is equivalent to sedition, except that sedition expresses a less extensive rising of citizens.

---

§2384. Seditious conspiracy​

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.​

 

[bigrebnc1775]

It's not just me saying it. The dictionary says it.

Insurrection​

​

A rising against civil or political authority; the open and active opposition of a number of persons to the execution of a law in a city or state. It is equivalent to sedition, except that sedition expresses a less extensive rising of citizens.​

​

​

---

​

​

§2384. Seditious conspiracy​

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.​

Two totally different statutes​

§2383. Rebellion or insurrection​

§2384. Seditious conspiracy​

 

[Faun]

Two totally different statutes​

§2383. Rebellion or insurrection​

§2384. Seditious conspiracy​

Because one is conspiracy and the other is not. How many times need I show you the dictionary says sedition is the same as insurrection until it seeps past your impenetrable armor of ignorance??

Insurrection

A rising against civil or political authority; the open and active opposition of a number of persons to the execution of a law in a city or state. It is equivalent to sedition, except that sedition expresses a less extensive rising of citizens.

---

§2384. Seditious conspiracy​

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.​

 

[MagicMike]

No insurrection happened because their was no armed revolt.

Define your use of the word "armed," because it sounds like you are suggesting that GUNS are the only deadly weapon known to man.
And you certainly wouldn't want to say that because it flies right in the face of everything the NRA has programmed you to say.
Oops!

 

[MagicMike]

Blah blah blah no one has been convicted with insurrection because no armed revolt happened

Broken record much?

 

[surada]

Tucker Carlson’s Latest Bombshell About January 6 Might Make You Rethink Everything​

Tucker Carlson’s Latest Bombshell About January 6 Might Make You Rethink Everything

pjmedia.com

8 Jan 2024 ~~ By Matt Margolis

PJ Media readers already know that the Jan. 6 Capitol riot wasn’t an insurrection, but it’s still absolutely mind-blowing just how much we’ve been lied about the events of that day.
The truth has never stopped the left from pushing the narrative that it wants, between the criminally partisan House Select Committee on Jan. 6 and Joe Biden's annual speeches making insane accusations and debunked mischaracterizations, it's almost a miracle they haven't turned Jan. 6 into a federal holiday akin to Memorial Day. According to the left, it was not only an insurrection, but as many as five Capitol Police officers died that day when there were actually zero.
Why do they continue to push these falsehoods and bogus narratives? For one thing, it's pretty much the only message Biden has (but, sadly for him, it's not working), and it's also an effective fundraising tool. According to a report from The Hill, Biden's campaign raised more than a million dollars following his January 6 anniversary speech.
Is the truth starting to sink in?
But again, we're being sold a huge barrel of lies. In an interview with Tucker Carlson on the new Tucker Carlson Network, Rep. Clay Higgins (R-La.), who has been investigating the Capitol riot, says that there were at least 200 undercover FBI assets embedded in the crowd, inside and outside of the Capitol Building.
“We believe that there were easily 200 FBI undercover assets operating in the crowd outside the Capitol, embedded into groups that entered the Capitol or provoked entry of the Capitol,” Higgins told Carlson. "Given the scope of the operation and the number of doors where entry was allowed or even encouraged — and the number of people that were actually outside the Capitol and that entered — we believe 200 [is a] conservative number."
“It’s shocking what you’re saying and confirms everyone’s worst suspicions about this,” Carlson told Higgins, clearly alarmed by this new information. “It’s clearly true.”
Higgins said that based on the evidence he's reviewed, the FBI worked with local law enforcement, including the Capitol Police. The undercover agents, Higgins said, dressed as Trump supporters inside the Capitol “because those were the guys that knew their way around the Capitol.”
As Carlson explained in the interview, FBI Director Wray has long refused to answer whether the FBI had assets dressed as Trump supporters at the Capitol that day.
~Snip~
Higgins believes that anti-Trumpers in the FBI orchestrated the entire thing.
“It’s a complex web of FBI assets across the country that can be activated. So, if you have authority at some of the highest levels in the FBI, it doesn’t take much,” Higgins explained.
~Snip~
In other words, according to Higgins, the evidence suggests that the Capitol riot, which has been used as a pretext to incarcerate Trump supporters without trial and to even prevent Trump from being allowed on the ballot in various states, was a set-up.
“I’m following the evidence, and to my horror, it implicates our FBI at the highest level,” Higgins said.

​

Commentary:
As Carlson explained in the interview, FBI Director Wray has long refused to answer whether the FBI had assets dressed as Trump supporters at the Capitol that day.
One point that Higgins made was that it is highly improbable that civilians would know how to get around the Capitol without help from people who knew where they were going..
Higgins says the evidence points to FBI undercover agents who planted the seeds of a “radical occupation” of the Capitol online before Jan. 6.
“Some of that evidence shockingly reveals that the FBI agents that were operating undercover within the online groups across the country were the first ones to plant the seeds of suggestions of a more radical occupation of the Capitol.”
Like Sullivan’s Insurgence USA? He was posting just that sort of stuff to his followers.
It wasn’t MAGA people he was inciting to go to DC. Sullivan was calling for the people who follow him, leftists or anarchists, to disguise themselves as Trump supporters when they got to DC.
This was a rather ingenious use of violent and non-violent stampeding, go spies, and agent provocateurs, to generate the appearance of aggression from initially peaceful/unarmed protesters who were by stages harassed, led and herded into the wrong place at the wrong time and had to start extricating/defending themselves. the videos I’ve seen speak for themselves.
One point that Higgins made was that it is highly improbable that civilians would know how to get around the Capitol without help from people who knew where they were going.

The government would have never voluntarily told the American people that these armed, undercover DOJ/DEA agents were walking east from the Ellipse area on January 6 during Trump's speech.​

Clay Higgins and PJ Media?

 

[Smokin' OP]

Democrat propaganda no insurrection happened because their was no armed revolt.

Yes, Capitol Rioters Were Armed. Here Are The Weapons ...​

View attachment 964493
NPR
https://www.npr.org › 2021/03/19 › yes-capitol-rioters-...
Mar 19, 2021 — In at least seven cases, federal prosecutors say rioters used flagpoles as weapons to attack law enforcement or destroy property. The Cases.

A review of the federal charges against the alleged rioters shows that they did come armed, and with a variety of weapons: stun guns, pepper spray, baseball bats and flagpoles wielded as clubs. An additional suspect also allegedly planted pipe bombs by the headquarters of the Democratic and Republican parties the night before the riot and remains at large.

Those weapons brought violence and chaos to the Capitol. Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick died one day after two rioters allegedly sprayed him and other officers with what prosecutors describe as an "unknown chemical substance." Four other people in the crowd died in the insurrection, and more than 100 police officers suffered injuries, including cracked ribs, gouged eyes and shattered spinal disks.

As of now, at least 13 people have been hit with illegal gun possession charges stemming from the riot, according to an analysis of arrest records and court documents. Two of them were detained after police noticed a bulge under their clothing. Three people were arrested the night before the riot. Another person,

 

[Smokin' OP]

.

Liars, all of you.








.

Only your dear leader tells the truth.

Trump's latest speech compared to '1984': 'What you're ...​

The Independent
https://www.the-independent.com › ... › US politics
Jul 25, 2018 — “Just stick with us, don't believe the crap you see from these people, the fake news,” Mr Trump said as the crowd erupted in boos. He later ...


Trump's cult sure does, even when he lies.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Yes, Capitol Rioters Were Armed. Here Are The Weapons ...​

View attachment 964493
NPR
https://www.npr.org › 2021/03/19 › yes-capitol-rioters-...
Mar 19, 2021 — In at least seven cases, federal prosecutors say rioters used flagpoles as weapons to attack law enforcement or destroy property. The Cases.

A review of the federal charges against the alleged rioters shows that they did come armed, and with a variety of weapons: stun guns, pepper spray, baseball bats and flagpoles wielded as clubs. An additional suspect also allegedly planted pipe bombs by the headquarters of the Democratic and Republican parties the night before the riot and remains at large.

Those weapons brought violence and chaos to the Capitol. Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick died one day after two rioters allegedly sprayed him and other officers with what prosecutors describe as an "unknown chemical substance." Four other people in the crowd died in the insurrection, and more than 100 police officers suffered injuries, including cracked ribs, gouged eyes and shattered spinal disks.

As of now, at least 13 people have been hit with illegal gun possession charges stemming from the riot, according to an analysis of arrest records and court documents. Two of them were detained after police noticed a bulge under their clothing. Three people were arrested the night before the riot. Another person,

Blah lie blah repeat the leftist dogma

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Define your use of the word "armed," because it sounds like you are suggesting that GUNS are the only deadly weapon known to man.
And you certainly wouldn't want to say that because it flies right in the face of everything the NRA has programmed you to say.
Oops!

Numbnuts not my definition but the governments. You know the right
To keep and bear arms

 

[MagicMike]

Numbnuts not my definition but the governments. You know the right
To keep and bear arms

Yes. I keep and bear quite a few arms myself, but back to the subject.
You seem to think that firearms are the only weapons that can be used in an insurrection.
Is that correct?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Yes. I keep and bear quite a few arms myself, but back to the subject.
You seem to think that firearms are the only weapons that can be used in an insurrection.
Is that correct?

Numbnuts there was no armed revolt. No one was trying to destroy the government.

 

[Faun]

Numbnuts there was no armed revolt. No one was trying to destroy the government.

You've been show the definition of insurrection, repeatedly, does not require an armed revolt. It's just sad you can't learn.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

You've been show the definition of insurrection, repeatedly, does not require an armed revolt. It's just sad you can't learn.

You've been shown the real definition.
Yes insurrection requires an armed revolt.
Wait a minute you're using the banana republic communist Russia definition
Show me the man and I'll show you the crime
When trump win in 2024 and takes the oath please go protest it in DC insurrectionist.

 

[Faun]

You've been shown the real definition.
Yes insurrection requires an armed revolt.
Wait a minute you're using the banana republic communist Russia definition
Show me the man and I'll show you the crime
When trump win in 2024 and takes the oath please go protest it in DC insurrectionist.

LOLOL

You putz, my definition came from Webster's dictionary, an American dictionary of the English language. Not my problem you think that's a Russian definition.