Perhaps The primary obligation of the No Personal Responsibility league is that other entities are responsible for their problems.Absolutely.She defends Assad and tracks pretty close to Trump. Is she a plant in the dems who can run a second column campaign and do a Jill Stein by siphoning off a few dems who'd buy an isolationist for policy?I was watching an interview with her that just ended. She's a loon. Hillary Clinton should not have given this nut air. She was talking about a Hillary Clinton foreign policy. When was that? Clinton has never been president. She blamed Clinton for Libya, but the U.S. did not present the proposal to use force in Libya to the UN. A person running for president should have some knowledge about UN resolutions. All in all, she just doesn't make sense.
She's doing a Jill Stein and trying to aid Trump's re-election
She has absolutely no chance of being elected and the only possible reason for her to do any of this is as mentioned above
There's about 7 million other people running for the nomination that also have no chance of winning. Are they all in cahoots with the russians?
Yeah but Gabbard's platform is chock full of federal handout programs. I just don't understand why the "no blood for oil" people aren't supporting her.
Exactly what I've been saying! She agrees with them on virtually every single issue. So unless they are FOR perpetual blood for oil wars, they are just being idiotic sheep by going along what the pro-war establishment / media spoon-feeds them. To me, there's nothing lower and more foolish than that, it is pitiful.