Turned On The Debate Just To Get A Glance -

[francoHFW]

He obviously knew he was doing something the electorate wouldn't be too happy about if they found out. Maybe Mueller would have been more successful in finding collusion had he checked it out, since he couldn't find it in Trump.

yeah hadit trumps innocent like the new fallen snow

What does that have to do with Biden, or even Obama for that matter? You know, the guys we were talking about.

Obama and Biden NEVER colluded with Russia Can you say the same for Trump?? the guy who believes Putin ahead of 17 of our finest agencies?

I can say that, despite the best efforts of a prosecutor with nearly unlimited time, money, and power, and the best efforts of a rabid House full of weenies desperate to find reason to impeach Trump, evidence of collusion was, well, remarkable for its absence. This, despite years of constant assurances that it was a slam dunk case, the walls were closing in, it was Mueller time, etc, etc. Thus, the question becomes, if you believe Trump colluded with Russia, on what authority do you base that belief that is greater than that already cited that failed to prove it?

Can you believe that after all that, they're still saying...

View attachment 313303

the Russians won the election for Trump but you'd never know it from the GOP propaganda machine. A disgrace. Poor America.

 

[Ame®icano]

Bologna, brainwashed functional moron.By March 2015, the US had committed more than $120 million in security assistance for Ukraine and had pledged an additional $75 million worth of equipment including UAVs, counter-mortar radars, night vision devices and medical supplies, according to the Pentagon's Defense Security Cooperation Agency.


Too bad everything you know is garbage propaganda, brainwashed functional moron.

When you say "according to", you should provide link to your claim.

We all heard during impeachment inquiry from several witnesses what Barry provided to Ukraine.

Read the link in my post duh.

Link is not working.

By the way, you're trying to prove that Barry's sent military help to Ukraine. I'm not denying he did, MREs and blankets are also military help. He didn't send any lethal help that could hurt Putin's conquering plans. Whatever Putin wanted to take, he took with Barry's blessing.

 

[Ame®icano]

What does that have to do with Biden, or even Obama for that matter? You know, the guys we were talking about.

Obama and Biden NEVER colluded with Russia Can you say the same for Trump?? the guy who believes Putin ahead of 17 of our finest agencies?

I can say that, despite the best efforts of a prosecutor with nearly unlimited time, money, and power, and the best efforts of a rabid House full of weenies desperate to find reason to impeach Trump, evidence of collusion was, well, remarkable for its absence. This, despite years of constant assurances that it was a slam dunk case, the walls were closing in, it was Mueller time, etc, etc. Thus, the question becomes, if you believe Trump colluded with Russia, on what authority do you base that belief that is greater than that already cited that failed to prove it?

Trumps ass kisser the AG made Meullers investigation null and void Another low life republican ,,Trump is guilty as sin

How he made it null and void?

Mueller testified in Congress about his investigation. He made it null and void himself in front of everyone.

Being a scumbag GOP, he said you can indict a president so he was just reporting the facts so Congress could decide. Which the Senate refused to do.

And he was correct. Mueller job was not to indict the president. His job was to find the collusion, and he hasn't. Nothing in his report to Congress proves there was collusion between Trump's campaign and Russia.

 

[Ame®icano]

yeah hadit trumps innocent like the new fallen snow

What does that have to do with Biden, or even Obama for that matter? You know, the guys we were talking about.

Obama and Biden NEVER colluded with Russia Can you say the same for Trump?? the guy who believes Putin ahead of 17 of our finest agencies?

I can say that, despite the best efforts of a prosecutor with nearly unlimited time, money, and power, and the best efforts of a rabid House full of weenies desperate to find reason to impeach Trump, evidence of collusion was, well, remarkable for its absence. This, despite years of constant assurances that it was a slam dunk case, the walls were closing in, it was Mueller time, etc, etc. Thus, the question becomes, if you believe Trump colluded with Russia, on what authority do you base that belief that is greater than that already cited that failed to prove it?

Can you believe that after all that, they're still saying...

View attachment 313303

the Russians won the election for Trump but you'd never know it from the GOP propaganda machine. A disgrace. Poor America.

If there was collusion, don't you think Meuller wouldn't find it? That leaves us with only party that still pushing for collusion are leftist media. Do they have access to evidence that Mueller couldn't find?

If Meuller did find something, we could've said leftist media was right. But Mueller didn't find anything that Trump was accused of, how can you say that media was right?

Because you are leftist shill that don't care about facts. You just care to get it your way. Unfortunately for you, facts are not there.

 

[hadit]

He obviously knew he was doing something the electorate wouldn't be too happy about if they found out. Maybe Mueller would have been more successful in finding collusion had he checked it out, since he couldn't find it in Trump.

yeah hadit trumps innocent like the new fallen snow

What does that have to do with Biden, or even Obama for that matter? You know, the guys we were talking about.

Obama and Biden NEVER colluded with Russia Can you say the same for Trump?? the guy who believes Putin ahead of 17 of our finest agencies?

I can say that, despite the best efforts of a prosecutor with nearly unlimited time, money, and power, and the best efforts of a rabid House full of weenies desperate to find reason to impeach Trump, evidence of collusion was, well, remarkable for its absence. This, despite years of constant assurances that it was a slam dunk case, the walls were closing in, it was Mueller time, etc, etc. Thus, the question becomes, if you believe Trump colluded with Russia, on what authority do you base that belief that is greater than that already cited that failed to prove it?

Trumps ass kisser the AG made Meullers investigation null and void Another low life republican ,,Trump is guilty as sin

On what authority do you base your continued belief? The rabid House Haters would have included collusion in the impeachment if there was any possible way to do so, as we all know. So again, on what do you base your belief? What evidence do you have that they did not, and why didn't you get it to them?

 

[edward37]

yeah hadit trumps innocent like the new fallen snow

What does that have to do with Biden, or even Obama for that matter? You know, the guys we were talking about.

Obama and Biden NEVER colluded with Russia Can you say the same for Trump?? the guy who believes Putin ahead of 17 of our finest agencies?

I can say that, despite the best efforts of a prosecutor with nearly unlimited time, money, and power, and the best efforts of a rabid House full of weenies desperate to find reason to impeach Trump, evidence of collusion was, well, remarkable for its absence. This, despite years of constant assurances that it was a slam dunk case, the walls were closing in, it was Mueller time, etc, etc. Thus, the question becomes, if you believe Trump colluded with Russia, on what authority do you base that belief that is greater than that already cited that failed to prove it?

Trumps ass kisser the AG made Meullers investigation null and void Another low life republican ,,Trump is guilty as sin

On what authority do you base your continued belief? The rabid House Haters would have included collusion in the impeachment if there was any possible way to do so, as we all know. So again, on what do you base your belief? What evidence do you have that they did not, and why didn't you get it to them?

You don't think there was enough evidence to fry Obama if that was him in the WH ? Never mind evidence hidden and the help from the slimebag Barr? And the cowards in the Senate 52 scum afraid to rile Trump??

 

[hadit]

What does that have to do with Biden, or even Obama for that matter? You know, the guys we were talking about.

Obama and Biden NEVER colluded with Russia Can you say the same for Trump?? the guy who believes Putin ahead of 17 of our finest agencies?

I can say that, despite the best efforts of a prosecutor with nearly unlimited time, money, and power, and the best efforts of a rabid House full of weenies desperate to find reason to impeach Trump, evidence of collusion was, well, remarkable for its absence. This, despite years of constant assurances that it was a slam dunk case, the walls were closing in, it was Mueller time, etc, etc. Thus, the question becomes, if you believe Trump colluded with Russia, on what authority do you base that belief that is greater than that already cited that failed to prove it?

Trumps ass kisser the AG made Meullers investigation null and void Another low life republican ,,Trump is guilty as sin

On what authority do you base your continued belief? The rabid House Haters would have included collusion in the impeachment if there was any possible way to do so, as we all know. So again, on what do you base your belief? What evidence do you have that they did not, and why didn't you get it to them?

You don't think there was enough evidence to fry Obama if that was him in the WH ? Never mind evidence hidden and the help from the slimebag Barr? And the cowards in the Senate 52 scum afraid to rile Trump??

I'm not the one you should be mad at. The House Haters were desperate to impeach Trump and they had the results of a multi year, multi million dollar investigation into whether Trump colluded with Russia. Now, do you for a MOMENT want to pretend that they had evidence that Trump colluded with Russia and decided NOT to include it in the impeachment? Are you really that stupid?

So again I ask, on what authority do you base your continued belief that Trump colluded with Russia, given that the House had the results of the Mueller investigation, complete with testimony from Mueller himself, and decided NOT to include collusion in the impeachment? And if you have such evidence from such an authority, why in the name of all that's democrat did you sit on it and not send it to the Schiffster?

 

[francoHFW]

Obama and Biden NEVER colluded with Russia Can you say the same for Trump?? the guy who believes Putin ahead of 17 of our finest agencies?

I can say that, despite the best efforts of a prosecutor with nearly unlimited time, money, and power, and the best efforts of a rabid House full of weenies desperate to find reason to impeach Trump, evidence of collusion was, well, remarkable for its absence. This, despite years of constant assurances that it was a slam dunk case, the walls were closing in, it was Mueller time, etc, etc. Thus, the question becomes, if you believe Trump colluded with Russia, on what authority do you base that belief that is greater than that already cited that failed to prove it?

Trumps ass kisser the AG made Meullers investigation null and void Another low life republican ,,Trump is guilty as sin

On what authority do you base your continued belief? The rabid House Haters would have included collusion in the impeachment if there was any possible way to do so, as we all know. So again, on what do you base your belief? What evidence do you have that they did not, and why didn't you get it to them?

You don't think there was enough evidence to fry Obama if that was him in the WH ? Never mind evidence hidden and the help from the slimebag Barr? And the cowards in the Senate 52 scum afraid to rile Trump??

I'm not the one you should be mad at. The House Haters were desperate to impeach Trump and they had the results of a multi year, multi million dollar investigation into whether Trump colluded with Russia. Now, do you for a MOMENT want to pretend that they had evidence that Trump colluded with Russia and decided NOT to include it in the impeachment? Are you really that stupid?

So again I ask, on what authority do you base your continued belief that Trump colluded with Russia, given that the House had the results of the Mueller investigation, complete with testimony from Mueller himself, and decided NOT to include collusion in the impeachment? And if you have such evidence from such an authority, why in the name of all that's democrat did you sit on it and not send it to the Schiffster?

The impeachment was all about The whistleblower and Trump trying to blackmail a foreign leader in the middle of a war in order to get him to say that he was investigating Biden. There is plenty of evidence and suspicion of some collusion but really why would the Russians need the help of these idiots? funny how the Trump campaign met with Russians 30 x lied about it never wrote down anything about it etcetera etcetera and in public he told the Russians to go ahead and get dirt on Hillary and 2 hours later the Russians started hacking her server. Also he asked the Chinese to help. I believe the whole point was to try and get through to the brainwashed GOP voters what was happening, since they'll never get it from their ridiculous propaganda....

 

[francoHFW]

I can say that, despite the best efforts of a prosecutor with nearly unlimited time, money, and power, and the best efforts of a rabid House full of weenies desperate to find reason to impeach Trump, evidence of collusion was, well, remarkable for its absence. This, despite years of constant assurances that it was a slam dunk case, the walls were closing in, it was Mueller time, etc, etc. Thus, the question becomes, if you believe Trump colluded with Russia, on what authority do you base that belief that is greater than that already cited that failed to prove it?

Trumps ass kisser the AG made Meullers investigation null and void Another low life republican ,,Trump is guilty as sin

On what authority do you base your continued belief? The rabid House Haters would have included collusion in the impeachment if there was any possible way to do so, as we all know. So again, on what do you base your belief? What evidence do you have that they did not, and why didn't you get it to them?

You don't think there was enough evidence to fry Obama if that was him in the WH ? Never mind evidence hidden and the help from the slimebag Barr? And the cowards in the Senate 52 scum afraid to rile Trump??

I'm not the one you should be mad at. The House Haters were desperate to impeach Trump and they had the results of a multi year, multi million dollar investigation into whether Trump colluded with Russia. Now, do you for a MOMENT want to pretend that they had evidence that Trump colluded with Russia and decided NOT to include it in the impeachment? Are you really that stupid?

So again I ask, on what authority do you base your continued belief that Trump colluded with Russia, given that the House had the results of the Mueller investigation, complete with testimony from Mueller himself, and decided NOT to include collusion in the impeachment? And if you have such evidence from such an authority, why in the name of all that's democrat did you sit on it and not send it to the Schiffster?

The impeachment was all about The whistleblower and Trump trying to blackmail a foreign leader in the middle of a war in order to get him to say that he was investigating Biden. There is plenty of evidence and suspicion of some collusion but really why would the Russians need the help of these idiots? funny how the Trump campaign met with Russians 30 x lied about it never wrote down anything about it etcetera etcetera and in public he told the Russians to go ahead and get dirt on Hillary and 2 hours later the Russians started hacking her server. Also he asked the Chinese to help. I believe the whole point was to try and get through to the brainwashed GOP voters what was happening, since they'll never get it from their ridiculous propaganda....

mahler's actual scumbag GOP conclusion was that it was beyond his scope to indict a president and perhaps that the president could not be indicted. Does Congress was supposed to try him. The Senate refused to go along.... That's why you can do when your entire base can be told anything and they will swallow it....

 

[edward37]

Obama and Biden NEVER colluded with Russia Can you say the same for Trump?? the guy who believes Putin ahead of 17 of our finest agencies?

I can say that, despite the best efforts of a prosecutor with nearly unlimited time, money, and power, and the best efforts of a rabid House full of weenies desperate to find reason to impeach Trump, evidence of collusion was, well, remarkable for its absence. This, despite years of constant assurances that it was a slam dunk case, the walls were closing in, it was Mueller time, etc, etc. Thus, the question becomes, if you believe Trump colluded with Russia, on what authority do you base that belief that is greater than that already cited that failed to prove it?

Trumps ass kisser the AG made Meullers investigation null and void Another low life republican ,,Trump is guilty as sin

On what authority do you base your continued belief? The rabid House Haters would have included collusion in the impeachment if there was any possible way to do so, as we all know. So again, on what do you base your belief? What evidence do you have that they did not, and why didn't you get it to them?

You don't think there was enough evidence to fry Obama if that was him in the WH ? Never mind evidence hidden and the help from the slimebag Barr? And the cowards in the Senate 52 scum afraid to rile Trump??

I'm not the one you should be mad at. The House Haters were desperate to impeach Trump and they had the results of a multi year, multi million dollar investigation into whether Trump colluded with Russia. Now, do you for a MOMENT want to pretend that they had evidence that Trump colluded with Russia and decided NOT to include it in the impeachment? Are you really that stupid?

So again I ask, on what authority do you base your continued belief that Trump colluded with Russia, given that the House had the results of the Mueller investigation, complete with testimony from Mueller himself, and decided NOT to include collusion in the impeachment? And if you have such evidence from such an authority, why in the name of all that's democrat did you sit on it and not send it to the Schiffster?

Can I start with ALL the evidence hidden? That those who could prove collusion were forbidden to speak, that documents hidden could have proven that trump the slimebag colluded?? Why else did they hide evidence ,,,because it would show he was innocent????

 

[joaquinmiller]

Trumps ass kisser the AG made Meullers investigation null and void Another low life republican ,,Trump is guilty as sin

On what authority do you base your continued belief? The rabid House Haters would have included collusion in the impeachment if there was any possible way to do so, as we all know. So again, on what do you base your belief? What evidence do you have that they did not, and why didn't you get it to them?

You don't think there was enough evidence to fry Obama if that was him in the WH ? Never mind evidence hidden and the help from the slimebag Barr? And the cowards in the Senate 52 scum afraid to rile Trump??

I'm not the one you should be mad at. The House Haters were desperate to impeach Trump and they had the results of a multi year, multi million dollar investigation into whether Trump colluded with Russia. Now, do you for a MOMENT want to pretend that they had evidence that Trump colluded with Russia and decided NOT to include it in the impeachment? Are you really that stupid?

So again I ask, on what authority do you base your continued belief that Trump colluded with Russia, given that the House had the results of the Mueller investigation, complete with testimony from Mueller himself, and decided NOT to include collusion in the impeachment? And if you have such evidence from such an authority, why in the name of all that's democrat did you sit on it and not send it to the Schiffster?

The impeachment was all about The whistleblower and Trump trying to blackmail a foreign leader in the middle of a war in order to get him to say that he was investigating Biden. There is plenty of evidence and suspicion of some collusion but really why would the Russians need the help of these idiots? funny how the Trump campaign met with Russians 30 x lied about it never wrote down anything about it etcetera etcetera and in public he told the Russians to go ahead and get dirt on Hillary and 2 hours later the Russians started hacking her server. Also he asked the Chinese to help. I believe the whole point was to try and get through to the brainwashed GOP voters what was happening, since they'll never get it from their ridiculous propaganda....

mahler's actual scumbag GOP conclusion was that it was beyond his scope to indict a president and perhaps that the president could not be indicted. Does Congress was supposed to try him. The Senate refused to go along.... That's why you can do when your entire base can be told anything and they will swallow it....

Yes. The House proved a straightforward Impeachment Case. Dragging in the Mueller investigation would not only have cluttered the case, it probably wasn't doable. It wasn't until March 10, 2020, that a Federal Appeals Court ruled Congress is entitled to the grand jury testimony from the Mueller Investigation. Roy Cohn's DoJ is appealing, of course, and we can expect a ruling sometime after the election. 'Why didn't you bring in Mueller' is another of their red mackerels. The R Senators should have dumped Trump when they had the chance. Stupid quislings.

 

[hadit]

I can say that, despite the best efforts of a prosecutor with nearly unlimited time, money, and power, and the best efforts of a rabid House full of weenies desperate to find reason to impeach Trump, evidence of collusion was, well, remarkable for its absence. This, despite years of constant assurances that it was a slam dunk case, the walls were closing in, it was Mueller time, etc, etc. Thus, the question becomes, if you believe Trump colluded with Russia, on what authority do you base that belief that is greater than that already cited that failed to prove it?

Trumps ass kisser the AG made Meullers investigation null and void Another low life republican ,,Trump is guilty as sin

On what authority do you base your continued belief? The rabid House Haters would have included collusion in the impeachment if there was any possible way to do so, as we all know. So again, on what do you base your belief? What evidence do you have that they did not, and why didn't you get it to them?

You don't think there was enough evidence to fry Obama if that was him in the WH ? Never mind evidence hidden and the help from the slimebag Barr? And the cowards in the Senate 52 scum afraid to rile Trump??

I'm not the one you should be mad at. The House Haters were desperate to impeach Trump and they had the results of a multi year, multi million dollar investigation into whether Trump colluded with Russia. Now, do you for a MOMENT want to pretend that they had evidence that Trump colluded with Russia and decided NOT to include it in the impeachment? Are you really that stupid?

So again I ask, on what authority do you base your continued belief that Trump colluded with Russia, given that the House had the results of the Mueller investigation, complete with testimony from Mueller himself, and decided NOT to include collusion in the impeachment? And if you have such evidence from such an authority, why in the name of all that's democrat did you sit on it and not send it to the Schiffster?

The impeachment was all about The whistleblower and Trump trying to blackmail a foreign leader in the middle of a war in order to get him to say that he was investigating Biden. There is plenty of evidence and suspicion of some collusion but really why would the Russians need the help of these idiots? funny how the Trump campaign met with Russians 30 x lied about it never wrote down anything about it etcetera etcetera and in public he told the Russians to go ahead and get dirt on Hillary and 2 hours later the Russians started hacking her server. Also he asked the Chinese to help. I believe the whole point was to try and get through to the brainwashed GOP voters what was happening, since they'll never get it from their ridiculous propaganda....

If you think the House Haters had evidence of collusion but chose not to use it in the impeachment, you're hopeless. Like I've said, if you still believe Trump colluded after the Mueller investigation and House Haters didn't even accuse him of it, you should have gotten whatever evidence you have to the Schiffster.

 

[hadit]

I can say that, despite the best efforts of a prosecutor with nearly unlimited time, money, and power, and the best efforts of a rabid House full of weenies desperate to find reason to impeach Trump, evidence of collusion was, well, remarkable for its absence. This, despite years of constant assurances that it was a slam dunk case, the walls were closing in, it was Mueller time, etc, etc. Thus, the question becomes, if you believe Trump colluded with Russia, on what authority do you base that belief that is greater than that already cited that failed to prove it?

Trumps ass kisser the AG made Meullers investigation null and void Another low life republican ,,Trump is guilty as sin

On what authority do you base your continued belief? The rabid House Haters would have included collusion in the impeachment if there was any possible way to do so, as we all know. So again, on what do you base your belief? What evidence do you have that they did not, and why didn't you get it to them?

You don't think there was enough evidence to fry Obama if that was him in the WH ? Never mind evidence hidden and the help from the slimebag Barr? And the cowards in the Senate 52 scum afraid to rile Trump??

I'm not the one you should be mad at. The House Haters were desperate to impeach Trump and they had the results of a multi year, multi million dollar investigation into whether Trump colluded with Russia. Now, do you for a MOMENT want to pretend that they had evidence that Trump colluded with Russia and decided NOT to include it in the impeachment? Are you really that stupid?

So again I ask, on what authority do you base your continued belief that Trump colluded with Russia, given that the House had the results of the Mueller investigation, complete with testimony from Mueller himself, and decided NOT to include collusion in the impeachment? And if you have such evidence from such an authority, why in the name of all that's democrat did you sit on it and not send it to the Schiffster?

Can I start with ALL the evidence hidden? That those who could prove collusion were forbidden to speak, that documents hidden could have proven that trump the slimebag colluded?? Why else did they hide evidence ,,,because it would show he was innocent????

So, even though the evidence was 'hidden', you know what it is? Dang, you should have worked for the Schiffster, he could have used you. Seriously now, if Mueller couldn't dig it up, how did you? It's quite impressive.

I see a few "could", "could have" statements there.

 

[hadit]

Trumps ass kisser the AG made Meullers investigation null and void Another low life republican ,,Trump is guilty as sin

On what authority do you base your continued belief? The rabid House Haters would have included collusion in the impeachment if there was any possible way to do so, as we all know. So again, on what do you base your belief? What evidence do you have that they did not, and why didn't you get it to them?

You don't think there was enough evidence to fry Obama if that was him in the WH ? Never mind evidence hidden and the help from the slimebag Barr? And the cowards in the Senate 52 scum afraid to rile Trump??

I'm not the one you should be mad at. The House Haters were desperate to impeach Trump and they had the results of a multi year, multi million dollar investigation into whether Trump colluded with Russia. Now, do you for a MOMENT want to pretend that they had evidence that Trump colluded with Russia and decided NOT to include it in the impeachment? Are you really that stupid?

So again I ask, on what authority do you base your continued belief that Trump colluded with Russia, given that the House had the results of the Mueller investigation, complete with testimony from Mueller himself, and decided NOT to include collusion in the impeachment? And if you have such evidence from such an authority, why in the name of all that's democrat did you sit on it and not send it to the Schiffster?

The impeachment was all about The whistleblower and Trump trying to blackmail a foreign leader in the middle of a war in order to get him to say that he was investigating Biden. There is plenty of evidence and suspicion of some collusion but really why would the Russians need the help of these idiots? funny how the Trump campaign met with Russians 30 x lied about it never wrote down anything about it etcetera etcetera and in public he told the Russians to go ahead and get dirt on Hillary and 2 hours later the Russians started hacking her server. Also he asked the Chinese to help. I believe the whole point was to try and get through to the brainwashed GOP voters what was happening, since they'll never get it from their ridiculous propaganda....

mahler's actual scumbag GOP conclusion was that it was beyond his scope to indict a president and perhaps that the president could not be indicted. Does Congress was supposed to try him. The Senate refused to go along.... That's why you can do when your entire base can be told anything and they will swallow it....

Well, then you have evidence that Schiffster doesn't and you kept it quiet, because the House Haters didn't even accuse him of it in the impeachment. Shame on you.

 

[francoHFW]

On what authority do you base your continued belief? The rabid House Haters would have included collusion in the impeachment if there was any possible way to do so, as we all know. So again, on what do you base your belief? What evidence do you have that they did not, and why didn't you get it to them?

You don't think there was enough evidence to fry Obama if that was him in the WH ? Never mind evidence hidden and the help from the slimebag Barr? And the cowards in the Senate 52 scum afraid to rile Trump??

I'm not the one you should be mad at. The House Haters were desperate to impeach Trump and they had the results of a multi year, multi million dollar investigation into whether Trump colluded with Russia. Now, do you for a MOMENT want to pretend that they had evidence that Trump colluded with Russia and decided NOT to include it in the impeachment? Are you really that stupid?

So again I ask, on what authority do you base your continued belief that Trump colluded with Russia, given that the House had the results of the Mueller investigation, complete with testimony from Mueller himself, and decided NOT to include collusion in the impeachment? And if you have such evidence from such an authority, why in the name of all that's democrat did you sit on it and not send it to the Schiffster?

The impeachment was all about The whistleblower and Trump trying to blackmail a foreign leader in the middle of a war in order to get him to say that he was investigating Biden. There is plenty of evidence and suspicion of some collusion but really why would the Russians need the help of these idiots? funny how the Trump campaign met with Russians 30 x lied about it never wrote down anything about it etcetera etcetera and in public he told the Russians to go ahead and get dirt on Hillary and 2 hours later the Russians started hacking her server. Also he asked the Chinese to help. I believe the whole point was to try and get through to the brainwashed GOP voters what was happening, since they'll never get it from their ridiculous propaganda....

mahler's actual scumbag GOP conclusion was that it was beyond his scope to indict a president and perhaps that the president could not be indicted. Does Congress was supposed to try him. The Senate refused to go along.... That's why you can do when your entire base can be told anything and they will swallow it....

Well, then you have evidence that Schiffster doesn't and you kept it quiet, because the House Haters didn't even accuse him of it in the impeachment. Shame on you.

Mueller is Republican and say so is James Comey and they both suck.

 

[francoHFW]

On what authority do you base your continued belief? The rabid House Haters would have included collusion in the impeachment if there was any possible way to do so, as we all know. So again, on what do you base your belief? What evidence do you have that they did not, and why didn't you get it to them?

You don't think there was enough evidence to fry Obama if that was him in the WH ? Never mind evidence hidden and the help from the slimebag Barr? And the cowards in the Senate 52 scum afraid to rile Trump??

I'm not the one you should be mad at. The House Haters were desperate to impeach Trump and they had the results of a multi year, multi million dollar investigation into whether Trump colluded with Russia. Now, do you for a MOMENT want to pretend that they had evidence that Trump colluded with Russia and decided NOT to include it in the impeachment? Are you really that stupid?

So again I ask, on what authority do you base your continued belief that Trump colluded with Russia, given that the House had the results of the Mueller investigation, complete with testimony from Mueller himself, and decided NOT to include collusion in the impeachment? And if you have such evidence from such an authority, why in the name of all that's democrat did you sit on it and not send it to the Schiffster?

The impeachment was all about The whistleblower and Trump trying to blackmail a foreign leader in the middle of a war in order to get him to say that he was investigating Biden. There is plenty of evidence and suspicion of some collusion but really why would the Russians need the help of these idiots? funny how the Trump campaign met with Russians 30 x lied about it never wrote down anything about it etcetera etcetera and in public he told the Russians to go ahead and get dirt on Hillary and 2 hours later the Russians started hacking her server. Also he asked the Chinese to help. I believe the whole point was to try and get through to the brainwashed GOP voters what was happening, since they'll never get it from their ridiculous propaganda....

mahler's actual scumbag GOP conclusion was that it was beyond his scope to indict a president and perhaps that the president could not be indicted. Does Congress was supposed to try him. The Senate refused to go along.... That's why you can do when your entire base can be told anything and they will swallow it....

Well, then you have evidence that Schiffster doesn't and you kept it quiet, because the House Haters didn't even accuse him of it in the impeachment. Shame on you.

the evidence of collusion is only hitting on the GOP propaganda machine, brainwashed functional moron. Read something.
BBC.com › news › world-us-ca...
Web results
Trump Russia affair: Key questions answered - BBC News
Get your head around the sprawling saga of alleged collusion between the Trump team and Moscow.



Wikipedia › wiki › Links_between_...
Links between Trump associates and Russian officials - Wikipedia
The FBI and several United States congressional committees have been investigating links between Russian government officials or their affiliates and ...
Overview
Trump administration ...
Trump campaign members
Trump business partners




Washington Post
Analysis | Robert Mueller kneecaps President Trump's no collusion, no obstruction mantra
Jul 24, 2019 · “The investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired with the Russian government in its election ... Not in a yard

 

[francoHFW]

On what authority do you base your continued belief? The rabid House Haters would have included collusion in the impeachment if there was any possible way to do so, as we all know. So again, on what do you base your belief? What evidence do you have that they did not, and why didn't you get it to them?

You don't think there was enough evidence to fry Obama if that was him in the WH ? Never mind evidence hidden and the help from the slimebag Barr? And the cowards in the Senate 52 scum afraid to rile Trump??

I'm not the one you should be mad at. The House Haters were desperate to impeach Trump and they had the results of a multi year, multi million dollar investigation into whether Trump colluded with Russia. Now, do you for a MOMENT want to pretend that they had evidence that Trump colluded with Russia and decided NOT to include it in the impeachment? Are you really that stupid?

So again I ask, on what authority do you base your continued belief that Trump colluded with Russia, given that the House had the results of the Mueller investigation, complete with testimony from Mueller himself, and decided NOT to include collusion in the impeachment? And if you have such evidence from such an authority, why in the name of all that's democrat did you sit on it and not send it to the Schiffster?

The impeachment was all about The whistleblower and Trump trying to blackmail a foreign leader in the middle of a war in order to get him to say that he was investigating Biden. There is plenty of evidence and suspicion of some collusion but really why would the Russians need the help of these idiots? funny how the Trump campaign met with Russians 30 x lied about it never wrote down anything about it etcetera etcetera and in public he told the Russians to go ahead and get dirt on Hillary and 2 hours later the Russians started hacking her server. Also he asked the Chinese to help. I believe the whole point was to try and get through to the brainwashed GOP voters what was happening, since they'll never get it from their ridiculous propaganda....

mahler's actual scumbag GOP conclusion was that it was beyond his scope to indict a president and perhaps that the president could not be indicted. Does Congress was supposed to try him. The Senate refused to go along.... That's why you can do when your entire base can be told anything and they will swallow it....

Well, then you have evidence that Schiffster doesn't and you kept it quiet, because the House Haters didn't even accuse him of it in the impeachment. Shame on you.

And mueller called Trump co-conspirator number one because he ordered these Americans to lie to Mueller. "The counsel has indicted more than 30 people, including four members of Mr Trump's campaign team or administration, an adviser and long-time ally, and 26 Russians, as well as three Russian companies. From the BBC link above

 

[edward37]

Trumps ass kisser the AG made Meullers investigation null and void Another low life republican ,,Trump is guilty as sin

On what authority do you base your continued belief? The rabid House Haters would have included collusion in the impeachment if there was any possible way to do so, as we all know. So again, on what do you base your belief? What evidence do you have that they did not, and why didn't you get it to them?

You don't think there was enough evidence to fry Obama if that was him in the WH ? Never mind evidence hidden and the help from the slimebag Barr? And the cowards in the Senate 52 scum afraid to rile Trump??

I'm not the one you should be mad at. The House Haters were desperate to impeach Trump and they had the results of a multi year, multi million dollar investigation into whether Trump colluded with Russia. Now, do you for a MOMENT want to pretend that they had evidence that Trump colluded with Russia and decided NOT to include it in the impeachment? Are you really that stupid?

So again I ask, on what authority do you base your continued belief that Trump colluded with Russia, given that the House had the results of the Mueller investigation, complete with testimony from Mueller himself, and decided NOT to include collusion in the impeachment? And if you have such evidence from such an authority, why in the name of all that's democrat did you sit on it and not send it to the Schiffster?

Can I start with ALL the evidence hidden? That those who could prove collusion were forbidden to speak, that documents hidden could have proven that trump the slimebag colluded?? Why else did they hide evidence ,,,because it would show he was innocent????

So, even though the evidence was 'hidden', you know what it is? Dang, you should have worked for the Schiffster, he could have used you. Seriously now, if Mueller couldn't dig it up, how did you? It's quite impressive.

I see a few "could", "could have" statements there.

Hadit Grow up You think he was hiding all the evidence because it proved his innocence ??? You don't know the pos was a con man all his life??? You think he turned the corner ???

 

[hadit]

You don't think there was enough evidence to fry Obama if that was him in the WH ? Never mind evidence hidden and the help from the slimebag Barr? And the cowards in the Senate 52 scum afraid to rile Trump??

I'm not the one you should be mad at. The House Haters were desperate to impeach Trump and they had the results of a multi year, multi million dollar investigation into whether Trump colluded with Russia. Now, do you for a MOMENT want to pretend that they had evidence that Trump colluded with Russia and decided NOT to include it in the impeachment? Are you really that stupid?

So again I ask, on what authority do you base your continued belief that Trump colluded with Russia, given that the House had the results of the Mueller investigation, complete with testimony from Mueller himself, and decided NOT to include collusion in the impeachment? And if you have such evidence from such an authority, why in the name of all that's democrat did you sit on it and not send it to the Schiffster?

The impeachment was all about The whistleblower and Trump trying to blackmail a foreign leader in the middle of a war in order to get him to say that he was investigating Biden. There is plenty of evidence and suspicion of some collusion but really why would the Russians need the help of these idiots? funny how the Trump campaign met with Russians 30 x lied about it never wrote down anything about it etcetera etcetera and in public he told the Russians to go ahead and get dirt on Hillary and 2 hours later the Russians started hacking her server. Also he asked the Chinese to help. I believe the whole point was to try and get through to the brainwashed GOP voters what was happening, since they'll never get it from their ridiculous propaganda....

mahler's actual scumbag GOP conclusion was that it was beyond his scope to indict a president and perhaps that the president could not be indicted. Does Congress was supposed to try him. The Senate refused to go along.... That's why you can do when your entire base can be told anything and they will swallow it....

Well, then you have evidence that Schiffster doesn't and you kept it quiet, because the House Haters didn't even accuse him of it in the impeachment. Shame on you.

Mueller is Republican and say so is James Comey and they both suck.

So what? The real question is, why didn't you give Schiffler what you had?

 

[hadit]

You don't think there was enough evidence to fry Obama if that was him in the WH ? Never mind evidence hidden and the help from the slimebag Barr? And the cowards in the Senate 52 scum afraid to rile Trump??

I'm not the one you should be mad at. The House Haters were desperate to impeach Trump and they had the results of a multi year, multi million dollar investigation into whether Trump colluded with Russia. Now, do you for a MOMENT want to pretend that they had evidence that Trump colluded with Russia and decided NOT to include it in the impeachment? Are you really that stupid?

So again I ask, on what authority do you base your continued belief that Trump colluded with Russia, given that the House had the results of the Mueller investigation, complete with testimony from Mueller himself, and decided NOT to include collusion in the impeachment? And if you have such evidence from such an authority, why in the name of all that's democrat did you sit on it and not send it to the Schiffster?

The impeachment was all about The whistleblower and Trump trying to blackmail a foreign leader in the middle of a war in order to get him to say that he was investigating Biden. There is plenty of evidence and suspicion of some collusion but really why would the Russians need the help of these idiots? funny how the Trump campaign met with Russians 30 x lied about it never wrote down anything about it etcetera etcetera and in public he told the Russians to go ahead and get dirt on Hillary and 2 hours later the Russians started hacking her server. Also he asked the Chinese to help. I believe the whole point was to try and get through to the brainwashed GOP voters what was happening, since they'll never get it from their ridiculous propaganda....

mahler's actual scumbag GOP conclusion was that it was beyond his scope to indict a president and perhaps that the president could not be indicted. Does Congress was supposed to try him. The Senate refused to go along.... That's why you can do when your entire base can be told anything and they will swallow it....

Well, then you have evidence that Schiffster doesn't and you kept it quiet, because the House Haters didn't even accuse him of it in the impeachment. Shame on you.

And mueller called Trump co-conspirator number one because he ordered these Americans to lie to Mueller. "The counsel has indicted more than 30 people, including four members of Mr Trump's campaign team or administration, an adviser and long-time ally, and 26 Russians, as well as three Russian companies. From the BBC link above

Schiffler should have just asked you. He could have saved a lot of time and money.