Uber banned in London

Wow, the chimps are all out tonight.

I am far from being a defender of the London cabbie.

But they do have to be registered and pass certain checks before they are licensed.

Its a basic thing that is done.

So we can weed out the paedos,murderers and rapists.

I think even you nutters can agree that is a GOOD THING.

Uber are not fulfilling their duties in this respect. Neither are they being honest in reporting accidents.

Now, take a deep breath you thick fuckers, please explain how this decision is anything other than a correct decision that will protect the public.

When my kids are catching rides home I like to think that the driver is not a convicted pervert. Im sort of funny that way.
It's normal to do background checks. Private industries can't have any marks against them or you nutters go nutty.

The government has no such need.

cabbies get schooled on where to go and how to get there and the use of their equipment, since uber has no need of such things...
I have no idea what point you are trying to make.
 
Dumb as usual.

You really think taxi drivers are different? Dumb ass.

This is about government making money, but dupes can't see it even though it is clear as day.
It's about sexual assault from the "immigrants"

Freedom of Information data obtained by The Sun last year showed that the Metropolitan Police investigated 32 drivers for rape or sexual assault of a passenger between May 2015 and May 2016.

In August, Metropolitan Police Inspector Neil Billany wrote to TfL about his concern that the company was failing to properly investigate allegations against its drivers.

He revealed the company had continued to employ a driver after he was accused of sexual assault. According to Inspector Billany, the same driver went on to assault another female passenger before he was removed.
Thank you for underlining why uber is a problem.
 
Because those taxi drivers are so much safer.

LMFAO.

Yet another example of big government corruption and you support it.

Rideshare is exploitation of it's contractors.
It may be, but that has nothing to do with why the government banned Uber. It is about the money. Always is.

And besides, no one is forced to work for Uber. Force is always what government does.
 
Because those taxi drivers are so much safer.

LMFAO.

Yet another example of big government corruption and you support it.

Rideshare is exploitation of it's contractors.
It may be, but that has nothing to do with why the government banned Uber. It is about the money. Always is.

And besides, no one is forced to work for Uber. Force is always what government does.

The government is planning to exclude UBER from London because of the lack of accountability that current cab companies have to follow.

If you don't make a living wage you need a second job. (forced)

Rideshare is a predator to both their contractors as well as the public. Their operations are based on illegalities.
 
Because those taxi drivers are so much safer.

LMFAO.

Yet another example of big government corruption and you support it.
Evidently, yes the taxis are safer. That's why uber is banned and not taxis.


Safer and easier to tax then uber drivers maybe
How dare the Little People attempt to make money using their own ambition!

You mean taking advantage of the desperate?
 
Because those taxi drivers are so much safer.

LMFAO.

Yet another example of big government corruption and you support it.
Evidently, yes the taxis are safer. That's why uber is banned and not taxis.


Safer and easier to tax then uber drivers maybe
How dare the Little People attempt to make money using their own ambition!

You mean taking advantage of the desperate?
Uber drivers take advantage of the desperate!? Who knew! What tremendous knowledge you guide us with!
 
Because those taxi drivers are so much safer.

LMFAO.

Yet another example of big government corruption and you support it.
Evidently, yes the taxis are safer. That's why uber is banned and not taxis.


Safer and easier to tax then uber drivers maybe
How dare the Little People attempt to make money using their own ambition!

You mean taking advantage of the desperate?
Uber drivers take advantage of the desperate!? Who knew! What tremendous knowledge you guide us with!

Rideshare does.
 
Evidently, yes the taxis are safer. That's why uber is banned and not taxis.


Safer and easier to tax then uber drivers maybe
How dare the Little People attempt to make money using their own ambition!

You mean taking advantage of the desperate?
Uber drivers take advantage of the desperate!? Who knew! What tremendous knowledge you guide us with!

Rideshare does.
Lot of people love to keep going back and taken advantage of then! :spinner:
 
Safer and easier to tax then uber drivers maybe
How dare the Little People attempt to make money using their own ambition!

You mean taking advantage of the desperate?
Uber drivers take advantage of the desperate!? Who knew! What tremendous knowledge you guide us with!

Rideshare does.
Lot of people love to keep going back and taken advantage of then! :spinner:
Enough people DIDN'T want to be taken advantage of, that London banned Uber completely. So I guess you are wrong.
 
Safer and easier to tax then uber drivers maybe
How dare the Little People attempt to make money using their own ambition!

You mean taking advantage of the desperate?
Uber drivers take advantage of the desperate!? Who knew! What tremendous knowledge you guide us with!

Rideshare does.
Lot of people love to keep going back and taken advantage of then! :spinner:

I'll go slow for you. The issue I was addressing was rideshare contractors.
 
How dare the Little People attempt to make money using their own ambition!

You mean taking advantage of the desperate?
Uber drivers take advantage of the desperate!? Who knew! What tremendous knowledge you guide us with!

Rideshare does.
Lot of people love to keep going back and taken advantage of then! :spinner:

I'll go slow for you. The issue I was addressing was rideshare contractors.
It will all be moot, once they impose the driverless car.
 
You mean taking advantage of the desperate?
Uber drivers take advantage of the desperate!? Who knew! What tremendous knowledge you guide us with!

Rideshare does.
Lot of people love to keep going back and taken advantage of then! :spinner:

I'll go slow for you. The issue I was addressing was rideshare contractors.
It will all be moot, once they impose the driverless car.
I think the Brits deserve the first driverless cars. With this latest action they deserve it.
 
How dare the Little People attempt to make money using their own ambition!

You mean taking advantage of the desperate?
Uber drivers take advantage of the desperate!? Who knew! What tremendous knowledge you guide us with!

Rideshare does.
Lot of people love to keep going back and taken advantage of then! :spinner:

I'll go slow for you. The issue I was addressing was rideshare contractors.
Start your own thread then, this is about uber.
 
How dare the Little People attempt to make money using their own ambition!

You mean taking advantage of the desperate?
Uber drivers take advantage of the desperate!? Who knew! What tremendous knowledge you guide us with!

Rideshare does.
Lot of people love to keep going back and taken advantage of then! :spinner:
Enough people DIDN'T want to be taken advantage of, that London banned Uber completely. So I guess you are wrong.
Why would the government need to ban something no one was using? Have they banned photon death ray handguns?
 
You mean taking advantage of the desperate?
Uber drivers take advantage of the desperate!? Who knew! What tremendous knowledge you guide us with!

Rideshare does.
Lot of people love to keep going back and taken advantage of then! :spinner:
Enough people DIDN'T want to be taken advantage of, that London banned Uber completely. So I guess you are wrong.
Why would the government need to ban something no one was using? Have they banned photon death ray handguns?
No one said they weren't using the service. They were using the service and getting attacked. The service was not safe. Could not be made safe and now it is no more, at least in London.
 
Uber drivers take advantage of the desperate!? Who knew! What tremendous knowledge you guide us with!

Rideshare does.
Lot of people love to keep going back and taken advantage of then! :spinner:
Enough people DIDN'T want to be taken advantage of, that London banned Uber completely. So I guess you are wrong.
Why would the government need to ban something no one was using? Have they banned photon death ray handguns?
No one said they weren't using the service. They were using the service and getting attacked. The service was not safe. Could not be made safe and now it is no more, at least in London.
Uber works fine in America. What's different?

Oh yeah, half of London are Islamofacists.
 
You mean taking advantage of the desperate?
Uber drivers take advantage of the desperate!? Who knew! What tremendous knowledge you guide us with!

Rideshare does.
Lot of people love to keep going back and taken advantage of then! :spinner:

I'll go slow for you. The issue I was addressing was rideshare contractors.
It will all be moot, once they impose the driverless car.

Not in any of our lifetimes. Remember, planes can takeoff and land by themselves, but it takes the skill of a man to land on the Hudson. Computers are far from perfect to remove man from the equation.
 

Forum List

Back
Top