I
Indofred
Guest
Lots of versions of this story around, all suggesting various shoot down methods, but none showing rebels with the ability to do it.
That's the big hole in the story - no one can show the rebels had the weapons.
![]()
Is this BUK missile launcher that shot down MH17 being smuggled back to Russia Daily Mail Online
Hang on a minute.
That was two days after the shoot down, and here's the plates.
![]()
How much evidence do we need?
The Russian were stupid, running around for two days with a BUK system on a truck with Russian military plates.
Lucky the photographer was there to take a few pictures.
MH17 We have proof Russia knew Stuff.co.nz
At 2am (local time) on Friday July 18, about 8 hours after the plane came down, in a region of Ukraine near the Russian border, two big trucks each carrying a BUK system - one with a missing missile, were seen heading for Russia.
When?
The photos were two days after, but the Ukraine government claimed they buggered off to Russia within eight hours.
MH17 We have proof Russia knew Stuff.co.nz
At 4am on Saturday morning three more such trucks moved over the border into Russia. One had a BUK-M1, one was empty, and the third carried a tracking module that runs the system.
So, what do we have?
Conclusive proof that a Russian vehicle was photographed in Ukraine, if it was Russian, and if it was in Ukraine, more than 24 hours after the Ukrainians claimed the phantom Russian BUKs had left the country.
No convincing.
The Russian were stupid, running around for two days with a BUK system on a truck with Russian military plates.
Yeah, the bumbling Russian "rebels" aren't the smartest guys around.
Get real.
This truck propaganda photo was published AFTER the Ukrainians claimed the missile system was already back in Russia.