Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My point is you should be seeking information before spouting out accusations. If you can’t answer those questions... who changed the rules and why? Then you really don’t know the situation you are posting about. Trumps girl is in charge of the CIA. So start there. Is she dirty or did some staffers sneak something by her?I once hired a man who turned out to be a thief.Who exactly changed the rules and for what reasons? Last I check Trump appointed the leader of the CIA. You should get details before throwing out the deep state conspiracy theories.BREAKING: Intel Community Secretly Changed the Whistle-Blower Rules to Allow the Trump-Ukraine Complaint Just Days Before It Was Filed
This shit stinks to high heaven. I have withheld making such outlandish statements as in the title until now, but it is QUITE CLEAR there are operatives behind the scenes doing their best to usurp the will of the American voter.
They literally changed the rules protecting whistle blowers to create an avenue for this latest attack to come forward without the ability to challenge it.
Snip....
the intel community secretly changed the rules governing whistle-blowers, including amending the required form, in order to allow 2nd hand information to suffice.
What's your point tard?
I take "most" things on face value. This is UGLY no matter how you look at it. Could my summation be off? Of course, but I always stick with my gut instinct until shown why I shouldn't.My point is you should be seeking information before spouting out accusations. If you can’t answer those questions... who changed the rules and why? Then you really don’t know the situation you are posting about. Trumps girl is in charge of the CIA. So start there. Is she dirty or did some staffers sneak something by her?I once hired a man who turned out to be a thief.Who exactly changed the rules and for what reasons? Last I check Trump appointed the leader of the CIA. You should get details before throwing out the deep state conspiracy theories.BREAKING: Intel Community Secretly Changed the Whistle-Blower Rules to Allow the Trump-Ukraine Complaint Just Days Before It Was Filed
This shit stinks to high heaven. I have withheld making such outlandish statements as in the title until now, but it is QUITE CLEAR there are operatives behind the scenes doing their best to usurp the will of the American voter.
They literally changed the rules protecting whistle blowers to create an avenue for this latest attack to come forward without the ability to challenge it.
Snip....
the intel community secretly changed the rules governing whistle-blowers, including amending the required form, in order to allow 2nd hand information to suffice.
What's your point tard?
Voting for (or, in that case, against) someone doesn't make a person a hardcore partisan ideologue, Gramps, sorry.You aren't fooling anyone Mac. Maybe new members but that's it.Excellent straddle the issue response!I don't trust either side, and I don't know how any honest person can.
I remember having DEEP conversations with you about the 2016 election and no matter what Hillary did or was faced with your support for her NEVER wavered. So pardon me while I wipe my shoes from your horseshit
I never called you a partisan.Voting for (or, in that case, against) someone doesn't make a person a hardcore partisan ideologue, Gramps, sorry.You aren't fooling anyone Mac. Maybe new members but that's it.Excellent straddle the issue response!I don't trust either side, and I don't know how any honest person can.
I remember having DEEP conversations with you about the 2016 election and no matter what Hillary did or was faced with your support for her NEVER wavered. So pardon me while I wipe my shoes from your horseshit
And as you WELL know, I've had MORE than my share of squabbles with the Regressive Lefties here.
So that crap you tried doesn't float.
.
Matters not why. The fact is all the evidence points to this activity and only someone who doesn't value American values & traditions can ignore it.Are they upset that Trump hasn't started new wars? It's possible. It's the only redeeming value he has.
You are a FOREIGNER so why the fuck do you think your asinine opinion means anything?Matters not why. The fact is all the evidence points to this activity and only someone who doesn't value American values & traditions can ignore it.Are they upset that Trump hasn't started new wars? It's possible. It's the only redeeming value he has.
It never ceases to amaze me that right wingers look at the evidence and say the only possible conclusion is a "coup". The removal of a criminal President using the system set out in the Constitution, doesn't even meet the definition of a "coup".
Trump is and always has been a criminal president. He commits his crimes in plain sight and says "So what". American banks stopped lending to him in the mid-1990's. He was being sued in two states for fraud, and still Republicans let him run. Why? They knew far more about him than the public did and yet they allowed him to be their candidate. They promised to use their power to hold Trump in check, and then rolled over for him at every opportunity.
The the Republican Party doesn't at least offer someone better than a common thug as their Presidential candidate, they should expect the general public to revolt and vote them out. And that's what happened. The House Democrats take oversight more seriously than Republicans do.
Did you consider the impeachment of Bill Clinton a "coup"?
Matters not why. The fact is all the evidence points to this activity and only someone who doesn't value American values & traditions can ignore it.Are they upset that Trump hasn't started new wars? It's possible. It's the only redeeming value he has.
It never ceases to amaze me that right wingers look at the evidence and say the only possible conclusion is a "coup". The removal of a criminal President using the system set out in the Constitution, doesn't even meet the definition of a "coup".
Trump is and always has been a criminal president. He commits his crimes in plain sight and says "So what". American banks stopped lending to him in the mid-1990's. He was being sued in two states for fraud, and still Republicans let him run. Why? They knew far more about him than the public did and yet they allowed him to be their candidate. They promised to use their power to hold Trump in check, and then rolled over for him at every opportunity.
The the Republican Party doesn't at least offer someone better than a common thug as their Presidential candidate, they should expect the general public to revolt and vote them out. And that's what happened. The House Democrats take oversight more seriously than Republicans do.
Did you consider the impeachment of Bill Clinton a "coup"?
/——/ If the whistleblower was second hand how could he have known what was said?And yet the transcript of the call meshes gears perfectly with the whistleblower's complaint.
/——-/ The Democrats have Trump on video at Walmart with 15 items in his cart in a 10-item checkout line. This could be it.Matters not why. The fact is all the evidence points to this activity and only someone who doesn't value American values & traditions can ignore it.Are they upset that Trump hasn't started new wars? It's possible. It's the only redeeming value he has.
It never ceases to amaze me that right wingers look at the evidence and say the only possible conclusion is a "coup". The removal of a criminal President using the system set out in the Constitution, doesn't even meet the definition of a "coup".
Trump is and always has been a criminal president. He commits his crimes in plain sight and says "So what". American banks stopped lending to him in the mid-1990's. He was being sued in two states for fraud, and still Republicans let him run. Why? They knew far more about him than the public did and yet they allowed him to be their candidate. They promised to use their power to hold Trump in check, and then rolled over for him at every opportunity.
The the Republican Party doesn't at least offer someone better than a common thug as their Presidential candidate, they should expect the general public to revolt and vote them out. And that's what happened. The House Democrats take oversight more seriously than Republicans do.
Did you consider the impeachment of Bill Clinton a "coup"?
It never ceases to amaze me that leftwingers conclude that because DJT won the 2016 election against their will he is a criminal president.
And that as a consequence thereof they can conduct witch hunts, harass, frustrate his administration and effective perpetrate a Coup D. Etat.
I am so glad that the founding father declared that our right to bear arms shall not be infringed.
.
So assign an independent investigator with subpoena power.I don't trust either side, and I don't know how any honest person can.The side that is open to making gossip a legitimate source for serious investigation?I'd still like to know the other side of the story.It sends you directly to the form. It even states it was revised in august.The OP links to "Red State", which includes a link from "The Federalist", so there's a pretty good chance that we're only getting one side of the story here.
A conversation between people on both sides of the story would be required, at least as a start, before a reasonable conclusion can be reached on this.
Wouldn't you be curious to know what the other side of the story is?
.
wow
.
YOUR president broke the law He hides all his shit from the people Obama Bill never asked Putin or Ukraine to help in their elections BTW See you got lucky with KCOUR president didn't do anything any other president hasn't done before INCLUDING Obama.YOUR president ABUSED his power That's impeachableHis actions with the Ukrainian President were a threat to our national security.
Hahahahahahahahahaha
HOW?
Matters not why. The fact is all the evidence points to this activity and only someone who doesn't value American values & traditions can ignore it.Are they upset that Trump hasn't started new wars? It's possible. It's the only redeeming value he has.
It never ceases to amaze me that right wingers look at the evidence and say the only possible conclusion is a "coup". The removal of a criminal President using the system set out in the Constitution, doesn't even meet the definition of a "coup".
Trump is and always has been a criminal president. He commits his crimes in plain sight and says "So what". American banks stopped lending to him in the mid-1990's. He was being sued in two states for fraud, and still Republicans let him run. Why? They knew far more about him than the public did and yet they allowed him to be their candidate. They promised to use their power to hold Trump in check, and then rolled over for him at every opportunity.
The the Republican Party doesn't at least offer someone better than a common thug as their Presidential candidate, they should expect the general public to revolt and vote them out. And that's what happened. The House Democrats take oversight more seriously than Republicans do.
Did you consider the impeachment of Bill Clinton a "coup"?
I trust gossip even less....That is the linchpin of this entire fake scandal.I don't trust either side, and I don't know how any honest person can.The side that is open to making gossip a legitimate source for serious investigation?I'd still like to know the other side of the story.It sends you directly to the form. It even states it was revised in august.The OP links to "Red State", which includes a link from "The Federalist", so there's a pretty good chance that we're only getting one side of the story here.
A conversation between people on both sides of the story would be required, at least as a start, before a reasonable conclusion can be reached on this.
Wouldn't you be curious to know what the other side of the story is?
.
wow
.
Seriously, it's not that long. A dozen pages, maybe. If you're going to form an opinion, don't you want it to be an informed one? The Trump administration his phone calls. Calls you know damn good and well the other countries likely have recordings of. That is known as compromise.Then it should be easy for you to tell us what Trump is hiding.You could at least read the whistleblower complaint before commenting. Jesus, in the 21st century there is no reason for you to be so ill informed. There's an audio book version for the lazy or illiterate.What was Trump hiding?His actions with the Ukrainian President were a threat to our national security.
Hahahahahahahahahaha
HOW?
By being compromised. If you are hiding something from the American people and another country is aware you are trying to hide it, you are compromised. You are beholden to the country that is aware of what transpired. {Ukraine, Russia, Saudi Arabia)
Free Audiobook Listen: The Whistle-Blower Complaint
Course you won't. You will change the subject just like you just did with this post.
Y'all got NOTHING
In this case the "gossip" turned out to beWho exactly changed the rules and for what reasons? Last I check Trump appointed the leader of the CIA. You should get details before throwing out the deep state conspiracy theories.BREAKING: Intel Community Secretly Changed the Whistle-Blower Rules to Allow the Trump-Ukraine Complaint Just Days Before It Was Filed
This shit stinks to high heaven. I have withheld making such outlandish statements as in the title until now, but it is QUITE CLEAR there are operatives behind the scenes doing their best to usurp the will of the American voter.
They literally changed the rules protecting whistle blowers to create an avenue for this latest attack to come forward without the ability to challenge it.
Snip....
the intel community secretly changed the rules governing whistle-blowers, including amending the required form, in order to allow 2nd hand information to suffice.I trust gossip even less....That is the linchpin of this entire fake scandal.I don't trust either side, and I don't know how any honest person can.The side that is open to making gossip a legitimate source for serious investigation?I'd still like to know the other side of the story.It sends you directly to the form. It even states it was revised in august.The OP links to "Red State", which includes a link from "The Federalist", so there's a pretty good chance that we're only getting one side of the story here.
A conversation between people on both sides of the story would be required, at least as a start, before a reasonable conclusion can be reached on this.
Wouldn't you be curious to know what the other side of the story is?
.
wow
.
maybe I can helpMatters not why. The fact is all the evidence points to this activity and only someone who doesn't value American values & traditions can ignore it.Are they upset that Trump hasn't started new wars? It's possible. It's the only redeeming value he has.
It never ceases to amaze me that right wingers look at the evidence and say the only possible conclusion is a "coup". The removal of a criminal President using the system set out in the Constitution, doesn't even meet the definition of a "coup".
Trump is and always has been a criminal president. He commits his crimes in plain sight and says "So what". American banks stopped lending to him in the mid-1990's. He was being sued in two states for fraud, and still Republicans let him run. Why? They knew far more about him than the public did and yet they allowed him to be their candidate. They promised to use their power to hold Trump in check, and then rolled over for him at every opportunity.
The the Republican Party doesn't at least offer someone better than a common thug as their Presidential candidate, they should expect the general public to revolt and vote them out. And that's what happened. The House Democrats take oversight more seriously than Republicans do.
Did you consider the impeachment of Bill Clinton a "coup"?
Can you name the law he broke? I need the specific law...
Gossip.In this case the "gossip" turned out to beWho exactly changed the rules and for what reasons? Last I check Trump appointed the leader of the CIA. You should get details before throwing out the deep state conspiracy theories.BREAKING: Intel Community Secretly Changed the Whistle-Blower Rules to Allow the Trump-Ukraine Complaint Just Days Before It Was Filed
This shit stinks to high heaven. I have withheld making such outlandish statements as in the title until now, but it is QUITE CLEAR there are operatives behind the scenes doing their best to usurp the will of the American voter.
They literally changed the rules protecting whistle blowers to create an avenue for this latest attack to come forward without the ability to challenge it.
Snip....
the intel community secretly changed the rules governing whistle-blowers, including amending the required form, in order to allow 2nd hand information to suffice.I trust gossip even less....That is the linchpin of this entire fake scandal.I don't trust either side, and I don't know how any honest person can.The side that is open to making gossip a legitimate source for serious investigation?I'd still like to know the other side of the story.It sends you directly to the form. It even states it was revised in august.
Wouldn't you be curious to know what the other side of the story is?
.
wow
.
I'm sure president Hillary takes solace in that!BREAKING: Intel Community Secretly Changed the Whistle-Blower Rules to Allow the Trump-Ukraine Complaint Just Days Before It Was Filed
This shit stinks to high heaven. I have withheld making such outlandish statements as in the title until now, but it is QUITE CLEAR there are operatives behind the scenes doing their best to usurp the will of the American voter.
They literally changed the rules protecting whistle blowers to create an avenue for this latest attack to come forward without the ability to challenge it.
Snip....
the intel community secretly changed the rules governing whistle-blowers, including amending the required form, in order to allow 2nd hand information to suffice.The second hand information is accurate; Trump attempted to extort a foreign leader into providing damaging information against a potential political opponent in exchange for military aid.the intel community secretly changed the rules governing whistle-blowers, including amending the required form, in order to allow 2nd hand information to suffice.
The COUP happened three years ago when Trump became POTUS after losing the popular vote by more than 8 million ballots.
Whistleblower complaint, annotated
"In the course of my official duties, I have received information from multiple U.S. Government officials that the President of the United States is using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 U.S. election. This interference includes, among other things, pressuring a foreign country to investigate one of the President’s main domestic political rivals. The President’s personal lawyer, Mr. Rudolph Giuliani, is a central figure in this effort. Attorney General Barr appears to be involved as well."
Trump lost by 3 million and that difference was all CA. He won the popular in the other 49 and the electoral. Why spread more propaganda?
Take away Texas and Clinton won by more. Your reasoning here is stupid.
Nixon wasn't Impeached ...........he resigned and there wasn't a trialPlease point to that specific statement in the transcript, kthanks!Missiles for help with the Bidens?? IMPEACHABLEOUR president didn't do anything any other president hasn't done before INCLUDING Obama.YOUR president ABUSED his power That's impeachableHahahahahahahahahaha
HOW?
That can wait Meanwhile some words of wisdom from dragonlady
When the Nixon impeachment began, Americans opposed impeaching Nixon. Gradually, as the information on his corruption became public in the hearings, public sentiment turned. That is what is happening now with Trump. When he was elected, few people knew about Trump's history or background, and most still don't. They saw Trump as the rich, successful businessman they saw on TV. They had no clue about his shady practices or history of fraud and abuse, or that American banks won't lend to him. The MSM did little to reveal Trump's history.
Now Americans are really seeing Trump for the first time. The viciousness, the criminality, and the abject abuse of public office for personal gain. More will come out in the impeachment hearings. Trump will end his life like Nixon. Shunned and loathed.
Matters not why. The fact is all the evidence points to this activity and only someone who doesn't value American values & traditions can ignore it.Are they upset that Trump hasn't started new wars? It's possible. It's the only redeeming value he has.
It never ceases to amaze me that right wingers look at the evidence and say the only possible conclusion is a "coup". The removal of a criminal President using the system set out in the Constitution, doesn't even meet the definition of a "coup".
Trump is and always has been a criminal president. He commits his crimes in plain sight and says "So what". American banks stopped lending to him in the mid-1990's. He was being sued in two states for fraud, and still Republicans let him run. Why? They knew far more about him than the public did and yet they allowed him to be their candidate. They promised to use their power to hold Trump in check, and then rolled over for him at every opportunity.
The the Republican Party doesn't at least offer someone better than a common thug as their Presidential candidate, they should expect the general public to revolt and vote them out. And that's what happened. The House Democrats take oversight more seriously than Republicans do.
Did you consider the impeachment of Bill Clinton a "coup"?
It never ceases to amaze me that leftwingers conclude that because DJT won the 2016 election against their will he is a criminal president.
And that as a consequence thereof they can conduct witch hunts, harass, frustrate his administration and effective perpetrate a Coup D. Etat.
I am so glad that the founding father declared that our right to bear arms shall not be infringed.
.
