Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Where were the Teabaggers screaming for limited government and citizens' rights when Bush signed the USAPATRIOT Act?
Can I see your numbers on the leftist today tracing roots back to Rousseau?? Considering that the American Revolution was not one in the same as the French revolution considering the prior political systems they replaced.
The assumption without facts to assert your claim is most illogical and weak.
Same with the Russian revolution...European monarchies that were unwilling to allow political power to be shared by the new middle class of the industrial era were just as harsh as the revolutionary govts. that replaced them..
These motivations were not always political in nature but a payback for centuries of abuse...
Man in his very nature has proven through the millennia that he has an aggressive, destructive nature about him that has spread suffering and deprivation by his very lust for power and riches, no matter the form of government...or the party affiliation.
progressive are not democratic by nature, republicans, religious, non-religious progressive movements are in the history book and have yet to be affiliated with only one party.[/QUOTE7]
i schooled starkey inthat one, russo is founding father of modern communism. Jacobians were commies. The committee on public safety were commies
maybe so, they were pissed....
Also note that the French and the Russians were kept from being anything but peasants... Monarchies used the church and the state to repress freedoms, no surprise they were singled out for retribution by victorious parties that kept them out of power.
Where were the Teabaggers screaming for limited government and citizens' rights when Bush signed the USAPATRIOT Act?
Bush was never party of the Tea Party We were against the Patriot then as we are now, Ron Paul represented our views and was one of a very few that voted against the act. I was never a fan of Bush and he did as much damage to America as obama is doing. The Tea Party seems to be our only hope of keeping a Republic we can call Free.
Your right to revolution is inextricably tied to your willingness to abandon the Constitution,
and no manner of cloaking your abandonment in lofty rationalizations will change the fact that you have abandoned it.
maybe so, they were pissed....
Also note that the French and the Russians were kept from being anything but peasants... Monarchies used the church and the state to repress freedoms, no surprise they were singled out for retribution by victorious parties that kept them out of power.
You realize the French Revolution was started by middle management aristocrats, not peasants, right?
Also note that the French and the Russians were kept from being anything but peasants... Monarchies used the church and the state to repress freedoms, no surprise they were singled out for retribution by victorious parties that kept them out of power.
You realize the French Revolution was started by middle management aristocrats, not peasants, right?
because the monarchy would not share political power like Great Britain did to avert revolution of the new, middle class....
Can I see your numbers on the leftist today tracing roots back to Rousseau?? Considering that the American Revolution was not one in the same as the French revolution considering the prior political systems they replaced.
The assumption without facts to assert your claim is most illogical and weak.
Same with the Russian revolution...European monarchies that were unwilling to allow political power to be shared by the new middle class of the industrial era were just as harsh as the revolutionary govts. that replaced them..
These motivations were not always political in nature but a payback for centuries of abuse...
Man in his very nature has proven through the millennia that he has an aggressive, destructive nature about him that has spread suffering and deprivation by his very lust for power and riches, no matter the form of government...or the party affiliation.
progressive are not democratic by nature, republicans, religious, non-religious progressive movements are in the history book and have yet to be affiliated with only one party.
The names above, representing every Leftist revolution, are responsible for the slaughter of well over one million human beings.
The Liberal/Progressive/Democrat party has endorsed the very platform of the communist party, CPUSA.
Can I see your numbers on the leftist today tracing roots back to Rousseau?? Considering that the American Revolution was not one in the same as the French revolution considering the prior political systems they replaced.
The assumption without facts to assert your claim is most illogical and weak.
Same with the Russian revolution...European monarchies that were unwilling to allow political power to be shared by the new middle class of the industrial era were just as harsh as the revolutionary govts. that replaced them..
These motivations were not always political in nature but a payback for centuries of abuse...
Man in his very nature has proven through the millennia that he has an aggressive, destructive nature about him that has spread suffering and deprivation by his very lust for power and riches, no matter the form of government...or the party affiliation.
progressive are not democratic by nature, republicans, religious, non-religious progressive movements are in the history book and have yet to be affiliated with only one party.
Your right to revolution is inextricably tied to your willingness to abandon the Constitution,
and no manner of cloaking your abandonment in lofty rationalizations will change the fact that you have abandoned it.
1. Mussolini distinguished fascism from liberal capitalism in his 1928 autobiography: The citizen in the Fascist State is no longer a selfish individual who has the anti-social right of rebelling against any law of the Collectivity. The Fascist State with its corporative conception puts men and their possibilities into productive work and interprets for them the duties they have to fulfill. (p. 280)
a. Adolf Hitler, whose National Socialist (Nazi) Party adapted fascism to Germany beginning in 1933, said:
The state should retain supervision and each property owner should consider himself appointed by the state. It is his duty not to use his property against the interests of others among his own people. This is the crucial matter. The Third Reich will always retain its right to control the owners of property. (Barkai, "Nazi Economics: Ideology, Theory, and Policy," Trans. Ruth Hadass-Vashitz, pp. 2627)
So, for the fascist, and the national socialist, individuals must give up any right to rebel against the collective.
So....once a government is in place, it is the duty of the serfs....er, citizens, to accept it.
Not only do we see this view from the French Revolution onward, but, judging from the millions slaughtered, communism is pretty serious about this view as well.
And to see the very opposite view, one need look no further than the Tea Party.
And the demands of the Tea Party, based on individual rights, according to Charles Kesler, is the problem that another iteration of the above philosophies, Liberalism, has with the Tea Party.
"Charles R. Kesler (born 1956) is professor of Government/Political Science at Claremont McKenna College and Claremont Graduate University. He has a Ph.D in Government from Harvard University, from which he received his AB degree in 1978." Charles R. Kesler - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2. " Liberal impatience with partisanshipthat is, with people who oppose their plansarises from the fact that in contemporary liberalism, there is no publicly acknowledged right of revolution.
3. That may seem like a strange thing to say, but if one looks at some of the political theorists who were most important to modern or statist liberalismKant and Hegel in Germany, say, or Woodrow Wilson here in the United Statesthey are usually quite explicit in rejecting a right of revolution.
4. In their view, a people always has in the long run the government it deserves. So theres no right of the people to abolish, as the Declaration of Independence proclaims, the prevailing form of government and substitute a better one.
In particular, there is no conceivable right to overturn contemporary liberalism itself; as liberals today are so fond of saying, there is no turning back the clock. To liberals the Tea Party appears, well, bonkers, precisely because it recalls the American Revolution, and in doing so implies that it might not be such a bad thing to have another revolutionor at least a second installment of the originalin order to roll back the bad government that is damaging both the safety and happiness of the American people.
a. What is it, exactly, that the Tea Party means by limited government? Limited to what? And limited by what?
Clearly the Tea Partys form of conservatism points back to the Constitution as the basis for restoring American government."
http://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/file/2014_01_Imprimis.pdf
Communism failed only because it had flaws, those flaws were humans....
History holds testament of the failed social and political methods humans have tried since the agriculture revolution, none have proven to be everlasting and all fulfilling to those that practice existence in society..
Actually the first communistic form of government was the Spartan state in Greece..Over 3 thousand years ago...
Actually the first communistic form of government was the Spartan state in Greece..Over 3 thousand years ago...
maybe so, but that's not really relevant to this argument. I'll take capitalism over Sparta anyday...
The names above, representing every Leftist revolution, are responsible for the slaughter of well over one million human beings.
The Liberal/Progressive/Democrat party has endorsed the very platform of the communist party, CPUSA.
At one time more than a million people were killed over the mere fact that you were either a Roman Catholic or a Protestant. The right and the religious hold no exception to the useless slaughter and destruction at the hands of humans...
Communism failed only because it had flaws, those flaws were humans....
History holds testament of the failed social and political methods humans have tried since the agriculture revolution, none have proven to be everlasting and all fulfilling to those that practice existence in society..
