Unemployment falls to 8.3%


That number is U-6, and as I said about 12 times in this thread,

U-6 is at a 36 month LOW.

This chart disagrees..........................


Portal Seven | U6 Unemployment Rate

Even better 36 months equals 3 years. you do realize New York caribou would lie.
chart

Portal Seven | U6 Unemployment Rate
 
[The employment numbers are 'up' only by estimation since the total employment pool has been reduced by millions of jobs and is now at one of its historically lowest participation levels in decades. GDP is up because deficit government spending is up, mostly.

.

You're an idiot. The employment number is a not a percentage. If 243,000 jobs were added in January, that's how many were added, period.

Incorrect it is an estimate based on a survey.

Learn to read.
 
That number is U-6, and as I said about 12 times in this thread,

U-6 is at a 36 month LOW.

You wanted to know where that number came from it shows 23,188,055 whether or not it's at a 36 month drop does not matter

U-6 is down 2 full percentage points from its peak. The question was why should Democrats be happy about that.

Why wouldn't they?

You just said

That number is U-6, and as I said about 12 times in this thread,

U-6 is at a 36 month LOW.

It's not admit you lied or are uninformed and let it go.
 
You're an idiot. The employment number is a not a percentage. If 243,000 jobs were added in January, that's how many were added, period.

Incorrect it is an estimate based on a survey.

Learn to read.

YOU ARE A LYING WEASEL. FACT!!

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Year
2000 7.1 7.2 7.1 6.9 7.1 7.0 7.0 7.1 7.0 6.8 7.1 6.9 2000
2001 7.3 7.4 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.9 7.8 8.1 8.7 9.3 9.4 9.6 2001
2002 9.5 9.5 9.4 9.7 9.5 9.5 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.7 9.8 2002
2003 10.0 10.2 10.0 10.2 10.1 10.3 10.3 10.1 10.4 10.2 10.0 9.8 2003
2004 9.9 9.7 10.0 9.6 9.6 9.5 9.5 9.4 9.4 9.7 9.4 9.2 2004
2005 9.3 9.3 9.1 8.9 8.9 9.0 8.8 8.9 9.0 8.7 8.7 8.6 2005
2006 8.4 8.4 8.2 8.1 8.2 8.4 8.5 8.4 8.0 8.2 8.1 7.9 2006
2007 8.4 8.2 8.0 8.2 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.8 2007
2008 9.2 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.7 10.1 10.5 10.8 11.1 11.8 12.7 13.5 2008
2009 14.2 15.1 15.7 15.8 16.4 16.5 16.5 16.7 16.8 17.2 17.1 17.1 2009
2010 16.7 16.9 16.9 17.0 16.6 16.5 16.5 16.6 16.9 16.8 16.9 16.6 2010
2011 16.1 15.9 15.7 15.9 15.8 16.2 16.1 16.2 16.4 16.0 15.6 15.2 2011
2012 15.1
 
That number is U-6, and as I said about 12 times in this thread,

U-6 is at a 36 month LOW.

This chart disagrees..........................


Portal Seven | U6 Unemployment Rate

Even better 36 months equals 3 years. you do realize New York caribou would lie.
chart

Portal Seven | U6 Unemployment Rate

February 2009 through January 2012 is 3 years. Are you that stupid?

It was at 15.1 in Feb 2009, it's at 15.1 now.
 
This chart disagrees..........................


Portal Seven | U6 Unemployment Rate

Even better 36 months equals 3 years. you do realize New York caribou would lie.
chart

Portal Seven | U6 Unemployment Rate

February 2009 through January 2012 is 3 years. Are you that stupid?

It was at 15.1 in Feb 2009, it's at 15.1 now.

I am trying to give you a way out but you want take it. you said the U-6 was at a 36 month low. look at the graph I produced it's from 2009 until 2012 this month. not once diid the line drop down too the 2009 level.
Admit you are uninformed and move on.
 
Last edited:
Glad you figured out that the stimulus worked, and baby boomers are retiring.

Stock bubbles are not an indicator that anything is working at all. They are at artifical values due to government interference and as soon as the government realizes it cannot afford to maintain the status quo the bubble will burst. If the government doesnot figure it out, then Europe or China will knock the whole thing down anyway.

And of course Baby Boomers are retiring, but 1.25 million of them didnt just up and retire last month. This is nothing more than government statisticians lying for the government because they like Obama and want to stack the deck in his favor.

Obama is the Democrats Reagan.

Reagan stood for less government control, greater individual freedom and a restoration of confidence in the American dream.

Obama has done the EXACT opposite, so as the Democrats are opponents to the GOP it stands to reason their perfect President would be a statist who gows around the world grovelling before kings and apologizing for America possibly offending them.

The Democrats are masters at taking offense when someone somewhere might be offended, so it is quite natural for them to prefer taking the prostrate position on the global stage.

Reagan did the complete reverse of that, and this is more what the American public prefers and respects.

If it werent for the GOP establishment picking Romney to do a Dole/McCain/loser campaign, Obama would be a one term President.
 
Even better 36 months equals 3 years. you do realize New York caribou would lie.
chart

Portal Seven | U6 Unemployment Rate

February 2009 through January 2012 is 3 years. Are you that stupid?

It was at 15.1 in Feb 2009, it's at 15.1 now.

I am trying to give you a way out but you want take it. you said the U-6 was at a 36 month low. look at the graph I produced it's from 2009 until 2012 this month. not once diid the line drop down too the 2009 level.
Admit you are uninformed and move on.

You're an idiot.

U-6 is at 15.1. It hasn't been at 15.1 since February 2009. That makes it a 36 month low. Do you want to argue it's a 35 month low? If you had a brain you might have tried that.
 
Obama is the Democrats Reagan.

Except that Obama got Gaddafi and Bin Laden, and Reagan sent Bin Laden and Saddam weapons.

Still talking out your ass.

For Reagan's second term, it was given. The dems didn't even mount a threat. The sacraficed Mondale in what was a blowout.

Please be so stupid as to think that Obama is going to have that kind of support from this nation.

And then there will be no doubt you are the board moron.

He'll face either Mitt Romney or Newt Gingrich, neither of which have positive favorability ratings.

Unpopular challenger running against an incumbent president with an expanding economy, a positive trend in employment, an unassailable foreign policy record...

...when's the last time the challenger won under those circumstances?

Why are you trying to change the subject?

We are talking about Obama, right?
 
Romney right now is the underdog. We Republicans have to work harder. One thing we can do is tone down the stupids from the far right wing of the party. Numbskulls.
 
February 2009 through January 2012 is 3 years. Are you that stupid?

It was at 15.1 in Feb 2009, it's at 15.1 now.

I am trying to give you a way out but you want take it. you said the U-6 was at a 36 month low. look at the graph I produced it's from 2009 until 2012 this month. not once diid the line drop down too the 2009 level.
Admit you are uninformed and move on.

You're an idiot.

U-6 is at 15.1. It hasn't been at 15.1 since February 2009. That makes it a 36 month low. Do you want to argue it's a 35 month low? If you had a brain you might have tried that.

Look at the graph does the line drop at the 2009 level?
 
Glad you figured out that the stimulus worked, and baby boomers are retiring.

Stock bubbles are not an indicator that anything is working at all. They are at artifical values due to government interference and as soon as the government realizes it cannot afford to maintain the status quo the bubble will burst. If the government doesnot figure it out, then Europe or China will knock the whole thing down anyway.

And of course Baby Boomers are retiring, but 1.25 million of them didnt just up and retire last month. This is nothing more than government statisticians lying for the government because they like Obama and want to stack the deck in his favor.

Obama is the Democrats Reagan.

Reagan stood for less government control, greater individual freedom and a restoration of confidence in the American dream.

Obama has done the EXACT opposite, so as the Democrats are opponents to the GOP it stands to reason their perfect President would be a statist who gows around the world grovelling before kings and apologizing for America possibly offending them.

The Democrats are masters at taking offense when someone somewhere might be offended, so it is quite natural for them to prefer taking the prostrate position on the global stage.

Reagan did the complete reverse of that, and this is more what the American public prefers and respects.

If it werent for the GOP establishment picking Romney to do a Dole/McCain/loser campaign, Obama would be a one term President.

Tell us who could beat Obama, instead of Romney. I got to hear this one.
 
I am trying to give you a way out but you want take it. you said the U-6 was at a 36 month low. look at the graph I produced it's from 2009 until 2012 this month. not once diid the line drop down too the 2009 level.
Admit you are uninformed and move on.

You're an idiot.

U-6 is at 15.1. It hasn't been at 15.1 since February 2009. That makes it a 36 month low. Do you want to argue it's a 35 month low? If you had a brain you might have tried that.

Look at the graph does the line drop at the 2009 level?

What did I say above that was inaccurate specifically?
 

Forum List

Back
Top