Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LOL! Wow that graph just demonstrates it all. Chiefly it demonstrates you are a dimbuilb.Of course Bush & Clinton both had record numbers of people not in the labor force during their respective presidencies. Every president has...Bush didn't Clinton didn't So fuck off.It's a "record" EVERY president breaks!!!!!It's a record the 92 million is a record you stupid waste od a fuck you should have been condomizedIf it was lower before 1973, then it is not a "RECORD" low.
It demonstrates what was said here, which is clearly too complex for your limited comprehension ... that every president had more people who were not in the labor force than any previous president going as far back as the data allows.LOL! Wow that graph just demonstrates it all. Chiefly it demonstrates you are a dimbuilb.Of course Bush & Clinton both had record numbers of people not in the labor force during their respective presidencies. Every president has...Bush didn't Clinton didn't So fuck off.It's a "record" EVERY president breaks!!!!!It's a record the 92 million is a record you stupid waste od a fuck you should have been condomizedIf it was lower before 1973, then it is not a "RECORD" low.
Nothing is saner than an Obama voter when compared to a Bush voter. Bush almost doubled unemployment from 4.2% to 7.8%. Obama cleaned up Bush's mess and reduced unemployment from 7.8% to 5.9%.Insanity is still being an obama supporter you stupid fuckYou remain insane.WOW showing off obama's war on women wealth inequalityOver 2.5 million every year since Obama became president whereas St Ronnie averaged only 1.6 million each year.If that's the case then why did Reagan start with a lower workforce participation rate than he ended with?
Do you think the entire number of people leaving are baby boomers retiring?
Why do you think they are choosing now to retire, rather than continue working, which would increase their income?
You're not terribly well informed here. Just saying.
Beneficiary Data
View attachment 33138
You're a fucking nut like biggulpernc and rabbit, huh? So Bush didn't get down payments waived so more minorities could afford a home, huh? He didn't put that program on the backs of the GSE's, huh?Shitstain....Bush had nothing to do with home loan programs for poor people mostly blacks based on the CRA put in place by Jimmy bucktooth Carter and banks doing shady deals thanks to Glass–Steagall being repealed by Democraps.
Liberal policies/laws put in place before Bush took office are to blame, just like Clinton is responsible for 9-11 due to his lack of action against AQ.
Starting in Jan. 20, 2001, at the beginning of George W. Bush’s administration, the rate was 2.4 percent, but by the time he left in January 2009 it had reached 7 percent. The rate now is 5.9% and is on track to get even lower.
You clearly have no fucking clue to what you're talking about, rightie. You're talking about the CRA which did not cause the crash and ultimately produced just 6% of the toxic loans which did. And that 6% fell into the normal range of how many CRA loans go bad over that period of time.Asswipe...Bush didn't push bad loans on minority groups and let banks run wild with risky deals......those were put in place under Clinton and Carter.
Nothing is saner than an Obama voter when compared to a Bush voter. Bush almost doubled unemployment from 4.2% to 7.8%. Obama cleaned up Bush's mess and reduced unemployment from 7.8% to 5.9%.Insanity is still being an obama supporter you stupid fuckYou remain insane.WOW showing off obama's war on women wealth inequalityOver 2.5 million every year since Obama became president whereas St Ronnie averaged only 1.6 million each year.
Beneficiary Data
View attachment 33138
You ha
You clearly have no fucking clue to what you're talking about, rightie. You're talking about the CRA which did not cause the crash and ultimately produced just 6% of the toxic loans which did.Asswipe...Bush didn't push bad loans on minority groups and let banks run wild with risky deals......those were put in place under Clinton and Carter.
Nothing is saner than an Obama voter when compared to a Bush voter. Bush almost doubled unemployment from 4.2% to 7.8%. Obama cleaned up Bush's mess and reduced unemployment from 7.8% to 5.9%.Insanity is still being an obama supporter you stupid fuckYou remain insane.WOW showing off obama's war on women wealth inequality
Repeating your idiocy is not going to help you, rightie. Bush did not tighten standards,he loosened them with the American Dream Act. CRA loans did not cause the crash.Bush's people were called racist by Cummings and other scum in the HoR for asking to tighten the rules on giving out home loans like candy to minorities living in ghettos.
The banks were allowed to run wild thanks to Clinton and other Democrap scum, the party just came to an end when Bush was sitting in office.
Liberal scum like you caused the housing crisis and baking crisis but of course blame Bush.
It is not by chance the economy has sputtered under Obama doing the same shit as Carter and Clinton.
Bush's people were called racist by Cummings and other scum in the HoR for asking to tighten the rules on giving out home loans like candy to minorities living in ghettos.
The banks were allowed to run wild thanks to Clinton and other Democrap scum, the party just came to an end when Bush was sitting in office.
Liberal scum like you caused the housing crisis and baking crisis but of course blame Bush.
It is not by chance the economy has sputtered under Obama doing the same shit as Carter and Clinton.
You ha
Repeating your idiocy is not going to help you, rightie. Bush did not tighten standards,he loosened them with the American Dream Act. CRA loans did not cause the crash.Asswipe...Bush didn't push bad loans on minority groups and let banks run wild with risky deals......those were put in place under Clinton and Carter.
Learn what the fuck happened before you post.
Well here's another clue for ya...
Oh, noooo, not the Barney video....
Imbecile. Barney Frank was a member of the minority party. He wasn't the one in charge of setting policies. Republicans were.
My goodness, you fruit loop dinguses have no fucking clue.
Thanks to OUR POLICIES, home ownership in America is at an all time high." - George Bush, 2004 RNC acceptance speech
Exactly whose "policies" does your rightarded brain think Bush was crediting when he said, "OURS?" Bill Clinton's policies? Jimmy Carter's policies???
You really are too fucking stupid to know what happened. i.e., a typical Conservative.
Imbecile .... I can fix the quote ... you can't fix your retarded brain.You can't even quote correctly on this page, but act as if you understand economics......liberals like you should be locked up for life.
You stupid sack of shit.
Democraps blocked Bush's initiatives in Congress as a minority and majority party during his 8 years.....you stupid son of a bitch.
I'm done with a stupid fuck like you.....go kill yourself.
Oh, noooo, not the Barney video....
Imbecile. Barney Frank was a member of the minority party. He wasn't the one in charge of setting policies. Republicans were.
My goodness, you fruit loop dinguses have no fucking clue.
Thanks to OUR POLICIES, home ownership in America is at an all time high." - George Bush, 2004 RNC acceptance speech
Exactly whose "policies" does your rightarded brain think Bush was crediting when he said, "OURS?" Bill Clinton's policies? Jimmy Carter's policies???
You really are too fucking stupid to know what happened. i.e., a typical Conservative.
You stupid sack of shit.
Democraps blocked Bush's initiatives in Congress as a minority and majority party during his 8 years.....you stupid son of a bitch.
I'm done with a stupid fuck like you.....go kill yourself.
Oh, noooo, not the Barney video....
Imbecile. Barney Frank was a member of the minority party. He wasn't the one in charge of setting policies. Republicans were.
My goodness, you fruit loop dinguses have no fucking clue.
Thanks to OUR POLICIES, home ownership in America is at an all time high." - George Bush, 2004 RNC acceptance speech
Exactly whose "policies" does your rightarded brain think Bush was crediting when he said, "OURS?" Bill Clinton's policies? Jimmy Carter's policies???
You really are too fucking stupid to know what happened. i.e., a typical Conservative.
Shut your lying ass upYou're a fucking nut like biggulpernc and rabbit, huh? So Bush didn't get down payments waived so more minorities could afford a home, huh? He didn't put that program on the backs of the GSE's, huh?Shitstain....Bush had nothing to do with home loan programs for poor people mostly blacks based on the CRA put in place by Jimmy bucktooth Carter and banks doing shady deals thanks to Glass–Steagall being repealed by Democraps.
Liberal policies/laws put in place before Bush took office are to blame, just like Clinton is responsible for 9-11 due to his lack of action against AQ.
Starting in Jan. 20, 2001, at the beginning of George W. Bush’s administration, the rate was 2.4 percent, but by the time he left in January 2009 it had reached 7 percent. The rate now is 5.9% and is on track to get even lower.
Cries the rightard who's running away from my question an fast as his walker allows.Faun = troll
You don't.
You idiot, do you even read what you post??Shut your lying ass upYou're a fucking nut like biggulpernc and rabbit, huh? So Bush didn't get down payments waived so more minorities could afford a home, huh? He didn't put that program on the backs of the GSE's, huh?Shitstain....Bush had nothing to do with home loan programs for poor people mostly blacks based on the CRA put in place by Jimmy bucktooth Carter and banks doing shady deals thanks to Glass–Steagall being repealed by Democraps.
Liberal policies/laws put in place before Bush took office are to blame, just like Clinton is responsible for 9-11 due to his lack of action against AQ.
Starting in Jan. 20, 2001, at the beginning of George W. Bush’s administration, the rate was 2.4 percent, but by the time he left in January 2009 it had reached 7 percent. The rate now is 5.9% and is on track to get even lower.
Setting the Record Straight Six Years of Unheeded Warnings for GSE Reform
Today, the Washington Times incorrectly accused the White House of ignoring warnings of trouble ahead for government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) and neglecting to "adopt any reform until this summer," when it was too late. "Neither the White House nor Congress heeded the warnings, Fannie and Freddie retained strong bipartisan support during the 1990s and early part of this decade." (Editorial, "Hear, See And Speak No Evil About Fannie And Freddie," The Washington Times, 10/9/08)
Over the past six years, the President and his Administration have not only warned of the systemic consequences of failure to reform GSEs but also put forward thoughtful plans to reduce the risk that either Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac would encounter such difficulties. In fact, it was Congress that flatly rejected President Bush's call more than five years ago to reform the GSEs. Over the years, the President's repeated attempts to reform the supervision of these entities were thwarted by the legislative maneuvering of those who emphatically denied there were problems with the GSEs.
stupid fuck it was the democrats in congress that whined the republicans didn't want to be called RACIST you dumb son of a bitch.You idiot, do you even read what you post??Shut your lying ass upYou're a fucking nut like biggulpernc and rabbit, huh? So Bush didn't get down payments waived so more minorities could afford a home, huh? He didn't put that program on the backs of the GSE's, huh?Shitstain....Bush had nothing to do with home loan programs for poor people mostly blacks based on the CRA put in place by Jimmy bucktooth Carter and banks doing shady deals thanks to Glass–Steagall being repealed by Democraps.
Liberal policies/laws put in place before Bush took office are to blame, just like Clinton is responsible for 9-11 due to his lack of action against AQ.
Starting in Jan. 20, 2001, at the beginning of George W. Bush’s administration, the rate was 2.4 percent, but by the time he left in January 2009 it had reached 7 percent. The rate now is 5.9% and is on track to get even lower.
Setting the Record Straight Six Years of Unheeded Warnings for GSE Reform
Today, the Washington Times incorrectly accused the White House of ignoring warnings of trouble ahead for government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) and neglecting to "adopt any reform until this summer," when it was too late. "Neither the White House nor Congress heeded the warnings, Fannie and Freddie retained strong bipartisan support during the 1990s and early part of this decade." (Editorial, "Hear, See And Speak No Evil About Fannie And Freddie," The Washington Times, 10/9/08)
Over the past six years, the President and his Administration have not only warned of the systemic consequences of failure to reform GSEs but also put forward thoughtful plans to reduce the risk that either Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac would encounter such difficulties. In fact, it was Congress that flatly rejected President Bush's call more than five years ago to reform the GSEs. Over the years, the President's repeated attempts to reform the supervision of these entities were thwarted by the legislative maneuvering of those who emphatically denied there were problems with the GSEs.
In fact, it was Congress that flatly rejected President Bush's call more than five years ago to reform the GSEs.
From 2003 through the end of 2006, Congress was run by Republicans. Democrats did not block a single bill to reform the GSEs. When Democrats took over in 2007, the passed a reform bill.
Now you know. Will you learn? No, you're not capable. But now you know.
You really can't get any more retarded, no matter how hard you try. Moron ... "whining" doesn't prevent the majority party from passing legislation. On the flip side, the Senate majority, who's in charge of placing bills on the legislative calendar, can prevent bills from passing by not allowing an up/down vote by the full Senate, which is what the majority party Republicans did. You can't even lie about it because all of the major actions of every one of those bills has been documented and made available in the Internet (Thank you, Al Gore).stupid fuck it was the democrats in congress that whined the republicans didn't want to be called RACIST you dumb son of a bitch.You idiot, do you even read what you post??Shut your lying ass upYou're a fucking nut like biggulpernc and rabbit, huh? So Bush didn't get down payments waived so more minorities could afford a home, huh? He didn't put that program on the backs of the GSE's, huh?Shitstain....Bush had nothing to do with home loan programs for poor people mostly blacks based on the CRA put in place by Jimmy bucktooth Carter and banks doing shady deals thanks to Glass–Steagall being repealed by Democraps.
Liberal policies/laws put in place before Bush took office are to blame, just like Clinton is responsible for 9-11 due to his lack of action against AQ.
Starting in Jan. 20, 2001, at the beginning of George W. Bush’s administration, the rate was 2.4 percent, but by the time he left in January 2009 it had reached 7 percent. The rate now is 5.9% and is on track to get even lower.
Setting the Record Straight Six Years of Unheeded Warnings for GSE Reform
Today, the Washington Times incorrectly accused the White House of ignoring warnings of trouble ahead for government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) and neglecting to "adopt any reform until this summer," when it was too late. "Neither the White House nor Congress heeded the warnings, Fannie and Freddie retained strong bipartisan support during the 1990s and early part of this decade." (Editorial, "Hear, See And Speak No Evil About Fannie And Freddie," The Washington Times, 10/9/08)
Over the past six years, the President and his Administration have not only warned of the systemic consequences of failure to reform GSEs but also put forward thoughtful plans to reduce the risk that either Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac would encounter such difficulties. In fact, it was Congress that flatly rejected President Bush's call more than five years ago to reform the GSEs. Over the years, the President's repeated attempts to reform the supervision of these entities were thwarted by the legislative maneuvering of those who emphatically denied there were problems with the GSEs.
In fact, it was Congress that flatly rejected President Bush's call more than five years ago to reform the GSEs.
From 2003 through the end of 2006, Congress was run by Republicans. Democrats did not block a single bill to reform the GSEs. When Democrats took over in 2007, the passed a reform bill.
Now you know. Will you learn? No, you're not capable. But now you know.
But you have continuly blame bush Go shut the fuck up you have been shown just how fucking wrong you are.
