Unimaginable arrogance

[bripat9643]

The American people overwhelmingly voted for Trump. Even the Dumbocrat states like Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania voted for Trump.

NO, he lost by 3 million votes. Just because a racist system that slave rapists came up caused Trump to win on a technicality doesn't make him legitimate.

And when he proceeds to fail, miserably, you conservatives will all take the ride down with him...

Oh please, if it were the other way around and Trump won the PV with Hillary taking the election, you hypocrites would be bragging how her strategy worked.

Trump didn't lose the election by 3 million people. He won period. He lost nothing. Hil-liar is the one that lost.

Oh, I am sure the HRC folks would do just that as you trumpelthinskins are doing it now.

She would be facing the same lack of public support as Trump.

So you think all these hysterics by snowflakes means Trump doesn't have support?

Go find a safe space to cry in, Fakey.

 

[JoeB131]

So you think all these hysterics by snowflakes means Trump doesn't have support?

Go find a safe space to cry in, Fakey.

I think you have to differentiate between the hard core Trump Brownshirts and the opportunistic Republicans who backed him because it was convenient. The latter will turn on him the minute his approval rating drops below 30%.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I think you have to differentiate between the hard core Trump Brownshirts and the opportunistic Republicans who backed him because it was convenient.

They didn't back him because of convenience, they backed him to make sure Hil-Liar didn't get in.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Now you're hung up on the popular vote because Hillary got that. Well she got it against DumBama as well in 08, but no complaints about the PV back then or now.

Well, that's debatable if she got more votes, because the only thing that put her over the top was Michigan and Florida's early primaries, which were illegally held and Obama wasn't on the ballot.

Why wasn't he?????

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I never said they did. What I said is they came out for him in droves against Hillary or he wouldn't have had a shot at it. Remember you're the one trying to advance the point that it had nothing to do with race. They voted for Obama because he's a Democrat like any other. I call BS. They came out to vote for him because he is a Mulatto.

Mulatto? Seriously, you think that's a word we should still use in 2017?

Naw, Racist from Cleveland, you don't have any issues at all.

Obama won because Bush fucked it up. If we were at peace and the economy was good, McCain would have been the 44th White Guy to hold that job.

Ah yes, I forgot all about that liberal crystal ball. More than likely if Hillary would have won, McCain would have been President as well.

See! I have one too!

 

[usmbguest5318]

Why should Obama be any different than anyone else? Who doesn't offer public criticism when they deem it necessary? The publishers of The Blaze do it daily. So does Trump, everyone on this forum, myriad editorialists, and so on and so on and so on. What makes it arrogant that Obama would do the same?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Why should Obama be any different than anyone else? Who doesn't offer public criticism when they deem it necessary? The publishers of The Blaze do it daily. So does Trump, everyone on this forum, myriad editorialists, and so on and so on and so on. What makes it arrogant that Obama would do the same?

Because nobody will be seeking out his opinion. He's going to stay in Washington to intrude on the next administration as if they can't do the job without him. That's arrogant.

 

[Freewill]

So you think all these hysterics by snowflakes means Trump doesn't have support?

Go find a safe space to cry in, Fakey.

I think you have to differentiate between the hard core Trump Brownshirts and the opportunistic Republicans who backed him because it was convenient. The latter will turn on him the minute his approval rating drops below 30%.

And Gobbles raises his ugly head with the Nazi references, you really have to come to grip with your depression.

Your signature line, according to Hillary, indicates you are attacking our democracy, she meant Republic but then again she isn't really that bright.

Here listen to the loser once again:



Now ask yourself, are you really that depressed that you want to, in Hillary's terms, attack our Republic just as the NAZIs did in 1933? That is what you are doing. No one on the right is doing anything that isn't consitutional, what you suggest is a coup de ta.

Never the less, Hillary couldn't beat an unknown with the name Barrack Obama. She rigged the election against a keeper of the crypt old man and couldn't beat an orange faced clown, your words. Just too funny that you just don't get it.

 

[Freewill]

Why should Obama be any different than anyone else? Who doesn't offer public criticism when they deem it necessary? The publishers of The Blaze do it daily. So does Trump, everyone on this forum, myriad editorialists, and so on and so on and so on. What makes it arrogant that Obama would do the same?

Because nobody will be seeking out his opinion. He's going to stay in Washington to intrude on the next administration as if they can't do the job without him. That's arrogant.

The only way he stays the least bit relevant in politics is by raising money for the DNC. He can still do that and that will be how he wields his power. Kinda ironic when you listen to the left put down the rich. But they just be kidding.

 

[tyroneweaver]

The Bible didn't mention a 2 state solution.True belief in Israel begins with the Bible.

This would be the same book that has Talking Donkeys, Giants, Sea Monsters and Unicorns in it, right?

he has an added bonus of kolob and magical underwear

^^^^^^^^^
synagogue of satan

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Why should Obama be any different than anyone else? Who doesn't offer public criticism when they deem it necessary? The publishers of The Blaze do it daily. So does Trump, everyone on this forum, myriad editorialists, and so on and so on and so on. What makes it arrogant that Obama would do the same?

Because nobody will be seeking out his opinion. He's going to stay in Washington to intrude on the next administration as if they can't do the job without him. That's arrogant.

The only way he stays the least bit relevant in politics is by raising money for the DNC. He can still do that and that will be how he wields his power. Kinda ironic when you listen to the left put down the rich. But they just be kidding.

The problem is anytime DumBama snaps his fingers at the media, they will come running to his house so he can spout off about what Trump and his administration are doing.

When we wanted the guy to work, he was out playing Fn golf. Now that he's retired and can play golf, he wants to do the job of President.

 

[bripat9643]

So you think all these hysterics by snowflakes means Trump doesn't have support?

Go find a safe space to cry in, Fakey.

I think you have to differentiate between the hard core Trump Brownshirts and the opportunistic Republicans who backed him because it was convenient. The latter will turn on him the minute his approval rating drops below 30%.

And Gobbles raises his ugly head with the Nazi references, you really have to come to grip with your depression.

Your signature line, according to Hillary, indicates you are attacking our democracy, she meant Republic but then again she isn't really that bright.

Here listen to the loser once again:



Now ask yourself, are you really that depressed that you want to, in Hillary's terms, attack our Republic just as the NAZIs did in 1933? That is what you are doing. No one on the right is doing anything that isn't consitutional, what you suggest is a coup de ta.

Never the less, Hillary couldn't beat an unknown with the name Barrack Obama. She rigged the election against a keeper of the crypt old man and couldn't beat an orange faced clown, your words. Just too funny that you just don't get it.

I love that video. Nothing shows the profound hypocrisy of Hillary and her supporters better:

 

[bripat9643]

Why should Obama be any different than anyone else? Who doesn't offer public criticism when they deem it necessary? The publishers of The Blaze do it daily. So does Trump, everyone on this forum, myriad editorialists, and so on and so on and so on. What makes it arrogant that Obama would do the same?

Because nobody will be seeking out his opinion. He's going to stay in Washington to intrude on the next administration as if they can't do the job without him. That's arrogant.

The only way he stays the least bit relevant in politics is by raising money for the DNC. He can still do that and that will be how he wields his power. Kinda ironic when you listen to the left put down the rich. But they just be kidding.

The problem is anytime DumBama snaps his fingers at the media, they will come running to his house so he can spout off about what Trump and his administration are doing.

When we wanted the guy to work, he was out playing Fn golf. Now that he's retired and can play golf, he wants to do the job of President.

Actually all he wants is to prevent Trump from doing his job as President.

 

[bripat9643]

So you think all these hysterics by snowflakes means Trump doesn't have support?

Go find a safe space to cry in, Fakey.

I think you have to differentiate between the hard core Trump Brownshirts and the opportunistic Republicans who backed him because it was convenient. The latter will turn on him the minute his approval rating drops below 30%.

Only a douche bag would use a term like "brownshirt" to refer to patriotic Americans.

IF there were any "brownshirts" in this election, it was the thugs Hillary and George Soros sent to beat up Trumps supporters as they left his rallies

You wanne see brownshirts? Watch this video:

 

[bripat9643]

Why should Obama be any different than anyone else? Who doesn't offer public criticism when they deem it necessary? The publishers of The Blaze do it daily. So does Trump, everyone on this forum, myriad editorialists, and so on and so on and so on. What makes it arrogant that Obama would do the same?

Former presidents don't offer public criticism of sitting presidents - that is, until Maobama. The man is beyond the pale. He's a megalomaniac.

 

[Russ Alllah Gehry]

I can't even imagine the type of arrogance it takes to make these statements. For starters, all Barack Obama ever thinks about is Barack Obama and his "legacy". Second, he's so drunk with power that he doesn't even realize he will have no power to do anything about Donald Trump's policies.

"President Barack Obama used the final weekly address of his presidency to ensure the American people that despite leaving the White House in less than three weeks, he will remain vigilant of President-elect Donald Trump over the next four years to ensure the “progress” made by his administration is not undone under Trump."

Watch: Obama has no plans to leave your life after he vacates the White House on Jan. 20

Drunk with power? Better that than high with Twitter

 

[Russ Alllah Gehry]

Only a douche bag would use a term like "brownshirt" to refer to patriotic Americans.

really? Yet you helped elect the biggest douche of all. What a world

 

[JoeB131]

They didn't back him because of convenience, they backed him to make sure Hil-Liar didn't get in.

Well, that was stupid. and if he ends up doing more damage tot he country, that's just fine with them, because Hillary didn't get in.

This is the problem with you nuts, you personify Santayana's definition of a fanatic.

 

[bripat9643]

Only a douche bag would use a term like "brownshirt" to refer to patriotic Americans.

really? Yet you helped elect the biggest douche of all. What a world

Sorry, but Hillary was the biggest douche bag of all. Everyone who voted for her is a shameless douche bag. You need professional help if you can't admit that Hillary is a douche bag.

 

[bripat9643]

They didn't back him because of convenience, they backed him to make sure Hil-Liar didn't get in.

Well, that was stupid. and if he ends up doing more damage tot he country, that's just fine with them, because Hillary didn't get in.

This is the problem with you nuts, you personify Santayana's definition of a fanatic.

ROFL! Sorry, but it's all the leftwing snowflakes who are redoubling their efforts instead of dealing maturely with Hillary's defeat.