US adds massive 287,000 jobs in June.....Quite A Change From Bush's Fiasco

[Faun]

Especially with almost a year left in his Presidency

I don't recall the definition of the word delay having a time parameter attached to it making it different when one is longer than another.

So if Trump were to win, you are OK with a four year "delay"?

You left out several other "ifs". If you're going to live in a hypothetical world, go all the way.

As long as you're OK if Republicans delay for 4 years if Clinton is elected. Deal?

You put delay in quotes as if a time frame changes the definition. Show me in the definition of delay where it changes meaning if a time period longer than you like is used in the delay.

You're the one promoting the Senate not holding confirmation hearings for presidents they don't want choosing replacement justices. Why should others have to agree to it for you to agree with your own stated principles?

Nowhere have I said you have to agree with anything. Your agreement isn't and never will be required for the truth to be the truth. You have the right to disagree and be wrong.

You're too fucking retarded for words.

You literally just told rightwinger you'd agree to a four year "delay" if he would. Now you act as though his agreement isn't needed for you to uphold your own principles.

 

[Conservative65]

When Clinton could have been dealing with the danger, he was getting a blow job instead. He took his eyes off the ball but Monica didn't.

No planes were hijacked inside the US and flown into buildings by kamikaze terrorists while he was president.

Truck bombs were used in 1993 to try and do the same thing while he was.

So Bush41 was to blame for that, right?

And now, you're all over the place. You were whining about Bill getting blowjobs" causing him to take his eye off the ball. Meanwhile, Clinton left office with the Twin Towers still standing proudly. Regrettably, Bush cannot say the same.

Clinton was in office. That's the mindset you used.

LOL

That's actually the conservative mindset as they were the ones who blamed Clinton for 9.11, nearly 8 months into Bush's presidency. Well using that logic, Bush41 would have been responsible for an attack just 5 weeks into Clinton's

What's hysterical though is that I'm mocking you and you're fucking stupid to get it.

I know right where you are. You took Monica's place.

Oh look, yet another brain-dead conservative sharing his homo-erotic fantasies in public of men engaging in gay sex. You don't see that around here every day.

You're quite the exhibitionist, ain'tcha, con?

So you admit you do Monicas on Bill, faggot?

 

[Faun]

So Bush41 was to blame for that, right?

And now, you're all over the place. You were whining about Bill getting blowjobs" causing him to take his eye off the ball. Meanwhile, Clinton left office with the Twin Towers still standing proudly. Regrettably, Bush cannot say the same.

Clinton was in office. That's the mindset you used.

LOL

That's actually the conservative mindset as they were the ones who blamed Clinton for 9.11, nearly 8 months into Bush's presidency. Well using that logic, Bush41 would have been responsible for an attack just 5 weeks into Clinton's

What's hysterical though is that I'm mocking you and you're fucking stupid to get it.

I know right where you are. You took Monica's place.

Oh look, yet another brain-dead conservative sharing his homo-erotic fantasies in public of men engaging in gay sex. You don't see that around here every day.

You're quite the exhibitionist, ain'tcha, con?

Since you don't blame Clinton for his slack effort, blaming Bush 41 for it is hypocritical.

You don't have the ability to mock anyone, even yourself. What's hysterical is you think you're anything more than a Democrat puppet letting a black boy yank your strings.

Holyfuckingshit!

Again....

I was mocking you.

Even after I explain it to you, you still don't get it.

Again, a piece of shit like you isn't smart enough to do so. How many times do I have to tell you. Apparently, more than two in order for you to get it.

Meanwhile, I mocked you and you didn't get it. Denial doesn't help you since it's here for everyone to see.

 

[Faun]

No planes were hijacked inside the US and flown into buildings by kamikaze terrorists while he was president.

Truck bombs were used in 1993 to try and do the same thing while he was.

So Bush41 was to blame for that, right?

And now, you're all over the place. You were whining about Bill getting blowjobs" causing him to take his eye off the ball. Meanwhile, Clinton left office with the Twin Towers still standing proudly. Regrettably, Bush cannot say the same.

Clinton was in office. That's the mindset you used.

LOL

That's actually the conservative mindset as they were the ones who blamed Clinton for 9.11, nearly 8 months into Bush's presidency. Well using that logic, Bush41 would have been responsible for an attack just 5 weeks into Clinton's

What's hysterical though is that I'm mocking you and you're fucking stupid to get it.

I know right where you are. You took Monica's place.

Oh look, yet another brain-dead conservative sharing his homo-erotic fantasies in public of men engaging in gay sex. You don't see that around here every day.

You're quite the exhibitionist, ain'tcha, con?

So you admit you do Monicas on Bill, faggot?

Of course not. But I'm not responsible for an exhibitionist like you who can't keep his homo-erotic fantasies to himself.

 

[Conservative65]

I don't recall the definition of the word delay having a time parameter attached to it making it different when one is longer than another.

So if Trump were to win, you are OK with a four year "delay"?

You left out several other "ifs". If you're going to live in a hypothetical world, go all the way.

As long as you're OK if Republicans delay for 4 years if Clinton is elected. Deal?

You put delay in quotes as if a time frame changes the definition. Show me in the definition of delay where it changes meaning if a time period longer than you like is used in the delay.

You're the one promoting the Senate not holding confirmation hearings for presidents they don't want choosing replacement justices. Why should others have to agree to it for you to agree with your own stated principles?

Nowhere have I said you have to agree with anything. Your agreement isn't and never will be required for the truth to be the truth. You have the right to disagree and be wrong.

You're too fucking retarded for words.

You literally just told rightwinger you'd agree to a four year "delay" if he would. Now you act as though his agreement isn't needed for you to uphold your own principles.

Rightwinger already indicated that he would have had no problem if Biden supported a delay as long as the current one if Biden had done it. He lost any credibility when he held the same time standard differently when it's someone he supports. You support him which shows you're the same type of lowlife his mother raised him to be.

 

[Conservative65]

Clinton was in office. That's the mindset you used.

LOL

That's actually the conservative mindset as they were the ones who blamed Clinton for 9.11, nearly 8 months into Bush's presidency. Well using that logic, Bush41 would have been responsible for an attack just 5 weeks into Clinton's

What's hysterical though is that I'm mocking you and you're fucking stupid to get it.

I know right where you are. You took Monica's place.

Oh look, yet another brain-dead conservative sharing his homo-erotic fantasies in public of men engaging in gay sex. You don't see that around here every day.

You're quite the exhibitionist, ain'tcha, con?

Since you don't blame Clinton for his slack effort, blaming Bush 41 for it is hypocritical.

You don't have the ability to mock anyone, even yourself. What's hysterical is you think you're anything more than a Democrat puppet letting a black boy yank your strings.

Holyfuckingshit!

Again....

I was mocking you.

Even after I explain it to you, you still don't get it.

Again, a piece of shit like you isn't smart enough to do so. How many times do I have to tell you. Apparently, more than two in order for you to get it.

Meanwhile, I mocked you and you didn't get it. Denial doesn't help you since it's here for everyone to see.

Can't deny something that didn't occur. You can't mock yourself, pussy, much less anyone else.

 

[Conservative65]

Truck bombs were used in 1993 to try and do the same thing while he was.

So Bush41 was to blame for that, right?

And now, you're all over the place. You were whining about Bill getting blowjobs" causing him to take his eye off the ball. Meanwhile, Clinton left office with the Twin Towers still standing proudly. Regrettably, Bush cannot say the same.

Clinton was in office. That's the mindset you used.

LOL

That's actually the conservative mindset as they were the ones who blamed Clinton for 9.11, nearly 8 months into Bush's presidency. Well using that logic, Bush41 would have been responsible for an attack just 5 weeks into Clinton's

What's hysterical though is that I'm mocking you and you're fucking stupid to get it.

I know right where you are. You took Monica's place.

Oh look, yet another brain-dead conservative sharing his homo-erotic fantasies in public of men engaging in gay sex. You don't see that around here every day.

You're quite the exhibitionist, ain'tcha, con?

So you admit you do Monicas on Bill, faggot?

Of course not. But I'm not responsible for an exhibitionist like you who can't keep his homo-erotic fantasies to himself.

You did and don't even realize it, faggot.

 

[Faun]

So if Trump were to win, you are OK with a four year "delay"?

You left out several other "ifs". If you're going to live in a hypothetical world, go all the way.

As long as you're OK if Republicans delay for 4 years if Clinton is elected. Deal?

You put delay in quotes as if a time frame changes the definition. Show me in the definition of delay where it changes meaning if a time period longer than you like is used in the delay.

You're the one promoting the Senate not holding confirmation hearings for presidents they don't want choosing replacement justices. Why should others have to agree to it for you to agree with your own stated principles?

Nowhere have I said you have to agree with anything. Your agreement isn't and never will be required for the truth to be the truth. You have the right to disagree and be wrong.

You're too fucking retarded for words.

You literally just told rightwinger you'd agree to a four year "delay" if he would. Now you act as though his agreement isn't needed for you to uphold your own principles.

Rightwinger already indicated that he would have had no problem if Biden supported a delay as long as the current one if Biden had done it. He lost any credibility when he held the same time standard differently when it's someone he supports. You support him which shows you're the same type of lowlife his mother raised him to be.

Biden never suggested denying Bush an appointment. You remain delusional comparing what Biden suggested with what the GOP is doing.

 

[Conservative65]

You left out several other "ifs". If you're going to live in a hypothetical world, go all the way.

As long as you're OK if Republicans delay for 4 years if Clinton is elected. Deal?

You put delay in quotes as if a time frame changes the definition. Show me in the definition of delay where it changes meaning if a time period longer than you like is used in the delay.

You're the one promoting the Senate not holding confirmation hearings for presidents they don't want choosing replacement justices. Why should others have to agree to it for you to agree with your own stated principles?

Nowhere have I said you have to agree with anything. Your agreement isn't and never will be required for the truth to be the truth. You have the right to disagree and be wrong.

You're too fucking retarded for words.

You literally just told rightwinger you'd agree to a four year "delay" if he would. Now you act as though his agreement isn't needed for you to uphold your own principles.

Rightwinger already indicated that he would have had no problem if Biden supported a delay as long as the current one if Biden had done it. He lost any credibility when he held the same time standard differently when it's someone he supports. You support him which shows you're the same type of lowlife his mother raised him to be.

Biden never suggested denying Bush an appointment. You remain delusional comparing what Biden suggested with what the GOP is doing.

Biden said delaying was OK. The Republicans are delaying. No different.

I'm still waiting on one of you Liberal pussies to show me where the definition of delay has a time parameter. Can you?

 

[Faun]

So Bush41 was to blame for that, right?

And now, you're all over the place. You were whining about Bill getting blowjobs" causing him to take his eye off the ball. Meanwhile, Clinton left office with the Twin Towers still standing proudly. Regrettably, Bush cannot say the same.

Clinton was in office. That's the mindset you used.

LOL

That's actually the conservative mindset as they were the ones who blamed Clinton for 9.11, nearly 8 months into Bush's presidency. Well using that logic, Bush41 would have been responsible for an attack just 5 weeks into Clinton's

What's hysterical though is that I'm mocking you and you're fucking stupid to get it.

I know right where you are. You took Monica's place.

Oh look, yet another brain-dead conservative sharing his homo-erotic fantasies in public of men engaging in gay sex. You don't see that around here every day.

You're quite the exhibitionist, ain'tcha, con?

So you admit you do Monicas on Bill, faggot?

Of course not. But I'm not responsible for an exhibitionist like you who can't keep his homo-erotic fantasies to himself.

You did and don't even realize it, faggot.

Only in your gay-infused mind, rightie. You're so fucked in the head, you can't even comprehend you're sharing your own fantasies, and not anything I've ever done, with the forum.

Yes, you really are that rightarded.

 

[Faun]

You're the one promoting the Senate not holding confirmation hearings for presidents they don't want choosing replacement justices. Why should others have to agree to it for you to agree with your own stated principles?

Nowhere have I said you have to agree with anything. Your agreement isn't and never will be required for the truth to be the truth. You have the right to disagree and be wrong.

You're too fucking retarded for words.

You literally just told rightwinger you'd agree to a four year "delay" if he would. Now you act as though his agreement isn't needed for you to uphold your own principles.

Rightwinger already indicated that he would have had no problem if Biden supported a delay as long as the current one if Biden had done it. He lost any credibility when he held the same time standard differently when it's someone he supports. You support him which shows you're the same type of lowlife his mother raised him to be.

Biden never suggested denying Bush an appointment. You remain delusional comparing what Biden suggested with what the GOP is doing.

Biden said delaying was OK. The Republicans are delaying. No different.

I'm still waiting on one of you Liberal pussies to show me where the definition of delay has a time parameter. Can you?

Biden never said a president should be denied their Constitutional obligation to appoint judicial replacements, which is what the GOP is doing. The two situations are not the same no matter how much you delude yourself to the contrary.

 

[Crixus]

The U.S. added 287,000 new jobs in June, according to the Labor Department report ...

First off, may FDR rot in torment. Worst president ever. right up there with bamma, carter and booosh. anyway, from the Clinton years into the Bush years, joblessness was not the issue it is now. Speaking of Bush, I seem to remember they tried counting McDonalds and temp jobs as full time employment. He got a ton of crap for that, yet, here is Barry O saying fast food and walmart is gainful employment ? Libs are stupid, never figured yall were that stupid.

You have no concept of how employment figures are counted. They are reported the same as they have been for decades

Meh. I know people were happy during Clinton and Bush, during Obama most i know have had two or more jobs in any year since 2008. How ever they are counted they are bullshit.

 

[Faun]

LOL

That's actually the conservative mindset as they were the ones who blamed Clinton for 9.11, nearly 8 months into Bush's presidency. Well using that logic, Bush41 would have been responsible for an attack just 5 weeks into Clinton's

What's hysterical though is that I'm mocking you and you're fucking stupid to get it.

Oh look, yet another brain-dead conservative sharing his homo-erotic fantasies in public of men engaging in gay sex. You don't see that around here every day.

You're quite the exhibitionist, ain'tcha, con?

Since you don't blame Clinton for his slack effort, blaming Bush 41 for it is hypocritical.

You don't have the ability to mock anyone, even yourself. What's hysterical is you think you're anything more than a Democrat puppet letting a black boy yank your strings.

Holyfuckingshit!

Again....

I was mocking you.

Even after I explain it to you, you still don't get it.

Again, a piece of shit like you isn't smart enough to do so. How many times do I have to tell you. Apparently, more than two in order for you to get it.

Meanwhile, I mocked you and you didn't get it. Denial doesn't help you since it's here for everyone to see.

Can't deny something that didn't occur. You can't mock yourself, pussy, much less anyone else.

Your delusions persist. Explains why you still can't comprehend you were mocked.

 

[Faun]

The U.S. added 287,000 new jobs in June, according to the Labor Department report ...

First off, may FDR rot in torment. Worst president ever. right up there with bamma, carter and booosh. anyway, from the Clinton years into the Bush years, joblessness was not the issue it is now. Speaking of Bush, I seem to remember they tried counting McDonalds and temp jobs as full time employment. He got a ton of crap for that, yet, here is Barry O saying fast food and walmart is gainful employment ? Libs are stupid, never figured yall were that stupid.

You have no concept of how employment figures are counted. They are reported the same as they have been for decades

Meh. I know people were happy during Clinton and Bush, during Obama most i know have had two or more jobs in any year since 2008. How ever they are counted they are bullshit.

Riiight ... because the BLS changed their methodologies when Obama became president.

 

[Crixus]

The U.S. added 287,000 new jobs in June, according to the Labor Department report ...

First off, may FDR rot in torment. Worst president ever. right up there with bamma, carter and booosh. anyway, from the Clinton years into the Bush years, joblessness was not the issue it is now. Speaking of Bush, I seem to remember they tried counting McDonalds and temp jobs as full time employment. He got a ton of crap for that, yet, here is Barry O saying fast food and walmart is gainful employment ? Libs are stupid, never figured yall were that stupid.

You have no concept of how employment figures are counted. They are reported the same as they have been for decades

Meh. I know people were happy during Clinton and Bush, during Obama most i know have had two or more jobs in any year since 2008. How ever they are counted they are bullshit.

Riiight ... because the BLS changed their methodologies when Obama became president.

Dont know. but the fact remains, more people are unemployed or are underemployed now then there were 16 years ago. Likely why sone are a bit put off at the prospect of four more years of Bamma.

 

[rightwinger]

So delay means something different now than it did when Biden said it was OK to wait until after the election?

Of course the delay means something different. Telling a sitting president they will have to wait a few months until the the Senate holds hearing on their nominees is obviously different than telling a sitting president they will not get to appoint a replacement.

Especially with almost a year left in his Presidency

I don't recall the definition of the word delay having a time parameter attached to it making it different when one is longer than another.

So if Trump were to win, you are OK with a four year "delay"?

You left out several other "ifs". If you're going to live in a hypothetical world, go all the way.

As long as you're OK if Republicans delay for 4 years if Clinton is elected. Deal?

You put delay in quotes as if a time frame changes the definition. Show me in the definition of delay where it changes meaning if a time period longer than you like is used in the delay.

Republicans are taking on quite a challenge then

Not just Scalia, but Ginsberg, Kennedy, Breyer and possibly Thomas will all need to be replaced during the Clinton Presidency......are they willing to let the Supreme Court go down to four members because they refuse to fill the seats?

 

[Tom Horn]

By that "logic" did Scrub's job making policies generate 3000 job openings on 9/11?

No, that would have been one of Scum Willy's accomplishments slightly surpassing his taking Chinese campaign funds for our missile telemetry secrets and his multiple rapes and suspected murders ordered to protect his interests.

 

[Faun]

The U.S. added 287,000 new jobs in June, according to the Labor Department report ...

First off, may FDR rot in torment. Worst president ever. right up there with bamma, carter and booosh. anyway, from the Clinton years into the Bush years, joblessness was not the issue it is now. Speaking of Bush, I seem to remember they tried counting McDonalds and temp jobs as full time employment. He got a ton of crap for that, yet, here is Barry O saying fast food and walmart is gainful employment ? Libs are stupid, never figured yall were that stupid.

You have no concept of how employment figures are counted. They are reported the same as they have been for decades

Meh. I know people were happy during Clinton and Bush, during Obama most i know have had two or more jobs in any year since 2008. How ever they are counted they are bullshit.

Riiight ... because the BLS changed their methodologies when Obama became president.

Dont know. but the fact remains, more people are unemployed or are underemployed now then there were 16 years ago. Likely why sone are a bit put off at the prospect of four more years of Bamma.

Ah, yes, the golden days of Clinton. True, Obama is not Clinton when it comes to adding jobs, but he's no Bush either.

There were 15.4 million people under/unemployed (U-6 rate) when they first started the current methodology in 1994.

There were 10.5 million when Clinton left office.

There 21.9 million when Bush left office.

There were 25.5 million at the end of Bush's Great Recession.

There are 15.4 million today.
___________________________________

Numberwise, there are 15.4 million under/unemployed, just as there was in January, 1994 ... only now the civilian non-institutional population is 29% larger.

 

[IcebergSlim]

Thank you for confirming your hypocrisy. YOU blame Obama simply because he was in office when the bulk of the Bush damage hit, but blame the Dem Congress while Bush was in office even though you cannot name even one single bill that the Dems passed over a GOP filibuster and a Bush veto!

I'm using the same outlook the left used when 9/11 occurred. They blamed Bush BECAUSE he was in office. Now, when something happens under Obama's watch, you want to blame the person that wasn't in office. At least be consistent or shove your head back up Obama's ass.

No....when Scrub was repeatedly warned of the danger, and did NOTHING, he left himself open to severe criticism for his failure.....he then doubled up on it by taking his eye off the ball, letting Usama slide out of Tora Bora, and invading Iraqnam........

When Clinton could have been dealing with the danger, he was getting a blow job instead. He took his eyes off the ball but Monica didn't.

Well, there's the stupid shit you people believe, and then there is Reality...

In 2000, prior to the September 11 attacks, Paul Bremer characterized the Clinton administration as "correctly focused on bin Laden", while Oakley criticized their "obsession with Osama".

Robert B. Oakley - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

So you deny Clinton got a blow job from Monica?

Which has what, exactly, to do with the testimonials of Bremer and Oakley?

 

[IcebergSlim]

So delay means something different now than it did when Biden said it was OK to wait until after the election?

When Biden said it , there was no nominee under consideration. He was speaking in principal about not doing it in the heat of an election because senators up for election would be too tempted to deny a nominee to keep their job, not because the nominee didn't meet the various thresholds.

He EMPHATICALLY didn't say "delay until the next president", he said delay until after the election, which means the lame duck window.

The current Republican Party is destroying the Constitution to save it. This is what dictators do. They bend laws while claiming to care about something higher. They are the worse kind of partisan.

If the situation was reversed, the Right would get their nominee passed, as they did with Kennedy. If the Dems obstructed, then FOX would scream about the Constitutional crisis from leaving the Supreme Court unfilled for over a year. History will judge the current Republican Party as a soviet style menace who destroyed the rule of law.

The list of their crimes against the Nation is a long one, Citizen....

If they committed crimes, have them prosecuted. Didn't think you really believed what you said.

How, exactly, would I effect that?