Rshermr
VIP Member
To prove how dishonest you are, I found the article you got your quotes from. Because I was suspicious of your take on an article that you did not reference. So, lets take a look:Your quote above is accurate. What is not is the main part, that being the crux of the article, and what you did not include. Because, the following quote is the crux of what Mulally was saying, and it is the exact statement of fact that you have been given by Faun, and tried to say you did not get. See if you can read it this time. We are all waiting for your next set of lies:Quote Mulally saying that...Never happened, me boy. You can not even understand what Mulally said. Makes you a dumb shit.Again, it's your word against the CEO of Ford over what was best for Ford.
You lose that debate every single time.
Why? Mulally himself has said that the impending bankruptcy of GM and Chrysler did wonders for Ford sales.
It did. So we can all agree that an IMPENDING BANKRUPTCY probably did help ford sales. As Mulally said. Look up impending, dip shit. As I said before. Then, try and read the article that Faun provided you and that you keep lying about. And explain to us why Mulally, the guy you were happily just quoting, said it could bring the entire US auto industry down.
"Within a couple of weeks of the Big Three's request for help, Mulally said, "98% of the people in America ... knew GM and Chrysler were bankrupt" and that Ford wasn't. He added that more than half of U.S. consumers surveyed said that they were considering Ford for their next car purchase.
The episode resonates among car buyers to this day. Said Mulally, "The customers love that Ford didn't take taxpayer money."
"crucial fact: Companies that are broke require money to keep operating, even while under the protection of a Bankruptcy Court. And as Ford's chief executive, Alan Mulally, pointed out during a visit with The Times' editorial board Tuesday, "There was nobody that was going to give them money for [debtor-in-possession] financing."
Mulally's comments weren't offered as a criticism of Romney. Rather, he was defending Ford's decision to go to Congress with GM and Chrysler in 2008 to call for a federal rescue. Ford didn't need the money itself -- it had previously arranged a multibillion-dollar line of private credit. But Mulally said he believed then, just as he believes now, that GM and Chrysler threatened to drag the entire country into a depression.
"This could be upwards of 13% of the U.S. GDP if they were to go into freefall," Mulally said. "We believed [seeking the bailout] was the right thing for the industry, the right thing for the United States of America.... I'd do the same thing today."
Ford's CEO has no regrets about call for bailout
Notice the link to the article. So we can see where it came from, and check it out ourselves. That thing you do not use. Because honest people include links. Dishonest people do not.
Now, I know this is difficult for you to understand. Because it is not what you want to believe. But the rational world understands it and believes Mulally. Sorry no one is quoting you.
Where in any of THAT...is the part where GM's bankruptcy hurts Ford?
And I'm curious...do you think doing your posts in RED somehow makes them more intelligent than doing them in black? Got news for you, Georgie...you can paint a turd red but it's still a turd.
No on, me boy, needs any color to be more intelligent than you. They look at your posts, and realize that.