Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
BullshitBush lied
Saddam was not a threat
Yes, he was. I was over there during the containment period and Hussein was constantly making aggressive moves. It was just a matter of time before we had to smack him down again.
Was he an immediate threat? No. Bush fucked up by diverting resources away from the effort in Afghanistan.
Bush liedYep......innocent little dictator Saddam Hussein. Ummmm....ummmmm..Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11 or WMD. A bogus invasion so that Cheney's friends could get the oil and contracts in Iraq. And Saddam had better control of the region than anyone since.He was an enemy to ALL CIVILIZED PERSONS
(not you)
Ummmmm
the usual suspects are STILL pushing the LIBEL----"bush said sadamn has nukes"-----
In fact sadamn was engaged in mass destruction with whatever it was he DID have
and was hard at work doing chemicals and biologics over the dead bodies of
tens of thousands of kurds and Shiites. He also funded TERRORISM inter-nationally----nice guy that he was ------PUBH. Slobs are STILL farting out
9-11 !!!!!! I don't recall anyone blaming sadamn for 9-11-----but THEY
seem to have convinced themselves
Saddam was not a threat
Who cares about Iran . They are no threat to us.
Well, the problem with that is all of the stuff you're talking about happened after Obama left Iraq in 2012. Bush had been out of office almost 4 years.Come on now, you're becoming unhinged. The Iraq War should have never happened. We really blew it. It's time to move away from the 'Regime Change' policy. We just don't have the right to tell other nations they have to change their leaders. The policy only leads to horrific blunders like the Iraq War.
It wasn't the regime changing and initial invasions that made Iraq and Afghanistan failures. It was the failure to obtain surrender and terms and instead implementing nation building and entering into wars of insurgency and civil wars in those places. Should have left both places after the military assets in those places were destroyed and left the nation building to the people who lived there.
yes----the MISTAKE was in the conduct of the war-------but considering the Shiite/sunni thing already sickening the society-------chances are nothing
could have turned out well
The Iraq invasion has created this emerging Sunni/Shiite War. We handed the Shiites and Iran more power and influence in the region. Before the Iraq War, Iran and the Shiites had very little power & influence.
ROFLMAO since you know nothing about Shiites and sunnis and their
ONGOING feud------why do you comment?-----the CHANGE in the Iranian approach
to the area came when the IDIOT OF THE CENTURY -----JUMMAH CARTER stuck his tongue up the ass of KHOMEINI---------maybe you are too young to remember
The first muslim I knew WELL-------was a Shiite from India. He DESPISED
HINDUS-----and was not shy about discussing it with shy little youthful me. -------
that was about almost 50 years ago. When I commented "if hindus are so awful why did your family not migrate to Pakistan in 1948" ? The young surgeon
got so DISTRESSED that I thought he would die a cardiac death. I did not know ---way back then that Shiites were being shot in the streets of Pakistan and HE
did not tell me anything about it. It took me a few years to figure out why IRANIANS DESPISE PAKISTANIS--------real palpable hatred whenever they encountered each other ---------VIRULENT stuff
Hey man, wake up. Bush's horrific debacle handed Iraq over to Iran and the Shiites. You wanna be angry at someone, be angry at Bush and his crony assholes. Iran and the Shiites had less power & influence in the region before Bush's idiotic invasion.
Bush liedYep......innocent little dictator Saddam Hussein. Ummmm....ummmmm..Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11 or WMD. A bogus invasion so that Cheney's friends could get the oil and contracts in Iraq. And Saddam had better control of the region than anyone since.He was an enemy to ALL CIVILIZED PERSONS
(not you)
Ummmmm
the usual suspects are STILL pushing the LIBEL----"bush said sadamn has nukes"-----
In fact sadamn was engaged in mass destruction with whatever it was he DID have
and was hard at work doing chemicals and biologics over the dead bodies of
tens of thousands of kurds and Shiites. He also funded TERRORISM inter-nationally----nice guy that he was ------PUBH. Slobs are STILL farting out
9-11 !!!!!! I don't recall anyone blaming sadamn for 9-11-----but THEY
seem to have convinced themselves
Saddam was not a threat
saddam was not a threat to whom? and Dr Bashar Assad is up for sainthood?
Sometimes the guy before you left you a boatload of shit
Course we're not gonna verify it......we just have to take the Iranians word for it......the same fuckers that launched a missile over the SuperBowl, and the same fuckers that keep screaming "DEATH TO AMERICA!!!!!!"Obama already took on Iran. And the end result is Iran has shipped out 25,000 pounds of enriched uranium , deactivated a breeder reactor, and dismantled 15,000 centrifuges.
God...DAMMIT!!!
Merely articulating our trump (no pun intended) card, should we ever need to play it.M(utually) A(ssured) D(estruction) - to destroy them, all we have to do is repudiate our China debt, and they collapse overnight. Mission accomplished....U.S. China especially, has no interest. Why kill off your best customer? China owns much of the U.S. at this point. It doesn't need war. The mission has already been accomplished.
That's the way to go. Destroy our credit rating because we don't know how to play well with others.
Who cares about Iran . They are no threat to us.
Iran is a threat to the planet
Since WWII, US lost in Korea, Nam, Iran, Iraq, and Afghanistan, and got their ass booted in Somalia, Lebanon, Yemen and Libya. Did I leave anyone out?The US hasn't won a war since WWII. Capable of starting a war, yes. Capable of winning a war, no.First of all....why would we want to take them on?
Haven't we learned our lesson on global military intervention
Secondly, we are the only military power in the world capable of executing wars around the globe
We are not stupid enough to fight a war of the magnitude of WWII
WWII left us as the worlds primary super power
Nothing has changed
So the US didn't lose in Nam?Since WWII, US lost in Korea, Nam, Iran, Iraq, and Afghanistan, and got their ass booted in Somalia, Lebanon, Yemen and Libya. Did I leave anyone out?The US hasn't won a war since WWII. Capable of starting a war, yes. Capable of winning a war, no.First of all....why would we want to take them on?
Haven't we learned our lesson on global military intervention
Secondly, we are the only military power in the world capable of executing wars around the globe
We are not stupid enough to fight a war of the magnitude of WWII
WWII left us as the worlds primary super power
Nothing has changed
We didn't lose anything
We intervened militarily in global conflicts because we thought it was in our best interests. When we realized it wasn't worth the cost...we got the hell out
Most of those we shouldn't have gotten involved in the first place
Who cares about Iran . They are no threat to us.
Iran is a threat to the planet
No they are not .
Do you wake up in the moring thinking "oh no, Iran is coming to get me !"
Ya, the US left Nam on their own free will to let the communists have Nam.So the US didn't lose in Nam?Since WWII, US lost in Korea, Nam, Iran, Iraq, and Afghanistan, and got their ass booted in Somalia, Lebanon, Yemen and Libya. Did I leave anyone out?The US hasn't won a war since WWII. Capable of starting a war, yes. Capable of winning a war, no.
We are not stupid enough to fight a war of the magnitude of WWII
WWII left us as the worlds primary super power
Nothing has changed
We didn't lose anything
We intervened militarily in global conflicts because we thought it was in our best interests. When we realized it wasn't worth the cost...we got the hell out
Most of those we shouldn't have gotten involved in the first place
No, we didn't "lose". We left!
"Lost" means "didn't win". Now you know. Fool.Since WWII, US lost in Korea, Nam, Iran, Iraq, and Afghanistan, and got their ass booted in Somalia, Lebanon, Yemen and Libya. Did I leave anyone out?The US hasn't won a war since WWII. Capable of starting a war, yes. Capable of winning a war, no.First of all....why would we want to take them on?
Haven't we learned our lesson on global military intervention
Secondly, we are the only military power in the world capable of executing wars around the globe
We are not stupid enough to fight a war of the magnitude of WWII
WWII left us as the worlds primary super power
Nothing has changed
Many of these you claimed we lost. I think you had best redefine your terms, because you don't know what "lost" means.
Saddam was not a threat to the US, therefore, they had no reason to destroy the country.Bush liedYep......innocent little dictator Saddam Hussein. Ummmm....ummmmm..Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11 or WMD. A bogus invasion so that Cheney's friends could get the oil and contracts in Iraq. And Saddam had better control of the region than anyone since.He was an enemy to ALL CIVILIZED PERSONS
(not you)
Ummmmm
the usual suspects are STILL pushing the LIBEL----"bush said sadamn has nukes"-----
In fact sadamn was engaged in mass destruction with whatever it was he DID have
and was hard at work doing chemicals and biologics over the dead bodies of
tens of thousands of kurds and Shiites. He also funded TERRORISM inter-nationally----nice guy that he was ------PUBH. Slobs are STILL farting out
9-11 !!!!!! I don't recall anyone blaming sadamn for 9-11-----but THEY
seem to have convinced themselves
Saddam was not a threat
saddam was not a threat to whom? and Dr Bashar Assad is up for sainthood?
Not saying he was an angel, but neither is Putin, China's leader, North Korea, Iran, most of Africa... Is the US going to invade everyone?Yep......innocent little dictator Saddam Hussein. Ummmm....ummmmm..Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11 or WMD. A bogus invasion so that Cheney's friends could get the oil and contracts in Iraq. And Saddam had better control of the region than anyone since.He was an enemy to ALL CIVILIZED PERSONS
(not you)
Ummmmm
