TheGreatGatsby
Gold Member
- Thread starter
- #601
Let me ask you, do you think LBJ is a great defensive player? Do you think Kobe is a great defensive player?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bird couldn't play defense. That's the general consensus among people who follow the game closely.
Bruce Bowen was a so-called defensive stopper. Guess what though? He still had shortcomings on defense. He didn't get many steals, defensive rebounds or blocks. Would I object if someone called him a great defensive player though? No. There are various ways one can be a great defensive player.
A great defensive player is not always the so-called defensive stopper (other times) he is. Were you to say so, then you wouldn't be counting Bill Russuell or Wilt Chamberlain as great defensive players. See how stupid that is?
And don't tell me about thick heads. Only an f'ing idiot, actually believes that you can be top 30 all-freaking-time in steals per game and defensive rebounds per game, get 3 clutch defensive plays to get his team into the finals, lead his team in steals all 5 finals, and have LBJ-liked defensive numbers in his last healthy playoff series (2.7 stls, 1.5 blks) and not be a great defender. Only an idiot truly believes that.
And your counter? That he isn't playing the role of defensive stopper with everything else that he does. That he should somehow focus on the weakest part of his game.
Bird couldn't play defense. That's the general consensus among people who follow the game closely. Why is that? Is it a conspiracy against Bird?
I already told you, the guy made some great plays and was a great player, but defense was not his forte. The guy couldn't stop a nosebleed. Only a moron would think he's a great defender because he got rebounds. Charles Barkley has more steals and rebounds than Bird. Was he a great defender?
I would say that Barkley was an under-rated defender. But I would personally hesitate to call him a great defender. Though, from a statistical standpoint, one could make a case for it.
If you look at his second and third year numbers; about 2 steals, 1.5 blocks, 8.5 d-rebs, you would think well maybe during those years at least. But there's two things:
1. He was an under-sized PF, so it was easy for guys like McHale to have his way with him in the post.
2. CB is likely one of the top 10 raw talents to come out of college. But the problem is his work ethic, fundamentals and attitude was crap; especially early in his career. He was able to put up great stats while often not playing great defense whereas a guy like Bird played solid, well-thought defense on every play. And frankly, that's the essence of why Barkley got the short end of the stick vs. Bird.
Let me ask you, do you think LBJ is a great defensive player? Do you think Kobe is a great defensive player?
Barkley sucked on D.
Let me ask you, do you think LBJ is a great defensive player? Do you think Kobe is a great defensive player?
Lebron is, Kobe isn't.
Barkley sucked on D.
I was never impressed enough with Barkley's D to go to the mat for him. But he didn't get the nickname the round mound of rebounds for nothing. The dude was a beast on the boards early in his career.
I would point out that you're saying Barkley sucked on D and that LBJ was great on D when their career averages are:
Barkley: 1.5 stls, 0.8 blks, 7.7 D-Rebs
LBJ: 1.7 stls, 0.8 blks, 6.0 D-Rebs
Stats can be misleading; but to say one sucks and one is great while their stats are so close is a bit peculiar.
Barkley sucked on D.
I was never impressed enough with Barkley's D to go to the mat for him. But he didn't get the nickname the round mound of rebounds for nothing. The dude was a beast on the boards early in his career.
I would point out that you're saying Barkley sucked on D and that LBJ was great on D when their career averages are:
Barkley: 1.5 stls, 0.8 blks, 7.7 D-Rebs
LBJ: 1.7 stls, 0.8 blks, 6.0 D-Rebs
Stats can be misleading; but to say one sucks and one is great while their stats are so close is a bit peculiar.
I'm the one who told you those stats mean shit. What are you even talking about?
At this stage Kobe is not an elite defender. He used to be though.
I was never impressed enough with Barkley's D to go to the mat for him. But he didn't get the nickname the round mound of rebounds for nothing. The dude was a beast on the boards early in his career.
I would point out that you're saying Barkley sucked on D and that LBJ was great on D when their career averages are:
Barkley: 1.5 stls, 0.8 blks, 7.7 D-Rebs
LBJ: 1.7 stls, 0.8 blks, 6.0 D-Rebs
Stats can be misleading; but to say one sucks and one is great while their stats are so close is a bit peculiar.
I'm the one who told you those stats mean shit. What are you even talking about?
That's sort of my point. You completely disregard any stats you want and have a pass to buy all the hype you want.
At this stage Kobe is not an elite defender. He used to be though.
At no point has Kobe been a great defender. Great defenders constantly make defensive imprints on the games. And Kobe's been scorched for 30 plus on a consistent basis. Especially during the good years, Kobe coasted on defense. I actually think Kobe has played better defense this year than he has at any point in his career; even though he has lost a half a step. Defense is a mentality and frankly, for a long time Kobe did not have it. It didn't help that the league was reinforcing him with defensive accolades. He may have started to try sooner.
I'm the one who told you those stats mean shit. What are you even talking about?
That's sort of my point. You completely disregard any stats you want and have a pass to buy all the hype you want.
Frist of all, the only stat you provided is steals. You're argument that defensive rebounds should be considered is laughable.
At this stage Kobe is not an elite defender. He used to be though.
At no point has Kobe been a great defender. Great defenders constantly make defensive imprints on the games. And Kobe's been scorched for 30 plus on a consistent basis. Especially during the good years, Kobe coasted on defense. I actually think Kobe has played better defense this year than he has at any point in his career; even though he has lost a half a step. Defense is a mentality and frankly, for a long time Kobe did not have it. It didn't help that the league was reinforcing him with defensive accolades. He may have started to try sooner.
He was on 8 all NBA defensive first teams. How many was Bird on?
At no point has Kobe been a great defender. Great defenders constantly make defensive imprints on the games. And Kobe's been scorched for 30 plus on a consistent basis. Especially during the good years, Kobe coasted on defense. I actually think Kobe has played better defense this year than he has at any point in his career; even though he has lost a half a step. Defense is a mentality and frankly, for a long time Kobe did not have it. It didn't help that the league was reinforcing him with defensive accolades. He may have started to try sooner.
He was on 8 all NBA defensive first teams. How many was Bird on?
I don't know and I don't care. That was my point. I've seen Kobe have terrible defensive year after year and still get voted on the all-defensive team with regularity. That accolade is a joke and anybody with knowledge of the game knows that.
He was on 8 all NBA defensive first teams. How many was Bird on?
I don't know and I don't care. That was my point. I've seen Kobe have terrible defensive year after year and still get voted on the all-defensive team with regularity. That accolade is a joke and anybody with knowledge of the game knows that.
So, it's a conspiracy against Bird?
I don't know and I don't care. That was my point. I've seen Kobe have terrible defensive year after year and still get voted on the all-defensive team with regularity. That accolade is a joke and anybody with knowledge of the game knows that.
So, it's a conspiracy against Bird?
No. Just a reality check that the NBA wants to market Kobe as a great defensive player whether he is or not.
BTW - you just got done saying Kobe is not a great defender and then your counted off his all-time defensive team numbers. Whether you realize it or not, you're the one calling out a conspiracy theory.
So, it's a conspiracy against Bird?
No. Just a reality check that the NBA wants to market Kobe as a great defensive player whether he is or not.
BTW - you just got done saying Kobe is not a great defender and then your counted off his all-time defensive team numbers. Whether you realize it or not, you're the one calling out a conspiracy theory.
I clarified- he's not a great defender anymore.
No. Just a reality check that the NBA wants to market Kobe as a great defensive player whether he is or not.
BTW - you just got done saying Kobe is not a great defender and then your counted off his all-time defensive team numbers. Whether you realize it or not, you're the one calling out a conspiracy theory.
I clarified- he's not a great defender anymore.
He never was.