Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You fail if that is what you got. Every one of those two plus million denials stopped possible gun crimes. The criminals would have had to have gotten the guns illegally: more effort, more expense, more time to think about it.The cop lived. Good deal. The shooter was drunk and, according to 2aguy, should not have had a gun, meaning criminals can get guns.
One, there has always been a war on cops, and as they make the bad ones go away while catching the bad guys, the war will slow down.
Two, the Brady law has resulted in background checks denying more than two million purchases to people who should not have guns. Yes, there are needs to do background checks and license guns; otherwise, the carnage will be far higher.
Yet you sillies want to talk about the exception that proves the rule.
Name one crime where having licensed all gun owners would have stopped the crime.
Name one crime where registering all guns would have stopped the crime.
You can't.
Licensing and registration is what the uninformed people say to sound relevant and smart. The anti gun extremists push licensing and registering guns because they want to eventually ban guns, and in the mean time it gives them a way to trip up law abiding gun owners.
Thank you for proving my point.
Your opinion but not fact. The gunners have a lot of opinion but no facts. The post immediately above is blather but no facts.The cop lived. Good deal. The shooter was drunk and, according to 2aguy, should not have had a gun, meaning criminals can get guns.
One, there has always been a war on cops, and as they make the bad ones go away while catching the bad guys, the war will slow down.
Two, the Brady law has resulted in background checks denying more than two million purchases to people who should not have guns. Yes, there are needs to do background checks and license guns; otherwise, the carnage will be far higher.
Yet you sillies want to talk about the exception that proves the rule.
And criminals and mass shooters still get guns because they steal them, get straw purchasers to buy them or smuggle them into the country....background checks mainly catch law abiding citizens, not criminals....
criminals for the most part do not attempt
to go through legal methods to obtain guns
You fail if that is what you got. Every one of those two plus million denials stopped possible gun crimes. The criminals would have had to have gotten the guns illegally: more effort, more expense, more time to think about it.The cop lived. Good deal. The shooter was drunk and, according to 2aguy, should not have had a gun, meaning criminals can get guns.
One, there has always been a war on cops, and as they make the bad ones go away while catching the bad guys, the war will slow down.
Two, the Brady law has resulted in background checks denying more than two million purchases to people who should not have guns. Yes, there are needs to do background checks and license guns; otherwise, the carnage will be far higher.
Yet you sillies want to talk about the exception that proves the rule.
Name one crime where having licensed all gun owners would have stopped the crime.
Name one crime where registering all guns would have stopped the crime.
You can't.
Licensing and registration is what the uninformed people say to sound relevant and smart. The anti gun extremists push licensing and registering guns because they want to eventually ban guns, and in the mean time it gives them a way to trip up law abiding gun owners.
Thank you for proving my point.
What part of the fact that almost all of the denials are law abiding people, who are allowed to own guns, were denied because of mistakes, not criminals trying to buy guns.....did you not get.......
And criminals get guns faster, and easier than law abiding citizens do.......
Prevention of folks who should not have guns actually not getting guns is good sense and within the Constitutional guidelines,Absolutley..........registration = confiscation plain and simple
Your opinion but not fact. The gunners have a lot of opinion but no facts.The cop lived. Good deal. The shooter was drunk and, according to 2aguy, should not have had a gun, meaning criminals can get guns.
One, there has always been a war on cops, and as they make the bad ones go away while catching the bad guys, the war will slow down.
Two, the Brady law has resulted in background checks denying more than two million purchases to people who should not have guns. Yes, there are needs to do background checks and license guns; otherwise, the carnage will be far higher.
Yet you sillies want to talk about the exception that proves the rule.
And criminals and mass shooters still get guns because they steal them, get straw purchasers to buy them or smuggle them into the country....background checks mainly catch law abiding citizens, not criminals....
criminals for the most part do not attempt
to go through legal methods to obtain guns
You fail if that is what you got. Every one of those two plus million denials stopped possible gun crimes. The criminals would have had to have gotten the guns illegally: more effort, more expense, more time to think about it.The cop lived. Good deal. The shooter was drunk and, according to 2aguy, should not have had a gun, meaning criminals can get guns.
One, there has always been a war on cops, and as they make the bad ones go away while catching the bad guys, the war will slow down.
Two, the Brady law has resulted in background checks denying more than two million purchases to people who should not have guns. Yes, there are needs to do background checks and license guns; otherwise, the carnage will be far higher.
Yet you sillies want to talk about the exception that proves the rule.
Name one crime where having licensed all gun owners would have stopped the crime.
Name one crime where registering all guns would have stopped the crime.
You can't.
Licensing and registration is what the uninformed people say to sound relevant and smart. The anti gun extremists push licensing and registering guns because they want to eventually ban guns, and in the mean time it gives them a way to trip up law abiding gun owners.
Thank you for proving my point.
What part of the fact that almost all of the denials are law abiding people, who are allowed to own guns, were denied because of mistakes, not criminals trying to buy guns.....did you not get.......
And criminals get guns faster, and easier than law abiding citizens do.......
You are exactly right. Almost all cops who are shot...are shot by people who were already legally banned from possessing the gun. Gun laws don't work.
You put out your opinion is all. Anyone who is denied purchase can file appeal. Fact.We have all the facts, you don't...I just put out the facts on Background checks....you were completely wrong...Your opinion but not fact. The gunners have a lot of opinion but no facts.The cop lived. Good deal. The shooter was drunk and, according to 2aguy, should not have had a gun, meaning criminals can get guns.
One, there has always been a war on cops, and as they make the bad ones go away while catching the bad guys, the war will slow down.
Two, the Brady law has resulted in background checks denying more than two million purchases to people who should not have guns. Yes, there are needs to do background checks and license guns; otherwise, the carnage will be far higher.
Yet you sillies want to talk about the exception that proves the rule.
And criminals and mass shooters still get guns because they steal them, get straw purchasers to buy them or smuggle them into the country....background checks mainly catch law abiding citizens, not criminals....
criminals for the most part do not attempt
to go through legal methods to obtain guns
You fail if that is what you got. Every one of those two plus million denials stopped possible gun crimes. The criminals would have had to have gotten the guns illegally: more effort, more expense, more time to think about it.The cop lived. Good deal. The shooter was drunk and, according to 2aguy, should not have had a gun, meaning criminals can get guns.
One, there has always been a war on cops, and as they make the bad ones go away while catching the bad guys, the war will slow down.
Two, the Brady law has resulted in background checks denying more than two million purchases to people who should not have guns. Yes, there are needs to do background checks and license guns; otherwise, the carnage will be far higher.
Yet you sillies want to talk about the exception that proves the rule.
Name one crime where having licensed all gun owners would have stopped the crime.
Name one crime where registering all guns would have stopped the crime.
You can't.
Licensing and registration is what the uninformed people say to sound relevant and smart. The anti gun extremists push licensing and registering guns because they want to eventually ban guns, and in the mean time it gives them a way to trip up law abiding gun owners.
Thank you for proving my point.
btw
it is unconstitutional to require a felon to register a firearm
registration would only affect legal firearm owners
You fail if that is what you got. Every one of those two plus million denials stopped possible gun crimes. The criminals would have had to have gotten the guns illegally: more effort, more expense, more time to think about it.The cop lived. Good deal. The shooter was drunk and, according to 2aguy, should not have had a gun, meaning criminals can get guns.
One, there has always been a war on cops, and as they make the bad ones go away while catching the bad guys, the war will slow down.
Two, the Brady law has resulted in background checks denying more than two million purchases to people who should not have guns. Yes, there are needs to do background checks and license guns; otherwise, the carnage will be far higher.
Yet you sillies want to talk about the exception that proves the rule.
Name one crime where having licensed all gun owners would have stopped the crime.
Name one crime where registering all guns would have stopped the crime.
You can't.
Licensing and registration is what the uninformed people say to sound relevant and smart. The anti gun extremists push licensing and registering guns because they want to eventually ban guns, and in the mean time it gives them a way to trip up law abiding gun owners.
Thank you for proving my point.
What part of the fact that almost all of the denials are law abiding people, who are allowed to own guns, were denied because of mistakes, not criminals trying to buy guns.....did you not get.......
And criminals get guns faster, and easier than law abiding citizens do.......
You fail if that is what you got. Every one of those two plus million denials stopped possible gun crimes. The criminals would have had to have gotten the guns illegally: more effort, more expense, more time to think about it.The cop lived. Good deal. The shooter was drunk and, according to 2aguy, should not have had a gun, meaning criminals can get guns.
One, there has always been a war on cops, and as they make the bad ones go away while catching the bad guys, the war will slow down.
Two, the Brady law has resulted in background checks denying more than two million purchases to people who should not have guns. Yes, there are needs to do background checks and license guns; otherwise, the carnage will be far higher.
Yet you sillies want to talk about the exception that proves the rule.
Name one crime where having licensed all gun owners would have stopped the crime.
Name one crime where registering all guns would have stopped the crime.
You can't.
Licensing and registration is what the uninformed people say to sound relevant and smart. The anti gun extremists push licensing and registering guns because they want to eventually ban guns, and in the mean time it gives them a way to trip up law abiding gun owners.
Thank you for proving my point.
What part of the fact that almost all of the denials are law abiding people, who are allowed to own guns, were denied because of mistakes, not criminals trying to buy guns.....did you not get.......
And criminals get guns faster, and easier than law abiding citizens do.......
You are exactly right. Almost all cops who are shot...are shot by people who were already legally banned from possessing the gun. Gun laws don't work.
We need to lock up gun crimnals for life.....that would put a damper on their disire to carry a gun in public.
You put out your opinion is all. Anyone who is denied purchase can file appeal. Fact.We have all the facts, you don't...I just put out the facts on Background checks....you were completely wrong...Your opinion but not fact. The gunners have a lot of opinion but no facts.The cop lived. Good deal. The shooter was drunk and, according to 2aguy, should not have had a gun, meaning criminals can get guns.
One, there has always been a war on cops, and as they make the bad ones go away while catching the bad guys, the war will slow down.
Two, the Brady law has resulted in background checks denying more than two million purchases to people who should not have guns. Yes, there are needs to do background checks and license guns; otherwise, the carnage will be far higher.
Yet you sillies want to talk about the exception that proves the rule.
And criminals and mass shooters still get guns because they steal them, get straw purchasers to buy them or smuggle them into the country....background checks mainly catch law abiding citizens, not criminals....
criminals for the most part do not attempt
to go through legal methods to obtain guns
Your opinion but not fact. The gunners have a lot of opinion but no facts. The post immediately above is blather but no facts.The cop lived. Good deal. The shooter was drunk and, according to 2aguy, should not have had a gun, meaning criminals can get guns.
One, there has always been a war on cops, and as they make the bad ones go away while catching the bad guys, the war will slow down.
Two, the Brady law has resulted in background checks denying more than two million purchases to people who should not have guns. Yes, there are needs to do background checks and license guns; otherwise, the carnage will be far higher.
Yet you sillies want to talk about the exception that proves the rule.
And criminals and mass shooters still get guns because they steal them, get straw purchasers to buy them or smuggle them into the country....background checks mainly catch law abiding citizens, not criminals....
criminals for the most part do not attempt
to go through legal methods to obtain guns
Lets make this clear.
The RW have always stated they need their guns to stop the Government take over.
They then scream anti government and anti Obama hate filled propaganda
People shoot government employees (Cops)
RW blames Libs!!!!
Asking for gaps in background checks is asking for Criminals to have guns... It is like having airport security optional, you might as well not have it.
GOP policy is to arm criminals and mentally insane... 40 million Americas have mental problems.
40 million Americas have mental problems.
Those are not facts, only misguided opinion. More than 2 million background checks prevented untold numbers of gun shootings. The few that do happen are the exceptions that prove the rule that the 2aguy simply is worng.
The cop lived. Good deal. The shooter was drunk and, according to 2aguy, should not have had a gun, meaning criminals can get guns.
One, there has always been a war on cops, and as they make the bad ones go away while catching the bad guys, the war will slow down.
Two, the Brady law has resulted in background checks denying more than two million purchases to people who should not have guns. Yes, there are needs to do background checks and license guns; otherwise, the carnage will be far higher.
Yet you sillies want to talk about the exception that proves the rule.
No...there hasn't always been a war on cops. Random individuals maybe. But this is a collective anti cop movement by the American left wing. They chant for.dead cops. Hold rallies advocating for ambush killings on cops. And it's happening.
Liberals tried to make this happen. And succeeded. These dead officers blood is on the hands of every fucking liberal in this country.
