Admiral Rockwell Tory
Diamond Member
- Nov 1, 2015
- 59,935
- 14,770
That pretty much sums up the leftwingers defending the obvious criminal who was clearly trespassing and looking to steal stuff.see a video clip.Anything of value, just like any thief. Are you really this dumb, or are you always act like a c—t?He wasn’t jogging at all. The video shows him walking until he got to the house. He then stops, looks around, then runs up the driveway into the house. Clearly he intended to steal something.The important thing is figuring out where he lived in relation to the area, and why he chose the area to run in as opposed to an area more suitable to his location of interest or residence lived at. Infact they all should be vetted in this way. Should answer alot of questions.No, people have a curiosity which drives them to look at construction sites. It's fairly common and no couch is involved.Was in there to look where he wanted to put the couch? LolHe was In a dwelling he wasn’t supposed to be in. Felony in GAWhat crime did he commit?When charged at by a criminal.Same reason a cop would draw their weapon on a criminal trying to flee.Well, he shouldn’t had charged right at a man with a shotgun.great.Uh...there is video of the dead guy trespassing on private property. He may have also stolen the hammer seen in the video as well.What was the crime they committed?Actually what made this such a big story was because the killers were not being prosecuted. The crime occurred some 2 months ago but only became big news when video emerged showing they lied about how Arbery was hunted down.how often do joggers go jogging in kahki shorts?You racist sob you turned it into something about Race when It was just two guys going after a man they saw leaving the house he broke into.. democrats have no limits to your racismDoes the OP have any shame at all?
He walked into an open house that was under construction to have a look. He didn't break and enter anything. The police already determined that. Nobody lived there, and there were no furnishings or anything else. He broke no law by taking a peek at the new house being built.
i'm going to wait for an entire story before i take a side. but as usual, left and right line up to face off, each having a side and someone screaming GO.
The libs did start this. Really, this story is about someone getting shot on the street in small Georgia city. Neither party to the shooting is connected, the motive has yet to be determined. Those who say the shooters are "white supremacists" are talking shit, as no one knows and it would seem unlikely. People get shot every day of the weeks somewhere, there was nothing remarkable about this , except for the race of the actors
Picking a story, and forcing it into a predetermined template is what the libs always do.
They committed murder. The police already said the dead guy committed no crime.
But you morons just don’t want to accept the common sense story that this thug got caught red-handed.
You’re sticking to your story that black guy with a criminal record living with his mom, went “jogging” wearing khaki shorts and oversized white t-shirt and high tops, with a hammer in his pocket for “protection”.
He noticed a home under construction while walking (he must had been tired from jogging with a hammer), decides he will “check it out” since there aren’t any explicit “no trespassing signs” and figures it’s for sale. (Even though he has no job and lives with his mother).
He then continues his jog after “looking at a house” and is ambushed by some neo-Nazis who wanted to lynch some innocent black guy that day, in broad daylight in their own neighborhood.
^^ Yea, that sounds *way* more plausible than he was caught trespassing and stealing from a home he had no business being in, panicked and attacked the neighborhood watch that had already called the cops at least twice.
he got caught.
he never should have been shot and killed by joe average citizen.
you and many others seem to keep missing *that* point.
Was the man supposed to let suspected thug take the shotgun from him?
Why did he have the shotgun pointed at the guy?
You cannot do that. When can a cop unholster their weapon?
Have a nice day!
Name the law that says he shouldn't have been there.He was In a dwelling he wasn’t supposed to be in. Felony in GAWhat crime did he commit?When charged at by a criminal.Same reason a cop would draw their weapon on a criminal trying to flee.Well, he shouldn’t had charged right at a man with a shotgun.great.Uh...there is video of the dead guy trespassing on private property. He may have also stolen the hammer seen in the video as well.What was the crime they committed?Actually what made this such a big story was because the killers were not being prosecuted. The crime occurred some 2 months ago but only became big news when video emerged showing they lied about how Arbery was hunted down.how often do joggers go jogging in kahki shorts?You racist sob you turned it into something about Race when It was just two guys going after a man they saw leaving the house he broke into.. democrats have no limits to your racismDoes the OP have any shame at all?
He walked into an open house that was under construction to have a look. He didn't break and enter anything. The police already determined that. Nobody lived there, and there were no furnishings or anything else. He broke no law by taking a peek at the new house being built.
i'm going to wait for an entire story before i take a side. but as usual, left and right line up to face off, each having a side and someone screaming GO.
The libs did start this. Really, this story is about someone getting shot on the street in small Georgia city. Neither party to the shooting is connected, the motive has yet to be determined. Those who say the shooters are "white supremacists" are talking shit, as no one knows and it would seem unlikely. People get shot every day of the weeks somewhere, there was nothing remarkable about this , except for the race of the actors
Picking a story, and forcing it into a predetermined template is what the libs always do.
They committed murder. The police already said the dead guy committed no crime.
But you morons just don’t want to accept the common sense story that this thug got caught red-handed.
You’re sticking to your story that black guy with a criminal record living with his mom, went “jogging” wearing khaki shorts and oversized white t-shirt and high tops, with a hammer in his pocket for “protection”.
He noticed a home under construction while walking (he must had been tired from jogging with a hammer), decides he will “check it out” since there aren’t any explicit “no trespassing signs” and figures it’s for sale. (Even though he has no job and lives with his mother).
He then continues his jog after “looking at a house” and is ambushed by some neo-Nazis who wanted to lynch some innocent black guy that day, in broad daylight in their own neighborhood.
^^ Yea, that sounds *way* more plausible than he was caught trespassing and stealing from a home he had no business being in, panicked and attacked the neighborhood watch that had already called the cops at least twice.
he got caught.
he never should have been shot and killed by joe average citizen.
you and many others seem to keep missing *that* point.
Was the man supposed to let suspected thug take the shotgun from him?
Why did he have the shotgun pointed at the guy?
You cannot do that. When can a cop unholster their weapon?
Have a nice day!
Name the law that says he shouldn't have been there.
Do the vigilantes have psychic powers to know his intention was to steal something? The video is crap.
People can't run where they please? It's none of anyone else's business.
Maybe Arbery liked to run in this area because it was pleasant near the water. The owner of the house under construction said that he wanted it because the area was peaceful and gave him the opportunity for fishing and boating. I like to be around water, and just sit or walk on the beach.
Clearly? What did he intend to steal and why didn't he?
You really need to get a tune up on the crystal ball. It is on the fritz!
I am sure there were lots of things of value in that construction site. Why didn't he steal anything, ever?
You are the dumb **** making assumptions.
make up mind
now - regardless of what comes out, twist info to be correct.
there you have todays "debater". fucking idiots to the god damn core.
Trespassing, as you have been told time and again, is a misdemeanor, which makes you a dumbass.
You have nothing to support that he intended to steal stuff, which makes you a liar.