Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Conspire to commit a crime is a crime.Both case and statutory law show otherwise.
If you and your militia of three get together and decide to overthrow the gov't but never implement a plan or attempt it you cannot be convicted of sedition.
Idiot-gram ^^^; variety no evidence or facts to support this ad hominem.Rye is worried, because Thomas is black.
The fact that he consistently votes in his wife's interest AND the fact that he was the lone SC Bench vote to protect her communications with the White HouseHm. So if he believes A over B AND his wife also happens to believe A over B, then he is ruling in his wife’s interest?
Or are you claiming that he bends his judicial philosophy and his decisions to conform to her views? Maybe you have something beyond pure speculation to support that claim? I’d be interested in seeing it.
Mind you charged is not convicted and the prosecution has a very high bar of proof here. The first thing they have to do is prove a conspiracy to overthrow the US gov't.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
There must be an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy.Conspire to commit a crime is a crime.
read: 923. 18 U.S.C. § 371—Conspiracy to Defraud the United States.
As a party? I agree. But as a citizen who has expressed a view? No. That’s absurdity on your part.He should recuse himself from participating in any case arriving at the Supreme Court where his wife was involved.
So if you and Joe Blow discuss a notion on how to cheat on obtaining some money from an agency which is funded by the US treasury, and contemplate doing so, is it your contention that nothing further is required for you to have engaged in a conspiracy?Conspire to commit a crime is a crime.
read: 923. 18 U.S.C. § 371—Conspiracy to Defraud the United States.
And then there's thatYou fuckers went batshit because the FBI acting Director's wife was running for Congress
You have the memories of goldfish
It depends:Wait a second, what's wrong with promiscuity?
www.merriam-webster.com
It depends:
Definition of PROMISCUOUS
having or involving many sexual partners : not restricted to one sexual partner or few sexual partners; not restricted to one class, sort, or person : indiscriminate; casual, irregular… See the full definition
In the matter of Kavanaugh and Thomas one might call the former attempted rape and in the latter attempted sexual battery. I choose the word do to the lack of any criminal conviction.
Examples for men promiscuity isn't insulting, and with women it is immoral. We see this all the time, trump is excused for his behavior, and the VP is not.
His wife’s interests? Pretty vague. Not in all specifics, but quite often, my interests are aligned with hers. I’d suggest that maybe his interests (including that quaint notion of interpreting the Constitution on the basis of what it says and means) don’t take into account that his wife happens to agree with him.The fact that he consistently votes in his wife's interest AND the fact that he was the lone SC Bench vote to protect her communications with the White House
Where's Ray Epps?
www.nbcnews.com
Wow, how ironic. I tried to explain and yet you end up posting a logical fallacy, to wit an ad hominem.No, no, no. You don't get to change the meaning of words just because you don't know how to communicate any better.
Jan. 6 committee dismisses Ray Epps conspiracy theory, issues new subpoenas
The House panel said Epps, who was seen trying to egg on protesters ahead of the Jan. 6 riot, told it he was not a federal agent.
She has destroyed the SC, unless Roberts takes Thomas out to the woodshed, and they lock Ginny's ass up.Imagine if a Supreme Court justice was married to a radical activist who defended a group charged with sedition, encouraged a rally challenging election results, and gave out awards to people with an interest in cases appearing before the Court.
As it turns out, you don’t have to imagine. That’s a description of Ginni Thomas, wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
For years, Ginni Thomas has been a walking conflict of interest that everyone has seemingly agreed not to talk about. It’s not as if she tried to hide. She’s been a fixture in conservative circles since the 1980s. She has had her own lobbying firm for more than a decade.
Is Ginni Thomas a Threat to the Supreme Court?
Behind closed doors, Justice Clarence Thomas’s wife is working with many groups directly involved in controversial cases before the Court.www.newyorker.com
Who are they?Doing Gawd's work, don't care.
I mean what, you don't think that the liberal shit stains on the court don't have minions working for them outside of SCOTUS?
Links?Stephen Bryer, Elana Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor...
You never will because it never happened. You're a liar.J6 Reichstag Fire Plotters Committee, uh huh
We have to wait until there's an honest Congress to see when Nancy gave the Capitol police the orders to "Let them in!"
